Theorem meetval 18543

Description: Meet value. Since both sides evaluate to ∅ when they don't exist, for convenience we drop the {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 requirement. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
meetdef.u	⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
meetdef.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
meetdef.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
meetdef.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)
meetdef.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
meetval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))

Proof of Theorem meetval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		meetdef.k	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
2		meetdef.u	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
3		meetdef.m	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4	2, 3	meetfval2 18540	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → ∧ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))})
5	1, 4	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∧ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))})
6	5	oveqd 7429	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌))
7	6	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌))
8		simpr 490	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺)
9		eqidd 2762	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
10		meetdef.x	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)
11		meetdef.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)
12		fvexd 6892	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) ∈ V)
13		preq12 4696	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → {𝑥, 𝑦} = {𝑋, 𝑌})
14	13	eleq1d 2846	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
15	14	3adant3 1150	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
16		simp3 1156	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
17	13	fveq2d 6881	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
18	17	3adant3 1150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
19	16, 18	eqeq12d 2777	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
20	15, 19	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦})) ↔ ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))))
21		moeq 3665	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃*𝑧 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦})
22	21	moani 2579	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∃*𝑧({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))
23		eqid 2761	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}
24	20, 22, 23	ovigg 7557	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) ∈ V) → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
25	10, 11, 12, 24	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
26	25	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
27	8, 9, 26	mp2and 712	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
28	7, 27	eqtrd 2796	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
29	2, 3, 1, 10, 11	meetdef 18542	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
30	29	notbid 321	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
31		df-ov 7415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ( ∧ ‘⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
32		ndmfv 6909	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → ( ∧ ‘⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩) = ∅)
33	31, 32	eqtrid 2808	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅)
34	30, 33	biimtrrdi 257	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅))
35	34	imp 412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅)
36		ndmfv 6909	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = ∅)
37	36	adantl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = ∅)
38	35, 37	eqtr4d 2799	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
39	28, 38	pm2.61dan 825	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451  ∅c0 4279  {cpr 4586  ⟨cop 4590  dom cdm 5651  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412  {coprab 7413  glbcglb 18464  meetcmee 18466

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-glb 18499  df-meet 18501

This theorem is used by:  meetcl  18544  meetval2  18547  meetcomALT  18555  pmapmeet  40798  diameetN  42081  dihmeetlem2N  42324  dihmeetcN  42327  dihmeet  42368  posmidm  50025  toplatmeet  50055