Theorem unfilem2 9265

Description: Lemma for proving that the union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unfilem1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
unfilem1.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
unfilem1.3	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unfilem2	⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem unfilem2

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7444	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑥) ∈ V
2		unfilem1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))
3	1, 2	fnmpti 6679	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵
4		unfilem1.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
5		unfilem1.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
6	4, 5, 2	unfilem1 9264	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
7		df-fo 6543	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
8	3, 6, 7	mpbir2an 723	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
9		fof 6793	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
11		oveq2 7419	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
12		ovex 7444	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) ∈ V
13	11, 2, 12	fvmpt 6990	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
14		oveq2 7419	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
15		ovex 7444	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ∈ V
16	14, 2, 15	fvmpt 6990	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
17	13, 16	eqeqan12d 2783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤)))
18		elnn 7872	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
19	5, 18	mpan2 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
20		elnn 7872	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
21	5, 20	mpan2 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
22		nnacan 8613	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
23	4, 19, 21, 22	mp3an3an 1493	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
24	17, 23	bitrd 282	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
25	24	biimpd 232	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤))
26	25	rgen2 3211	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)
27		dff13 7253	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)))
28	10, 26, 27	mpbir2an 723	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
29		df-f1o 6544	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
30	28, 8, 29	mpbir2an 723	1 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085   ∖ cdif 3910   ↦ cmpt 5196  ran crn 5663   Fn wfn 6532  ⟶wf 6533  –1-1→wf1 6534  –onto→wfo 6535  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6536  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411  ωcom 7861   +_o coa 8449

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-int 4917  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-tr 5223  df-id 5557  df-eprel 5562  df-po 5570  df-so 5571  df-fr 5615  df-we 5617  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-om 7862  df-2nd 7986  df-frecs 8277  df-wrecs 8308  df-recs 8357  df-rdg 8396  df-oadd 8456

This theorem is referenced by:  unfilem3  9266