Theorem uhgrunop 15852

Description: The union of two (undirected) hypergraphs (with the same vertex set) represented as ordered pair: If ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ and ⟨𝑉, 𝐹⟩ are hypergraphs, then ⟨𝑉, 𝐸 ∪ 𝐹⟩ is a hypergraph (the vertex set stays the same, but the edges from both graphs are kept, possibly resulting in two edges between two vertices). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 11-Oct-2020.) (Revised by AV, 24-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uhgrun.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
uhgrun.h	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ UHGraph)
uhgrun.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
uhgrun.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
uhgrun.vg	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
uhgrun.vh	⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐻) = 𝑉)
uhgrun.i	⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐸 ∩ dom 𝐹) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uhgrunop	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem uhgrunop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uhgrun.g	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		uhgrun.h	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ UHGraph)
3		uhgrun.e	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
4		uhgrun.f	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
5		uhgrun.vg	. 2 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
6		uhgrun.vh	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐻) = 𝑉)
7		uhgrun.i	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐸 ∩ dom 𝐹) = ∅)
8		vtxex 15784	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
9	1, 8	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
10	5, 9	eqeltrid 2296	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ V)
11		iedgex 15785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
12	1, 11	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
13	3, 12	eqeltrid 2296	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ V)
14		iedgex 15785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐻) ∈ V)
15	2, 14	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐻) ∈ V)
16	4, 15	eqeltrid 2296	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
17		unexg 4511	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V)
18	13, 16, 17	syl2anc 411	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V)
19		opexg 4293	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V)
20	10, 18, 19	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V)
21		opvtxfv 15788	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → (Vtx‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = 𝑉)
22	10, 18, 21	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = 𝑉)
23		opiedgfv 15791	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → (iEdg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹))
24	10, 18, 23	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹))
25	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 22, 24	uhgrun 15851	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1375   ∈ wcel 2180  Vcvv 2779   ∪ cun 3175   ∩ cin 3176  ∅c0 3471  ⟨cop 3649  dom cdm 4696  ‘cfv 5294  Vtxcvtx 15778  iEdgciedg 15779  UHGraphcuhgr 15832

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 713  ax-5 1473  ax-7 1474  ax-gen 1475  ax-ie1 1519  ax-ie2 1520  ax-8 1530  ax-10 1531  ax-11 1532  ax-i12 1533  ax-bndl 1535  ax-4 1536  ax-17 1552  ax-i9 1556  ax-ial 1560  ax-i5r 1561  ax-13 2182  ax-14 2183  ax-ext 2191  ax-sep 4181  ax-pow 4237  ax-pr 4272  ax-un 4501  ax-setind 4606  ax-cnex 8058  ax-resscn 8059  ax-1cn 8060  ax-1re 8061  ax-icn 8062  ax-addcl 8063  ax-addrcl 8064  ax-mulcl 8065  ax-addcom 8067  ax-mulcom 8068  ax-addass 8069  ax-mulass 8070  ax-distr 8071  ax-i2m1 8072  ax-1rid 8074  ax-0id 8075  ax-rnegex 8076  ax-cnre 8078

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 985  df-tru 1378  df-fal 1381  df-nf 1487  df-sb 1789  df-eu 2060  df-mo 2061  df-clab 2196  df-cleq 2202  df-clel 2205  df-nfc 2341  df-ne 2381  df-ral 2493  df-rex 2494  df-reu 2495  df-rab 2497  df-v 2781  df-sbc 3009  df-csb 3105  df-dif 3179  df-un 3181  df-in 3183  df-ss 3190  df-nul 3472  df-if 3583  df-pw 3631  df-sn 3652  df-pr 3653  df-op 3655  df-uni 3868  df-int 3903  df-br 4063  df-opab 4125  df-mpt 4126  df-id 4361  df-xp 4702  df-rel 4703  df-cnv 4704  df-co 4705  df-dm 4706  df-rn 4707  df-res 4708  df-iota 5254  df-fun 5296  df-fn 5297  df-f 5298  df-fo 5300  df-fv 5302  df-riota 5927  df-ov 5977  df-oprab 5978  df-mpo 5979  df-1st 6256  df-2nd 6257  df-sub 8287  df-inn 9079  df-2 9137  df-3 9138  df-4 9139  df-5 9140  df-6 9141  df-7 9142  df-8 9143  df-9 9144  df-n0 9338  df-dec 9547  df-ndx 13001  df-slot 13002  df-base 13004  df-edgf 15771  df-vtx 15780  df-iedg 15781  df-uhgrm 15834

This theorem is referenced by:  ushgrunop  15854