Theorem sltsbday 27913

Description: Birthday comparison rule for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2026.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sltsbday.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))
sltsbday.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
sltsbday.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s {𝐵})
sltsbday.4	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sltsbday	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Proof of Theorem sltsbday

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sltsbday.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))
2	1	fveq2d 6838	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)))
3		sltsbday.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s {𝐵})
4		sltsbday.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)
5		sltsbday.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
6	5	snn0d 4732	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} ≠ ∅)
7		sltstr 27783	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐿 <<s {𝐵} ∧ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅 ∧ {𝐵} ≠ ∅) → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)
8	3, 4, 6, 7	syl3anc 1373	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)
9		cutbday 27780	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐿 <<s 𝑅 → ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
10	8, 9	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
11		bdayfn 27745	. . . . 5 ⊢ bday Fn No
12		ssrab2 4032	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)} ⊆ No
13		sneq 4590	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → {𝑥} = {𝐵})
14	13	breq2d 5110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ↔ 𝐿 <<s {𝐵}))
15	13	breq1d 5108	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → ({𝑥} <<s 𝑅 ↔ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅))
16	14, 15	anbi12d 632	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → ((𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅) ↔ (𝐿 <<s {𝐵} ∧ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)))
17	3, 4	jca 511	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 <<s {𝐵} ∧ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅))
18	16, 5, 17	elrabd 3648	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)})
19		fnfvima 7179	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( bday Fn No ∧ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)} ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
20	11, 12, 18, 19	mp3an12i 1467	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
21		intss1 4918	. . . 4 ⊢ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) → ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))
22	20, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))
23	10, 22	eqsstrd 3968	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))
24	2, 23	eqsstrd 3968	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113   ≠ wne 2932  {crab 3399   ⊆ wss 3901  ∅c0 4285  {csn 4580  ∩ cint 4902   class class class wbr 5098   “ cima 5627   Fn wfn 6487  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7358   No csur 27607   bday cbday 27609   <<s cslts 27753   |s ccuts 27755

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5224  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-pss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-tp 4585  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-int 4903  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-tr 5206  df-id 5519  df-eprel 5524  df-po 5532  df-so 5533  df-fr 5577  df-we 5579  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-suc 6323  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-riota 7315  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-1o 8397  df-2o 8398  df-no 27610  df-lts 27611  df-bday 27612  df-slts 27754  df-cuts 27756

This theorem is referenced by:  bdayfinbndlem1  28463