Theorem carddom2 9970

Description: Two numerable sets have the dominance relationship iff their cardinalities have the subset relationship. See also carddom 10544, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carddom2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem carddom2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		carddomi2 9963	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
2		brdom2 8977	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
3		cardon 9937	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (card‘𝐴) ∈ On
4	3	onelssi 6477	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴) → (card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴))
5		carddomi2 9963	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
6	5	ancoms 463	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
7		domnsym 9089	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ≼ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵)
8	4, 6, 7	syl56 37	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
9	8	con2d 135	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴)))
10		cardon 9937	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (card‘𝐵) ∈ On
11		ontri1 6395	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ∈ On ∧ (card‘𝐵) ∈ On) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴)))
12	3, 10, 11	mp2an 704	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴))
13	9, 12	imbitrrdi 255	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
14		carden2b 9960	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵))
15		eqimss 3994	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
16	14, 15	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
17	16	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
18	13, 17	jaod 872	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
19	2, 18	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
20	1, 19	impbid 215	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142   ⊆ wss 3904   class class class wbr 5108  dom cdm 5660  Oncon0 6360  ‘cfv 6536   ≈ cen 8938   ≼ cdom 8939   ≺ csdm 8940  cardccrd 9928

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-int 4912  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5555  df-eprel 5560  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-fr 5613  df-we 5615  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-er 8692  df-en 8942  df-dom 8943  df-sdom 8944  df-card 9932

This theorem is used by:  carduni  9974  carden2  9980  cardsdom2  9981  domtri2  9982  infxpidm2  10008  cardaleph  10080  infenaleph  10082  alephinit  10086  ficardun2  10192  ackbij2  10232  cfflb  10249  fin1a2lem9  10398  carddom  10544  pwfseqlem5  10654  hashdom  14422  minregex2  44289