P. 101 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10001-10100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	fidomtri 10001	Trichotomy of dominance without AC when one set is finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	fidomtri2 10002	Trichotomy of dominance without AC when one set is finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	harsdom 10003	The Hartogs number of a well-orderable set strictly dominates the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → 𝐴 ≺ (har‘𝐴))
Theorem	onsdom 10004*	Any well-orderable set is strictly dominated by an ordinal number. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥)
Theorem	harval2 10005*	An alternate expression for the Hartogs number of a well-orderable set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥})
Theorem	harsucnn 10006	The next cardinal after a finite ordinal is the successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (har‘𝐴) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	cardmin2 10007*	The smallest ordinal that strictly dominates a set is a cardinal, if it exists. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥 ↔ (card‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥})
Theorem	pm54.43lem 10008*	In Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360, the number 1 is defined as the collection of all sets with cardinality 1 (i.e. all singletons; see card1 9976), so that their 𝐴 ∈ 1 means, in our notation, 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o}. Here we show that this is equivalent to 𝐴 ≈ 1o so that we can use the latter more convenient notation in pm54.43 10009. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o})
Theorem	pm54.43 10009	Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360. "From this proposition it will follow, when arithmetical addition has been defined, that 1+1=2." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principia_Mathematica#Quotations. This theorem states that two sets of cardinality 1 are disjoint iff their union has cardinality 2. Whitehead and Russell define 1 as the collection of all sets with cardinality 1 (i.e. all singletons; see card1 9976), so that their 𝐴 ∈ 1 means, in our notation, 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o} which is the same as 𝐴 ≈ 1o by pm54.43lem 10008. We do not have several of their earlier lemmas available (which would otherwise be unused by our different approach to arithmetic), so our proof is longer. (It is also longer because we must show every detail.) Theorem dju1p1e2 10179 shows the derivation of 1+1=2 for cardinal numbers from this theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 1o ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 1o) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≈ 2o))
Theorem	enpr2 10010	An unordered pair with distinct elements is equinumerous to ordinal two. This is a closed-form version of enpr2d 9058. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5334, ax-un 7739. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o)
Theorem	pr2ne 10011	If an unordered pair has two elements, then they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.) Avoid ax-pow 5334, ax-un 7739. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	prdom2 10012	An unordered pair has at most two elements. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≼ 2o)
Theorem	en2eqpr 10013	Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ≈ 2o ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	en2eleq 10014	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → 𝑃 = {𝑋, ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})})
Theorem	en2other2 10015	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	dif1card 10016	The cardinality of a nonempty finite set is one greater than the cardinality of the set with one element removed. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (card‘𝐴) = suc (card‘(𝐴 ∖ {𝑋})))
Theorem	leweon 10017*	Lexicographical order is a well-ordering of On × On. Proposition 7.56(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 54. Note that unlike r0weon 10018, this order is not set-like, as the preimage of ⟨1o, ∅⟩ is the proper class ({∅} × On). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐿 We (On × On)
Theorem	r0weon 10018*	A set-like well-ordering of the class of ordinal pairs. Proposition 7.58(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 54. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑧 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) ∈ ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∨ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑧𝐿𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 We (On × On) ∧ 𝑅 Se (On × On))
Theorem	infxpenlem 10019*	Lemma for infxpen 10020. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑧 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) ∈ ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∨ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑧𝐿𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑅 ∩ ((𝑎 × 𝑎) × (𝑎 × 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑎 (ω ⊆ 𝑚 → (𝑚 × 𝑚) ≈ 𝑚)) ∧ (ω ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑎 𝑚 ≺ 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = OrdIso(𝑄, (𝑎 × 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infxpen 10020	Every infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its Cartesian square. Proposition 10.39 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 94, whose proof we follow closely. The key idea is to show that the relation 𝑅 is a well-ordering of (On × On) with the additional property that 𝑅-initial segments of (𝑥 × 𝑥) (where 𝑥 is a limit ordinal) are of cardinality at most 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xpomen 10021	The Cartesian product of omega (the set of ordinal natural numbers) with itself is equinumerous to omega. Exercise 1 of [Enderton] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (ω × ω) ≈ ω
Theorem	xpct 10022	The cartesian product of two countable sets is countable. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ ω ∧ 𝐵 ≼ ω) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≼ ω)
Theorem	infxpidm2 10023	Every infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its Cartesian square. This theorem provides the basis for infinite cardinal arithmetic. Proposition 10.40 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95. See also infxpidm 10573. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infxpenc 10024*	A canonical version of infxpen 10020, by a completely different approach (although it uses infxpen 10020 via xpomen 10021). Using Cantor's normal form, we can show that 𝐴 ↑o 𝐵 respects equinumerosity (oef1o 9680), so that all the steps of (ω↑𝑊) · (ω↑𝑊) ≈ ω↑(2𝑊) ≈ (ω↑2)↑𝑊 ≈ ω↑𝑊 can be verified using bijections to do the ordinal commutations. (The assumption on 𝑁 can be satisfied using cnfcom3c 9688.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐴–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⟨(𝑁‘𝑥), (𝑁‘𝑦)⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡𝑁 ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	infxpenc2lem1 10025*	Lemma for infxpenc2 10028. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ω ⊆ 𝑏)) → (𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ∧ (𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊)))
