Theorem carddom2 10082

Description: Two numerable sets have the dominance relationship iff their cardinalities have the subset relationship. See also carddom 10662, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carddom2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem carddom2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		carddomi2 10075	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
2		brdom2 9034	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
3		cardon 10049	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (card‘𝐴) ∈ On
4	3	onelssi 6494	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴) → (card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴))
5		carddomi2 10075	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
6	5	ancoms 464	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
7		domnsym 9147	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ≼ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵)
8	4, 6, 7	syl56 37	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
9	8	con2d 135	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴)))
10		cardon 10049	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (card‘𝐵) ∈ On
11		ontri1 6412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ∈ On ∧ (card‘𝐵) ∈ On) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴)))
12	3, 10, 11	mp2an 705	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴))
13	9, 12	imbitrrdi 255	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
14		carden2b 10072	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵))
15		eqimss 3971	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
16	14, 15	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
17	16	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
18	13, 17	jaod 873	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
19	2, 18	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
20	1, 19	impbid 215	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ⊆ wss 3900   class class class wbr 5106  dom cdm 5655  Oncon0 6377  ‘cfv 6555   ≈ cen 8995   ≼ cdom 8996   ≺ csdm 8997  cardccrd 10040

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-ord 6380  df-on 6381  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-er 8742  df-en 8999  df-dom 9000  df-sdom 9001  df-card 10044

This theorem is used by:  carduni  10086  carden2  10092  cardsdom2  10093  domtri2  10094  infxpidm2  10120  cardaleph  10192  infenaleph  10194  alephinit  10198  ficardun2  10304  ackbij2  10344  cfflb  10361  fin1a2lem9  10510  carddom  10662  pwfseqlem5  10772  hashdom  14547  minregex2  44726