| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 94 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | fczfsuppd 9301 | A constant function with value zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 × {𝑍}) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppun 9302 | The union of two finitely supported functions is finitely supported (but not necessarily a function!). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppunfi 9303 | The union of the support of two finitely supported functions is finite. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∪ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppunbi 9304 | If the union of two classes/functions is a function, this union is finitely supported iff the two functions are finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | 0fsupp 9305 | The empty set is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | snopfsupp 9306 | A singleton containing an ordered pair is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) → {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | funsnfsupp 9307 | Finite support for a function extended by a singleton. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∉ dom 𝐹)) → ((𝐹 ∪ {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉}) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppres 9308 | The restriction of a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | fmptssfisupp 9309* | The restriction of a mapping function has finite support if that function has finite support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | ressuppfi 9310 | If the support of the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finite, the support of the function itself is finite. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | resfsupp 9311 | If the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finitely supported, the function itself is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | resfifsupp 9312 | The restriction of a function to a finite set is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 12-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | ffsuppbi 9313 | Two ways of saying that a function with known codomain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin))) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppmptif 9314* | A function mapping an argument to either a value of a finitely supported function or zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑘), 𝑍)) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | sniffsupp 9315* | A function mapping all but one arguments to zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 𝐴, 0 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppcolem 9316 | Lemma for fsuppco 9317. Formula building theorem for finite supports: rearranging the index set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppco 9317 | The composition of a 1-1 function with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppco2 9318 | The composition of a function which maps the zero to zero with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. This is not only a special case of fsuppcor 9319 because it does not require that the "zero" is an element of the range of the finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | fsuppcor 9319 | The composition of a function which maps the zero of the range of a finitely supported function to the zero of its range with this finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | mapfienlem1 9320* | Lemma 1 for mapfien 9323. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹)) finSupp 𝑊) | ||
| Theorem | mapfienlem2 9321* | Lemma 2 for mapfien 9323. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | mapfienlem3 9322* | Lemma 3 for mapfien 9323. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mapfien 9323* | A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on the set of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹))):𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑇) | ||
| Theorem | mapfien2 9324* | Equinumerousity relation for sets of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 0 } & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
| Syntax | cfi 9325 | Extend class notation with the function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of a given set. |
| class fi | ||
| Definition | df-fi 9326* | Function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of the argument. Note that the empty intersection being the universal class, hence a proper class, it cannot be an element of that class. Therefore, the function value is the class of nonempty finite intersections of elements of the argument (see elfi2 9329). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) |
| ⊢ fi = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑧 = ∩ 𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | fival 9327* | The set of all the finite intersections of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)𝑦 = ∩ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | elfi 9328* | Specific properties of an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | elfi2 9329* | The empty intersection need not be considered in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | elfir 9330 | Sufficient condition for an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | intrnfi 9331 | Sufficient condition for the intersection of the range of a function to be in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iinfi 9332* | An indexed intersection of elements of 𝐶 is an element of the finite intersections of 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | inelfi 9333 | The intersection of two sets is a finite intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ssfii 9334 | Any element of a set 𝐴 is the intersection of a finite subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (fi‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fi0 9335 | The set of finite intersections of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (fi‘∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | fieq0 9336 | A set is empty iff the class of all the finite intersections of that set is empty. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | fiin 9337 | The elements of (fi‘𝐶) are closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | dffi2 9338* | The set of finite intersections is the smallest set that contains 𝐴 and is closed under pairwise intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑧)}) | ||
| Theorem | fiss 9339 | Subset relationship for function fi. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | inficl 9340* | A set which is closed under pairwise intersection is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fipwuni 9341 | The set of finite intersections of a set is contained in the powerset of the union of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | fisn 9342 | A singleton is closed under finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (fi‘{𝐴}) = {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | fiuni 9343 | The union of the finite intersections of a set is simply the union of the set itself. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ (fi‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fipwss 9344 | If a set is a family of subsets of some base set, then so is its finite intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | elfiun 9345* | A finite intersection of elements taken from a union of collections. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Nov-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘(𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)𝐴 = (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | dffi3 9346* | The set of finite intersections can be "constructed" inductively by iterating binary intersection ω-many times. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∪ (rec(𝑅, 𝐴) “ ω)) | ||
