Theorem unfilem2 9262

Description: Lemma for proving that the union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unfilem1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
unfilem1.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
unfilem1.3	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unfilem2	⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem unfilem2

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7443	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑥) ∈ V
2		unfilem1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))
3	1, 2	fnmpti 6678	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵
4		unfilem1.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
5		unfilem1.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
6	4, 5, 2	unfilem1 9261	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
7		df-fo 6542	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
8	3, 6, 7	mpbir2an 723	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
9		fof 6792	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
11		oveq2 7418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
12		ovex 7443	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) ∈ V
13	11, 2, 12	fvmpt 6989	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
14		oveq2 7418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
15		ovex 7443	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ∈ V
16	14, 2, 15	fvmpt 6989	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
17	13, 16	eqeqan12d 2777	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤)))
18		elnn 7869	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
19	5, 18	mpan2 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
20		elnn 7869	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
21	5, 20	mpan2 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
22		nnacan 8610	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
23	4, 19, 21, 22	mp3an3an 1496	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
24	17, 23	bitrd 282	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
25	24	biimpd 232	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤))
26	25	rgen2 3205	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)
27		dff13 7252	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)))
28	10, 26, 27	mpbir2an 723	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
29		df-f1o 6543	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
30	28, 8, 29	mpbir2an 723	1 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079   ∖ cdif 3902   ↦ cmpt 5192  ran crn 5662   Fn wfn 6531  ⟶wf 6532  –1-1→wf1 6533  –onto→wfo 6534  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  ωcom 7858   +_o coa 8446

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-int 4913  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-tr 5219  df-id 5556  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-we 5616  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-pred 6302  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-om 7859  df-2nd 7983  df-frecs 8274  df-wrecs 8305  df-recs 8354  df-rdg 8393  df-oadd 8453

This theorem is referenced by:  unfilem3  9263