MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbthfi Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sbthfi 9167
Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sbth 9069). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbthfi ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sbthfi
Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reldom 8933 . . . . 5 Rel ≼
21brrelex1i 5703 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ V)
31brrelex1i 5703 . . . 4 (𝐵𝐴𝐵 ∈ V)
4 breq1 5103 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
5 breq2 5104 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑧𝑤𝐴))
64, 53anbi23d 1460 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴)))
7 breq1 5103 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
86, 7imbi12d 346 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤) ↔ ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤)))
9 eleq1 2850 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
10 breq2 5104 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
11 breq1 5103 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤𝐴𝐵𝐴))
129, 10, 113anbi123d 1457 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴)))
13 breq2 5104 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
1412, 13imbi12d 346 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)))
15 vex 3458 . . . . . 6 𝑧 ∈ V
16 sseq1 3961 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧))
17 imaeq2 6045 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓𝑦) = (𝑓𝑥))
1817difeq2d 4080 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥)))
1918imaeq2d 6049 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))))
20 difeq2 4074 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑦) = (𝑧𝑥))
2119, 20sseq12d 3969 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥)))
2216, 21anbi12d 641 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))))
2322cbvabv 2832 . . . . . 6 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))}
24 eqid 2762 . . . . . 6 ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))})))
25 vex 3458 . . . . . 6 𝑤 ∈ V
2615, 23, 24, 25sbthfilem 9166 . . . . 5 ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤)
278, 14, 26vtocl2g 3538 . . . 4 ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
282, 3, 27syl2an 605 . . 3 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
29283adant1 1143 . 2 ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
3029pm2.43i 52 1 ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 399  w3a 1098   = wceq 1560  wcel 2142  {cab 2740  Vcvv 3454  cdif 3901  cun 3902  wss 3904   cuni 4865   class class class wbr 5100  ccnv 5646  cres 5649  cima 5650  cen 8924  cdom 8925  Fincfn 8927
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-nul 5256  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7718
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3or 1099  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-tr 5208  df-id 5542  df-eprel 5547  df-po 5555  df-so 5556  df-fr 5600  df-we 5602  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-ord 6349  df-on 6350  df-lim 6351  df-suc 6352  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fn 6524  df-f 6525  df-f1 6526  df-fo 6527  df-f1o 6528  df-fv 6529  df-om 7847  df-1o 8437  df-en 8928  df-dom 8929  df-fin 8931
This theorem is referenced by:  domnsymfi  9168  php  9175
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator