Theorem uhgrunop 15895

Description: The union of two (undirected) hypergraphs (with the same vertex set) represented as ordered pair: If ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ and ⟨𝑉, 𝐹⟩ are hypergraphs, then ⟨𝑉, 𝐸 ∪ 𝐹⟩ is a hypergraph (the vertex set stays the same, but the edges from both graphs are kept, possibly resulting in two edges between two vertices). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 11-Oct-2020.) (Revised by AV, 24-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uhgrun.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
uhgrun.h	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ UHGraph)
uhgrun.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
uhgrun.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
uhgrun.vg	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
uhgrun.vh	⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐻) = 𝑉)
uhgrun.i	⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐸 ∩ dom 𝐹) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uhgrunop	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem uhgrunop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uhgrun.g	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		uhgrun.h	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ UHGraph)
3		uhgrun.e	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
4		uhgrun.f	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
5		uhgrun.vg	. 2 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
6		uhgrun.vh	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐻) = 𝑉)
7		uhgrun.i	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐸 ∩ dom 𝐹) = ∅)
8		vtxex 15827	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
9	1, 8	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
10	5, 9	eqeltrid 2316	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ V)
11		iedgex 15828	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
12	1, 11	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
13	3, 12	eqeltrid 2316	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ V)
14		iedgex 15828	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐻) ∈ V)
15	2, 14	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐻) ∈ V)
16	4, 15	eqeltrid 2316	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
17		unexg 4534	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V)
18	13, 16, 17	syl2anc 411	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V)
19		opexg 4314	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V)
20	10, 18, 19	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V)
21		opvtxfv 15831	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → (Vtx‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = 𝑉)
22	10, 18, 21	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = 𝑉)
23		opiedgfv 15834	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → (iEdg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹))
24	10, 18, 23	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹))
25	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 22, 24	uhgrun 15894	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  Vcvv 2799   ∪ cun 3195   ∩ cin 3196  ∅c0 3491  ⟨cop 3669  dom cdm 4719  ‘cfv 5318  Vtxcvtx 15821  iEdgciedg 15822  UHGraphcuhgr 15875

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4202  ax-pow 4258  ax-pr 4293  ax-un 4524  ax-setind 4629  ax-cnex 8098  ax-resscn 8099  ax-1cn 8100  ax-1re 8101  ax-icn 8102  ax-addcl 8103  ax-addrcl 8104  ax-mulcl 8105  ax-addcom 8107  ax-mulcom 8108  ax-addass 8109  ax-mulass 8110  ax-distr 8111  ax-i2m1 8112  ax-1rid 8114  ax-0id 8115  ax-rnegex 8116  ax-cnre 8118

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-reu 2515  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-csb 3125  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-nul 3492  df-if 3603  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3889  df-int 3924  df-br 4084  df-opab 4146  df-mpt 4147  df-id 4384  df-xp 4725  df-rel 4726  df-cnv 4727  df-co 4728  df-dm 4729  df-rn 4730  df-res 4731  df-iota 5278  df-fun 5320  df-fn 5321  df-f 5322  df-fo 5324  df-fv 5326  df-riota 5960  df-ov 6010  df-oprab 6011  df-mpo 6012  df-1st 6292  df-2nd 6293  df-sub 8327  df-inn 9119  df-2 9177  df-3 9178  df-4 9179  df-5 9180  df-6 9181  df-7 9182  df-8 9183  df-9 9184  df-n0 9378  df-dec 9587  df-ndx 13043  df-slot 13044  df-base 13046  df-edgf 15814  df-vtx 15823  df-iedg 15824  df-uhgrm 15877

This theorem is referenced by:  ushgrunop  15897