P. 101 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10001-10100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	numwdom 10001	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	fodomfi2 10002	Onto functions define dominance when a finite number of choices need to be made. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomfil 10003	Weak dominance agrees with normal for finite left sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ Fin → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ≼ 𝑌))
Theorem	infpwfien 10004	Any infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its set of finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	inffien 10005	The set of finite intersections of an infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to the set itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (fi‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomnumr 10006	Weak dominance agrees with normal for numerable right sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephfnon 10007	The aleph function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ℵ Fn On
Theorem	aleph0 10008	The first infinite cardinal number, discovered by Georg Cantor in 1873, has the same size as the set of natural numbers ω (and under our particular definition is also equal to it). In the literature, the argument of the aleph function is often written as a subscript, and the first aleph is written ℵ0. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. Also Definition 12(i) of [Suppes] p. 228. From Moshé Machover, Set Theory, Logic, and Their Limitations, p. 95: "Aleph ... the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet ... is also the first letter of the Hebrew word ... (einsoph, meaning infinity), which is a cabbalistic appellation of the deity. The notation is due to Cantor, who was deeply interested in mysticism." (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
Theorem	alephlim 10009*	Value of the aleph function at a limit ordinal. Definition 12(iii) of [Suppes] p. 91. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (ℵ‘𝑥))
Theorem	alephsuc 10010	Value of the aleph function at a successor ordinal. Definition 12(ii) of [Suppes] p. 91. Here we express the successor aleph in terms of the Hartogs function df-har 9491, which gives the smallest ordinal that strictly dominates its argument (or the supremum of all ordinals that are dominated by the argument). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = (har‘(ℵ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	alephon 10011	An aleph is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	alephcard 10012	Every aleph is a cardinal number. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (card‘(ℵ‘𝐴)) = (ℵ‘𝐴)
Theorem	alephnbtwn 10013	No cardinal can be sandwiched between an aleph and its successor aleph. Theorem 67 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴)))
Theorem	alephnbtwn2 10014	No set has equinumerosity between an aleph and its successor aleph. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordilem1 10015	Lemma for alephordi 10016. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordi 10016	Strict ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord 10017	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2 10018	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 8A(a) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2i 10019	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 66 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord3 10020	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephsucdom 10021	A set dominated by an aleph is strictly dominated by its successor aleph and vice-versa. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ≼ (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	alephsuc2 10022*	An alternate representation of a successor aleph. The aleph function is the function obtained from the hartogs 9478 function by transfinite recursion, starting from ω. Using this theorem we could define the aleph function with {𝑧 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ≼ 𝑥} in place of ∩ {𝑧 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝑧} in df-aleph 9884. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≼ (ℵ‘𝐴)})
Theorem	alephdom 10023	Relationship between inclusion of ordinal numbers and dominance of infinite initial ordinals. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≼ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephgeom 10024	Every aleph is greater than or equal to the set of natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ ω ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	alephislim 10025	Every aleph is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ Lim (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	aleph11 10026	The aleph function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((ℵ‘𝐴) = (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	alephf1 10027	The aleph function is a one-to-one mapping from the ordinals to the infinite cardinals. See also alephf1ALT 10045. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ℵ:On–1-1→On
Theorem	alephsdom 10028	If an ordinal is smaller than an initial ordinal, it is strictly dominated by it. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephdom2 10029	A dominated initial ordinal is included. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephle 10030	The argument of the aleph function is less than or equal to its value. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. (Later, in alephfp2 10051, we will that equality can sometimes hold.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴))
