P. 94 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9301-9400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	funsnfsupp 9301	Finite support for a function extended by a singleton. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∉ dom 𝐹)) → ((𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩}) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍))
Theorem	fsuppres 9302	The restriction of a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fmptssfisupp 9303*	The restriction of a mapping function has finite support if that function has finite support. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐵) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	ressuppfi 9304	If the support of the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finite, the support of the function itself is finite. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	resfsupp 9305	If the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finitely supported, the function itself is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	resfifsupp 9306	The restriction of a function to a finite set is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	ffsuppbi 9307	Two ways of saying that a function with known codomain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin)))
Theorem	fsuppmptif 9308*	A function mapping an argument to either a value of a finitely supported function or zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑘), 𝑍)) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	sniffsupp 9309*	A function mapping all but one arguments to zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 𝐴, 0 ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 0 )
Theorem	fsuppcolem 9310	Lemma for fsuppco 9311. Formula building theorem for finite supports: rearranging the index set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fsuppco 9311	The composition of a 1-1 function with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppco2 9312	The composition of a function which maps the zero to zero with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. This is not only a special case of fsuppcor 9313 because it does not require that the "zero" is an element of the range of the finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	fsuppcor 9313	The composition of a function which maps the zero of the range of a finitely supported function to the zero of its range with this finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 0 )
Theorem	mapfienlem1 9314*	Lemma 1 for mapfien 9317. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹)) finSupp 𝑊)
Theorem	mapfienlem2 9315*	Lemma 2 for mapfien 9317. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) finSupp 𝑍)
Theorem	mapfienlem3 9316*	Lemma 3 for mapfien 9317. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	mapfien 9317*	A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on the set of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹))):𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑇)
Theorem	mapfien2 9318*	Equinumerousity relation for sets of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 0 }    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
2.4.36  Finite intersections
Syntax	cfi 9319	Extend class notation with the function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of a given set.
class fi
Definition	df-fi 9320*	Function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of the argument. Note that the empty intersection being the universal class, hence a proper class, it cannot be an element of that class. Therefore, the function value is the class of nonempty finite intersections of elements of the argument (see elfi2 9323). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.)
⊢ fi = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑧 = ∩ 𝑦})
Theorem	fival 9321*	The set of all the finite intersections of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)𝑦 = ∩ 𝑥})
Theorem	elfi 9322*	Specific properties of an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	elfi2 9323*	The empty intersection need not be considered in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	elfir 9324	Sufficient condition for an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵))
Theorem	intrnfi 9325	Sufficient condition for the intersection of the range of a function to be in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ (fi‘𝐵))
Theorem	iinfi 9326*	An indexed intersection of elements of 𝐶 is an element of the finite intersections of 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶))
Theorem	inelfi 9327	The intersection of two sets is a finite intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝑋))
Theorem	ssfii 9328	Any element of a set 𝐴 is the intersection of a finite subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (fi‘𝐴))
Theorem	fi0 9329	The set of finite intersections of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (fi‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	fieq0 9330	A set is empty iff the class of all the finite intersections of that set is empty. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = ∅))
Theorem	fiin 9331	The elements of (fi‘𝐶) are closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝐶))
Theorem	dffi2 9332*	The set of finite intersections is the smallest set that contains 𝐴 and is closed under pairwise intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑧)})
Theorem	fiss 9333	Subset relationship for function fi. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ (fi‘𝐵))
Theorem	inficl 9334*	A set which is closed under pairwise intersection is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = 𝐴))
Theorem	fipwuni 9335	The set of finite intersections of a set is contained in the powerset of the union of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	fisn 9336	A singleton is closed under finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (fi‘{𝐴}) = {𝐴}
Theorem	fiuni 9337	The union of the finite intersections of a set is simply the union of the set itself. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ (fi‘𝐴))
Theorem	fipwss 9338	If a set is a family of subsets of some base set, then so is its finite intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	elfiun 9339*	A finite intersection of elements taken from a union of collections. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Nov-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘(𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)𝐴 = (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))))
Theorem	dffi3 9340*	The set of finite intersections can be "constructed" inductively by iterating binary intersection ω-many times. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∪ (rec(𝑅, 𝐴) “ ω))
Theorem	fifo 9341*	Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ ∩ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
2.4.37  Hall's marriage theorem
Theorem	marypha1lem 9342*	Core induction for Philip Hall's marriage theorem. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝑏 ∈ Fin → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝑏)(∀𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑑 ≼ (𝑐 “ 𝑑) → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑐𝑒:𝐴–1-1→V)))
Theorem	marypha1 9343*	(Philip) Hall's marriage theorem, sufficiency: a finite relation contains an injection if there is no subset of its domain which would be forced to violate the pigeonhole principle. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ (𝐶 “ 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	marypha2lem1 9344*	Lemma for marypha2 9348. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	marypha2lem2 9345*	Lemma for marypha2 9348. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
Theorem	marypha2lem3 9346*	Lemma for marypha2 9348. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐺 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	marypha2lem4 9347*	Lemma for marypha2 9348. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
Theorem	marypha2 9348*	Version of marypha1 9343 using a functional family of sets instead of a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴–1-1→V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
2.4.38  Supremum and infimum
Syntax	csup 9349	Extend class notation to include supremum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers.
class sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Syntax	cinf 9350	Extend class notation to include infimum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers.
class inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Definition	df-sup 9351*	Define the supremum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the supremum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals whose square is less than 2; in this case the supremum is defined as the square root of 2 per sqrtval 15162. See dfsup2 9353 for alternate definition not requiring dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
Definition	df-inf 9352	Define the infimum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the infimum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, ◡𝑅)
Theorem	dfsup2 9353	Quantifier-free definition of supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ (𝐴 ∖ ((◡𝑅 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∖ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	supeq1 9354	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq1d 9355	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq1i 9356	Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Theorem	supeq2 9357	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq3 9358	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆))
Theorem	supeq123d 9359	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = sup(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹))
Theorem	nfsup 9360	Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Theorem	supmo 9361*	Any class 𝐵 has at most one supremum in 𝐴 (where 𝑅 is interpreted as 'less than'). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	supexd 9362	A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	supeu 9363*	A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	supval2 9364*	Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
Theorem	eqsup 9365*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶))
Theorem	eqsupd 9366*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝐶)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)
Theorem	supcl 9367*	A supremum belongs to its base class (closure law). See also supub 9368 and suplub 9369. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	supub 9368*	A supremum is an upper bound. See also supcl 9367 and suplub 9369. This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 6442) using riotacl2 7326. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	suplub 9369*	A supremum is the least upper bound. See also supcl 9367 and supub 9368. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	suplub2 9370*	Bidirectional form of suplub 9369. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	supnub 9371*	An upper bound is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑧) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	supssd 9372*	Inequality deduction for supremum of a subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supex 9373	A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ 𝑅 Or 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V
Theorem	sup00 9374	The supremum under an empty base set is always the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ sup(𝐵, ∅, 𝑅) = ∅
Theorem	sup0riota 9375*	The supremum of an empty set is the smallest element of the base set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 → sup(∅, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	sup0 9376*	The supremum of an empty set under a base set which has a unique smallest element is the smallest element of the base set. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑋) ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → sup(∅, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	supmax 9377*	The greatest element of a set is its supremum. Note that the converse is not true; the supremum might not be an element of the set considered. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Jun-2008.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 30-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐶𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)
Theorem	fisup2g 9378*	A finite set satisfies the conditions to have a supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	fisupcl 9379	A nonempty finite set contains its supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 9-May-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	supgtoreq 9380	The supremum of a finite set is greater than or equal to all the elements of the set. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝑅𝑆 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝑆))
Theorem	suppr 9381	The supremum of a pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → sup({𝐵, 𝐶}, 𝐴, 𝑅) = if(𝐶𝑅𝐵, 𝐵, 𝐶))
Theorem	supsn 9382	The supremum of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → sup({𝐵}, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	supisolem 9383*	Lemma for supiso 9385. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝐷𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝐷 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷)𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘𝐷) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
Theorem	supisoex 9384*	Lemma for supiso 9385. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ 𝑢𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆𝑢 → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)))
Theorem	supiso 9385*	Image of a supremum under an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	infeq1 9386	Equality theorem for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	infeq1d 9387	Equality deduction for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	infeq1i 9388	Equality inference for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = inf(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Theorem	infeq2 9389	Equality theorem for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = inf(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))
Theorem	infeq3 9390	Equality theorem for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆))
Theorem	infeq123d 9391	Equality deduction for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = inf(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹))
Theorem	nfinf 9392	Hypothesis builder for infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Theorem	infexd 9393	An infimum is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	eqinf 9394*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶))
Theorem	eqinfd 9395*	Sufficient condition for an element to be equal to the infimum. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝑦)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝐶)
Theorem	infval 9396*	Alternate expression for the infimum. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦))))
Theorem	infcllem 9397*	Lemma for infcl 9398, inflb 9399, infglb 9400, etc. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦◡𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦◡𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	infcl 9398*	An infimum belongs to its base class (closure law). See also inflb 9399 and infglb 9400. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	inflb 9399*	An infimum is a lower bound. See also infcl 9398 and infglb 9400. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐶𝑅inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	infglb 9400*	An infimum is the greatest lower bound. See also infcl 9398 and inflb 9399. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧𝑅𝐶))