Theorem caucvgprlemupu 8039

Description: Lemma for caucvgpr 8049. The upper cut of the putative limit is upper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
caucvgpr.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:N⟶Q)
caucvgpr.cau	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ N ∀𝑘 ∈ N (𝑛 <N 𝑘 → ((𝐹‘𝑛) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑘) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) <Q ((𝐹‘𝑛) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑛, 1o⟩] ~Q )))))
caucvgpr.bnd	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ N 𝐴 <Q (𝐹‘𝑗))
caucvgpr.lim	⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caucvgprlemupu	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑗   𝐹,𝑙,𝑟,𝑠   𝑢,𝐹   𝑗,𝐿,𝑟,𝑠   𝑗,𝑙,𝑠   𝜑,𝑗,𝑟,𝑠   𝑢,𝑗,𝑟,𝑠

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑢, 𝑘, 𝑛, 𝑙)   𝐴(𝑢, 𝑘, 𝑛, 𝑠, 𝑟, 𝑙)   𝐹(𝑗, 𝑘, 𝑛)   𝐿(𝑢, 𝑘, 𝑛, 𝑙)

Proof of Theorem caucvgprlemupu

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltrelnq 7732	. . . . 5 ⊢ <Q ⊆ (Q × Q)
2	1	brel 4827	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑠 ∈ Q ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Q))
3	2	simprd 114	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 → 𝑟 ∈ Q)
4	3	3ad2ant2 1050	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑟 ∈ Q)
5		breq2 4134	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑠 → (((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢 ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠))
6	5	rexbidv 2551	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑠 → (∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠))
7		caucvgpr.lim	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐿 = ⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩
8	7	fveq2i 5698	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝐿) = (2nd ‘⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩)
9		nqex 7730	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Q ∈ V
10	9	rabex 4280	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)} ∈ V
11	9	rabex 4280	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢} ∈ V
12	10, 11	op2nd 6381	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨{𝑙 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N (𝑙 +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q (𝐹‘𝑗)}, {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}⟩) = {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}
13	8, 12	eqtri 2259	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝐿) = {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢}
14	6, 13	elrab2 2985	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑠 ∈ Q ∧ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠))
15	14	simprbi 275	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) → ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠)
16	15	3ad2ant3 1051	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠)
17		ltsonq 7765	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ <Q Or Q
18	17, 1	sotri 5183	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟) → ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟)
19	18	expcom 116	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 <Q 𝑟 → (((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠 → ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟))
20	19	3ad2ant2 1050	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → (((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠 → ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟))
21	20	reximdv 2651	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → (∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑠 → ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟))
22	16, 21	mpd 13	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟)
23		breq2 4134	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑟 → (((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢 ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟))
24	23	rexbidv 2551	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑟 → (∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑢 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟))
25	24, 13	elrab2 2985	. 2 ⊢ (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿) ↔ (𝑟 ∈ Q ∧ ∃𝑗 ∈ N ((𝐹‘𝑗) +Q (*Q‘[⟨𝑗, 1o⟩] ~Q )) <Q 𝑟))
26	4, 22, 25	sylanbrc 421	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿)) → 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐿))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∧ w3a 1009   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ∀wral 2528  ∃wrex 2529  {crab 2532  ⟨cop 3712   class class class wbr 4130  ⟶wf 5373  ‘cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085  2^nd c2nd 6373  1_oc1o 6680  [cec 6805  Ncnpi 7639   <_N clti 7642   ~_Q ceq 7646  Qcnq 7647   +_Q cplq 7649  *_Qcrq 7651   <_Q cltq 7652

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-coll 4246  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-iinf 4735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-eprel 4434  df-id 4438  df-po 4441  df-iso 4442  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-recs 6576  df-irdg 6641  df-oadd 6691  df-omul 6692  df-er 6807  df-ec 6809  df-qs 6813  df-ni 7671  df-mi 7673  df-lti 7674  df-enq 7714  df-nqqs 7715  df-ltnqqs 7720

This theorem is used by:  caucvgprlemrnd  8040