Theorem nninfwlpoim 7369

Description: Decidable equality for ℕ_∞ implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Dec-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nninfwlpoim	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem nninfwlpoim

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑛 𝑞 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elmapi 6834	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω) → 𝑓:ω⟶2o)
2	1	adantl 277	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → 𝑓:ω⟶2o)
3		fveqeq2 5644	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑞 = 𝑧 → ((𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ (𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
4	3	cbvrexv 2766	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅)
5		suceq 4497	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → suc 𝑗 = suc 𝑖)
6	5	rexeqdv 2735	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
7	4, 6	bitrid 192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅))
8	7	ifbid 3625	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → if(∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅, ∅, 1o) = if(∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅, ∅, 1o))
9	8	cbvmptv 4183	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑞 ∈ suc 𝑗(𝑓‘𝑞) = ∅, ∅, 1o)) = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝑓‘𝑧) = ∅, ∅, 1o))
10		simpl 109	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
11		equequ1 1758	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦))
12	11	dcbid 843	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑦))
13		equequ2 1759	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
14	13	dcbid 843	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (DECID 𝑧 = 𝑦 ↔ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤))
15	12, 14	cbvral2v 2778	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤)
16	10, 15	sylib 122	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑧 = 𝑤)
17	2, 9, 16	nninfwlpoimlemdc 7367	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)) → DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
18	17	ralrimiva 2603	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
19		omex 4689	. . 3 ⊢ ω ∈ V
20		iswomnimap 7356	. . 3 ⊢ (ω ∈ V → (ω ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o))
21	19, 20	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 ω)DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛) = 1o)
22	18, 21	sylibr 134	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  DECID wdc 839   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  ∀wral 2508  ∃wrex 2509  Vcvv 2800  ∅c0 3492  ifcif 3603   ↦ cmpt 4148  suc csuc 4460  ωcom 4686  ⟶wf 5320  ‘cfv 5324  (class class class)co 6013  1_oc1o 6570  2_oc2o 6571   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6812  ℕ_∞xnninf 7309  WOmnicwomni 7353

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-coll 4202  ax-sep 4205  ax-nul 4213  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528  ax-setind 4633  ax-iinf 4684

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 840  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-reu 2515  df-rab 2517  df-v 2802  df-sbc 3030  df-csb 3126  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-nul 3493  df-if 3604  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-op 3676  df-uni 3892  df-int 3927  df-iun 3970  df-br 4087  df-opab 4149  df-mpt 4150  df-tr 4186  df-id 4388  df-iord 4461  df-on 4463  df-suc 4466  df-iom 4687  df-xp 4729  df-rel 4730  df-cnv 4731  df-co 4732  df-dm 4733  df-rn 4734  df-res 4735  df-ima 4736  df-iota 5284  df-fun 5326  df-fn 5327  df-f 5328  df-f1 5329  df-fo 5330  df-f1o 5331  df-fv 5332  df-ov 6016  df-oprab 6017  df-mpo 6018  df-1o 6577  df-2o 6578  df-er 6697  df-map 6814  df-en 6905  df-fin 6907  df-nninf 7310  df-womni 7354

This theorem is referenced by:  nninfwlpo  7371