Theorem lcmval 16796

Description: Value of the lcm operator. (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) is the least common multiple of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If either 𝑀 or 𝑁 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 16694 and gcdval 16695. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lcmval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem lcmval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	orbi1d 930	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq1 5109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑛))
4	3	anbi1d 643	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)))
5	4	rabbidv 3423	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)})
6	5	infeq1d 9497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4512	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	orbi2d 929	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq1 5109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛))
11	10	anbi2d 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)))
12	11	rabbidv 3423	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)})
13	12	infeq1d 9497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4512	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-lcm 16794	. 2 ⊢ lcm = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11327	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11417	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	infex 9514	. . 3 ⊢ inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4536	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7604	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {crab 3416  ifcif 4485   class class class wbr 5106  (class class class)co 7443  infcinf 9460  ℝcr 11226  0cc0 11227   < clt 11370  ℕcn 12362  ℤcz 12720   ∥ cdvds 16451   lcm clcm 16792

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-resscn 11284  ax-1cn 11285  ax-icn 11286  ax-addcl 11287  ax-mulcl 11289  ax-i2m1 11295  ax-pre-lttri 11301  ax-pre-lttrn 11302

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-er 8745  df-en 9002  df-dom 9003  df-sdom 9004  df-sup 9461  df-inf 9462  df-pnf 11372  df-mnf 11373  df-ltxr 11375  df-lcm 16794

This theorem is used by:  lcmcom  16797  lcm0val  16798  lcmn0val  16799  lcmass  16818  lcmfpr  16831