P. 421 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42001-42100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pm13.195 42001*	Theorem *13.195 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. This theorem is very similar to sbc5 3748. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	pm13.196a 42002*	Theorem *13.196 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. The only difference is the position of the substituted variable. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝑦 ≠ 𝑥))
Theorem	2sbc6g 42003*	Theorem *13.21 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑))
Theorem	2sbc5g 42004*	Theorem *13.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑))
Theorem	iotain 42005	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = (℩𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	iotaexeu 42006	The iota class exists. This theorem does not require ax-nul 5234 for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	iotasbc 42007*	Definition *14.01 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. In Principia Mathematica, Russell and Whitehead define ℩ in terms of a function of (℩𝑥𝜑). Their definition differs in that a function of (℩𝑥𝜑) evaluates to "false" when there isn't a single 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	iotasbc2 42008*	Theorem *14.111 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦][(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑧]𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm14.12 42009*	Theorem *14.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	pm14.122a 42010*	Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	pm14.122b 42011*	Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))
Theorem	pm14.122c 42012*	Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))
Theorem	pm14.123a 42013*	Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑)))
Theorem	pm14.123b 42014*	Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))
Theorem	pm14.123c 42015*	Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))
Theorem	pm14.18 42016	Theorem *14.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	iotaequ 42017*	Theorem *14.2 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) = 𝑦
Theorem	iotavalb 42018*	Theorem *14.202 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. A biconditional version of iotaval 6406. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦))
Theorem	iotasbc5 42019*	Theorem *14.205 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm14.24 42020*	Theorem *14.24 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑)))
Theorem	iotavalsb 42021*	Theorem *14.242 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑧]𝜓))
Theorem	sbiota1 42022	Theorem *14.25 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	sbaniota 42023	Theorem *14.26 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	eubiOLD 42024	Obsolete proof of eubi 2586 as of 7-Oct-2022. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	iotasbcq 42025	Theorem *14.272 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 193. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜒 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑦]𝜒))
20.35.5  Set Theory
Theorem	elnev 42026*	Any set that contains one element less than the universe is not equal to it. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴} ≠ V)
Theorem	rusbcALT 42027	A version of Russell's paradox which is proven using proper substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V
Theorem	compeq 42028*	Equality between two ways of saying "the complement of 𝐴". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	compne 42029	The complement of 𝐴 is not equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐴
Theorem	compab 42030	Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
Theorem	conss2 42031	Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐴))
Theorem	conss1 42032	Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (V ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ralbidar 42033	More general form of ralbida 3159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	rexbidar 42034	More general form of rexbida 3249. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	dropab1 42035	Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	dropab2 42036	Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	ipo0 42037	If the identity relation partially orders any class, then that class is the null class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ( I Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	ifr0 42038	A class that is founded by the identity relation is null. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ ( I Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	ordpss 42039	ordelpss 6293 with an antecedent removed. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	fvsb 42040*	Explicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → ([(𝐹‘𝐴) / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	fveqsb 42041*	Implicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	xpexb 42042	A Cartesian product exists iff its converse does. Corollary 6.9(1) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	trelpss 42043	An element of a transitive set is a proper subset of it. Theorem 7.2 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 35. Unlike tz7.2 5574, ax-reg 9329 is required for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴)
20.35.6  Arithmetic
Theorem	addcomgi 42044	Generalization of commutative law for addition. Simplifies proofs dealing with vectors. However, it is dependent on our particular definition of ordered pair. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)
20.35.7  Geometry
Syntax	cplusr 42045	Introduce the operation of vector addition.
class +𝑟
Syntax	cminusr 42046	Introduce the operation of vector subtraction.
class -𝑟
Syntax	ctimesr 42047	Introduce the operation of scalar multiplication.
class .𝑣
Syntax	cptdfc 42048	PtDf is a predicate that is crucial for the definition of lines as well as proving a number of important theorems.
class PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵)
Syntax	crr3c 42049	RR3 is a class.
class RR3
Syntax	cline3 42050	line3 is a class.