Theorem	cardaleph 10031*	Given any transfinite cardinal number 𝐴, there is exactly one aleph that is equal to it. Here we compute that aleph explicitly. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (ℵ‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	cardalephex 10032*	Every transfinite cardinal is an aleph and vice-versa. Theorem 8A(b) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (ω ⊆ 𝐴 → ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = (ℵ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	infenaleph 10033*	An infinite numerable set is equinumerous to an infinite initial ordinal. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℵ𝑥 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	isinfcard 10034	Two ways to express the property of being a transfinite cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((ω ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ran ℵ)
Theorem	iscard3 10035	Two ways to express the property of being a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (ω ∪ ran ℵ))
Theorem	cardnum 10036	Two ways to express the class of all cardinal numbers, which consists of the finite ordinals in ω plus the transfinite alephs. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2004.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥} = (ω ∪ ran ℵ)
Theorem	alephinit 10037*	An infinite initial ordinal is characterized by the property of being initial - that is, it is a subset of any dominating ordinal. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 29-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ ran ℵ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴 ≼ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥)))
Theorem	carduniima 10038	The union of the image of a mapping to cardinals is a cardinal. Proposition 11.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶(ω ∪ ran ℵ) → ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ (ω ∪ ran ℵ)))
Theorem	cardinfima 10039*	If a mapping to cardinals has an infinite value, then the union of its image is an infinite cardinal. Corollary 11.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹:𝐴⟶(ω ∪ ran ℵ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ran ℵ) → ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ ran ℵ))
Theorem	alephiso 10040	Aleph is an order isomorphism of the class of ordinal numbers onto the class of infinite cardinals. Definition 10.27 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ℵ Isom E , E (On, {𝑥 ∣ (ω ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥)})
Theorem	alephprc 10041	The class of all transfinite cardinal numbers (the range of the aleph function) is a proper class. Proposition 10.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ¬ ran ℵ ∈ V
Theorem	alephsson 10042	The class of transfinite cardinals (the range of the aleph function) is a subclass of the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ran ℵ ⊆ On
Theorem	unialeph 10043	The union of the class of transfinite cardinals (the range of the aleph function) is the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ∪ ran ℵ = On
Theorem	alephsmo 10044	The aleph function is strictly monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ Smo ℵ
Theorem	alephf1ALT 10045	Alternate proof of alephf1 10027. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℵ:On–1-1→On
Theorem	alephfplem1 10046	Lemma for alephfp 10050. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻‘∅) ∈ ran ℵ
Theorem	alephfplem2 10047*	Lemma for alephfp 10050. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ω → (𝐻‘suc 𝑤) = (ℵ‘(𝐻‘𝑤)))
Theorem	alephfplem3 10048*	Lemma for alephfp 10050. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑣 ∈ ω → (𝐻‘𝑣) ∈ ran ℵ)
Theorem	alephfplem4 10049	Lemma for alephfp 10050. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ (𝐻 “ ω) ∈ ran ℵ
Theorem	alephfp 10050	The aleph function has a fixed point. Similar to Proposition 11.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104, except that we construct an actual example of a fixed point rather than just showing its existence. See alephfp2 10051 for an abbreviated version just showing existence. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (rec(ℵ, ω) ↾ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (ℵ‘∪ (𝐻 “ ω)) = ∪ (𝐻 “ ω)
Theorem	alephfp2 10051	The aleph function has at least one fixed point. Proposition 11.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 104. See alephfp 10050 for an actual example of a fixed point. Compare the inequality alephle 10030 that holds in general. Note that if 𝑥 is a fixed point, then ℵ‘ℵ‘ℵ‘... ℵ‘𝑥 = 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (ℵ‘𝑥) = 𝑥
Theorem	alephval3 10052*	An alternate way to express the value of the aleph function: it is the least infinite cardinal different from all values at smaller arguments. Definition of aleph in [Enderton] p. 212 and definition of aleph in [BellMachover] p. 490 . (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ ((card‘𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ ω ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = (ℵ‘𝑦))})
Theorem	alephsucpw2 10053	The power set of an aleph is not strictly dominated by the successor aleph. (The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis says they are equinumerous, see gch3 10620 or gchaleph2 10616.) The transposed form alephsucpw 10514 cannot be proven without the AC, and is in fact equivalent to it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴)
Theorem	mappwen 10054	Power rule for cardinal arithmetic. Theorem 11.21 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐵) ∧ (2o ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝒫 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	finnisoeu 10055*	A finite totally ordered set has a unique order isomorphism to a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃!𝑓 𝑓 Isom E , 𝑅 ((card‘𝐴), 𝐴))
Theorem	iunfictbso 10056	Countability of a countable union of finite sets with a strict (not globally well) order fulfilling the choice role. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ ω ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ Fin ∧ 𝐵 Or ∪ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝐴 ≼ ω)
2.6.13  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 10057	Wff for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 10058*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There is a slight problem with taking the exact form of ax-ac 10402 as our definition, because the equivalence to more standard forms (dfac2 10074) requires the Axiom of Regularity, which we often try to avoid. Thus, we take the first of the "textbook forms" as the definition and derive the form of ax-ac 10402 itself as dfac0 10076. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑥))
Theorem	aceq1 10059*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10402. The proof uses neither AC nor the Axiom of Regularity. The right-hand side expresses our AC with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥∀𝑧(∃𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥)))
Theorem	aceq0 10060*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The proof uses neither AC nor the Axiom of Regularity. The right-hand side is our original ax-ac 10402. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → ∃𝑣∀𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
Theorem	aceq2 10061*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The proof uses neither AC nor the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣)))
Theorem	aceq3lem 10062*	Lemma for dfac3 10063. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ dom 𝑦 ↦ (𝑓‘{𝑢 ∣ 𝑤𝑦𝑢}))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑦))
Theorem	dfac3 10063*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The left-hand side is defined as the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. The right-hand side is the Axiom of Choice of [TakeutiZaring] p. 83. The proof does not depend on AC. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	dfac4 10064*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The right-hand side is Axiom AC of [BellMachover] p. 488. The proof does not depend on AC. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	dfac5lem1 10065*	Lemma for dfac5 10071. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (({𝑤} × 𝑤) ∩ 𝑦) ↔ ∃!𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ⟨𝑤, 𝑔⟩ ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	dfac5lem2 10066*	Lemma for dfac5 10071. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ (𝑢 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℎ 𝑢 = ({𝑡} × 𝑡))}    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝑤, 𝑔⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℎ ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝑤))
Theorem	dfac5lem3 10067*	Lemma for dfac5 10071. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ (𝑢 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℎ 𝑢 = ({𝑡} × 𝑡))}    ⇒   ⊢ (({𝑤} × 𝑤) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℎ))
Theorem	dfac5lem4 10068*	Lemma for dfac5 10071. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2004.) Avoid ax-11 2181. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ (𝑢 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℎ 𝑢 = ({𝑡} × 𝑡))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))
Theorem	dfac5lem5 10069*	Lemma for dfac5 10071. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ (𝑢 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℎ 𝑢 = ({𝑡} × 𝑡))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (∪ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓∀𝑤 ∈ ℎ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑤) ∈ 𝑤))
Theorem	dfac5lem4OLD 10070*	Obsolete version of dfac5lem4 10068 as of 23-Jun-2025. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ (𝑢 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℎ 𝑢 = ({𝑡} × 𝑡))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (∪ 𝐴 ∩ 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))
Theorem	dfac5 10071*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The right-hand side is Theorem 6M(4) of [Enderton] p. 151 and asserts that given a family of mutually disjoint nonempty sets, a set exists containing exactly one member from each set in the family. The proof does not depend on AC. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)))
Theorem	dfac2a 10072*	Our Axiom of Choice (in the form of ac3 10405) implies the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. The proof uses neither AC nor the Axiom of Regularity. See dfac2b 10073 for the converse (which does use the Axiom of Regularity). (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣)) → CHOICE)
Theorem	dfac2b 10073*	Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49 implies our Axiom of Choice (in the form of ac3 10405). The proof does not make use of AC. Note that the Axiom of Regularity is used by the proof. Specifically, elneq 9535 and preleq 9557 that are referenced in the proof each make use of Regularity for their derivations. (The reverse implication can be derived without using Regularity; see dfac2a 10072.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (CHOICE → ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣)))
Theorem	dfac2 10074*	Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49 corresponds to our Axiom of Choice (in the form of ac3 10405). The proof does not make use of AC, but the Axiom of Regularity is used (by applying dfac2b 10073). (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jun-2022.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣)))
Theorem	dfac7 10075*	Equivalence of the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49 and our Axiom of Choice (in the form of ac2 10404). The proof does not depend on AC but does depend on the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢))
