Theorem bnj1228 35708

Description: Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if 𝑅 is well-founded and set-like on 𝐴, then every nonempty subclass of 𝐴 has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj1228.1	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1228	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑤,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑤)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝑅(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem bnj1228

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj69 35707	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
2		nfv 1949	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
3		bnj1228.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	nfcii 2915	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5	4	nfcri 2918	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵
6		nfv 1949	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧
7	4, 6	nfralw 3313	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧
8	5, 7	nfan 1934	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
9		eleq1w 2847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
10		breq2 5110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
11	10	notbid 321	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
12	11	ralbidv 3189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
13	9, 12	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
14	2, 8, 13	cbvexv1 2375	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
15		df-rex 3091	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
16		df-rex 3091	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
18	1, 17	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4281   class class class wbr 5106   FrSe w-bnj15 35390

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772  ax-reg 9610  ax-inf2 9666

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-ord 6380  df-on 6381  df-lim 6382  df-suc 6383  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-om 7899  df-1o 8501  df-bnj17 35385  df-bnj14 35387  df-bnj13 35389  df-bnj15 35391  df-bnj18 35393  df-bnj19 35395

This theorem is used by:  bnj1204  35709  bnj1311  35721  bnj1312  35755