Theorem carddomi2 9383

Description: Two sets have the dominance relationship if their cardinalities have the subset relationship and one is numerable. See also carddom 9965, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carddomi2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem carddomi2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cardnueq0 9377	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ((card‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
2	1	adantr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
3	2	biimpa 480	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
4		0domg 8628	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼ 𝐵)
5	4	ad2antlr 726	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → ∅ ≼ 𝐵)
6	3, 5	eqbrtrd 5052	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
7	6	a1d 25	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
8		fvex 6658	. . . . 5 ⊢ (card‘𝐵) ∈ V
9		simprr 772	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
10		ssdomg 8538	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ∈ V → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵)))
11	8, 9, 10	mpsyl 68	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵))
12		cardid2 9366	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
13	12	ad2antrr 725	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
14		simprl 770	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅)
15		ssn0 4308	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅) → (card‘𝐵) ≠ ∅)
16	9, 14, 15	syl2anc 587	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐵) ≠ ∅)
17		ndmfv 6675	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐵) = ∅)
18	17	necon1ai 3014	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
19		cardid2 9366	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵)
20	16, 18, 19	3syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵)
21		domen1 8643	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 → ((card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ (card‘𝐵)))
22		domen2 8644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
23	21, 22	sylan9bb 513	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵) → ((card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
24	13, 20, 23	syl2anc 587	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → ((card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
25	11, 24	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
26	25	expr 460	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
27	7, 26	pm2.61dane 3074	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987  Vcvv 3441   ⊆ wss 3881  ∅c0 4243   class class class wbr 5030  dom cdm 5519  ‘cfv 6324   ≈ cen 8489   ≼ cdom 8490  cardccrd 9348

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295  ax-un 7441

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-pss 3900  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-tp 4530  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-int 4839  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-tr 5137  df-id 5425  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-rn 5530  df-res 5531  df-ima 5532  df-ord 6162  df-on 6163  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fn 6327  df-f 6328  df-f1 6329  df-fo 6330  df-f1o 6331  df-fv 6332  df-er 8272  df-en 8493  df-dom 8494  df-card 9352

This theorem is referenced by:  carddom2  9390