Theorem lcmval 16562

Description: Value of the lcm operator. (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) is the least common multiple of 𝑀 and 𝑁. If either 𝑀 or 𝑁 is 0, the result is defined conventionally as 0. Contrast with df-gcd 16465 and gcdval 16466. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 20-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Sep-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lcmval	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝑀   𝑛,𝑁

Proof of Theorem lcmval

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 = 0 ↔ 𝑀 = 0))
2	1	orbi1d 916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0)))
3		breq1 5110	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑀 ∥ 𝑛))
4	3	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → ((𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)))
5	4	rabbidv 3413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)})
6	5	infeq1d 9429	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
7	2, 6	ifbieq2d 4515	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑀 → if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
8		eqeq1 2733	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 = 0 ↔ 𝑁 = 0))
9	8	orbi2d 915	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0) ↔ (𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0)))
10		breq1 5110	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → (𝑦 ∥ 𝑛 ↔ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛))
11	10	anbi2d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛) ↔ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)))
12	11	rabbidv 3413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)} = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)})
13	12	infeq1d 9429	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ))
14	9, 13	ifbieq2d 4515	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑁 → if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
15		df-lcm 16560	. 2 ⊢ lcm = (𝑥 ∈ ℤ, 𝑦 ∈ ℤ ↦ if((𝑥 = 0 ∨ 𝑦 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑥 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))
16		c0ex 11168	. . 3 ⊢ 0 ∈ V
17		ltso 11254	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ
18	17	infex 9446	. . 3 ⊢ inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < ) ∈ V
19	16, 18	ifex 4539	. 2 ⊢ if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )) ∈ V
20	7, 14, 15, 19	ovmpo 7549	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 lcm 𝑁) = if((𝑀 = 0 ∨ 𝑁 = 0), 0, inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝑀 ∥ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑁 ∥ 𝑛)}, ℝ, < )))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {crab 3405  ifcif 4488   class class class wbr 5107  (class class class)co 7387  infcinf 9392  ℝcr 11067  0cc0 11068   < clt 11208  ℕcn 12186  ℤcz 12529   ∥ cdvds 16222   lcm clcm 16558

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711  ax-resscn 11125  ax-1cn 11126  ax-icn 11127  ax-addcl 11128  ax-mulcl 11130  ax-i2m1 11136  ax-pre-lttri 11142  ax-pre-lttrn 11143

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-nel 3030  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3354  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-oprab 7391  df-mpo 7392  df-er 8671  df-en 8919  df-dom 8920  df-sdom 8921  df-sup 9393  df-inf 9394  df-pnf 11210  df-mnf 11211  df-ltxr 11213  df-lcm 16560

This theorem is referenced by:  lcmcom  16563  lcm0val  16564  lcmn0val  16565  lcmass  16584  lcmfpr  16597