| Theorem | fifo 9347* | Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ ∩ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | marypha1lem 9348* | Core induction for Philip Hall's marriage theorem. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝑏 ∈ Fin → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝑏)(∀𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑑 ≼ (𝑐 “ 𝑑) → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑐𝑒:𝐴–1-1→V))) | ||
| Theorem | marypha1 9349* | (Philip) Hall's marriage theorem, sufficiency: a finite relation contains an injection if there is no subset of its domain which would be forced to violate the pigeonhole principle. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ (𝐶 “ 𝑑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | marypha2lem1 9350* | Lemma for marypha2 9354. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | marypha2lem2 9351* | Lemma for marypha2 9354. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} | ||
| Theorem | marypha2lem3 9352* | Lemma for marypha2 9354. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐺 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | marypha2lem4 9353* | Lemma for marypha2 9354. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | marypha2 9354* | Version of marypha1 9349 using a functional family of sets instead of a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴–1-1→V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
| Syntax | csup 9355 | Extend class notation to include supremum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers. |
| class sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Syntax | cinf 9356 | Extend class notation to include infimum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers. |
| class inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Definition | df-sup 9357* | Define the supremum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the supremum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals whose square is less than 2; in this case the supremum is defined as the square root of 2 per sqrtval 15172. See dfsup2 9359 for alternate definition not requiring dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} | ||
| Definition | df-inf 9358 | Define the infimum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the infimum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, ◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfsup2 9359 | Quantifier-free definition of supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ (𝐴 ∖ ((◡𝑅 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∖ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵))))) | ||
| Theorem | supeq1 9360 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq1d 9361 | Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq1i 9362 | Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | supeq2 9363 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq3 9364 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | supeq123d 9365 | Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = sup(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | nfsup 9366 | Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | supmo 9367* | Any class 𝐵 has at most one supremum in 𝐴 (where 𝑅 is interpreted as 'less than'). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | supexd 9368 | A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | supeu 9369* | A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | supval2 9370* | Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | eqsup 9371* | Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | eqsupd 9372* | Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝐶)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | supcl 9373* | A supremum belongs to its base class (closure law). See also supub 9374 and suplub 9375. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | supub 9374* |
A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 9373 and suplub 9375.
This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6456) using riotacl2 7341. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | suplub 9375* | A supremum is the least upper bound. See also supcl 9373 and supub 9374. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | suplub2 9376* | Bidirectional form of suplub 9375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | supnub 9377* | An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | supssd 9378* | Inequality deduction for supremum of a subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | supex 9379 | A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | sup00 9380 | The supremum under an empty base set is always the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ sup(𝐵, ∅, 𝑅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | sup0riota 9381* | The supremum of an empty set is the smallest element of the base set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 → sup(∅, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | sup0 9382* | The supremum of an empty set under a base set which has a unique smallest element is the smallest element of the base set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑋) ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → sup(∅, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | supmax 9383* | The greatest element of a set is its supremum. Note that the converse is not true; the supremum might not be an element of the set considered. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 30-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fisup2g 9384* | A finite set satisfies the conditions to have a supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | fisupcl 9385 | A nonempty finite set contains its supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 9-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | supgtoreq 9386 | The supremum of a finite set is greater than or equal to all the elements of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝑅𝑆 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | suppr 9387 | The supremum of a pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → sup({𝐵, 𝐶}, 𝐴, 𝑅) = if(𝐶𝑅𝐵, 𝐵, 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | supsn 9388 | The supremum of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → sup({𝐵}, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | supisolem 9389* | Lemma for supiso 9391. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝐷𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝐷 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷)𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘𝐷) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)))) | ||
| Theorem | supisoex 9390* | Lemma for supiso 9391. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ 𝑢𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆𝑢 → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))) | ||
| Theorem | supiso 9391* | Image of a supremum under an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | infeq1 9392 | Equality theorem for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | infeq1d 9393 | Equality deduction for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | infeq1i 9394 | Equality inference for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | infeq2 9395 | Equality theorem for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = inf(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | infeq3 9396 | Equality theorem for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | infeq123d 9397 | Equality deduction for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = inf(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | nfinf 9398 | Hypothesis builder for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | infexd 9399 | An infimum is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | eqinf 9400* | Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |