Theorem unfilem2 9261

Description: Lemma for proving that the union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unfilem1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
unfilem1.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
unfilem1.3	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unfilem2	⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem unfilem2

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7422	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑥) ∈ V
2		unfilem1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))
3	1, 2	fnmpti 6663	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵
4		unfilem1.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
5		unfilem1.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
6	4, 5, 2	unfilem1 9260	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
7		df-fo 6519	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
8	3, 6, 7	mpbir2an 711	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
9		fof 6774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
11		oveq2 7397	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
12		ovex 7422	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) ∈ V
13	11, 2, 12	fvmpt 6970	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
14		oveq2 7397	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
15		ovex 7422	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ∈ V
16	14, 2, 15	fvmpt 6970	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
17	13, 16	eqeqan12d 2744	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤)))
18		elnn 7855	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
19	5, 18	mpan2 691	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
20		elnn 7855	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
21	5, 20	mpan2 691	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
22		nnacan 8594	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
23	4, 19, 21, 22	mp3an3an 1469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
24	17, 23	bitrd 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
25	24	biimpd 229	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤))
26	25	rgen2 3178	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)
27		dff13 7231	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)))
28	10, 26, 27	mpbir2an 711	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
29		df-f1o 6520	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
30	28, 8, 29	mpbir2an 711	1 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3045   ∖ cdif 3913   ↦ cmpt 5190  ran crn 5641   Fn wfn 6508  ⟶wf 6509  –1-1→wf1 6510  –onto→wfo 6511  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6512  ‘cfv 6513  (class class class)co 7389  ωcom 7844   +_o coa 8433

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-reu 3357  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3756  df-csb 3865  df-dif 3919  df-un 3921  df-in 3923  df-ss 3933  df-pss 3936  df-nul 4299  df-if 4491  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-int 4913  df-iun 4959  df-br 5110  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5535  df-eprel 5540  df-po 5548  df-so 5549  df-fr 5593  df-we 5595  df-xp 5646  df-rel 5647  df-cnv 5648  df-co 5649  df-dm 5650  df-rn 5651  df-res 5652  df-ima 5653  df-pred 6276  df-ord 6337  df-on 6338  df-lim 6339  df-suc 6340  df-iota 6466  df-fun 6515  df-fn 6516  df-f 6517  df-f1 6518  df-fo 6519  df-f1o 6520  df-fv 6521  df-ov 7392  df-oprab 7393  df-mpo 7394  df-om 7845  df-2nd 7971  df-frecs 8262  df-wrecs 8293  df-recs 8342  df-rdg 8380  df-oadd 8440

This theorem is referenced by:  unfilem3  9262