Theorem lcmval 16519

Description: Value of the lcm operator. (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) is the least common multiple of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If either 𝑀 or 𝑁 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 16422 and gcdval 16423. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lcmval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem lcmval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	orbi1d 916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq1 5101	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑛))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)))
5	4	rabbidv 3406	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)})
6	5	infeq1d 9381	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4506	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2740	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	orbi2d 915	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq1 5101	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛))
11	10	anbi2d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)))
12	11	rabbidv 3406	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)})
13	12	infeq1d 9381	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4506	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-lcm 16517	. 2 ⊢ lcm = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11126	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11213	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	infex 9398	. . 3 ⊢ inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4530	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7518	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  {crab 3399  ifcif 4479   class class class wbr 5098  (class class class)co 7358  infcinf 9344  ℝcr 11025  0cc0 11026   < clt 11166  ℕcn 12145  ℤcz 12488   ∥ cdvds 16179   lcm clcm 16515

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680  ax-resscn 11083  ax-1cn 11084  ax-icn 11085  ax-addcl 11086  ax-mulcl 11088  ax-i2m1 11094  ax-pre-lttri 11100  ax-pre-lttrn 11101

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-nel 3037  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-id 5519  df-po 5532  df-so 5533  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-er 8635  df-en 8884  df-dom 8885  df-sdom 8886  df-sup 9345  df-inf 9346  df-pnf 11168  df-mnf 11169  df-ltxr 11171  df-lcm 16517

This theorem is referenced by:  lcmcom  16520  lcm0val  16521  lcmn0val  16522  lcmass  16541  lcmfpr  16554