Theorem noxpordpred 34037

Description: Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
noxpord.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
noxpord.2	⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noxpordpred	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑎,𝑏,𝐴   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑎,𝑏)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem noxpordpred

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noxpord.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}
2	1	xpord2pred 33719	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
3		noxpord.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}
4	3	lrrecpred 34028	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
5	4	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) = (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))
6	5	uneq1d 4092	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}))
7	3	lrrecpred 34028	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
8	7	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) = (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))
9	8	uneq1d 4092	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵}) = ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵}))
10	6, 9	xpeq12d 5611	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) = (((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})))
11	10	difeq1d 4052	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (((Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) × (Pred(𝑅, No , 𝐵) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
12	2, 11	eqtrd 2778	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 843   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942   ∖ cdif 3880   ∪ cun 3881  {csn 4558  ⟨cop 4564   class class class wbr 5070  {copab 5132   × cxp 5578  Predcpred 6190  ‘cfv 6418  1^st c1st 7802  2^nd c2nd 7803   No csur 33770   L cleft 33956   R cright 33957

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-pss 3902  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-tp 4563  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-int 4877  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-tr 5188  df-id 5480  df-eprel 5486  df-po 5494  df-so 5495  df-fr 5535  df-we 5537  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-pred 6191  df-ord 6254  df-on 6255  df-suc 6257  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-riota 7212  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-frecs 8068  df-wrecs 8099  df-recs 8173  df-1o 8267  df-2o 8268  df-no 33773  df-slt 33774  df-bday 33775  df-sslt 33903  df-scut 33905  df-made 33958  df-old 33959  df-left 33961  df-right 33962

This theorem is referenced by:  norec2ov  34041