Theorem axdc 10527

Description: This theorem derives ax-dc 10452 using ax-ac 10465 and ax-inf 9621. Thus, AC implies DC, but not vice-versa (so that ZFC is strictly stronger than ZF+DC). (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc	⊢ ((∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 ∧ ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥) → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛))

Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑛,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem axdc

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑔 𝑢 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq2 5111	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑢𝑥𝑤 ↔ 𝑢𝑥𝑧))
2	1	cbvabv 2832	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑧}
3		breq1 5110	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (𝑢𝑥𝑧 ↔ 𝑣𝑥𝑧))
4	3	abbidv 2828	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → {𝑧 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑧} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})
5	2, 4	eqtrid 2809	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})
6	5	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤}) = (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧}))
7	6	cbvmptv 5213	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧}))
8		rdgeq1 8404	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})) → rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) = rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) = rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦)
10	9	reseq1i 5972	. . . 4 ⊢ (rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦) ↾ ω)
11	10	axdclem2 10526	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 → (ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥 → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛)))
12	11	exlimiv 1963	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 → (ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥 → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛)))
13	12	imp 412	1 ⊢ ((∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 ∧ ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥) → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  {cab 2740  ∀wral 3078  Vcvv 3453   ⊆ wss 3902   class class class wbr 5107   ↦ cmpt 5190  dom cdm 5659  ran crn 5660   ↾ cres 5661  suc csuc 6363  ‘cfv 6537  ωcom 7866  reccrdg 8402

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740  ax-inf2 9624  ax-ac2 10469

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7420  df-om 7867  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-ac 10123

This theorem is used by: (None)