Theorem bnj1228 35641

Description: Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if 𝑅 is well-founded and set-like on 𝐴, then every nonempty subclass of 𝐴 has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj1228.1	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1228	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑤,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑤)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝑅(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem bnj1228

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj69 35640	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
2		nfv 1946	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
3		bnj1228.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	nfcii 2911	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5	4	nfcri 2914	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵
6		nfv 1946	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧
7	4, 6	nfralw 3309	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧
8	5, 7	nfan 1931	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
9		eleq1w 2843	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
10		breq2 5106	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
11	10	notbid 321	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
12	11	ralbidv 3185	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
13	9, 12	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
14	2, 8, 13	cbvexv1 2371	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
15		df-rex 3087	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
16		df-rex 3087	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧))
17	14, 15, 16	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
18	1, 17	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103  ∀wal 1567  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086   ⊆ wss 3895  ∅c0 4278   class class class wbr 5102   FrSe w-bnj15 35323

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7751  ax-reg 9586  ax-inf2 9642

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-pss 4014  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-fr 5603  df-we 5605  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-om 7878  df-1o 8476  df-bnj17 35318  df-bnj14 35320  df-bnj13 35322  df-bnj15 35324  df-bnj18 35326  df-bnj19 35328

This theorem is used by:  bnj1204  35642  bnj1311  35654  bnj1312  35688