class line3
Definition	df-addr 42051*	Define the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ +𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) + (𝑦‘𝑣))))
Definition	df-subr 42052*	Define the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ -𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) − (𝑦‘𝑣))))
Definition	df-mulv 42053*	Define the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ .𝑣 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 · (𝑦‘𝑣))))
Theorem	addrval 42054*	Value of the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) + (𝐵‘𝑣))))
Theorem	subrval 42055*	Value of the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) − (𝐵‘𝑣))))
Theorem	mulvval 42056*	Value of the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴.𝑣𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝑣))))
Theorem	addrfv 42057	Vector addition at a value. The operation takes each vector 𝐴 and 𝐵 and forms a new vector whose values are the sum of each of the values of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴+𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) + (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	subrfv 42058	Vector subtraction at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴-𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) − (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	mulvfv 42059	Scalar multiplication at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴.𝑣𝐵)‘𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	addrfn 42060	Vector addition produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)
Theorem	subrfn 42061	Vector subtraction produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)
Theorem	mulvfn 42062	Scalar multiplication producees a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴.𝑣𝐵) Fn ℝ)
Theorem	addrcom 42063	Vector addition is commutative. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+𝑟𝐵) = (𝐵+𝑟𝐴))
Definition	df-ptdf 42064*	Define the predicate PtDf, which is a utility definition used to shorten definitions and simplify proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (((𝑥.𝑣(𝐵-𝑟𝐴)) +𝑣 𝐴) “ {1, 2, 3}))
Definition	df-rr3 42065	Define the set of all points RR3. We define each point 𝐴 as a function to allow the use of vector addition and subtraction as well as scalar multiplication in our proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ RR3 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2, 3})
Definition	df-line3 42066*	Define the set of all lines. A line is an infinite subset of RR3 that satisfies a PtDf property. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ line3 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 RR3 ∣ (2o ≼ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑦 → ran PtDf(𝑦, 𝑧) = 𝑥))}
20.36  Mathbox for Alan Sare We are sad to report the passing of long-time contributor Alan Sare (Nov. 9, 1954 - Mar. 23, 2019). Alan's first contribution to Metamath was a shorter proof for tfrlem8 8206 in 2008. He developed a tool called "completeusersproof" that assists developing proofs using his "virtual deduction" method: https://us.metamath.org/other.html#completeusersproof 8206. His virtual deduction method is explained in the comment for wvd1 42159. Below are some excerpts from his first emails to NM in 2007: ...I have been interested in proving set theory theorems for many years for mental exercise. I enjoy it. I have used a book by Martin Zuckerman. It is informal. I am interested in completely and perfectly proving theorems. Mr. Zuckerman leaves out most of the steps of a proof, of course, like most authors do, as you have noted. A complete proof for higher theorems would require a volume of writing similar to the Metamath documents. So I am frustrated when I am not capable of constructing a proof and Zuckerman leaves out steps I do not understand. I could search for the steps in other texts, but I don't do that too much. Metamath may be the answer for me.... ...If we go beyond mathematics, I believe that it is possible to write down all human knowledge in a way similar to the way you have explicated large areas of mathematics. Of course, that would be a much, much more difficult job. For example, it is possible to take a hard science like physics, construct axioms based on experimental results, and to cast all of physics into a collection of axioms and theorems. Maybe this has already been attempted, although I am not familiar with it. When one then moves on to the soft sciences such as social science, this job gets much more difficult. The key is: All human thought consists of logical operations on abstract objects. Usually, these logical operations are done informally. There is no reason why one cannot take any subject and explicate it and take it down to the indivisible postulates in a formal rigorous way.... ...When I read a math book or an engineering book I come across something I don't understand and I am compelled to understand it. But, often it is hopeless. I don't have the time. Or, I would have to read the same thing by multiple authors in the hope that different authors would give parts of the working proof that others have omitted. It is very inefficient. Because I have always been inclined to "get to the bottom" for a 100% fully understood proof....
20.36.1  Auxiliary theorems for the Virtual Deduction tool
Theorem	idiALT 42067	Placeholder for idi 1. Though unnecessary, this theorem is sometimes used in proofs in this mathbox for pedagogical purposes. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	exbir 42068	Exportation implication also converting the consequent from a biconditional to an implication. Derived automatically from exbirVD 42443. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	3impexpbicom 42069	Version of 3impexp 1357 where in addition the consequent is commuted. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))
Theorem	3impexpbicomi 42070	Inference associated with 3impexpbicom 42069. Derived automatically from 3impexpbicomiVD 42448. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))
20.36.2  Supplementary unification deductions
Theorem	bi1imp 42071	Importation inference similar to imp 407, except the outermost implication of the hypothesis is a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	bi2imp 42072	Importation inference similar to imp 407, except both implications of the hypothesis are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	bi3impb 42073	Similar to 3impb 1114 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi3impa 42074	Similar to 3impa 1109 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi23impib 42075	3impib 1115 with the inner implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi13impib 42076	3impib 1115 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi123impib 42077	3impib 1115 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi13impia 42078	3impia 1116 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi123impia 42079	3impia 1116 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi33imp12 42080	3imp 1110 with innermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi23imp13 42081	3imp 1110 with middle implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi13imp23 42082	3imp 1110 with outermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi13imp2 42083	Similar to 3imp 1110 except the outermost and innermost implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi12imp3 42084	Similar to 3imp 1110 except all but innermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi23imp1 42085	Similar to 3imp 1110 except all but outermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	bi123imp0 42086	Similar to 3imp 1110 except all implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	4animp1 42087	A single hypothesis unification deduction with an assertion which is an implication with a 4-right-nested conjunction antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
Theorem	4an31 42088	A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)
⊢ ((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
Theorem	4an4132 42089	A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)
⊢ ((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
Theorem	expcomdg 42090	Biconditional form of expcomd 417. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
20.36.3  Conventional Metamath proofs, some derived from VD proofs
Theorem	iidn3 42091	idn3 42205 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	ee222 42092	e222 42226 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 7-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂))
Theorem	ee3bir 42093	Right-biconditional form of e3 42327 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
Theorem	ee13 42094	e13 42338 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	ee121 42095	e121 42246 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))
Theorem	ee122 42096	e122 42243 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))
Theorem	ee333 42097	e333 42323 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))
Theorem	ee323 42098	e323 42356 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))
Theorem	3ornot23 42099	If the second and third disjuncts of a true triple disjunction are false, then the first disjunct is true. Automatically derived from 3ornot23VD 42437. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
Theorem	orbi1r 42100	orbi1 915 with order of disjuncts reversed. Derived from orbi1rVD 42438. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))