Theorem elttcirr 37497

Description: Irreflexivity of 𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐵 relationship. This is a consequence of Regularity, but it does not require Transitive Containment. We use the alternative expression dfttc4 37496 to construct a set in which 𝐴 is both ∈-minimal and not ∈-minimal. (Contributed by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elttcirr	⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴

Proof of Theorem elttcirr

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2		inss2 4137	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑦
3		ssn0 4358	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
4	2, 3	mpan 703	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
5		zfreg 9617	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
6	1, 4, 5	sylancr 599	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
7		ineq1 4113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))
8	7	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9		ineq1 4113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦))
10	9	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	8, 10	rexraleqim 3604	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
12	6, 11	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
13		neneq 2965	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ → ¬ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
14	13	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
15	12, 14	pm2.65i 196	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))
16	15	nex 1833	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))
17		eqeq2 2775	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 = 𝐴))
18	17	imbi2d 343	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)))
19	18	ralbidv 3189	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)))
20	19	anbi2d 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))))
21	20	exbidv 1956	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))))
22		dfttc4 37496	. . . 4 ⊢ TC+ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥))}
23	21, 22	elab2g 3637	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))))
24	23	ibi 270	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴 → ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)))
25	16, 24	mto 200	1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900   ∩ cin 4092  ∅c0 4281  TC+ cttc 37452

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-reg 9613

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6322  df-ord 6383  df-on 6384  df-lim 6385  df-suc 6386  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-om 7902  df-2nd 8026  df-frecs 8327  df-wrecs 8358  df-recs 8407  df-rdg 8446  df-ttc 37453

This theorem is used by: (None)