Theorem noxpordpred 28214

Description: Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
noxpord.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
noxpord.2	⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noxpordpred	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑎,𝑏,𝐴   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑎, 𝑏)   𝑆(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem noxpordpred

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noxpord.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}
2	1	xpord2pred 8146	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
3		noxpord.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
4	3	lrrecpred 28205	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
5	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
6	5	uneq1d 4117	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}))
7	3	lrrecpred 28205	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
8	7	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
9	8	uneq1d 4117	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) = ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵}))
10	6, 9	xpeq12d 5690	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) = (((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})))
11	10	difeq1d 4076	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
12	2, 11	eqtrd 2797	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2957   ∖ cdif 3899   ∪ cun 3900  {csn 4587  ⟨cop 4593   class class class wbr 5107  {copab 5171   × cxp 5657  Predcpred 6302  ‘cfv 6537  1^st c1st 7987  2^nd c2nd 7988   No csur 27872   L cleft 28086   R cright 28087

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-tp 4592  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7373  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-1st 7989  df-2nd 7990  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-1o 8458  df-2o 8459  df-no 27875  df-lts 27876  df-bday 27877  df-slts 28019  df-cuts 28021  df-made 28088  df-old 28089  df-left 28091  df-right 28092

This theorem is used by:  norec2ov  28218