Theorem axdc 10523

Description: This theorem derives ax-dc 10448 using ax-ac 10461 and ax-inf 9617. Thus, AC implies DC, but not vice-versa (so that ZFC is strictly stronger than ZF+DC). (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc	⊢ ((∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 ∧ ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥) → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛))

Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑛,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem axdc

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑔 𝑢 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq2 5118	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑢𝑥𝑤 ↔ 𝑢𝑥𝑧))
2	1	cbvabv 2836	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑧}
3		breq1 5117	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (𝑢𝑥𝑧 ↔ 𝑣𝑥𝑧))
4	3	abbidv 2832	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → {𝑧 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑧} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})
5	2, 4	eqtrid 2813	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})
6	5	fveq2d 6892	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤}) = (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧}))
7	6	cbvmptv 5220	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧}))
8		rdgeq1 8407	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})) → rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) = rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) = rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦)
10	9	reseq1i 5979	. . . 4 ⊢ (rec((𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑤 ∣ 𝑢𝑥𝑤})), 𝑦) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘{𝑧 ∣ 𝑣𝑥𝑧})), 𝑦) ↾ ω)
11	10	axdclem2 10522	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 → (ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥 → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛)))
12	11	exlimiv 1963	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 → (ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥 → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛)))
13	12	imp 412	1 ⊢ ((∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑦𝑥𝑧 ∧ ran 𝑥 ⊆ dom 𝑥) → ∃𝑓∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑛)𝑥(𝑓‘suc 𝑛))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812  {cab 2744  ∀wral 3082  Vcvv 3458   ⊆ wss 3908   class class class wbr 5114   ↦ cmpt 5197  dom cdm 5666  ran crn 5667   ↾ cres 5668  suc csuc 6369  ‘cfv 6543  ωcom 7871  reccrdg 8405

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745  ax-inf2 9620  ax-ac2 10465

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-pss 3928  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-tr 5224  df-id 5561  df-eprel 5566  df-po 5574  df-so 5575  df-fr 5619  df-we 5621  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-pred 6309  df-ord 6370  df-on 6371  df-lim 6372  df-suc 6373  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-om 7872  df-2nd 7996  df-frecs 8287  df-wrecs 8318  df-recs 8367  df-rdg 8406  df-ac 10119

This theorem is used by: (None)