MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addscutlem Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addscutlem 27461
Description: Lemma for addscut 27462. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
addscutlem.1 (𝜑𝑋 No )
addscutlem.2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
Assertion
Ref Expression
addscutlem (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚   𝑋,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑡,𝑋,𝑠   𝑤,𝑋   𝑌,𝑙,𝑚   𝑌,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑡,𝑌   𝑤,𝑌   𝑝,𝑙,𝜑,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝜑,𝑚,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝜑,𝑝,𝑞,𝑟,𝑠   𝑤,𝑝   𝜑,𝑡   𝜑,𝑤   𝑡,𝑞,𝑟   𝑤,𝑟

Proof of Theorem addscutlem
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 addsprop 27460 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
21a1d 25 . . . 4 ((𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No ) → (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
32rgen3 3203 . . 3 𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥))))
43a1i 11 . 2 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 No 𝑦 No 𝑧 No (((( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑦)) ∪ (( bday 𝑥) +no ( bday 𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday 𝑌)) ∪ (( bday 𝑋) +no ( bday ‘ 0s ))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))
5 addscutlem.1 . 2 (𝜑𝑋 No )
6 addscutlem.2 . 2 (𝜑𝑌 No )
74, 5, 6addsproplem3 27455 1 (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 397  w3a 1088   = wceq 1542  wcel 2107  {cab 2710  wral 3062  wrex 3071  cun 3947  {csn 4629   class class class wbr 5149  cfv 6544  (class class class)co 7409   +no cnadd 8664   No csur 27143   <s cslt 27144   bday cbday 27145   <<s csslt 27282   0s c0s 27323   L cleft 27340   R cright 27341   +s cadds 27443
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-rep 5286  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7725
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3or 1089  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rmo 3377  df-reu 3378  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-csb 3895  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-pss 3968  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-tp 4634  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-int 4952  df-iun 5000  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-tr 5267  df-id 5575  df-eprel 5581  df-po 5589  df-so 5590  df-fr 5632  df-se 5633  df-we 5634  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-pred 6301  df-ord 6368  df-on 6369  df-suc 6371  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-f1 6549  df-fo 6550  df-f1o 6551  df-fv 6552  df-riota 7365  df-ov 7412  df-oprab 7413  df-mpo 7414  df-1st 7975  df-2nd 7976  df-frecs 8266  df-wrecs 8297  df-recs 8371  df-1o 8466  df-2o 8467  df-nadd 8665  df-no 27146  df-slt 27147  df-bday 27148  df-sslt 27283  df-scut 27285  df-0s 27325  df-made 27342  df-old 27343  df-left 27345  df-right 27346  df-norec2 27433  df-adds 27444
This theorem is referenced by:  addscut  27462
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator