Theorem noxpordpred 28114

Description: Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
noxpord.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
noxpord.2	⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noxpordpred	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑎,𝑏,𝐴   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑎,𝑏)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem noxpordpred

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noxpord.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}
2	1	xpord2pred 8143	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
3		noxpord.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
4	3	lrrecpred 28105	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
5	4	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
6	5	uneq1d 4129	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}))
7	3	lrrecpred 28105	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
8	7	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
9	8	uneq1d 4129	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) = ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵}))
10	6, 9	xpeq12d 5695	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) = (((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})))
11	10	difeq1d 4088	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
12	2, 11	eqtrd 2804	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149   ≠ wne 2964   ∖ cdif 3910   ∪ cun 3911  {csn 4594  ⟨cop 4600   class class class wbr 5113  {copab 5177   × cxp 5662  Predcpred 6304  ‘cfv 6539  1^st c1st 7986  2^nd c2nd 7987   No csur 27772   L cleft 27986   R cright 27987

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5242  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5273  ax-pow 5339  ax-pr 5407  ax-un 7735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-tp 4599  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-int 4917  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-tr 5223  df-id 5559  df-eprel 5564  df-po 5572  df-so 5573  df-fr 5617  df-we 5619  df-xp 5670  df-rel 5671  df-cnv 5672  df-co 5673  df-dm 5674  df-rn 5675  df-res 5676  df-ima 5677  df-pred 6305  df-ord 6366  df-on 6367  df-suc 6369  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-riota 7370  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-1st 7988  df-2nd 7989  df-frecs 8280  df-wrecs 8311  df-recs 8360  df-1o 8455  df-2o 8456  df-no 27775  df-lts 27776  df-bday 27777  df-slts 27919  df-cuts 27921  df-made 27988  df-old 27989  df-left 27991  df-right 27992

This theorem is referenced by:  norec2ov  28118