Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 374 of 450) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28695) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28696-30218) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30219-44926) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | idltrn 37301 | The identity function is a lattice translation. Remark below Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | ltrnmw 37302 | Property of lattice translation value. Remark below Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. TODO: Can this be used in more places? (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2012.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∧ 𝑊) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | dilfsetN 37303* | The mapping from fiducial atom to set of dilations. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐿 = (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ (𝑊‘𝑑) → (𝑓‘𝑥) = 𝑥)})) | ||
Theorem | dilsetN 37304* | The set of dilations for a fiducial atom 𝐷. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐿‘𝐷) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ (𝑊‘𝐷) → (𝑓‘𝑥) = 𝑥)}) | ||
Theorem | isdilN 37305* | The predicate "is a dilation". (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑥 ⊆ (𝑊‘𝐷) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑥)))) | ||
Theorem | trnfsetN 37306* | The mapping from fiducial atom to set of translations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾) & ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑇 = (𝑑 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝑑) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝑑)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝑑)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝑑})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝑑}))})) | ||
Theorem | trnsetN 37307* | The set of translations for a fiducial atom 𝐷. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾) & ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑇‘𝐷) = {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))}) | ||
Theorem | istrnN 37308* | The predicate "is a translation". (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾) & ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))) | ||
Syntax | ctrl 37309 | Extend class notation with set of all traces of lattice translations. |
class trL | ||
Definition | df-trl 37310* | Define trace of a lattice translation. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2012.) |
⊢ trL = (𝑘 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∈ (LHyp‘𝑘) ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝑘)‘𝑤) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)∀𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)(¬ 𝑝(le‘𝑘)𝑤 → 𝑥 = ((𝑝(join‘𝑘)(𝑓‘𝑝))(meet‘𝑘)𝑤)))))) | ||
Theorem | trlfset 37311* | The set of all traces of lattice translations for a lattice 𝐾. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐶 → (trL‘𝐾) = (𝑤 ∈ 𝐻 ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑤) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑤 → 𝑥 = ((𝑝 ∨ (𝑓‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑤)))))) | ||
Theorem | trlset 37312* | The set of traces of lattice translations for a fiducial co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 → 𝑥 = ((𝑝 ∨ (𝑓‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊))))) | ||
Theorem | trlval 37313* | The value of the trace of a lattice translation. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 → 𝑥 = ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
Theorem | trlval2 37314 | The value of the trace of a lattice translation, given any atom 𝑃 not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊. Note: this requires only the weaker assumption 𝐾 ∈ Lat; we use 𝐾 ∈ HL for convenience. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | trlcl 37315 | Closure of the trace of a lattice translation. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | trlcnv 37316 | The trace of the converse of a lattice translation. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅‘◡𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | trljat1 37317 | The value of a translation of an atom 𝑃 not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊, joined with trace. Equation above Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. TODO: shorten with atmod3i1 37015? (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) = (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | trljat2 37318 | The value of a translation of an atom 𝑃 not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊, joined with trace. Equation above Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) = (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | trljat3 37319 | The value of a translation of an atom 𝑃 not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊, joined with trace. Equation above Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) = ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | trlat 37320 | If an atom differs from its translation, the trace is an atom. Equation above Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝑅‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | trl0 37321 | If an atom not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊 equals its lattice translation, the trace of the translation is zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃)) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | trlator0 37322 | The trace of a lattice translation is an atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2013.) |
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝑅‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹) = 0 )) | ||
Theorem | trlatn0 37323 | The trace of a lattice translation is an atom iff it is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → ((𝑅‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≠ 0 )) | ||
Theorem | trlnidat 37324 | The trace of a lattice translation other than the identity is an atom. Remark above Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) → (𝑅‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ltrnnidn 37325 | If a lattice translation is not the identity, then the translation of any atom not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊 is different from the atom. Remark above Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | ltrnideq 37326 | Property of the identity lattice translation. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹 = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | trlid0 37327 | The trace of the identity translation is zero. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑅‘( I ↾ 𝐵)) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | trlnidatb 37328 | A lattice translation is not the identity iff its trace is an atom. TODO: Can proofs be reorganized so this goes with trlnidat 37324? Why do both this and ltrnideq 37326 need trlnidat 37324? (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐹 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐹) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | trlid0b 37329 | A lattice translation is the identity iff its trace is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐹 = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐹) = 0 )) | ||
Theorem | trlnid 37330 | Different translations with the same trace cannot be the identity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ∧ (𝑅‘𝐹) = (𝑅‘𝐺))) → 𝐹 ≠ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ltrn2ateq 37331 | Property of the equality of a lattice translation with its value. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑄) = 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | ltrnateq 37332 | If any atom (under 𝑊) is not equal to its translation, so is any other atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃) → (𝐹‘𝑄) = 𝑄) | ||
Theorem | ltrnatneq 37333 | If any atom (under 𝑊) is not equal to its translation, so is any other atom. TODO: ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊 isn't needed to prove this. Will removing it shorten (and not lengthen) proofs using it? (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃) → (𝐹‘𝑄) ≠ 𝑄) | ||
Theorem | ltrnatlw 37334 | If the value of an atom equals the atom in a non-identity translation, the atom is under the fiducial hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑄) = 𝑄)) → 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) | ||
Theorem | trlle 37335 | The trace of a lattice translation is less than the fiducial co-atom 𝑊. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ 𝑊) | ||
Theorem | trlne 37336 | The trace of a lattice translation is not equal to any atom not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊. Part of proof of Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝑃 ≠ (𝑅‘𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | trlnle 37337 | The atom not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊 is not less than the trace of a lattice translation. Part of proof of Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅‘𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | trlval3 37338 | The value of the trace of a lattice translation in terms of 2 atoms. TODO: Try to shorten proof. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)))) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)))) | ||
Theorem | trlval4 37339 | The value of the trace of a lattice translation in terms of 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ (𝑅‘𝐹) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑄)))) | ||
Theorem | trlval5 37340 | The value of the trace of a lattice translation in terms of itself. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑅‘𝐹) = ((𝑃 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ∧ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | arglem1N 37341 | Lemma for Desargues's law. Theorem 13.3 of [Crawley] p. 110, third and fourth lines from bottom. In these lemmas, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑇, 𝑈, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹, and 𝐺 represent Crawley's a0, a1, a2, b0, b1, b2, c, z0, z1, z2, and p respectively. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇)) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc1 37342 | Part of proof of Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. TODO: shorten with atmod3i1 37015? (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝑃 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑊)) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc2 37343 | Part of proof of Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝐹‘𝑄) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc3 37344 | Part of proof of Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc4 37345 | Part of proof of Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃))) → (𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ≠ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc5 37346 | Lemma for cdlemc 37348. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) ≠ 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘𝑄) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc6 37347 | Lemma for cdlemc 37348. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃) → (𝐹‘𝑄) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemc 37348 | Lemma C in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((trL‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃))) → (𝐹‘𝑄) = ((𝑄 ∨ (𝑅‘𝐹)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd1 37349 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑅 = ((𝑃 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd2 37350 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑄) = (𝐺‘𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝐺‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd3 37351 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. The 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 requirement is not mentioned in their proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃)) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd4 37352 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑄) = (𝐺‘𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝐺‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd5 37353 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑄) = (𝐺‘𝑄))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝐺‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd6 37354 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃))) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃)) → (𝐹‘𝑄) = (𝐺‘𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd7 37355 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑃)))) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝐺‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd8 37356 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝐺‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd9 37357 | Part of proof of Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃)) → (𝐹‘𝑅) = (𝐺‘𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | cdlemd 37358 | If two translations agree at any atom not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊, then they are equal. Lemma D in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃)) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ltrneq3 37359 | Two translations agree at any atom not under the fiducial co-atom 𝑊 iff they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝐹‘𝑃) = (𝐺‘𝑃) ↔ 𝐹 = 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme00a 37360 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0aa 37361 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0a 37362 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0b 37363 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0c 37364 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0cp 37365 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. TODO: Reformat as in cdlemg3a 37748- swap consequent equality; make antecedent use df-3an 1085. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0cq 37366 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝑄 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0dN 37367 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅)) → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0e 37368 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0fN 37369 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑉 ≠ 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0gN 37370 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) → 𝑉 ≠ 𝑄) | ||
Theorem | cdlemeulpq 37371 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑈 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme01N 37372 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝑈 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑈 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme02N 37373 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑈) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑈 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0ex1N 37374* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0ex2N 37375* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Note that (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑢) is a shorter way to express 𝑢 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme0moN 37376* | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ∃*𝑟(𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) → (𝑅 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑅 = 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme1b 37377 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Utility lemma showing 𝐹 is a lattice element. 𝐹 represents their f(r). (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cdleme1 37378 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 represents their f(r). Here we show r ∨ f(r) = r ∨ u (7th through 5th lines from bottom on p. 113). (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝐹) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme2 37379 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 represents f(r). 𝑊 is the fiducial co-atom (hyperplane) w. Here we show that (r ∨ f(r)) ∧ w = u in their notation (4th line from bottom on p. 113). (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐹) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3b 37380 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3c 37381 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊))) → 𝐹 ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3d 37382 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3e 37383 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))) → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3fN 37384 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. TODO: Delete - duplicates cdleme0e 37368. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3g 37385 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝐹 ≠ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3h 37386 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 37387 and cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3fa 37387 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. See cdleme3 37388. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme3 37388 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 represents f(r). 𝑊 is the fiducial co-atom (hyperplane) w. Here and in cdleme3fa 37387 above, we show that f(r) ∈ W (4th line from bottom on p. 113), meaning it is an atom and not under w, which in our notation is expressed as 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐹 ≤ 𝑊. Their proof provides no details of our lemmas cdleme3b 37380 through cdleme3 37388, so there may be a simpler proof that we have overlooked. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝐹 ≤ 𝑊) | ||
Theorem | cdleme4 37389 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐹 and 𝐺 represent f(s) and fs(r). Here show p ∨ q = r ∨ u at the top of p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme4a 37390 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 114 top. 𝐺 represents fs(r). Auxiliary lemma derived from cdleme5 37391. We show fs(r) ≤ p ∨ q. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme5 37391 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐺 represents fs(r). We show r ∨ fs(r)) = p ∨ q at the top of p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝐺) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme6 37392 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. This expresses (r ∨ fs(r)) ∧ w = u at the top of p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝐺) ∧ 𝑊) = 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7aa 37393 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme7ga 37399 and cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7a 37394 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme7ga 37399 and cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7b 37395 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme7ga 37399 and cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7c 37396 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme7ga 37399 and cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7d 37397 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme7ga 37399 and cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝐺 ≠ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7e 37398 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme7ga 37399 and cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝐺 ≠ (0.‘𝐾)) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7ga 37399 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. See cdleme7 37400. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cdleme7 37400 | Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. 𝐺 and 𝐹 represent fs(r) and f(s) respectively. 𝑊 is the fiducial co-atom (hyperplane) that they call w. Here and in cdleme7ga 37399 above, we show that fs(r) ∈ W (top of p. 114), meaning it is an atom and not under w, which in our notation is expressed as 𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐺 ≤ 𝑊. (Note that we do not have a symbol for their W.) Their proof provides no details of our cdleme7aa 37393 through cdleme7 37400, so there may be a simpler proof that we have overlooked. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑊))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ 𝑊)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝐺 ≤ 𝑊) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |