Theorem noxpordpred 28155

Description: Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
noxpord.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
noxpord.2	⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noxpordpred	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑎,𝑏,𝐴   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝑆(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem noxpordpred

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noxpord.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}
2	1	xpord2pred 8137	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
3		noxpord.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
4	3	lrrecpred 28146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
5	4	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
6	5	uneq1d 4121	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}))
7	3	lrrecpred 28146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
8	7	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
9	8	uneq1d 4121	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) = ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵}))
10	6, 9	xpeq12d 5692	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) = (((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})))
11	10	difeq1d 4080	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
12	2, 11	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ≠ wne 2958   ∖ cdif 3902   ∪ cun 3903  {csn 4589  ⟨cop 4595   class class class wbr 5109  {copab 5173   × cxp 5659  Predcpred 6301  ‘cfv 6536  1^st c1st 7980  2^nd c2nd 7981   No csur 27813   L cleft 28027   R cright 28028

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-tp 4594  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-int 4913  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-tr 5219  df-id 5556  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-we 5616  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-pred 6302  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-frecs 8274  df-wrecs 8305  df-recs 8354  df-1o 8449  df-2o 8450  df-no 27816  df-lts 27817  df-bday 27818  df-slts 27960  df-cuts 27962  df-made 28029  df-old 28030  df-left 28032  df-right 28033

This theorem is used by:  norec2ov  28159