MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addcutslem Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addcutslem 27973
Description: Lemma for addcuts 27974. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
addcutslem.1 (𝜑𝑋 No )
addcutslem.2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
Assertion
Ref Expression
addcutslem (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚   𝑌,𝑙,𝑚   𝜑,𝑝,𝑤   𝑌,𝑝,𝑤   𝜑,𝑙,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠,𝑚   𝑝,𝑙,𝑞,𝑠,𝑌,𝑟   𝑡,𝑌,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑋,𝑝,𝑟,𝑤   𝑋,𝑞,𝑠,𝑡   𝜑,𝑡

Proof of Theorem addcutslem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 addsprop 27972 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
21a1d 25 . . . 4 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
32rgen3 3181 . . 3 𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
43a1i 11 . 2 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
5 addcutslem.1 . 2 (𝜑𝑋 No )
6 addcutslem.2 . 2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
74, 5, 6addsproplem3 27967 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395  w3a 1086   = wceq 1541  wcel 2113  {cab 2714  wral 3051  wrex 3060  cun 3899  {csn 4580   class class class wbr 5098  cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7358   +no cnadd 8593   No csur 27607   <s clts 27608   bday cbday 27609   <<s cslts 27753   0s c0s 27801   L cleft 27821   R cright 27822   +s cadds 27955
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5224  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-pss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-tp 4585  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-int 4903  df-iun 4948  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-tr 5206  df-id 5519  df-eprel 5524  df-po 5532  df-so 5533  df-fr 5577  df-se 5578  df-we 5579  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-pred 6259  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-suc 6323  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-riota 7315  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-1st 7933  df-2nd 7934  df-frecs 8223  df-wrecs 8254  df-recs 8303  df-1o 8397  df-2o 8398  df-nadd 8594  df-no 27610  df-lts 27611  df-bday 27612  df-slts 27754  df-cuts 27756  df-0s 27803  df-made 27823  df-old 27824  df-left 27826  df-right 27827  df-norec2 27945  df-adds 27956
This theorem is referenced by:  addcuts  27974
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator