![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 368 of 472) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-29705) |
![]() (29706-31228) |
![]() (31229-47147) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | idresssidinxp 36701 | Condition for the identity restriction to be a subclass of identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | idreseqidinxp 36702 | Condition for the identity restriction to be equal to the identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | extid 36703 | Property of identity relation, see also extep 36675, extssr 36903 and the comment of df-ssr 36892. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴]◡ I = [𝐵]◡ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | inxpss 36704* | Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | idinxpss 36705* | Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | ref5 36706* | Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | inxpss3 36707* | Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass (see also inxpss 36704). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | inxpss2 36708* | Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | inxpssidinxp 36709* | Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 36708. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | idinxpssinxp 36710* | Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 36708. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | idinxpssinxp2 36711* | Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | idinxpssinxp3 36712 | Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | idinxpssinxp4 36713* | Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product (see also idinxpssinxp2 36711). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥) | ||
Theorem | relcnveq3 36714* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | relcnveq 36715 | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | relcnveq2 36716* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | relcnveq4 36717* | Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | qsresid 36718 | Simplification of a special quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 / 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | n0elqs 36719 | Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | n0elqs2 36720 | Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ecex2 36721 | Condition for a coset to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-May-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | uniqsALTV 36722 | The union of a quotient set, like uniqs 8674 but with a weaker antecedent: only the restricion of 𝑅 by 𝐴 needs to be a set, not 𝑅 itself, see e.g. cnvepima 36730. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝑅 “ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | imaexALTV 36723 | Existence of an image of a class. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (cf. imaexg 7844) with weakened antecedent: only the restricion of 𝐴 by a set needs to be a set, not 𝐴 itself, see e.g. cnvepimaex 36729. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | ecexALTV 36724 | Existence of a coset, like ecexg 8610 but with a weaker antecedent: only the restricion of 𝑅 by the singleton of 𝐴 needs to be a set, not 𝑅 itself, see e.g. eccnvepex 36728. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴]𝑅 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | rnresequniqs 36725 | The range of a restriction is equal to the union of the quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-May-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | n0el2 36726 | Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jan-2018.) |
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cnvepresex 36727 | Sethood condition for the restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | eccnvepex 36728 | The converse epsilon coset exists. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ [𝐴]◡ E ∈ V | ||
Theorem | cnvepimaex 36729 | The image of converse epsilon exists, proof via imaexALTV 36723 (see also cnvepima 36730 and uniexg 7669 for alternate way). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | cnvepima 36730 | The image of converse epsilon. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | inex3 36731 | Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | inxpex 36732 | Sufficient condition for an intersection with a Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-May-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | eqres 36733 | Converting a class constant definition by restriction (like df-ers 37057 or df-parts 37159) into a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑆 ↾ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | brrabga 36734* | The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | brcnvrabga 36735* | The law of concretion for the converse of operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ◡{〈〈𝑦, 𝑧〉, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | opideq 36736 | Equality conditions for ordered pairs 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 and 〈𝐵, 𝐵〉. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Feb-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 = 〈𝐵, 𝐵〉 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iss2 36737 | A subclass of the identity relation is the intersection of identity relation with Cartesian product of the domain and range of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ∩ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | eldmcnv 36738* | Elementhood in a domain of a converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-May-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | dfrel5 36739 | Alternate definition of the relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Nov-2018.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | dfrel6 36740 | Alternate definition of the relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | cnvresrn 36741 | Converse restricted to range is converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (◡𝑅 ↾ ran 𝑅) = ◡𝑅 | ||
Theorem | relssinxpdmrn 36742 | Subset of restriction, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | cnvref4 36743 | Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Apr-2023.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | cnvref5 36744* | Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass of the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | ecin0 36745* | Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have no elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | ecinn0 36746* | Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have some elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | ineleq 36747* | Equivalence of restricted universal quantifications. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | inecmo 36748* | Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝐵]𝑅 ∩ [𝐶]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑧∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | inecmo2 36749* | Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | ineccnvmo 36750* | Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦) | ||
Theorem | alrmomorn 36751 | Equivalence of an "at most one" and an "at most one" restricted to the range inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦) | ||
Theorem | alrmomodm 36752* | Equivalence of an "at most one" and an "at most one" restricted to the domain inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | ineccnvmo2 36753* | Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the range and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥) | ||
