Theorem ac10ct 10041

Description: A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10501, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ac10ct	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ac10ct

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2	1	brdom 8970	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦)
3		onss 7788	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On)
4	3	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On))
5		epweon 7778	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ E We On
6		wess 5645	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ⊆ On → ( E We On → E We 𝑦))
7	4, 5, 6	syl6mpi 68	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
8	7	adantl 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦))
9		eqid 2762	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)}
10	9	f1we 7360	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ( E We 𝑦 → {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴))
11		weinxp 5744	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴)
12		reldom 8962	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Rel ≼
13	12	brrelex1i 5715	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
14		sqxpexg 7758	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V)
15		inex2g 5287	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V)
16		weeq1 5646	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (𝑥 We 𝐴 ↔ ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴))
17	16	spcegv 3554	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∈ V → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
18	13, 14, 15, 17	4syl 20	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
19	11, 18	biimtrid 245	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ({⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑓‘𝑤) E (𝑓‘𝑧)} We 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
20	10, 19	sylan9r 518	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → ( E We 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
21	8, 20	syld 48	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦) → (𝑦 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
22	21	impancom 457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
23	22	exlimdv 1966	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
24	2, 23	biimtrid 245	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
25	24	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)))
26	25	pm2.43b 56	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴))
27	26	rexlimiv 3158	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3453   ∩ cin 3901   ⊆ wss 3902   class class class wbr 5107  {copab 5171   E cep 5558   We wwe 5611   × cxp 5657  Oncon0 6361  –1-1→wf1 6534  ‘cfv 6537   ≼ cdom 8954

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-isom 6546  df-dom 8958

This theorem is used by:  ondomen  10044