Theorem meetval 18024

Description: Meet value. Since both sides evaluate to ∅ when they don't exist, for convenience we drop the {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 requirement. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
meetdef.u	⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
meetdef.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
meetdef.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
meetdef.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)
meetdef.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
meetval	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))

Proof of Theorem meetval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		meetdef.k	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
2		meetdef.u	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)
3		meetdef.m	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4	2, 3	meetfval2 18021	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → ∧ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))})
5	1, 4	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∧ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))})
6	5	oveqd 7272	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌))
7	6	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌))
8		simpr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺)
9		eqidd 2739	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
10		meetdef.x	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)
11		meetdef.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍)
12		fvexd 6771	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) ∈ V)
13		preq12 4668	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → {𝑥, 𝑦} = {𝑋, 𝑌})
14	13	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
15	14	3adant3 1130	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
16		simp3 1136	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
17	13	fveq2d 6760	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
18	17	3adant3 1130	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
19	16, 18	eqeq12d 2754	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
20	15, 19	anbi12d 630	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦})) ↔ ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))))
21		moeq 3637	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃*𝑧 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦})
22	21	moani 2553	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∃*𝑧({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))
23		eqid 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}
24	20, 22, 23	ovigg 7396	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) ∈ V) → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
25	10, 11, 12, 24	syl3anc 1369	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
26	25	adantr 480	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌})))
27	8, 9, 26	mp2and 695	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ 𝑧 = (𝐺‘{𝑥, 𝑦}))}𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
28	7, 27	eqtrd 2778	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
29	2, 3, 1, 10, 11	meetdef 18023	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
30	29	notbid 317	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺))
31		df-ov 7258	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ( ∧ ‘⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
32		ndmfv 6786	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → ( ∧ ‘⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩) = ∅)
33	31, 32	eqtrid 2790	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅)
34	30, 33	syl6bir 253	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅))
35	34	imp 406	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = ∅)
36		ndmfv 6786	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺 → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = ∅)
37	36	adantl 481	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}) = ∅)
38	35, 37	eqtr4d 2781	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))
39	28, 38	pm2.61dan 809	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝐺‘{𝑋, 𝑌}))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3422  ∅c0 4253  {cpr 4560  ⟨cop 4564  dom cdm 5580  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  {coprab 7256  glbcglb 17943  meetcmee 17945

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-riota 7212  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-glb 17980  df-meet 17982

This theorem is referenced by:  meetcl  18025  meetval2  18028  meetcomALT  18036  pmapmeet  37714  diameetN  38997  dihmeetlem2N  39240  dihmeetcN  39243  dihmeet  39284  posmidm  46155  toplatmeet  46177