Theorem sltsbday 27925

Description: Birthday comparison rule for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2026.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sltsbday.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))
sltsbday.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
sltsbday.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s {𝐵})
sltsbday.4	⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sltsbday	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Proof of Theorem sltsbday

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sltsbday.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))
2	1	fveq2d 6846	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)))
3		sltsbday.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s {𝐵})
4		sltsbday.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)
5		sltsbday.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
6	5	snn0d 4734	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} ≠ ∅)
7		sltstr 27795	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐿 <<s {𝐵} ∧ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅 ∧ {𝐵} ≠ ∅) → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)
8	3, 4, 6, 7	syl3anc 1374	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)
9		cutbday 27792	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐿 <<s 𝑅 → ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
10	8, 9	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
11		bdayfn 27757	. . . . 5 ⊢ bday Fn No
12		ssrab2 4034	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)} ⊆ No
13		sneq 4592	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → {𝑥} = {𝐵})
14	13	breq2d 5112	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ↔ 𝐿 <<s {𝐵}))
15	13	breq1d 5110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → ({𝑥} <<s 𝑅 ↔ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅))
16	14, 15	anbi12d 633	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → ((𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅) ↔ (𝐿 <<s {𝐵} ∧ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)))
17	3, 4	jca 511	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿 <<s {𝐵} ∧ {𝐵} <<s 𝑅))
18	16, 5, 17	elrabd 3650	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)})
19		fnfvima 7189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( bday Fn No ∧ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)} ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
20	11, 12, 18, 19	mp3an12i 1468	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}))
21		intss1 4920	. . . 4 ⊢ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) → ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))
22	20, 21	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ ( bday “ {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (𝐿 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝑅)}) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))
23	10, 22	eqsstrd 3970	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘(𝐿 |s 𝑅)) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))
24	2, 23	eqsstrd 3970	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2933  {crab 3401   ⊆ wss 3903  ∅c0 4287  {csn 4582  ∩ cint 4904   class class class wbr 5100   “ cima 5635   Fn wfn 6495  ‘cfv 6500  (class class class)co 7368   No csur 27619   bday cbday 27621   <<s cslts 27765   |s ccuts 27767

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pow 5312  ax-pr 5379  ax-un 7690

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3352  df-reu 3353  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-pss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-tp 4587  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-int 4905  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-tr 5208  df-id 5527  df-eprel 5532  df-po 5540  df-so 5541  df-fr 5585  df-we 5587  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-res 5644  df-ima 5645  df-ord 6328  df-on 6329  df-suc 6331  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fn 6503  df-f 6504  df-f1 6505  df-fo 6506  df-f1o 6507  df-fv 6508  df-riota 7325  df-ov 7371  df-oprab 7372  df-mpo 7373  df-1o 8407  df-2o 8408  df-no 27622  df-lts 27623  df-bday 27624  df-slts 27766  df-cuts 27768

This theorem is referenced by:  bdayfinbndlem1  28475