Theorem wepwso 42100

Description: A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wepwso.t	⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wepwso	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑇(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wepwso

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2onn 8647	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
2		nnord 7867	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (2o ∈ ω → Ord 2o)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord 2o
4		ordwe 6377	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 2o → E We 2o)
5		weso 5667	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E We 2o → E Or 2o)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ E Or 2o
7		eqid 2731	. . . . 5 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}
8	7	wemapso 9552	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ E Or 2o) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
9	6, 8	mpan2 688	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
10	9	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
11		elex 3492	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
12		wepwso.t	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}
13		eqid 2731	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o}))
14	12, 7, 13	wepwsolem 42099	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
15		isoso 7348	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
16	11, 14, 15	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
17	16	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
18	10, 17	mpbid 231	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  ∀wral 3060  ∃wrex 3069  Vcvv 3473  𝒫 cpw 4602  {csn 4628   class class class wbr 5148  {copab 5210   ↦ cmpt 5231   E cep 5579   Or wor 5587   We wwe 5630  ^◡ccnv 5675   “ cima 5679  Ord word 6363  ‘cfv 6543   Isom wiso 6544  (class class class)co 7412  ωcom 7859  1_oc1o 8465  2_oc2o 8466   ↑_m cmap 8826

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-reu 3376  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3778  df-csb 3894  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-pss 3967  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5574  df-eprel 5580  df-po 5588  df-so 5589  df-fr 5631  df-we 5633  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-isom 6552  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-om 7860  df-1st 7979  df-2nd 7980  df-1o 8472  df-2o 8473  df-map 8828

This theorem is referenced by:  aomclem1  42111