Theorem ac10ct 10094

Description: A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10554, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ac10ct	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ac10ct

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3455	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2	1	brdom 8971	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦)
3		onss 7788	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On)
4	3	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On))
5		epweon 7778	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ E We On
6		wess 5637	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ⊆ On → ( E We On → E We 𝑦))
7	4, 5, 6	syl6mpi 68	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
8	7	adantl 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
9		eqid 2761	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)}
10	9	f1we 7355	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ( E We 𝑦 → {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴))
11		weinxp 5736	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴)
12		reldom 8963	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Rel ≼
13	12	brrelex1i 5707	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
14		sqxpexg 7758	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V)
15		inex2g 5280	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V)
16		weeq1 5638	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (𝑥 We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴))
17	16	spcegv 3552	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
18	13, 14, 15, 17	4syl 20	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
19	11, 18	biimtrid 245	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
20	10, 19	sylan9r 518	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → ( E We 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
21	8, 20	syld 48	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
22	21	impancom 457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
23	22	exlimdv 1966	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
24	2, 23	biimtrid 245	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
25	24	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)))
26	25	pm2.43b 56	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
27	26	rexlimiv 3157	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087  Vcvv 3451   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899   class class class wbr 5103  {copab 5167   E cep 5550   We wwe 5603   × cxp 5649  Oncon0 6355  –1-1→wf1 6528  ‘cfv 6531   ≼ cdom 8955

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-ord 6358  df-on 6359  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-isom 6540  df-dom 8959

This theorem is used by:  ondomen  10097