Theorem asclpropd 20125

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), one is an associative algebra iff the other one is. The last hypotheses on 1_r can be discharged either by letting 𝑊 = V (if strong equality is known on ·_𝑠) or assuming 𝐾 is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
asclpropd.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
asclpropd.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
asclpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
asclpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
asclpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
asclpropd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
asclpropd.5	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
asclpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝑥,𝑃,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem asclpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		asclpropd.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)
2		asclpropd.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	oveqrspc2v 7182	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
4	3	anassrs 470	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
5	1, 4	mpidan 687	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
6		asclpropd.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
7	6	oveq2d 7171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
8	7	adantr 483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
9	5, 8	eqtrd 2856	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
10	9	mpteq2dva 5160	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
11		asclpropd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
12	11	mpteq1d 5154	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))))
13		asclpropd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
14	13	mpteq1d 5154	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
15	10, 12, 14	3eqtr3d 2864	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
16		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐾)
17		asclpropd.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
19		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)
20		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐾)
21	16, 17, 18, 19, 20	asclfval 20107	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)))
22		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (algSc‘𝐿)
23		asclpropd.g	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
24		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
25		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)
26		eqid 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐿) = (1r‘𝐿)
27	22, 23, 24, 25, 26	asclfval 20107	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
28	15, 21, 27	3eqtr4g 2881	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110   ↦ cmpt 5145  ‘cfv 6354  (class class class)co 7155  Basecbs 16482  Scalarcsca 16567   ·_𝑠 cvsca 16568  1_rcur 19250  algSccascl 20083

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5189  ax-sep 5202  ax-nul 5209  ax-pow 5265  ax-pr 5329

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-csb 3883  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-uni 4838  df-iun 4920  df-br 5066  df-opab 5128  df-mpt 5146  df-id 5459  df-xp 5560  df-rel 5561  df-cnv 5562  df-co 5563  df-dm 5564  df-rn 5565  df-res 5566  df-ima 5567  df-iota 6313  df-fun 6356  df-fn 6357  df-f 6358  df-f1 6359  df-fo 6360  df-f1o 6361  df-fv 6362  df-ov 7158  df-slot 16486  df-base 16488  df-ascl 20086

This theorem is referenced by:  ply1ascl  20425