Theorem lcmval 16747

Description: Value of the lcm operator. (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) is the least common multiple of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If either 𝑀 or 𝑁 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 16645 and gcdval 16646. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lcmval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem lcmval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	orbi1d 930	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq1 5106	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑛))
4	3	anbi1d 643	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)))
5	4	rabbidv 3420	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)})
6	5	infeq1d 9454	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4509	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	orbi2d 929	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq1 5106	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛))
11	10	anbi2d 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)))
12	11	rabbidv 3420	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)})
13	12	infeq1d 9454	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4509	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-lcm 16745	. 2 ⊢ lcm = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11281	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11371	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	infex 9471	. . 3 ⊢ inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4533	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7572	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3413  ifcif 4482   class class class wbr 5103  (class class class)co 7412  infcinf 9417  ℝcr 11180  0cc0 11181   < clt 11324  ℕcn 12316  ℤcz 12674   ∥ cdvds 16402   lcm clcm 16743

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740  ax-resscn 11238  ax-1cn 11239  ax-icn 11240  ax-addcl 11241  ax-mulcl 11243  ax-i2m1 11249  ax-pre-lttri 11255  ax-pre-lttrn 11256

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-nel 3063  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-er 8701  df-en 8958  df-dom 8959  df-sdom 8960  df-sup 9418  df-inf 9419  df-pnf 11326  df-mnf 11327  df-ltxr 11329  df-lcm 16745

This theorem is used by:  lcmcom  16748  lcm0val  16749  lcmn0val  16750  lcmass  16769  lcmfpr  16782