MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbthfi Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sbthfi 9179
Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sbth 9081). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbthfi ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sbthfi
Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reldom 8945 . . . . 5 Rel ≼
21brrelex1i 5717 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ V)
31brrelex1i 5717 . . . 4 (𝐵𝐴𝐵 ∈ V)
4 breq1 5112 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
5 breq2 5113 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑧𝑤𝐴))
64, 53anbi23d 1467 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴)))
7 breq1 5112 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
86, 7imbi12d 347 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤) ↔ ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤)))
9 eleq1 2851 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
10 breq2 5113 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
11 breq1 5112 . . . . . . 7 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤𝐴𝐵𝐴))
129, 10, 113anbi123d 1464 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴)))
13 breq2 5113 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
1412, 13imbi12d 347 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)))
15 vex 3459 . . . . . 6 𝑧 ∈ V
16 sseq1 3962 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧))
17 imaeq2 6058 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓𝑦) = (𝑓𝑥))
1817difeq2d 4081 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥)))
1918imaeq2d 6062 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))))
20 difeq2 4075 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑦) = (𝑧𝑥))
2119, 20sseq12d 3970 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥)))
2216, 21anbi12d 643 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))))
2322cbvabv 2833 . . . . . 6 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))}
24 eqid 2763 . . . . . 6 ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))})))
25 vex 3459 . . . . . 6 𝑤 ∈ V
2615, 23, 24, 25sbthfilem 9178 . . . . 5 ((𝑤 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤)
278, 14, 26vtocl2g 3538 . . . 4 ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
282, 3, 27syl2an 607 . . 3 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
29283adant1 1148 . 2 ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
3029pm2.43i 53 1 ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 400  w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  wcel 2143  {cab 2741  Vcvv 3455  cdif 3902  cun 3903  wss 3905   cuni 4872   class class class wbr 5109  ccnv 5660  cres 5663  cima 5664  cen 8936  cdom 8937  Fincfn 8939
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-tr 5219  df-id 5556  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-we 5616  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-om 7859  df-1o 8449  df-en 8940  df-dom 8941  df-fin 8943
This theorem is referenced by:  domnsymfi  9180  php  9187
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator