Theorem nninfwlpoim 7178

Description: Decidable equality for ℕ_∞ implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Dec-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfwlpoim	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem nninfwlpoim

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑛 𝑞 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elmapi 6672	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω) → 𝑓:ω⟶2o)
2	1	adantl 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → 𝑓:ω⟶2o)
3		fveqeq2 5526	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑞 = 𝑧 → ((𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ (𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
4	3	cbvrexv 2706	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅)
5		suceq 4404	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → suc 𝑗 = suc 𝑖)
6	5	rexeqdv 2680	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
7	4, 6	bitrid 192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
8	7	ifbid 3557	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → if(∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅, ∅, 1o) = if(∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅, ∅, 1o))
9	8	cbvmptv 4101	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅, ∅, 1o)) = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅, ∅, 1o))
10		simpl 109	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11		equequ1 1712	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦))
12	11	dcbid 838	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑦))
13		equequ2 1713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
14	13	dcbid 838	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (DECID 𝑧 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤))
15	12, 14	cbvral2v 2718	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤)
16	10, 15	sylib 122	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤)
17	2, 9, 16	nninfwlpoimlemdc 7177	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
18	17	ralrimiva 2550	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
19		omex 4594	. . 3 ⊢ ω ∈ V
20		iswomnimap 7166	. . 3 ⊢ (ω ∈ V → (ω ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
22	18, 21	sylibr 134	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  DECID wdc 834   = wceq 1353   ∈ wcel 2148  ∀wral 2455  ∃wrex 2456  Vcvv 2739  ∅c0 3424  ifcif 3536   ↦ cmpt 4066  suc csuc 4367  ωcom 4591  ⟶wf 5214  ‘cfv 5218  (class class class)co 5877  1_oc1o 6412  2_oc2o 6413   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6650  ℕ_∞xnninf 7120  WOmnicwomni 7163

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-coll 4120  ax-sep 4123  ax-nul 4131  ax-pow 4176  ax-pr 4211  ax-un 4435  ax-setind 4538  ax-iinf 4589

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 835  df-3or 979  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-fal 1359  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ne 2348  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-reu 2462  df-rab 2464  df-v 2741  df-sbc 2965  df-csb 3060  df-dif 3133  df-un 3135  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-nul 3425  df-if 3537  df-pw 3579  df-sn 3600  df-pr 3601  df-op 3603  df-uni 3812  df-int 3847  df-iun 3890  df-br 4006  df-opab 4067  df-mpt 4068  df-tr 4104  df-id 4295  df-iord 4368  df-on 4370  df-suc 4373  df-iom 4592  df-xp 4634  df-rel 4635  df-cnv 4636  df-co 4637  df-dm 4638  df-rn 4639  df-res 4640  df-ima 4641  df-iota 5180  df-fun 5220  df-fn 5221  df-f 5222  df-f1 5223  df-fo 5224  df-f1o 5225  df-fv 5226  df-ov 5880  df-oprab 5881  df-mpo 5882  df-1o 6419  df-2o 6420  df-er 6537  df-map 6652  df-en 6743  df-fin 6745  df-nninf 7121  df-womni 7164

This theorem is referenced by:  nninfwlpo  7179