Theorem carddomi2 9972

Description: Two sets have the dominance relationship if their cardinalities have the subset relationship and one is numerable. See also carddom 10555, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carddomi2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem carddomi2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cardnueq0 9966	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ((card‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
2	1	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
3	2	biimpa 482	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
4		0domg 9099	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼ 𝐵)
5	4	ad2antlr 740	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → ∅ ≼ 𝐵)
6	3, 5	eqbrtrd 5135	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
7	6	a1d 26	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = ∅) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
8		fvex 6898	. . . . 5 ⊢ (card‘𝐵) ∈ V
9		simprr 785	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
10		ssdomg 9003	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ∈ V → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵)))
11	8, 9, 10	mpsyl 69	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵))
12		cardid2 9955	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
13	12	ad2antrr 739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
14		simprl 783	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅)
15		ssn0 4362	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅) → (card‘𝐵) ≠ ∅)
16	9, 14, 15	syl2anc 596	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐵) ≠ ∅)
17		ndmfv 6917	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝐵 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐵) = ∅)
18	17	necon1ai 2987	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
19		cardid2 9955	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵)
20	16, 18, 19	3syl 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵)
21		domen1 9114	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 → ((card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ (card‘𝐵)))
22		domen2 9115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
23	21, 22	sylan9bb 519	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵) → ((card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
24	13, 20, 23	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → ((card‘𝐴) ≼ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
25	11, 24	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ ∧ (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
26	25	expr 462	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≠ ∅) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
27	7, 26	pm2.61dane 3047	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960  Vcvv 3457   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5111  dom cdm 5663  ‘cfv 6540   ≈ cen 8946   ≼ cdom 8947  cardccrd 9937

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-int 4915  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-tr 5221  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-er 8700  df-en 8950  df-dom 8951  df-card 9941

This theorem is used by:  carddom2  9979