MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addscutlem Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addscutlem 28019
Description: Lemma for addscut 28020. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
addscutlem.1 (𝜑𝑋 No )
addscutlem.2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
Assertion
Ref Expression
addscutlem (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚   𝑋,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑡,𝑋,𝑠   𝑤,𝑋   𝑌,𝑙,𝑚   𝑌,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑡,𝑌   𝑤,𝑌   𝑝,𝑙,𝜑,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝜑,𝑚,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝜑,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑤,𝑝   𝜑,𝑡   𝜑,𝑤   𝑡,𝑞,𝑟   𝑤,𝑟

Proof of Theorem addscutlem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 addsprop 28018 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
21a1d 25 . . . 4 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
32rgen3 3206 . . 3 𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
43a1i 11 . 2 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
5 addscutlem.1 . 2 (𝜑𝑋 No )
6 addscutlem.2 . 2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
74, 5, 6addsproplem3 28013 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395  w3a 1087   = wceq 1537  wcel 2103  {cab 2711  wral 3063  wrex 3072  cun 3968  {csn 4648   class class class wbr 5169  cfv 6572  (class class class)co 7445   +no cnadd 8717   No csur 27693   <s cslt 27694   bday cbday 27695   <<s csslt 27834   0s c0s 27876   L cleft 27893   R cright 27894   +s cadds 28001
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2105  ax-9 2113  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2705  ax-rep 5306  ax-sep 5320  ax-nul 5327  ax-pow 5386  ax-pr 5450  ax-un 7766
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3064  df-rex 3073  df-rmo 3383  df-reu 3384  df-rab 3439  df-v 3484  df-sbc 3799  df-csb 3916  df-dif 3973  df-un 3975  df-in 3977  df-ss 3987  df-pss 3990  df-nul 4348  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-tp 4653  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-int 4973  df-iun 5021  df-br 5170  df-opab 5232  df-mpt 5253  df-tr 5287  df-id 5597  df-eprel 5603  df-po 5611  df-so 5612  df-fr 5654  df-se 5655  df-we 5656  df-xp 5705  df-rel 5706  df-cnv 5707  df-co 5708  df-dm 5709  df-rn 5710  df-res 5711  df-ima 5712  df-pred 6331  df-ord 6397  df-on 6398  df-suc 6400  df-iota 6524  df-fun 6574  df-fn 6575  df-f 6576  df-f1 6577  df-fo 6578  df-f1o 6579  df-fv 6580  df-riota 7401  df-ov 7448  df-oprab 7449  df-mpo 7450  df-1st 8026  df-2nd 8027  df-frecs 8318  df-wrecs 8349  df-recs 8423  df-1o 8518  df-2o 8519  df-nadd 8718  df-no 27696  df-slt 27697  df-bday 27698  df-sslt 27835  df-scut 27837  df-0s 27878  df-made 27895  df-old 27896  df-left 27898  df-right 27899  df-norec2 27991  df-adds 28002
This theorem is referenced by:  addscut  28020
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator