Theorem elpg 51213

Description: Membership in the class of partisan games. In John Horton Conway's On Numbers and Games, this is stated as "If 𝐿 and 𝑅 are any two sets of games, then there is a game {𝐿 ∣ 𝑅}. All games are constructed in this way." The first sentence corresponds to the backward direction of our theorem, and the second to the forward direction. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 27-Aug-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elpg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Pg ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg))

Proof of Theorem elpg

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elpglem1 51210	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥)) → ((1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg))
2		elpglem2 51211	. . . 4 ⊢ (((1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥)))
3	1, 2	impbii 212	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥)) ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg))
4	3	anbi2i 635	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥))) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg)))
5		df-pg 51209	. . . 4 ⊢ Pg = setrecs((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝒫 𝑦 × 𝒫 𝑦)))
6	5	elsetrecs 51199	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Pg ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝒫 𝑦 × 𝒫 𝑦))‘𝑥)))
7		elpglem3 51212	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ((𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝒫 𝑦 × 𝒫 𝑦))‘𝑥)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥))))
8	6, 7	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Pg ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ Pg ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝒫 𝑥))))
9		3anass 1111	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg)))
10	4, 8, 9	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Pg ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (1st ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ⊆ Pg))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900  𝒫 cpw 4560   ↦ cmpt 5192   × cxp 5656  ‘cfv 6566  1^st c1st 8033  2^nd c2nd 8034  Pgcpg 51208

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783  ax-reg 9623  ax-inf2 9679

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-int 4913  df-iun 4958  df-iin 4959  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-tr 5219  df-id 5553  df-eprel 5558  df-po 5566  df-so 5567  df-fr 5611  df-we 5613  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-pred 6330  df-ord 6391  df-on 6392  df-lim 6393  df-suc 6394  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-om 7912  df-1st 8035  df-2nd 8036  df-frecs 8337  df-wrecs 8368  df-recs 8417  df-rdg 8456  df-r1 9805  df-rank 9806  df-scott 9966  df-setrecs 10002  df-pg 51209

This theorem is used by: (None)