Theorem	dfac0 10076*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice. The proof uses the Axiom of Regularity. The right-hand side is our original ax-ac 10402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → ∃𝑣∀𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑡) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
Theorem	dfac1 10077*	Equivalence of two versions of the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10402. The proof uses the Axiom of Regularity. The right-hand side expresses our AC with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥∀𝑧(∃𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)) ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑥)))
Theorem	dfac8 10078*	A proof of the equivalency of the well-ordering theorem weth 10438 and the axiom of choice ac7 10416. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑟 𝑟 We 𝑥)
Theorem	dfac9 10079*	Equivalence of the axiom of choice with a statement related to ac9 10426; definition AC3 of [Schechter] p. 139. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ ∅ ∉ ran 𝑓) → X𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑓‘𝑥) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	dfac10 10080	Axiom of Choice equivalent: the cardinality function measures every set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
Theorem	dfac10c 10081*	Axiom of Choice equivalent: every set is equinumerous to an ordinal. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑦 ≈ 𝑥)
Theorem	dfac10b 10082	Axiom of Choice equivalent: every set is equinumerous to an ordinal (quantifier-free short cryptic version alluded to in df-ac 10058). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ( ≈ “ On) = V)
Theorem	acacni 10083	A choice equivalent: every set has choice sets of every length. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((CHOICE ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → AC 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	dfacacn 10084	A choice equivalent: every set has choice sets of every length. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥AC 𝑥 = V)
Theorem	dfac13 10085	The axiom of choice holds iff every set has choice sequences as long as itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ AC 𝑥)
Theorem	dfac12lem1 10086*	Lemma for dfac12 10092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 (har‘(𝑅1‘𝐴))–1-1→On)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘dom 𝑥) ↦ if(dom 𝑥 = ∪ dom 𝑥, ((suc ∪ ran ∪ ran 𝑥 ·o (rank‘𝑦)) +o ((𝑥‘suc (rank‘𝑦))‘𝑦)), (𝐹‘((◡OrdIso( E , ran (𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) ∘ (𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) “ 𝑦))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (◡OrdIso( E , ran (𝐺‘∪ 𝐶)) ∘ (𝐺‘∪ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐶) ↦ if(𝐶 = ∪ 𝐶, ((suc ∪ ran ∪ (𝐺 “ 𝐶) ·o (rank‘𝑦)) +o ((𝐺‘suc (rank‘𝑦))‘𝑦)), (𝐹‘(𝐻 “ 𝑦)))))
Theorem	dfac12lem2 10087*	Lemma for dfac12 10092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 (har‘(𝑅1‘𝐴))–1-1→On)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘dom 𝑥) ↦ if(dom 𝑥 = ∪ dom 𝑥, ((suc ∪ ran ∪ ran 𝑥 ·o (rank‘𝑦)) +o ((𝑥‘suc (rank‘𝑦))‘𝑦)), (𝐹‘((◡OrdIso( E , ran (𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) ∘ (𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) “ 𝑦))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (◡OrdIso( E , ran (𝐺‘∪ 𝐶)) ∘ (𝐺‘∪ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 (𝐺‘𝑧):(𝑅1‘𝑧)–1-1→On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐶):(𝑅1‘𝐶)–1-1→On)
Theorem	dfac12lem3 10088*	Lemma for dfac12 10092. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 (har‘(𝑅1‘𝐴))–1-1→On)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1‘dom 𝑥) ↦ if(dom 𝑥 = ∪ dom 𝑥, ((suc ∪ ran ∪ ran 𝑥 ·o (rank‘𝑦)) +o ((𝑥‘suc (rank‘𝑦))‘𝑦)), (𝐹‘((◡OrdIso( E , ran (𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) ∘ (𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥)) “ 𝑦))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12r 10089	The axiom of choice holds iff every ordinal has a well-orderable powerset. This version of dfac12 10092 does not assume the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ⊆ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12k 10090*	Equivalence of dfac12 10092 and dfac12a 10091, without using Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ On 𝒫 (ℵ‘𝑦) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12a 10091	The axiom of choice holds iff every ordinal has a well-orderable powerset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12 10092	The axiom of choice holds iff every aleph has a well-orderable powerset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 (ℵ‘𝑥) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	kmlem1 10093*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, 1 => 2. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → 𝜓)))
Theorem	kmlem2 10094*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)) ↔ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))))
Theorem	kmlem3 10095*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. The right-hand side is part of the hypothesis of 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)))
Theorem	kmlem4 10096*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)
Theorem	kmlem5 10097*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)
Theorem	kmlem6 10098*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 4 => 1. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ∅)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	kmlem7 10099*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 4 => 1. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)))
Theorem	kmlem8 10100*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4 1 <=> 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 𝜓 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))) ↔ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 𝜓 ∨ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))))