P. 101 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10001-10100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	infxpenc 10001*	A canonical version of infxpen 9997, by a completely different approach (although it uses infxpen 9997 via xpomen 9998). Using Cantor's normal form, we can show that 𝐴 ↑o 𝐵 respects equinumerosity (oef1o 9666), so that all the steps of (ω↑𝑊) · (ω↑𝑊) ≈ ω↑(2𝑊) ≈ (ω↑2)↑𝑊 ≈ ω↑𝑊 can be verified using bijections to do the ordinal commutations. (The assumption on 𝑁 can be satisfied using cnfcom3c 9674.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐴–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⟨(𝑁‘𝑥), (𝑁‘𝑦)⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡𝑁 ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	infxpenc2lem1 10002*	Lemma for infxpenc2 10005. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ω ⊆ 𝑏)) → (𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ∧ (𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊)))
Theorem	infxpenc2lem2 10003*	Lemma for infxpenc2 10005. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ⟨((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑥), ((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑦)⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡(𝑛‘𝑏) ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	infxpenc2lem3 10004*	Lemma for infxpenc2 10005. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	infxpenc2 10005*	Existence form of infxpenc 10001. A "uniform" or "canonical" version of infxpen 9997, asserting the existence of a single function 𝑔 that simultaneously demonstrates product idempotence of all ordinals below a given bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	iunmapdisj 10006*	The union ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶(𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) is a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ∃*𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛)
Theorem	fseqenlem1 10007*	Lemma for fseqen 10010. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {⟨∅, 𝐵⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → (𝐺‘𝐶):(𝐴 ↑m 𝐶)–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	fseqenlem2 10008*	Lemma for fseqen 10010. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {⟨∅, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘) ↦ ⟨dom 𝑦, ((𝐺‘dom 𝑦)‘𝑦)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘)–1-1→(ω × 𝐴))
Theorem	fseqdom 10009*	One half of fseqen 10010. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (ω × 𝐴) ≼ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛))
Theorem	fseqen 10010*	A set that is equinumerous to its Cartesian product is equinumerous to the set of finite sequences on it. (This can be proven more easily using some choice but this proof avoids it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) ≈ (ω × 𝐴))
Theorem	infpwfidom 10011	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V because this theorem also implies that 𝐴 is a set if 𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V → 𝐴 ≼ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	dfac8alem 10012*	Lemma for dfac8a 10013. If the power set of a set has a choice function, then the set is numerable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (∃𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝑔‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card))
Theorem	dfac8a 10013*	Numeration theorem: every set with a choice function on its power set is numerable. With AC, this reduces to the statement that every set is numerable. Similar to Theorem 10.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 84. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃ℎ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (ℎ‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card))
Theorem	dfac8b 10014*	The well-ordering theorem: every numerable set is well-orderable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)
Theorem	dfac8clem 10015*	Lemma for dfac8c 10016. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ↦ (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑏𝑟𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	dfac8c 10016*	If the union of a set is well-orderable, then the set has a choice function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	ac10ct 10017*	A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10478, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ween 10018*	A set is numerable iff it can be well-ordered. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card ↔ ∃𝑟 𝑟 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ac5num 10019*	A version of ac5b 10461 with the choice as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((∪ 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	ondomen 10020	If a set is dominated by an ordinal, then it is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	numdom 10021	A set dominated by a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	ssnum 10022	A subset of a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	onssnum 10023	All subsets of the ordinals are numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ On) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	indcardi 10024*	Indirect strong induction on the cardinality of a finite or numerable set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ dom card)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 ≼ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑆 ≺ 𝑅 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	acnrcl 10025	Reverse closure for the choice set predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	acneq 10026	Equality theorem for the choice set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐶)
Theorem	isacn 10027*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}) ↑m 𝐴)∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)))
Theorem	acni 10028*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
Theorem	acni2 10029*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	acni3 10030*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑔‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝜑) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	acnlem 10031*	Construct a mapping satisfying the consequent of isacn 10027. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥))
Theorem	numacn 10032	A well-orderable set has choice sequences of every length. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ dom card → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	finacn 10033	Every set has finite choice sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → AC 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	acndom 10034	A set with long choice sequences also has shorter choice sequences, where "shorter" here means the new index set is dominated by the old index set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	acnnum 10035	A set 𝑋 which has choice sequences on it of length 𝒫 𝑋 is well-orderable (and hence has choice sequences of every length). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝒫 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	acnen 10036	The class of choice sets of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐵)
