Theorem unfilem2 9255

Description: Lemma for proving that the union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
unfilem1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
unfilem1.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
unfilem1.3	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unfilem2	⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem unfilem2

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑥) ∈ V
2		unfilem1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐴 +o 𝑥))
3	1, 2	fnmpti 6661	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵
4		unfilem1.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω
5		unfilem1.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω
6	4, 5, 2	unfilem1 9254	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
7		df-fo 6517	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 = ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
8	3, 6, 7	mpbir2an 711	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
9		fof 6772	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
11		oveq2 7395	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
12		ovex 7420	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) ∈ V
13	11, 2, 12	fvmpt 6968	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑧))
14		oveq2 7395	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝐴 +o 𝑥) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
15		ovex 7420	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ∈ V
16	14, 2, 15	fvmpt 6968	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤))
17	13, 16	eqeqan12d 2743	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤)))
18		elnn 7853	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
19	5, 18	mpan2 691	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑧 ∈ ω)
20		elnn 7853	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
21	5, 20	mpan2 691	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑤 ∈ ω)
22		nnacan 8592	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
23	4, 19, 21, 22	mp3an3an 1469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 +o 𝑧) = (𝐴 +o 𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
24	17, 23	bitrd 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑤))
25	24	biimpd 229	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤))
26	25	rgen2 3177	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)
27		dff13 7229	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑤) → 𝑧 = 𝑤)))
28	10, 26, 27	mpbir2an 711	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)
29		df-f1o 6518	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵–1-1→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)))
30	28, 8, 29	mpbir2an 711	1 ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∖ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044   ∖ cdif 3911   ↦ cmpt 5188  ran crn 5639   Fn wfn 6506  ⟶wf 6507  –1-1→wf1 6508  –onto→wfo 6509  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6510  ‘cfv 6511  (class class class)co 7387  ωcom 7842   +_o coa 8431

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-pss 3934  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-int 4911  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-tr 5215  df-id 5533  df-eprel 5538  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-we 5593  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-pred 6274  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336  df-lim 6337  df-suc 6338  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-oprab 7391  df-mpo 7392  df-om 7843  df-2nd 7969  df-frecs 8260  df-wrecs 8291  df-recs 8340  df-rdg 8378  df-oadd 8438

This theorem is referenced by:  unfilem3  9256