Theorem wepwso 43039

Description: A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wepwso.t	⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wepwso	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑇(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wepwso

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2onn 8609	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
2		nnord 7853	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (2o ∈ ω → Ord 2o)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord 2o
4		ordwe 6348	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 2o → E We 2o)
5		weso 5632	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E We 2o → E Or 2o)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ E Or 2o
7		eqid 2730	. . . . 5 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}
8	7	wemapso 9511	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ E Or 2o) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
9	6, 8	mpan2 691	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
10	9	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
11		elex 3471	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
12		wepwso.t	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}
13		eqid 2730	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o}))
14	12, 7, 13	wepwsolem 43038	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
15		isoso 7326	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
16	11, 14, 15	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
17	16	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
18	10, 17	mpbid 232	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3045  ∃wrex 3054  Vcvv 3450  𝒫 cpw 4566  {csn 4592   class class class wbr 5110  {copab 5172   ↦ cmpt 5191   E cep 5540   Or wor 5548   We wwe 5593  ^◡ccnv 5640   “ cima 5644  Ord word 6334  ‘cfv 6514   Isom wiso 6515  (class class class)co 7390  ωcom 7845  1_oc1o 8430  2_oc2o 8431   ↑_m cmap 8802

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5323  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-reu 3357  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-pss 3937  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5536  df-eprel 5541  df-po 5549  df-so 5550  df-fr 5594  df-we 5596  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-ord 6338  df-on 6339  df-lim 6340  df-suc 6341  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-f 6518  df-f1 6519  df-fo 6520  df-f1o 6521  df-fv 6522  df-isom 6523  df-ov 7393  df-oprab 7394  df-mpo 7395  df-om 7846  df-1st 7971  df-2nd 7972  df-1o 8437  df-2o 8438  df-map 8804

This theorem is referenced by:  aomclem1  43050