Theorem axdc 10580

Description: This theorem derives ax-dc 10505 using ax-ac 10518 and ax-inf 9623. Thus, AC implies DC, but not vice-versa (so that ZFC is strictly stronger than ZF+DC). (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc	⊢ ((∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 ∧ ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥) → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛))

Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑛,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem axdc

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑔 𝑢 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑢𝑥𝑤 ↔ 𝑢𝑥𝑧))
2	1	cbvabv 2831	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑧}
3		breq1 5106	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (𝑢𝑥𝑧 ↔ 𝑣𝑥𝑧))
4	3	abbidv 2827	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → {𝑧 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑧} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})
5	2, 4	eqtrid 2808	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})
6	5	fveq2d 6881	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤}) = (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧}))
7	6	cbvmptv 5209	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧}))
8		rdgeq1 8403	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})) → rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) = rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) = rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦)
10	9	reseq1i 5966	. . . 4 ⊢ (rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦) ↾ ω)
11	10	axdclem2 10579	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 → (ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥 → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛)))
12	11	exlimiv 1963	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 → (ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥 → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛)))
13	12	imp 412	1 ⊢ ((∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 ∧ ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥) → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  {cab 2739  ∀wral 3077  Vcvv 3451   ⊆ wss 3899   class class class wbr 5103   ↦ cmpt 5186  dom cdm 5651  ran crn 5652   ↾ cres 5653  suc csuc 6357  ‘cfv 6531  ωcom 7866  reccrdg 8401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740  ax-inf2 9626  ax-ac2 10522

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6297  df-ord 6358  df-on 6359  df-lim 6360  df-suc 6361  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-ov 7415  df-om 7867  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-ac 10176

This theorem is used by: (None)