Theorem infpssr 10268

Description: Dedekind infinity implies existence of a denumerable subset: take a single point witnessing the proper subset relation and iterate the embedding. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
infpssr	⊢ ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem infpssr

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pssnel 4437	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋))
2	1	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋))
3		eldif 3927	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋))
4		pssss 4064	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴)
5		bren 8931	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑋 ≈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴)
6		simpr 484	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴)
7		f1ofo 6810	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝑓:𝑋–onto→𝐴)
8		forn 6778	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑓:𝑋–onto→𝐴 → ran 𝑓 = 𝐴)
9	6, 7, 8	3syl 18	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → ran 𝑓 = 𝐴)
10		vex 3454	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
11	10	rnex 7889	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
12	9, 11	eqeltrrdi 2838	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
13		simplr 768	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴)
14		simpll 766	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋))
15		eqid 2730	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (rec(◡𝑓, 𝑦) ↾ ω) = (rec(◡𝑓, 𝑦) ↾ ω)
16	13, 6, 14, 15	infpssrlem5 10267	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ V → ω ≼ 𝐴))
17	12, 16	mpd 15	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴)
18	17	ex 412	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴 → ω ≼ 𝐴))
19	18	exlimdv 1933	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝐴 → ω ≼ 𝐴))
20	5, 19	biimtrid 242	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ≈ 𝐴 → ω ≼ 𝐴))
21	20	ex 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑋 ≈ 𝐴 → ω ≼ 𝐴)))
22	4, 21	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 → (𝑋 ≈ 𝐴 → ω ≼ 𝐴)))
23	22	impd 410	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴))
24	3, 23	sylbir 235	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴))
25	24	exlimiv 1930	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴))
26	2, 25	mpcom 38	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝐴) → ω ≼ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3914   ⊆ wss 3917   ⊊ wpss 3918   class class class wbr 5110  ^◡ccnv 5640  ran crn 5642   ↾ cres 5643  –onto→wfo 6512  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6513  ωcom 7845  reccrdg 8380   ≈ cen 8918   ≼ cdom 8919

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-reu 3357  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-pss 3937  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5536  df-eprel 5541  df-po 5549  df-so 5550  df-fr 5594  df-we 5596  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-pred 6277  df-ord 6338  df-on 6339  df-lim 6340  df-suc 6341  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-f 6518  df-f1 6519  df-fo 6520  df-f1o 6521  df-fv 6522  df-ov 7393  df-om 7846  df-2nd 7972  df-frecs 8263  df-wrecs 8294  df-recs 8343  df-rdg 8381  df-en 8922  df-dom 8923

This theorem is referenced by:  isfin4-2  10274