Theorem	infxpenc2lem2 10026*	Lemma for infxpenc2 10028. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ⟨((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑥), ((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑦)⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡(𝑛‘𝑏) ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	infxpenc2lem3 10027*	Lemma for infxpenc2 10028. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	infxpenc2 10028*	Existence form of infxpenc 10024. A "uniform" or "canonical" version of infxpen 10020, asserting the existence of a single function 𝑔 that simultaneously demonstrates product idempotence of all ordinals below a given bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	iunmapdisj 10029*	The union ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶(𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) is a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ∃*𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛)
Theorem	fseqenlem1 10030*	Lemma for fseqen 10033. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {⟨∅, 𝐵⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → (𝐺‘𝐶):(𝐴 ↑m 𝐶)–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	fseqenlem2 10031*	Lemma for fseqen 10033. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {⟨∅, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘) ↦ ⟨dom 𝑦, ((𝐺‘dom 𝑦)‘𝑦)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘)–1-1→(ω × 𝐴))
Theorem	fseqdom 10032*	One half of fseqen 10033. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (ω × 𝐴) ≼ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛))
Theorem	fseqen 10033*	A set that is equinumerous to its Cartesian product is equinumerous to the set of finite sequences on it. (This can be proven more easily using some choice but this proof avoids it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) ≈ (ω × 𝐴))
Theorem	infpwfidom 10034	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V because this theorem also implies that 𝐴 is a set if 𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V → 𝐴 ≼ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	dfac8alem 10035*	Lemma for dfac8a 10036. If the power set of a set has a choice function, then the set is numerable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (∃𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝑔‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card))
Theorem	dfac8a 10036*	Numeration theorem: every set with a choice function on its power set is numerable. With AC, this reduces to the statement that every set is numerable. Similar to Theorem 10.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 84. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃ℎ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (ℎ‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card))
Theorem	dfac8b 10037*	The well-ordering theorem: every numerable set is well-orderable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)
Theorem	dfac8clem 10038*	Lemma for dfac8c 10039. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ↦ (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑏𝑟𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	dfac8c 10039*	If the union of a set is well-orderable, then the set has a choice function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	ac10ct 10040*	A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10500, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ween 10041*	A set is numerable iff it can be well-ordered. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card ↔ ∃𝑟 𝑟 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ac5num 10042*	A version of ac5b 10483 with the choice as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((∪ 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	ondomen 10043	If a set is dominated by an ordinal, then it is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	numdom 10044	A set dominated by a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	ssnum 10045	A subset of a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	onssnum 10046	All subsets of the ordinals are numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ On) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	indcardi 10047*	Indirect strong induction on the cardinality of a finite or numerable set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ dom card)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 ≼ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑆 ≺ 𝑅 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	acnrcl 10048	Reverse closure for the choice set predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	acneq 10049	Equality theorem for the choice set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐶)
Theorem	isacn 10050*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}) ↑m 𝐴)∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)))
Theorem	acni 10051*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
Theorem	acni2 10052*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	acni3 10053*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑔‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝜑) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	acnlem 10054*	Construct a mapping satisfying the consequent of isacn 10050. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥))
Theorem	numacn 10055	A well-orderable set has choice sequences of every length. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ dom card → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	finacn 10056	Every set has finite choice sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → AC 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	acndom 10057	A set with long choice sequences also has shorter choice sequences, where "shorter" here means the new index set is dominated by the old index set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	acnnum 10058	A set 𝑋 which has choice sequences on it of length 𝒫 𝑋 is well-orderable (and hence has choice sequences of every length). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝒫 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	acnen 10059	The class of choice sets of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐵)
