MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addcutslem Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addcutslem 28369
Description: Lemma for addcuts 28370. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
addcutslem.1 (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)
addcutslem.2 (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)
Assertion
Ref Expression
addcutslem (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚   𝑌,𝑙,𝑚   𝜑,𝑝,𝑤   𝑌,𝑝,𝑤   𝜑,𝑙,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠,𝑚   𝑝,𝑙,𝑞,𝑠,𝑌,𝑟   𝑡,𝑌,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑋,𝑝,𝑟,𝑤   𝑋,𝑞,𝑠,𝑡   𝜑,𝑡

Proof of Theorem addcutslem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 addsprop 28368 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ∧ 𝑧 ∈ No) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
21a1d 26 . . . 4 ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ∧ 𝑧 ∈ No) → ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
32rgen3 3207 . . 3 ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
43a1i 11 . 2 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
5 addcutslem.1 . 2 (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)
6 addcutslem.2 . 2 (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)
74, 5, 6addsproplem3 28363 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  {cab 2738  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086   ∪ cun 4149  {csn 4584   class class class wbr 5102  ‘cfv 6539  (class class class)co 7421   +no cnadd 8678  Nocsur 28003   <s clts 28004  bdaycbday 28005   <<s cslts 28149   0s c0s 28197  Lcleft 28217  Rcright 28218   +s cadds 28351
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7752
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-pss 4014  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-tp 4589  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-fr 5603  df-se 5604  df-we 5605  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-pred 6304  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-riota 7378  df-ov 7424  df-oprab 7425  df-mpo 7426  df-1st 8002  df-2nd 8003  df-frecs 8303  df-wrecs 8334  df-recs 8383  df-1o 8480  df-2o 8481  df-nadd 8679  df-no 28006  df-lts 28007  df-bday 28008  df-slts 28150  df-cuts 28152  df-0s 28199  df-made 28219  df-old 28220  df-left 28222  df-right 28223  df-norec2 28341  df-adds 28352
This theorem is used by:  addcuts  28370
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator