Theorem elttcirr 36896

Description: Irreflexivity of 𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐵 relationship. This is a consequence of Regularity, but it does not require Transitive Containment. We use the alternative expression dfttc4 36895 to construct a set in which 𝐴 is both ∈-minimal and not ∈-minimal. (Contributed by Matthew House, 6-Apr-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elttcirr	⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴

Proof of Theorem elttcirr

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3459	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2		inss2 4190	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑦
3		ssn0 4359	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
4	2, 3	mpan 700	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
5		zfreg 9542	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
6	1, 4, 5	sylancr 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
7		ineq1 4166	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))
8	7	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑥 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9		ineq1 4166	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦))
10	9	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	8, 10	rexraleqim 3607	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
12	6, 11	sylan 589	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
13		neneq 2964	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ → ¬ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
14	13	adantr 484	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
15	12, 14	pm2.65i 195	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))
16	15	nex 1821	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))
17		eqeq2 2775	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 = 𝐴))
18	17	imbi2d 342	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)))
19	18	ralbidv 3186	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)))
20	19	anbi2d 639	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))))
21	20	exbidv 1942	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))))
22		dfttc4 36895	. . . 4 ⊢ TC+ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝑥))}
23	21, 22	elab2g 3640	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴))))
24	23	ibi 269	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴 → ∃𝑦((𝐴 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ → 𝑤 = 𝐴)))
25	16, 24	mto 199	1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ TC+ 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1561  ∃wex 1800   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087  Vcvv 3455   ∩ cin 3904   ⊆ wss 3905  ∅c0 4286  TC+ cttc 36851

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5228  ax-sep 5247  ax-nul 5257  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7718  ax-reg 9538

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3or 1100  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1564  df-fal 1574  df-ex 1801  df-nf 1805  df-sb 2092  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5102  df-opab 5164  df-mpt 5183  df-tr 5209  df-id 5543  df-eprel 5548  df-po 5556  df-so 5557  df-fr 5601  df-we 5603  df-xp 5654  df-rel 5655  df-cnv 5656  df-co 5657  df-dm 5658  df-rn 5659  df-res 5660  df-ima 5661  df-pred 6288  df-ord 6349  df-on 6350  df-lim 6351  df-suc 6352  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fn 6524  df-f 6525  df-f1 6526  df-fo 6527  df-f1o 6528  df-fv 6529  df-ov 7399  df-om 7847  df-2nd 7971  df-frecs 8262  df-wrecs 8293  df-recs 8342  df-rdg 8381  df-ttc 36852

This theorem is referenced by: (None)