Theorem ac10ct 10117

Description: A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10577, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ac10ct	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ac10ct

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2	1	brdom 8991	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦)
3		onss 7800	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On)
4	3	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On))
5		epweon 7790	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ E We On
6		wess 5636	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ⊆ On → ( E We On → E We 𝑦))
7	4, 5, 6	syl6mpi 68	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
8	7	adantl 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
9		eqid 2760	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)}
10	9	f1we 7364	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ( E We 𝑦 → {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴))
11		weinxp 5735	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴)
12		reldom 8983	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Rel ≼
13	12	brrelex1i 5706	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
14		sqxpexg 7770	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V)
15		inex2g 5279	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V)
16		weeq1 5637	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (𝑥 We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴))
17	16	spcegv 3551	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
18	13, 14, 15, 17	4syl 20	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
19	11, 18	biimtrid 245	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
20	10, 19	sylan9r 518	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → ( E We 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
21	8, 20	syld 48	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
22	21	impancom 457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
23	22	exlimdv 1965	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
24	2, 23	biimtrid 245	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
25	24	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)))
26	25	pm2.43b 56	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
27	26	rexlimiv 3156	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144  ∃wrex 3086  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3895   ∩ cin 4089   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5166   E cep 5549   We wwe 5602   × cxp 5648  Oncon0 6362  –1-1→wf1 6536  ‘cfv 6539   ≼ cdom 8975

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7752

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-pss 4014  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-tr 5212  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-fr 5603  df-we 5605  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-isom 6548  df-dom 8979

This theorem is used by:  ondomen  10120  dfac16  35811