Theorem konigth 10625

Description: Konig's Theorem. If 𝑚(𝑖) ≺ 𝑛(𝑖) for all 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴, then Σ𝑖 ∈ 𝐴𝑚(𝑖) ≺ ∏𝑖 ∈ 𝐴𝑛(𝑖), where the sums and products stand in for disjoint union and infinite cartesian product. The version here is proven with unions rather than disjoint unions for convenience, but the version with disjoint unions is clearly a special case of this version. The Axiom of Choice is needed for this proof, but it contains AC as a simple corollary (letting 𝑚(𝑖) = ∅, this theorem says that an infinite cartesian product of nonempty sets is nonempty), so this is an AC equivalent. Theorem 11.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 107. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
konigth.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
konigth.2	⊢ 𝑆 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑀‘𝑖)
konigth.3	⊢ 𝑃 = X𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑁‘𝑖)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
konigth	⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑀‘𝑖) ≺ (𝑁‘𝑖) → 𝑆 ≺ 𝑃)

Distinct variable group:   𝐴,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑃(𝑖)   𝑆(𝑖)   𝑀(𝑖)   𝑁(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem konigth

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑒 𝑓 𝑗 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		konigth.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		konigth.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑀‘𝑖)
3		konigth.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑃 = X𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑁‘𝑖)
4		fveq2 6873	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑎 → (𝑓‘𝑏) = (𝑓‘𝑎))
5	4	fveq1d 6875	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑎 → ((𝑓‘𝑏)‘𝑖) = ((𝑓‘𝑎)‘𝑖))
6	5	cbvmptv 5208	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ (𝑀‘𝑖) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑏)‘𝑖)) = (𝑎 ∈ (𝑀‘𝑖) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑎)‘𝑖))
7	6	mpteq2i 5200	. 2 ⊢ (𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ (𝑀‘𝑖) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑏)‘𝑖))) = (𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝑀‘𝑖) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑎)‘𝑖)))
8		fveq2 6873	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑖 → (𝑒‘𝑗) = (𝑒‘𝑖))
9	8	cbvmptv 5208	. 2 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑒‘𝑗)) = (𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑒‘𝑖))
10	1, 2, 3, 7, 9	konigthlem 10624	1 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑀‘𝑖) ≺ (𝑁‘𝑖) → 𝑆 ≺ 𝑃)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450  ∪ ciun 4950   class class class wbr 5102   ↦ cmpt 5185  ‘cfv 6527  Xcixp 8903   ≺ csdm 8950

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7734  ax-ac2 10512

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-pss 3918  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5542  df-eprel 5547  df-po 5555  df-so 5556  df-fr 5600  df-se 5601  df-we 5602  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-pred 6293  df-ord 6354  df-on 6355  df-suc 6357  df-iota 6483  df-fun 6529  df-fn 6530  df-f 6531  df-f1 6532  df-fo 6533  df-f1o 6534  df-fv 6535  df-isom 6536  df-riota 7365  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985  df-frecs 8277  df-wrecs 8308  df-recs 8357  df-er 8695  df-map 8827  df-ixp 8904  df-en 8952  df-dom 8953  df-sdom 8954  df-card 9991  df-acn 9994  df-ac 10166

This theorem is used by:  pwcfsdom  10639