Theorem | inecmo3 36754* | Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the domain and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | moeu2 36755 | Uniqueness is equivalent to non-existence or unique existence. Alternate definition of the at-most-one quantifier, in terms of the existential quantifier and the unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Nov-2024.) |
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃!𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | mopickr 36756 | "At most one" picks a variable value, eliminating an existential quantifier. The proof begins with references *2.21 (pm2.21 123) and *14.26 (eupickbi 2636) from [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104 and p. 183. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | moantr 36757 | Sufficient condition for transitivity of conjunctions inside existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜓 → ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | brabidgaw 36758* | The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5489. Version of brabidga 36759 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2370. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 2-Apr-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | brabidga 36759 | The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5489. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2370, see brabidgaw 36758 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | inxp2 36760* | Intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | opabf 36761 | A class abstraction of a collection of ordered pairs with a negated wff is the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2019.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2022.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ | ||
Theorem | ec0 36762 | The empty-coset of a class is the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-May-2019.) |
⊢ [𝐴]∅ = ∅ | ||
Theorem | 0qs 36763 | Quotient set with the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ (∅ / 𝑅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | brcnvin 36764 | Intersection with a converse, binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Mar-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝐴))) | ||
Definition | df-xrn 36765 | Define the range Cartesian product of two classes. Definition from [Holmes] p. 40. Membership in this class is characterized by xrnss3v 36766 and brxrn 36768. This is Scott Fenton's df-txp 34371 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 34371. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) = ((◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ 𝐴) ∩ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xrnss3v 36766 | A range Cartesian product is a subset of the class of ordered triples. This is Scott Fenton's txpss3v 34395 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 34395. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) ⊆ (V × (V × V)) | ||
Theorem | xrnrel 36767 | A range Cartesian product is a relation. This is Scott Fenton's txprel 34396 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 34396. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.) |
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | brxrn 36768 | Characterize a ternary relation over a range Cartesian product. Together with xrnss3v 36766, this characterizes elementhood in a range cross. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | brxrn2 36769* | A characterization of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | dfxrn2 36770* | Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑢〉 ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | xrneq1 36771 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | xrneq1i 36772 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | xrneq1d 36773 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | xrneq2 36774 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xrneq2i 36775 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | xrneq2d 36776 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | xrneq12 36777 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | xrneq12i 36778 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | xrneq12d 36779 | Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | elecxrn 36780* | Elementhood in the (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | ecxrn 36781* | The (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)}) | ||
Theorem | disjressuc2 36782* | Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))) | ||
Theorem | disjecxrn 36783 | Two ways of saying that (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-cosets are disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅))) | ||
Theorem | disjecxrncnvep 36784 | Two ways of saying that cosets are disjoint, special case of disjecxrn 36783. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))) | ||
Theorem | disjsuc2 36785* | Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))) | ||
Theorem | xrninxp 36786* | Intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) = ◡{〈〈𝑦, 𝑧〉, 𝑢〉 ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)〈𝑦, 𝑧〉))} | ||
Theorem | xrninxp2 36787* | Intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) = {〈𝑢, 𝑥〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑥))} | ||
Theorem | xrninxpex 36788 | Sufficient condition for the intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | inxpxrn 36789 | Two ways to express the intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⋉ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶))) = ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | br1cnvxrn2 36790* | The converse of a binary relation over a range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | elec1cnvxrn2 36791* | Elementhood in the converse range Cartesian product coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴]◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | rnxrn 36792* | Range of the range Cartesian product of classes. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Jun-2020.) |
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | rnxrnres 36793* | Range of a range Cartesian product with a restricted relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | rnxrncnvepres 36794* | Range of a range Cartesian product with a restriction of the converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | rnxrnidres 36795* | Range of a range Cartesian product with a restriction of the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Dec-2021.) |
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | xrnres 36796 | Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product, see also xrnres2 36797, xrnres3 36798. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⋉ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | xrnres2 36797 | Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product, see also xrnres 36796, xrnres3 36798. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xrnres3 36798 | Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product, see also xrnres 36796, xrnres2 36797. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xrnres4 36799 | Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) × ran (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))) | ||
Theorem | xrnresex 36800 | Sufficient condition for a restricted range Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ V) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |