![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 94 of 474) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-29923) |
![]() (29924-31446) |
![]() (31447-47372) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | ixpfi2 9301* | A Cartesian product of finite sets such that all but finitely many are singletons is finite. (Note that 𝐵(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑥) are both possibly dependent on 𝑥.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶)) → 𝐵 ⊆ {𝐷}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | mptfi 9302* | A finite mapping set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | abrexfi 9303* | An image set from a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Feb-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | cnvimamptfin 9304* | A preimage of a mapping with a finite domain under any class is finite. In contrast to fisuppfi 9321, the range of the mapping needs not to be known. (Contributed by AV, 21-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝑝 ∈ 𝑁 ↦ 𝑋) “ 𝑌) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | elfpw 9305 | Membership in a class of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) | ||
Theorem | unifpw 9306 | A set is the union of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ∪ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | f1opwfi 9307* | A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑏 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)) | ||
Theorem | fissuni 9308* | A finite subset of a union is covered by finitely many elements. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑐) | ||
Theorem | fipreima 9309* | Given a finite subset 𝐴 of the range of a function, there exists a finite subset of the domain whose image is 𝐴. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)(𝐹 “ 𝑐) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | finsschain 9310* | A finite subset of the union of a superset chain is a subset of some element of the chain. A useful preliminary result for alexsub 23433 and others. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 25-Jan-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ [⊊] Or 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑧) | ||
Theorem | indexfi 9311* | If for every element of a finite indexing set 𝐴 there exists a corresponding element of another set 𝐵, then there exists a finite subset of 𝐵 consisting only of those elements which are indexed by 𝐴. Proven without the Axiom of Choice, unlike indexdom 36266. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑐 ∈ Fin (𝑐 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)) | ||
Syntax | cfsupp 9312 | Extend class definition to include the predicate to be a finitely supported function. |
class finSupp | ||
Definition | df-fsupp 9313* | Define the property of a function to be finitely supported (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) |
⊢ finSupp = {〈𝑟, 𝑧〉 ∣ (Fun 𝑟 ∧ (𝑟 supp 𝑧) ∈ Fin)} | ||
Theorem | relfsupp 9314 | The property of a function to be finitely supported is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ Rel finSupp | ||
Theorem | relprcnfsupp 9315 | A proper class is never finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐴 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | isfsupp 9316 | The property of a class to be a finitely supported function (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (Fun 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin))) | ||
Theorem | isfsuppd 9317 | Deduction form of isfsupp 9316. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | funisfsupp 9318 | The property of a function to be finitely supported (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)) | ||
Theorem | fsuppimp 9319 | Implications of a class being a finitely supported function (in relation to a given zero). (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2019.) |
⊢ (𝑅 finSupp 𝑍 → (Fun 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin)) | ||
Theorem | fsuppimpd 9320 | A finitely supported function is a function with a finite support. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fisuppfi 9321 | A function on a finite set is finitely supported. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fidmfisupp 9322 | A function with a finite domain is finitely supported. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 24-Dec-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fdmfisuppfi 9323 | The support of a function with a finite domain is always finite. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fdmfifsupp 9324 | A function with a finite domain is always finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fsuppmptdm 9325* | A mapping with a finite domain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fndmfisuppfi 9326 | The support of a function with a finite domain is always finite. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fndmfifsupp 9327 | A function with a finite domain is always finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | suppeqfsuppbi 9328 | If two functions have the same support, one function is finitely supported iff the other one is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ Fun 𝐹) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = (𝐺 supp 𝑍) → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | suppssfifsupp 9329 | If the support of a function is a subset of a finite set, the function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ⊆ 𝐹)) → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fsuppsssupp 9330 | If the support of a function is a subset of the support of a finitely supported function, the function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ⊆ (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fsuppxpfi 9331 | The cartesian product of two finitely supported functions is finite. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) × (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fczfsuppd 9332 | A constant function with value zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 × {𝑍}) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fsuppun 9333 | The union of two finitely supported functions is finitely supported (but not necessarily a function!). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fsuppunfi 9334 | The union of the support of two finitely supported functions is finite. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∪ (𝐺 supp 𝑍)) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fsuppunbi 9335 | If the union of two classes/functions is a function, this union is finitely supported iff the two functions are finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 18-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | 0fsupp 9336 | The empty set is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | snopfsupp 9337 | A singleton containing an ordered pair is a finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈) → {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉} finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | funsnfsupp 9338 | Finite support for a function extended by a singleton. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 19-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∉ dom 𝐹)) → ((𝐹 ∪ {〈𝑋, 𝑌〉}) finSupp 𝑍 ↔ 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | fsuppres 9339 | The restriction of a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | ressuppfi 9340 | If the support of the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finite, the support of the function itself is finite. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | resfsupp 9341 | If the restriction of a function by a set which, subtracted from the domain of the function so that its difference is finitely supported, the function itself is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 27-May-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | resfifsupp 9342 | The restriction of a function to a finite set is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 12-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑋) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | ffsuppbi 9343 | Two ways of saying that a function with known codomain is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹:𝐼⟶𝑆 → (𝐹 finSupp 𝑍 ↔ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin))) | ||
Theorem | fsuppmptif 9344* | A function mapping an argument to either a value of a finitely supported function or zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐷, (𝐹‘𝑘), 𝑍)) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | sniffsupp 9345* | A function mapping all but one arguments to zero is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 𝐴, 0 )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) | ||
Theorem | fsuppcolem 9346 | Lemma for fsuppco 9347. Formula building theorem for finite supports: rearranging the index set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡(𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) “ (V ∖ {𝑍})) ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | fsuppco 9347 | The composition of a 1-1 function with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 28-May-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋–1-1→𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fsuppco2 9348 | The composition of a function which maps the zero to zero with a finitely supported function is finitely supported. This is not only a special case of fsuppcor 9349 because it does not require that the "zero" is an element of the range of the finitely supported function. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | fsuppcor 9349 | The composition of a function which maps the zero of the range of a finitely supported function to the zero of its range with this finitely supported function is finitely supported. (Contributed by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 finSupp 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) finSupp 0 ) | ||
