MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbthfi Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sbthfi 9265
Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sbth 9159). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbthfi ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sbthfi
Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reldom 9009 . . . . 5 Rel ≼
21brrelex1i 5756 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ V)
31brrelex1i 5756 . . . 4 (𝐵𝐴𝐵 ∈ V)
4 breq1 5169 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
5 breq2 5170 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑧𝑤𝐴))
64, 53anbi23d 1439 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴)))
7 breq1 5169 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
86, 7imbi12d 344 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤) ↔ ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤)))
9 eleq1 2832 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
10 breq2 5170 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
11 breq1 5169 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤𝐴𝐵𝐴))
129, 10, 113anbi123d 1436 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴)))
13 breq2 5170 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
1412, 13imbi12d 344 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)))
15 vex 3492 . . . . . 6 𝑧 ∈ V
16 sseq1 4034 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧))
17 imaeq2 6085 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓𝑦) = (𝑓𝑥))
1817difeq2d 4149 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥)))
1918imaeq2d 6089 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))))
20 difeq2 4143 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑦) = (𝑧𝑥))
2119, 20sseq12d 4042 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥)))
2216, 21anbi12d 631 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))))
2322cbvabv 2815 . . . . . 6 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))}
24 eqid 2740 . . . . . 6 ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))})))
25 vex 3492 . . . . . 6 𝑤 ∈ V
2615, 23, 24, 25sbthfilem 9264 . . . . 5 ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤)
278, 14, 26vtocl2g 3586 . . . 4 ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
282, 3, 27syl2an 595 . . 3 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
29283adant1 1130 . 2 ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
3029pm2.43i 52 1 ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395  w3a 1087   = wceq 1537  wcel 2108  {cab 2717  Vcvv 3488  cdif 3973  cun 3974  wss 3976   cuni 4931   class class class wbr 5166  ccnv 5699  cres 5702  cima 5703  cen 9000  cdom 9001  Fincfn 9003
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-pss 3996  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-tr 5284  df-id 5593  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-lim 6400  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-om 7904  df-1o 8522  df-en 9004  df-dom 9005  df-fin 9007
This theorem is referenced by:  domnsymfi  9266  php  9273
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator