P. 77 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7601-7700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sucpw1nss3 7601	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ suc 𝒫 1o ⊆ 3o)
Theorem	3nsssucpw1 7602	Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (¬ EXMID → ¬ 3o ⊆ suc 𝒫 1o)
Theorem	onntri35 7603*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. There are five equivalent statements: (1) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (2) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), (3) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (4) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), and (5) ¬ ¬ EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7604), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7603), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7606), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7608), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7607), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7610). Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 or the 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 form, as shown in exmidontri 7605 and exmidontri2or 7609, respectively. Thus ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7611 and (4) by onntri2or 7612. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
Theorem	onntri13 7604	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	exmidontri 7605*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri51 7606*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri45 7607*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
Theorem	onntri24 7608	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	exmidontri2or 7609*	Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri52 7610*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri3or 7611*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	onntri2or 7612*	Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	fmelpw1o 7613	With a formula 𝜑 one can associate an element of 𝒫 1o, which can therefore be thought of as the set of "truth values" (but recall that there are no other genuine truth values than ⊤ and ⊥, by nndc 863, which translate to 1o and ∅ respectively by iftrue 3645 and iffalse 3648, giving pwtrufal 17244). As proved in if0ab 3641, the associated element of 𝒫 1o is the extension, in 𝒫 1o, of the formula 𝜑. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 5-May-2026.)
⊢ if(𝜑, 1o, ∅) ∈ 𝒫 1o
2.6.49  Apartness relations
Syntax	wap 7614	Apartness predicate symbol.
wff 𝑅 Ap 𝐴
Definition	df-pap 7615*	Apartness predicate. A relation 𝑅 is an apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, and cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ↔ ((𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))))
Theorem	papeq1 7616	Equality theorem for apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Ap 𝐴))
Theorem	papeq2 7617	Equality theorem for apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Ap 𝐵))
Theorem	papirr 7618	An apartness is irreflexive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑋𝑅𝑋)
Theorem	papsym 7619	An apartness is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Ap 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌𝑅𝑋)
Theorem	papcotr 7620	An apartness is cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-May-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Ap 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝑅𝑍 ∨ 𝑌𝑅𝑍))
Syntax	wtap 7621	Tight apartness predicate symbol.
wff 𝑅 TAp 𝐴
Definition	df-tap 7622*	Tight apartness predicate. A relation 𝑅 is a tight apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, cotransitive, and tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	tapap 7623	A tight apartness is an apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-May-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 → 𝑅 Ap 𝐴)
Theorem	dftap2 7624*	Tight apartness with the apartness properties from df-pap 7615 expanded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
Theorem	tapeq1 7625	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 TAp 𝐴))
Theorem	tapeq2 7626	Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 TAp 𝐵))
Theorem	netap 7627*	Negated equality on a set with decidable equality is a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)} TAp 𝐴)
Theorem	2onetap 7628*	Negated equality is a tight apartness on 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)} TAp 2o
Theorem	2oneel 7629*	∅ and 1o are two unequal elements of 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ⟨∅, 1o⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}
Theorem	2omotaplemap 7630*	Lemma for 2omotap 7632. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣))} TAp 2o)
Theorem	2omotaplemst 7631*	Lemma for 2omotap 7632. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	2omotap 7632	If there is at most one tight apartness on 2o, excluded middle follows. Based on online discussions by Tom de Jong, Andrew W Swan, and Martin Escardo. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o → EXMID)
Theorem	exmidapne 7633*	Excluded middle implies there is only one tight apartness on any class, namely negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (EXMID → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
Theorem	exmidmotap 7634*	The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)
PART 3  CHOICE PRINCIPLES We have already introduced the full Axiom of Choice df-ac 7569 but since it implies excluded middle as shown at exmidac 7572, it is not especially relevant to us. In this section we define countable choice and dependent choice, which are not as strong as thus often considered in mathematics which seeks to avoid full excluded middle.
3.1  Countable Choice and Dependent Choice
3.1.1  Introduce Countable Choice
Syntax	wacc 7635	Formula for an abbreviation of countable choice.