Theorem	acndom2 10060	A set smaller than one with choice sequences of length 𝐴 also has choice sequences of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → (𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	acnen2 10061	The class of sets with choice sequences of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≈ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	fodomacn 10062	A version of fodom 10528 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10464. If 𝐴 has choice sequences of length 𝐵, then any surjection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 can be inverted to an injection the other way. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ AC 𝐵 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	fodomnum 10063	A version of fodom 10528 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10464. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	fonum 10064	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	numwdom 10065	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	fodomfi2 10066	Onto functions define dominance when a finite number of choices need to be made. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomfil 10067	Weak dominance agrees with normal for finite left sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ Fin → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ≼ 𝑌))
Theorem	infpwfien 10068	Any infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its set of finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	inffien 10069	The set of finite intersections of an infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to the set itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (fi‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomnumr 10070	Weak dominance agrees with normal for numerable right sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephfnon 10071	The aleph function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ℵ Fn On
Theorem	aleph0 10072	The first infinite cardinal number, discovered by Georg Cantor in 1873, has the same size as the set of natural numbers ω (and under our particular definition is also equal to it). In the literature, the argument of the aleph function is often written as a subscript, and the first aleph is written ℵ0. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. Also Definition 12(i) of [Suppes] p. 228. From Moshé Machover, Set Theory, Logic, and Their Limitations, p. 95: "Aleph ... the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet ... is also the first letter of the Hebrew word ... (einsoph, meaning infinity), which is a cabbalistic appellation of the deity. The notation is due to Cantor, who was deeply interested in mysticism." (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
Theorem	alephlim 10073*	Value of the aleph function at a limit ordinal. Definition 12(iii) of [Suppes] p. 91. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (ℵ‘𝑥))
Theorem	alephsuc 10074	Value of the aleph function at a successor ordinal. Definition 12(ii) of [Suppes] p. 91. Here we express the successor aleph in terms of the Hartogs function df-har 9532, which gives the smallest ordinal that strictly dominates its argument (or the supremum of all ordinals that are dominated by the argument). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = (har‘(ℵ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	alephon 10075	An aleph is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	alephcard 10076	Every aleph is a cardinal number. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (card‘(ℵ‘𝐴)) = (ℵ‘𝐴)
Theorem	alephnbtwn 10077	No cardinal can be sandwiched between an aleph and its successor aleph. Theorem 67 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴)))
Theorem	alephnbtwn2 10078	No set has equinumerosity between an aleph and its successor aleph. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordilem1 10079	Lemma for alephordi 10080. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordi 10080	Strict ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord 10081	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2 10082	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 8A(a) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2i 10083	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 66 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord3 10084	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephsucdom 10085	A set dominated by an aleph is strictly dominated by its successor aleph and vice-versa. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	alephsuc2 10086*	An alternate representation of a successor aleph. The aleph function is the function obtained from the hartogs 9519 function by transfinite recursion, starting from ω. Using this theorem we could define the aleph function with {𝑧 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ≼ 𝑥} in place of ∩ {𝑧 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝑧} in df-aleph 9948. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ (ℵ‘𝐴)})
Theorem	alephdom 10087	Relationship between inclusion of ordinal numbers and dominance of infinite initial ordinals. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≼ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephgeom 10088	Every aleph is greater than or equal to the set of natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ ω ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	alephislim 10089	Every aleph is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ Lim (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	aleph11 10090	The aleph function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((ℵ‘𝐴) = (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	alephf1 10091	The aleph function is a one-to-one mapping from the ordinals to the infinite cardinals. See also alephf1ALT 10109. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ℵ:On–1-1→On
Theorem	alephsdom 10092	If an ordinal is smaller than an initial ordinal, it is strictly dominated by it. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephdom2 10093	A dominated initial ordinal is included. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephle 10094	The argument of the aleph function is less than or equal to its value. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. (Later, in alephfp2 10115, we will that equality can sometimes hold.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	cardaleph 10095*	Given any transfinite cardinal number 𝐴, there is exactly one aleph that is equal to it. Here we compute that aleph explicitly. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (ℵ‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	cardalephex 10096*	Every transfinite cardinal is an aleph and vice-versa. Theorem 8A(b) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (ω ⊆ 𝐴 → ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = (ℵ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	infenaleph 10097*	An infinite numerable set is equinumerous to an infinite initial ordinal. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℵ𝑥 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	isinfcard 10098	Two ways to express the property of being a transfinite cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran ℵ)
Theorem	iscard3 10099	Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (ω ∪ ran ℵ))
Theorem	cardnum 10100	Two ways to express the class of all cardinal numbers, which consists of the finite ordinals in ω plus the transfinite alephs. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2004.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥} = (ω ∪ ran ℵ)