Theorem	acndom2 10037	A set smaller than one with choice sequences of length 𝐴 also has choice sequences of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → (𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	acnen2 10038	The class of sets with choice sequences of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≈ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	fodomacn 10039	A version of fodom 10506 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10442. If 𝐴 has choice sequences of length 𝐵, then any surjection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 can be inverted to an injection the other way. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ AC 𝐵 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	fodomnum 10040	A version of fodom 10506 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10442. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	fonum 10041	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	numwdom 10042	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	fodomfi2 10043	Onto functions define dominance when a finite number of choices need to be made. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomfil 10044	Weak dominance agrees with normal for finite left sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ Fin → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ≼ 𝑌))
Theorem	infpwfien 10045	Any infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its set of finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	inffien 10046	The set of finite intersections of an infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to the set itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (fi‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomnumr 10047	Weak dominance agrees with normal for numerable right sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephfnon 10048	The aleph function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ℵ Fn On
Theorem	aleph0 10049	The first infinite cardinal number, discovered by Georg Cantor in 1873, has the same size as the set of natural numbers ω (and under our particular definition is also equal to it). In the literature, the argument of the aleph function is often written as a subscript, and the first aleph is written ℵ0. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. Also Definition 12(i) of [Suppes] p. 228. From Moshé Machover, Set Theory, Logic, and Their Limitations, p. 95: "Aleph ... the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet ... is also the first letter of the Hebrew word ... (einsoph, meaning infinity), which is a cabbalistic appellation of the deity. The notation is due to Cantor, who was deeply interested in mysticism." (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
Theorem	alephlim 10050*	Value of the aleph function at a limit ordinal. Definition 12(iii) of [Suppes] p. 91. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (ℵ‘𝑥))
Theorem	alephsuc 10051	Value of the aleph function at a successor ordinal. Definition 12(ii) of [Suppes] p. 91. Here we express the successor aleph in terms of the Hartogs function df-har 9518, which gives the smallest ordinal that strictly dominates its argument (or the supremum of all ordinals that are dominated by the argument). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = (har‘(ℵ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	alephon 10052	An aleph is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	alephcard 10053	Every aleph is a cardinal number. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (card‘(ℵ‘𝐴)) = (ℵ‘𝐴)
Theorem	alephnbtwn 10054	No cardinal can be sandwiched between an aleph and its successor aleph. Theorem 67 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴)))
Theorem	alephnbtwn2 10055	No set has equinumerosity between an aleph and its successor aleph. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordilem1 10056	Lemma for alephordi 10057. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordi 10057	Strict ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord 10058	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2 10059	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 8A(a) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2i 10060	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 66 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord3 10061	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephsucdom 10062	A set dominated by an aleph is strictly dominated by its successor aleph and vice-versa. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	alephsuc2 10063*	An alternate representation of a successor aleph. The aleph function is the function obtained from the hartogs 9505 function by transfinite recursion, starting from ω. Using this theorem we could define the aleph function with {𝑧 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ≼ 𝑥} in place of ∩ {𝑧 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝑧} in df-aleph 9925. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ (ℵ‘𝐴)})
Theorem	alephdom 10064	Relationship between inclusion of ordinal numbers and dominance of infinite initial ordinals. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≼ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephgeom 10065	Every aleph is greater than or equal to the set of natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ ω ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	alephislim 10066	Every aleph is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ Lim (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	aleph11 10067	The aleph function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((ℵ‘𝐴) = (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	alephf1 10068	The aleph function is a one-to-one mapping from the ordinals to the infinite cardinals. See also alephf1ALT 10086. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ℵ:On–1-1→On