wff CCHOICE
Definition	df-cc 7636*	The expression CCHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of countable choice, analogous to df-ac 7569 for full choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (CCHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥(dom 𝑥 ≈ ω → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑥)))
Theorem	ccfunen 7637*	Existence of a choice function for a countably infinite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	cc1 7638*	Countable choice in terms of a choice function on a countably infinite set of inhabited sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (CCHOICE → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ≈ ω ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	cc2lem 7639*	Lemma for cc2 7640. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ({𝑛} × (𝐹‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑓‘(𝐴‘𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑔‘𝑛) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)))
Theorem	cc2 7640*	Countable choice using sequences instead of countable sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑔‘𝑛) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)))
Theorem	cc3 7641*	Countable choice using a sequence F(n) . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑓‘𝑛) ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	cc4f 7642*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 𝑓 which can choose a value at each index 𝑛 such that 𝜒 holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑛𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑁⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
Theorem	cc4 7643*	Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 𝑓 which can choose a value at each index 𝑛 such that 𝜒 holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑁⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
Theorem	cc4n 7644*	Countable choice with a simpler restriction on how every set in the countable collection needs to be inhabited. That is, compared with cc4 7643, the hypotheses only require an A(n) for each value of 𝑛, not a single set 𝐴 which suffices for every 𝑛 ∈ ω. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
Theorem	acnccim 7645	Given countable choice, every set has choice sets of length ω. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (CCHOICE → AC ω = V)
PART 4  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. To construct the real numbers constructively, we follow two main sources. The first is Metamath Proof Explorer, which has the advantage of being already formalized in metamath. Its disadvantage, for our purposes, is that it assumes the law of the excluded middle throughout. Since we have already developed natural numbers ( for example, nna0 6751 and similar theorems ), going from there to positive integers (df-ni 7678) and then positive rational numbers (df-nqqs 7722) does not involve a major change in approach compared with the Metamath Proof Explorer. It is when we proceed to Dedekind cuts that we bring in more material from Section 11.2 of [HoTT], which focuses on the aspects of Dedekind cuts which are different without excluded middle or choice principles. With excluded middle, it is natural to define a cut as the lower set only (as Metamath Proof Explorer does), but here we define the cut as a pair of both the lower and upper sets, as [HoTT] does. There are also differences in how we handle order and replacing "not equal to zero" with "apart from zero". When working constructively, there are several possible definitions of real numbers. Here we adopt the most common definition, as two-sided Dedekind cuts with the properties described at df-inp 7840. The Cauchy reals (without countable choice) fail to satisfy ax-caucvg 8306 and the MacNeille reals fail to satisfy axltwlin 8400, and we do not develop them here. For more on differing definitions of the reals, see the introduction to Chapter 11 in [HoTT] or Section 1.2 of [BauerHanson].
4.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
4.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 7646	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers ω with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers.
class N
Syntax	cpli 7647	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 7648	Positive integer multiplication.
class ·N
Syntax	clti 7649	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 7650	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 7651	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class ·pQ
Syntax	cltpq 7652	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 7653	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 7654	Set of positive fractions.
class Q
Syntax	c1q 7655	The positive fraction constant 1.
class 1Q
Syntax	cplq 7656	Positive fraction addition.
class +Q
Syntax	cmq 7657	Positive fraction multiplication.
class ·Q
Syntax	crq 7658	Positive fraction reciprocal operation.
class *Q
Syntax	cltq 7659	Positive fraction ordering relation.
class <Q
Syntax	ceq0 7660	Equivalence class used to construct nonnegative fractions.
class ~Q0
Syntax	cnq0 7661	Set of nonnegative fractions.
class Q0
Syntax	c0q0 7662	The nonnegative fraction constant 0.
class 0Q0
Syntax	cplq0 7663	Nonnegative fraction addition.
class +Q0
Syntax	cmq0 7664	Nonnegative fraction multiplication.
class ·Q0
Syntax	cnp 7665	Set of positive reals.
class P
Syntax	c1p 7666	Positive real constant 1.
class 1P
Syntax	cpp 7667	Positive real addition.
class +P
Syntax	cmp 7668	Positive real multiplication.
class ·P
Syntax	cltp 7669	Positive real ordering relation.
class <P
Syntax	cer 7670	Equivalence class used to construct signed reals.
class ~R
Syntax	cnr 7671	Set of signed reals.
class R
Syntax	c0r 7672	The signed real constant 0.
class 0R
Syntax	c1r 7673	The signed real constant 1.
class 1R
Syntax	cm1r 7674	The signed real constant -1.
class -1R
Syntax	cplr 7675	Signed real addition.
class +R
Syntax	cmr 7676	Signed real multiplication.
class ·R
Syntax	cltr 7677	Signed real ordering relation.
class <R
Definition	df-ni 7678	Define the class of positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ N = (ω ∖ {∅})
Definition	df-pli 7679	Define addition on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ +N = ( +o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-mi 7680	Define multiplication on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ·N = ( ·o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-lti 7681	Define 'less than' on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <N = ( E ∩ (N × N))
Theorem	elni 7682	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	pinn 7683	A positive integer is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	pion 7684	A positive integer is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	piord 7685	A positive integer is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	niex 7686	The class of positive integers is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.)
⊢ N ∈ V
Theorem	0npi 7687	The empty set is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ N
Theorem	elni2 7688	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	1pi 7689	Ordinal 'one' is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 1o ∈ N
Theorem	addpiord 7690	Positive integer addition in terms of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulpiord 7691	Positive integer multiplication in terms of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulidpi 7692	1 is an identity element for multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → (𝐴 ·N 1o) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ltpiord 7693	Positive integer 'less than' in terms of ordinal membership. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ltsopi 7694	Positive integer 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.)
⊢ <N Or N
Theorem	pitric 7695	Trichotomy for positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <N 𝐴)))
Theorem	pitri3or 7696	Trichotomy for positive integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <N 𝐴))
Theorem	ltdcpi 7697	Less-than for positive integers is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → DECID 𝐴 <N 𝐵)
Theorem	ltrelpi 7698	Positive integer 'less than' is a relation on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.)
⊢ <N ⊆ (N × N)
Theorem	dmaddpi 7699	Domain of addition on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom +N = (N × N)
Theorem	dmmulpi 7700	Domain of multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ dom ·N = (N × N)