Theorem uhgrunop 15967

Description: The union of two (undirected) hypergraphs (with the same vertex set) represented as ordered pair: If ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩ and ⟨𝑉, 𝐹⟩ are hypergraphs, then ⟨𝑉, 𝐸 ∪ 𝐹⟩ is a hypergraph (the vertex set stays the same, but the edges from both graphs are kept, possibly resulting in two edges between two vertices). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 11-Oct-2020.) (Revised by AV, 24-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
uhgrun.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
uhgrun.h	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ UHGraph)
uhgrun.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
uhgrun.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
uhgrun.vg	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
uhgrun.vh	⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐻) = 𝑉)
uhgrun.i	⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐸 ∩ dom 𝐹) = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uhgrunop	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem uhgrunop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uhgrun.g	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
2		uhgrun.h	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ UHGraph)
3		uhgrun.e	. 2 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
4		uhgrun.f	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = (iEdg‘𝐻)
5		uhgrun.vg	. 2 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
6		uhgrun.vh	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐻) = 𝑉)
7		uhgrun.i	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐸 ∩ dom 𝐹) = ∅)
8		vtxex 15898	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
9	1, 8	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
10	5, 9	eqeltrid 2317	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ V)
11		iedgex 15899	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
12	1, 11	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
13	3, 12	eqeltrid 2317	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ V)
14		iedgex 15899	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐻) ∈ V)
15	2, 14	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐻) ∈ V)
16	4, 15	eqeltrid 2317	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
17		unexg 4542	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V)
18	13, 16, 17	syl2anc 411	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V)
19		opexg 4322	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V)
20	10, 18, 19	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V)
21		opvtxfv 15902	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → (Vtx‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = 𝑉)
22	10, 18, 21	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = 𝑉)
23		opiedgfv 15905	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹) ∈ V) → (iEdg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹))
24	10, 18, 23	syl2anc 411	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩) = (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹))
25	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 22, 24	uhgrun 15966	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑉, (𝐸 ∪ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2201  Vcvv 2801   ∪ cun 3197   ∩ cin 3198  ∅c0 3493  ⟨cop 3673  dom cdm 4727  ‘cfv 5328  Vtxcvtx 15892  iEdgciedg 15893  UHGraphcuhgr 15947

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2203  ax-14 2204  ax-ext 2212  ax-sep 4208  ax-pow 4266  ax-pr 4301  ax-un 4532  ax-setind 4637  ax-cnex 8128  ax-resscn 8129  ax-1cn 8130  ax-1re 8131  ax-icn 8132  ax-addcl 8133  ax-addrcl 8134  ax-mulcl 8135  ax-addcom 8137  ax-mulcom 8138  ax-addass 8139  ax-mulass 8140  ax-distr 8141  ax-i2m1 8142  ax-1rid 8144  ax-0id 8145  ax-rnegex 8146  ax-cnre 8148

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1810  df-eu 2081  df-mo 2082  df-clab 2217  df-cleq 2223  df-clel 2226  df-nfc 2362  df-ne 2402  df-ral 2514  df-rex 2515  df-reu 2516  df-rab 2518  df-v 2803  df-sbc 3031  df-csb 3127  df-dif 3201  df-un 3203  df-in 3205  df-ss 3212  df-nul 3494  df-if 3605  df-pw 3655  df-sn 3676  df-pr 3677  df-op 3679  df-uni 3895  df-int 3930  df-br 4090  df-opab 4152  df-mpt 4153  df-id 4392  df-xp 4733  df-rel 4734  df-cnv 4735  df-co 4736  df-dm 4737  df-rn 4738  df-res 4739  df-iota 5288  df-fun 5330  df-fn 5331  df-f 5332  df-fo 5334  df-fv 5336  df-riota 5976  df-ov 6026  df-oprab 6027  df-mpo 6028  df-1st 6308  df-2nd 6309  df-sub 8357  df-inn 9149  df-2 9207  df-3 9208  df-4 9209  df-5 9210  df-6 9211  df-7 9212  df-8 9213  df-9 9214  df-n0 9408  df-dec 9617  df-ndx 13108  df-slot 13109  df-base 13111  df-edgf 15885  df-vtx 15894  df-iedg 15895  df-uhgrm 15949

This theorem is referenced by:  ushgrunop  15969