Theorem | mapfienlem1 9350* | Lemma 1 for mapfien 9353. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹)) finSupp 𝑊) | ||
Theorem | mapfienlem2 9351* | Lemma 2 for mapfien 9353. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) finSupp 𝑍) | ||
Theorem | mapfienlem3 9352* | Lemma 3 for mapfien 9353. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑇) → ((◡𝐺 ∘ 𝑔) ∘ ◡𝐹) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | mapfien 9353* | A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on the set of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐺 ∘ (𝑓 ∘ 𝐹))):𝑆–1-1-onto→𝑇) | ||
Theorem | mapfien2 9354* | Equinumerousity relation for sets of finitely supported functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 0 } & ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐷 ↑m 𝐶) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑊} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
Syntax | cfi 9355 | Extend class notation with the function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of a given set. |
class fi | ||
Definition | df-fi 9356* | Function whose value is the class of finite intersections of the elements of the argument. Note that the empty intersection being the universal class, hence a proper class, it cannot be an element of that class. Therefore, the function value is the class of nonempty finite intersections of elements of the argument (see elfi2 9359). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) |
⊢ fi = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑧 = ∩ 𝑦}) | ||
Theorem | fival 9357* | The set of all the finite intersections of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)𝑦 = ∩ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | elfi 9358* | Specific properties of an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | elfi2 9359* | The empty intersection need not be considered in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝐴 = ∩ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | elfir 9360 | Sufficient condition for an element of (fi‘𝐵). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | intrnfi 9361 | Sufficient condition for the intersection of the range of a function to be in the set of finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iinfi 9362* | An indexed intersection of elements of 𝐶 is an element of the finite intersections of 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | inelfi 9363 | The intersection of two sets is a finite intersection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | ssfii 9364 | Any element of a set 𝐴 is the intersection of a finite subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (fi‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fi0 9365 | The set of finite intersections of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (fi‘∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | fieq0 9366 | A set is empty iff the class of all the finite intersections of that set is empty. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = ∅)) | ||
Theorem | fiin 9367 | The elements of (fi‘𝐶) are closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (fi‘𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | dffi2 9368* | The set of finite intersections is the smallest set that contains 𝐴 and is closed under pairwise intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑧)}) | ||
Theorem | fiss 9369 | Subset relationship for function fi. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 7-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ (fi‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | inficl 9370* | A set which is closed under pairwise intersection is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (fi‘𝐴) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fipwuni 9371 | The set of finite intersections of a set is contained in the powerset of the union of the elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | fisn 9372 | A singleton is closed under finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ (fi‘{𝐴}) = {𝐴} | ||
Theorem | fiuni 9373 | The union of the finite intersections of a set is simply the union of the set itself. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 5-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ (fi‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | fipwss 9374 | If a set is a family of subsets of some base set, then so is its finite intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 → (fi‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | elfiun 9375* | A finite intersection of elements taken from a union of collections. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Nov-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Nov-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘(𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (fi‘𝐶) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐵)∃𝑦 ∈ (fi‘𝐶)𝐴 = (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | dffi3 9376* | The set of finite intersections can be "constructed" inductively by iterating binary intersection ω-many times. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑢 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑢, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ↦ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ∪ (rec(𝑅, 𝐴) “ ω)) | ||
Theorem | fifo 9377* | Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ ∩ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | marypha1lem 9378* | Core induction for Philip Hall's marriage theorem. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝑏 ∈ Fin → ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝑏)(∀𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴𝑑 ≼ (𝑐 “ 𝑑) → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 𝑐𝑒:𝐴–1-1→V))) | ||
Theorem | marypha1 9379* | (Philip) Hall's marriage theorem, sufficiency: a finite relation contains an injection if there is no subset of its domain which would be forced to violate the pigeonhole principle. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ (𝐶 “ 𝑑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | marypha2lem1 9380* | Lemma for marypha2 9384. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | marypha2lem2 9381* | Lemma for marypha2 9384. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} | ||
Theorem | marypha2lem3 9382* | Lemma for marypha2 9384. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐺 ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | marypha2lem4 9383* | Lemma for marypha2 9384. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | marypha2 9384* | Version of marypha1 9379 using a functional family of sets instead of a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶Fin) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑑 ≼ ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑑)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴–1-1→V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
Syntax | csup 9385 | Extend class notation to include supremum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers. |
class sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
Syntax | cinf 9386 | Extend class notation to include infimum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers. |
class inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
Definition | df-sup 9387* | Define the supremum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the supremum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals whose square is less than 2; in this case the supremum is defined as the square root of 2 per sqrtval 15134. See dfsup2 9389 for alternate definition not requiring dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} | ||
Definition | df-inf 9388 | Define the infimum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the infimum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, ◡𝑅) | ||
Theorem | dfsup2 9389 | Quantifier-free definition of supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ (𝐴 ∖ ((◡𝑅 “ 𝐵) ∪ (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∖ (◡𝑅 “ 𝐵))))) | ||
Theorem | supeq1 9390 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | supeq1d 9391 | Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | supeq1i 9392 | Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | supeq2 9393 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | supeq3 9394 | Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | supeq123d 9395 | Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = sup(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | nfsup 9396 | Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | supmo 9397* | Any class 𝐵 has at most one supremum in 𝐴 (where 𝑅 is interpreted as 'less than'). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | supexd 9398 | A supremum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | supeu 9399* | A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | supval2 9400* | Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |