MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addcutslem Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addcutslem 28345
Description: Lemma for addcuts 28346. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
addcutslem.1 (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )
addcutslem.2 (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )
Assertion
Ref Expression
addcutslem (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚   𝑌,𝑙,𝑚   𝜑,𝑝,𝑤   𝑌,𝑝,𝑤   𝜑,𝑙,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠,𝑚   𝑝,𝑙,𝑞,𝑠,𝑌,𝑟   𝑡,𝑌,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑋,𝑝,𝑟,𝑤   𝑋,𝑞,𝑠,𝑡   𝜑,𝑡

Proof of Theorem addcutslem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 addsprop 28344 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ∧ 𝑧 ∈ No ) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
21a1d 26 . . . 4 ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ∧ 𝑧 ∈ No ) → (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
32rgen3 3208 . . 3 ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
43a1i 11 . 2 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
5 addcutslem.1 . 2 (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )
6 addcutslem.2 . 2 (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )
74, 5, 6addsproplem3 28339 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087   ∪ cun 3897  {csn 4584   class class class wbr 5103  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412   +no cnadd 8658   No csur 27979   <s clts 27980   bday cbday 27981   <<s cslts 28125   0s c0s 28173   L cleft 28193   R cright 28194   +s cadds 28327
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-tp 4589  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-se 5605  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6297  df-ord 6358  df-on 6359  df-suc 6361  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7990  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-1o 8460  df-2o 8461  df-nadd 8659  df-no 27982  df-lts 27983  df-bday 27984  df-slts 28126  df-cuts 28128  df-0s 28175  df-made 28195  df-old 28196  df-left 28198  df-right 28199  df-norec2 28317  df-adds 28328
This theorem is used by:  addcuts  28346
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator