Theorem carddom2 10059

Description: Two numerable sets have the dominance relationship iff their cardinalities have the subset relationship. See also carddom 10639, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
carddom2	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem carddom2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		carddomi2 10052	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
2		brdom2 9010	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
3		cardon 10026	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (card‘𝐴) ∈ On
4	3	onelssi 6480	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴) → (card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴))
5		carddomi2 10052	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
6	5	ancoms 464	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ⊆ (card‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
7		domnsym 9123	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ≼ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵)
8	4, 6, 7	syl56 37	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
9	8	con2d 135	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴)))
10		cardon 10026	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (card‘𝐵) ∈ On
11		ontri1 6398	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((card‘𝐴) ∈ On ∧ (card‘𝐵) ∈ On) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴)))
12	3, 10, 11	mp2an 705	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ ¬ (card‘𝐵) ∈ (card‘𝐴))
13	9, 12	imbitrrdi 255	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
14		carden2b 10049	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵))
15		eqimss 3987	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
16	14, 15	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵))
17	16	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
18	13, 17	jaod 873	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
19	2, 18	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵)))
20	1, 19	impbid 215	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3914   class class class wbr 5103  dom cdm 5651  Oncon0 6363  ‘cfv 6539   ≈ cen 8971   ≼ cdom 8972   ≺ csdm 8973  cardccrd 10017

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7752

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3915  df-pss 4035  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-ord 6366  df-on 6367  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-er 8718  df-en 8975  df-dom 8976  df-sdom 8977  df-card 10021

This theorem is used by:  carduni  10063  carden2  10069  cardsdom2  10070  domtri2  10071  infxpidm2  10097  cardaleph  10169  infenaleph  10171  alephinit  10175  ficardun2  10281  ackbij2  10321  cfflb  10338  fin1a2lem9  10487  carddom  10639  pwfseqlem5  10749  hashdom  14524  minregex2  44537