MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addscutlem Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addscutlem 27912
Description: Lemma for addscut 27913. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
addscutlem.1 (𝜑𝑋 No )
addscutlem.2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
Assertion
Ref Expression
addscutlem (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚   𝑋,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑡,𝑋,𝑠   𝑤,𝑋   𝑌,𝑙,𝑚   𝑌,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑡,𝑌   𝑤,𝑌   𝑝,𝑙,𝜑,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝜑,𝑚,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝜑,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑤,𝑝   𝜑,𝑡   𝜑,𝑤   𝑡,𝑞,𝑟   𝑤,𝑟

Proof of Theorem addscutlem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 addsprop 27911 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
21a1d 25 . . . 4 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
32rgen3 3193 . . 3 𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
43a1i 11 . 2 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
5 addscutlem.1 . 2 (𝜑𝑋 No )
6 addscutlem.2 . 2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
74, 5, 6addsproplem3 27906 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 394  w3a 1084   = wceq 1533  wcel 2098  {cab 2702  wral 3051  wrex 3060  cun 3937  {csn 4624   class class class wbr 5143  cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7416   +no cnadd 8684   No csur 27591   <s cslt 27592   bday cbday 27593   <<s csslt 27731   0s c0s 27773   L cleft 27790   R cright 27791   +s cadds 27894
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2696  ax-rep 5280  ax-sep 5294  ax-nul 5301  ax-pow 5359  ax-pr 5423  ax-un 7738
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3364  df-reu 3365  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3769  df-csb 3885  df-dif 3942  df-un 3944  df-in 3946  df-ss 3956  df-pss 3959  df-nul 4319  df-if 4525  df-pw 4600  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-tp 4629  df-op 4631  df-uni 4904  df-int 4945  df-iun 4993  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-mpt 5227  df-tr 5261  df-id 5570  df-eprel 5576  df-po 5584  df-so 5585  df-fr 5627  df-se 5628  df-we 5629  df-xp 5678  df-rel 5679  df-cnv 5680  df-co 5681  df-dm 5682  df-rn 5683  df-res 5684  df-ima 5685  df-pred 6300  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7372  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-1st 7991  df-2nd 7992  df-frecs 8285  df-wrecs 8316  df-recs 8390  df-1o 8485  df-2o 8486  df-nadd 8685  df-no 27594  df-slt 27595  df-bday 27596  df-sslt 27732  df-scut 27734  df-0s 27775  df-made 27792  df-old 27793  df-left 27795  df-right 27796  df-norec2 27884  df-adds 27895
This theorem is referenced by:  addscut  27913
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator