Theorem nninfwlpoim 7244

Description: Decidable equality for ℕ_∞ implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Dec-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfwlpoim	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem nninfwlpoim

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑛 𝑞 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elmapi 6729	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω) → 𝑓:ω⟶2o)
2	1	adantl 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → 𝑓:ω⟶2o)
3		fveqeq2 5567	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑞 = 𝑧 → ((𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ (𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
4	3	cbvrexv 2730	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅)
5		suceq 4437	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → suc 𝑗 = suc 𝑖)
6	5	rexeqdv 2700	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
7	4, 6	bitrid 192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
8	7	ifbid 3582	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → if(∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅, ∅, 1o) = if(∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅, ∅, 1o))
9	8	cbvmptv 4129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅, ∅, 1o)) = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅, ∅, 1o))
10		simpl 109	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11		equequ1 1726	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦))
12	11	dcbid 839	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑦))
13		equequ2 1727	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
14	13	dcbid 839	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (DECID 𝑧 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤))
15	12, 14	cbvral2v 2742	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤)
16	10, 15	sylib 122	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤)
17	2, 9, 16	nninfwlpoimlemdc 7243	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
18	17	ralrimiva 2570	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
19		omex 4629	. . 3 ⊢ ω ∈ V
20		iswomnimap 7232	. . 3 ⊢ (ω ∈ V → (ω ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
22	18, 21	sylibr 134	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  DECID wdc 835   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  ∀wral 2475  ∃wrex 2476  Vcvv 2763  ∅c0 3450  ifcif 3561   ↦ cmpt 4094  suc csuc 4400  ωcom 4626  ⟶wf 5254  ‘cfv 5258  (class class class)co 5922  1_oc1o 6467  2_oc2o 6468   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6707  ℕ_∞xnninf 7185  WOmnicwomni 7229

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-13 2169  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-coll 4148  ax-sep 4151  ax-nul 4159  ax-pow 4207  ax-pr 4242  ax-un 4468  ax-setind 4573  ax-iinf 4624

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 836  df-3or 981  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-eu 2048  df-mo 2049  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ne 2368  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-reu 2482  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-sbc 2990  df-csb 3085  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3451  df-if 3562  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-pr 3629  df-op 3631  df-uni 3840  df-int 3875  df-iun 3918  df-br 4034  df-opab 4095  df-mpt 4096  df-tr 4132  df-id 4328  df-iord 4401  df-on 4403  df-suc 4406  df-iom 4627  df-xp 4669  df-rel 4670  df-cnv 4671  df-co 4672  df-dm 4673  df-rn 4674  df-res 4675  df-ima 4676  df-iota 5219  df-fun 5260  df-fn 5261  df-f 5262  df-f1 5263  df-fo 5264  df-f1o 5265  df-fv 5266  df-ov 5925  df-oprab 5926  df-mpo 5927  df-1o 6474  df-2o 6475  df-er 6592  df-map 6709  df-en 6800  df-fin 6802  df-nninf 7186  df-womni 7230

This theorem is referenced by:  nninfwlpo  7245