Theorem	alephsdom 10069	If an ordinal is smaller than an initial ordinal, it is strictly dominated by it. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephdom2 10070	A dominated initial ordinal is included. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephle 10071	The argument of the aleph function is less than or equal to its value. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. (Later, in alephfp2 10092, we will that equality can sometimes hold.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	cardaleph 10072*	Given any transfinite cardinal number 𝐴, there is exactly one aleph that is equal to it. Here we compute that aleph explicitly. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (ℵ‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	cardalephex 10073*	Every transfinite cardinal is an aleph and vice-versa. Theorem 8A(b) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (ω ⊆ 𝐴 → ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = (ℵ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	infenaleph 10074*	An infinite numerable set is equinumerous to an infinite initial ordinal. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℵ𝑥 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	isinfcard 10075	Two ways to express the property of being a transfinite cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran ℵ)
Theorem	iscard3 10076	Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (ω ∪ ran ℵ))
Theorem	cardnum 10077	Two ways to express the class of all cardinal numbers, which consists of the finite ordinals in ω plus the transfinite alephs. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2004.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥} = (ω ∪ ran ℵ)
Theorem	alephinit 10078*	An infinite initial ordinal is characterized by the property of being initial - that is, it is a subset of any dominating ordinal. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ ran ℵ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴 ≼ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)))
Theorem	carduniima 10079	The union of the image of a mapping to cardinals is a cardinal. Proposition 11.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶(ω ∪ ran ℵ) → ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ (ω ∪ ran ℵ)))
Theorem	cardinfima 10080*	If a mapping to cardinals has an infinite value, then the union of its image is an infinite cardinal. Corollary 11.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹:𝐴⟶(ω ∪ ran ℵ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ran ℵ) → ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ ran ℵ))
Theorem	alephiso 10081	Aleph is an order isomorphism of the class of ordinal numbers onto the class of infinite cardinals. Definition 10.27 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ℵ Isom E , E (On, {𝑥 ∣ (ω ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥)})
Theorem	alephprc 10082	The class of all transfinite cardinal numbers (the range of the aleph function) is a proper class. Proposition 10.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ¬ ran ℵ ∈ V
Theorem	alephsson 10083	The class of transfinite cardinals (the range of the aleph function) is a subclass of the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ran ℵ ⊆ On
Theorem	unialeph 10084	The union of the class of transfinite cardinals (the range of the aleph function) is the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ∪ ran ℵ = On
Theorem	alephsmo 10085	The aleph function is strictly monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ Smo ℵ
Theorem	alephf1ALT 10086	Alternate proof of alephf1 10068. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℵ:On–1-1→On
Theorem	alephfplem1 10087	Lemma for alephfp 10091. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻‘∅) ∈ ran ℵ
Theorem	alephfplem2 10088*	Lemma for alephfp 10091. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ω → (𝐻‘suc 𝑤) = (ℵ‘(𝐻‘𝑤)))
Theorem	alephfplem3 10089*	Lemma for alephfp 10091. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑣 ∈ ω → (𝐻‘𝑣) ∈ ran ℵ)
Theorem	alephfplem4 10090	Lemma for alephfp 10091. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ (𝐻 “ ω) ∈ ran ℵ
Theorem	alephfp 10091	The aleph function has a fixed point. Similar to Proposition 11.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104, except that we construct an actual example of a fixed point rather than just showing its existence. See alephfp2 10092 for an abbreviated version just showing existence. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (ℵ‘∪ (𝐻 “ ω)) = ∪ (𝐻 “ ω)
Theorem	alephfp2 10092	The aleph function has at least one fixed point. Proposition 11.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104. See alephfp 10091 for an actual example of a fixed point. Compare the inequality alephle 10071 that holds in general. Note that if 𝑥 is a fixed point, then ℵ‘ℵ‘ℵ‘... ℵ‘𝑥 = 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (ℵ‘𝑥) = 𝑥
Theorem	alephval3 10093*	An alternate way to express the value of the aleph function: it is the least infinite cardinal different from all values at smaller arguments. Definition of aleph in [Enderton] p. 212 and definition of aleph in [BellMachover] p. 490 . (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ((card‘𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ ω ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = (ℵ‘𝑦))})
Theorem	alephsucpw2 10094	The power set of an aleph is not strictly dominated by the successor aleph. (The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis says they are equinumerous, see gch3 10660 or gchaleph2 10656.) The transposed form alephsucpw 10554 cannot be proven without the AC, and is in fact equivalent to it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴)
Theorem	mappwen 10095	Power rule for cardinal arithmetic. Theorem 11.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐵) ∧ (2o ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝒫 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	finnisoeu 10096*	A finite totally ordered set has a unique order isomorphism to a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 Isom E , 𝑅 ((card‘𝐴), 𝐴))
Theorem	iunfictbso 10097	Countability of a countable union of finite sets with a strict (not globally well) order fulfilling the choice role. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ ω ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin ∧ 𝐵 Or ∪ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝐴 ≼ ω)
2.6.13  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 10098	Wff for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 10099*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There is a slight problem with taking the exact form of ax-ac 10442 as our definition, because the equivalence to more standard forms (dfac2 10114) requires the Axiom of Regularity, which we often try to avoid. Thus, we take the first of the "textbook forms" as the definition and derive the form of ax-ac 10442 itself as dfac0 10116. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑥))
Theorem	aceq1 10100*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10442. The proof uses neither AC nor the Axiom of Regularity. The right-hand side expresses our AC with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥∀𝑧(∃𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥)))