Theorem ac10ct 10037

Description: A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10497, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ac10ct	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ac10ct

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3462	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2	1	brdom 8966	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦)
3		onss 7793	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On)
4	3	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On))
5		epweon 7783	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ E We On
6		wess 5652	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ⊆ On → ( E We On → E We 𝑦))
7	4, 5, 6	syl6mpi 68	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
8	7	adantl 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
9		eqid 2766	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)}
10	9	f1we 7364	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ( E We 𝑦 → {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴))
11		weinxp 5751	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴)
12		reldom 8958	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Rel ≼
13	12	brrelex1i 5722	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
14		sqxpexg 7763	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V)
15		inex2g 5294	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V)
16		weeq1 5653	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (𝑥 We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴))
17	16	spcegv 3559	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
18	13, 14, 15, 17	4syl 20	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
19	11, 18	biimtrid 245	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
20	10, 19	sylan9r 518	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → ( E We 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
21	8, 20	syld 48	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
22	21	impancom 457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
23	22	exlimdv 1966	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
24	2, 23	biimtrid 245	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
25	24	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)))
26	25	pm2.43b 56	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
27	26	rexlimiv 3162	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3092  Vcvv 3458   ∩ cin 3907   ⊆ wss 3908   class class class wbr 5114  {copab 5178   E cep 5565   We wwe 5618   × cxp 5664  Oncon0 6367  –1-1→wf1 6540  ‘cfv 6543   ≼ cdom 8950

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-pss 3928  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-tr 5224  df-id 5561  df-eprel 5566  df-po 5574  df-so 5575  df-fr 5619  df-we 5621  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-ord 6370  df-on 6371  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-isom 6552  df-dom 8954

This theorem is used by:  ondomen  10040