Theorem onsetrec 49697

Description: Construct On using set recursion. When 𝑥 ∈ On, the function 𝐹 constructs the least ordinal greater than any of the elements of 𝑥, which is ∪ 𝑥 for a limit ordinal and suc ∪ 𝑥 for a successor ordinal.

For example, (𝐹‘{1_o, 2_o}) = {∪ {1_o, 2_o}, suc ∪ {1_o, 2_o}} = {2_o, 3_o} which contains 3_o, and (𝐹‘ω) = {∪ ω, suc ∪ ω} = {ω, ω +_o 1_o}, which contains ω. If we start with the empty set and keep applying 𝐹 transfinitely many times, all ordinal numbers will be generated.

Any function 𝐹 fulfilling lemmas onsetreclem2 49695 and onsetreclem3 49696 will recursively generate On; for example, 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc suc ∪ 𝑥}) also works. Whether this function or the function in the theorem is used, taking this theorem as a definition of On is unsatisfying because it relies on the different properties of limit and successor ordinals. A different approach could be to let 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∣ Tr 𝑦}), based on dfon2 35780.

The proof of this theorem uses the dummy variable 𝑎 rather than 𝑥 to avoid a distinct variable condition between 𝐹 and 𝑥. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 22-Jun-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
onsetrec.1	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {∪ 𝑥, suc ∪ 𝑥})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onsetrec	⊢ setrecs(𝐹) = On

Proof of Theorem onsetrec

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2729	. . . 4 ⊢ setrecs(𝐹) = setrecs(𝐹)
2		onsetrec.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {∪ 𝑥, suc ∪ 𝑥})
3	2	onsetreclem2 49695	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ On → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ On)
4	3	ax-gen 1795	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑎(𝑎 ⊆ On → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ On)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → ∀𝑎(𝑎 ⊆ On → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ On))
6	1, 5	setrec2v 49685	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → setrecs(𝐹) ⊆ On)
7	6	mptru 1547	. 2 ⊢ setrecs(𝐹) ⊆ On
8		vex 3451	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
9	8	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ V)
10		id 22	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹))
11	1, 9, 10	setrec1 49680	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ setrecs(𝐹))
12	2	onsetreclem3 49696	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ On → 𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑎))
13		ssel 3940	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑎) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹)))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2im 40	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → (𝑎 ∈ On → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹)))
15	14	com12 32	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ On → (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹)))
16	15	rgen 3046	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ On (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹))
17		tfi 7829	. 2 ⊢ ((setrecs(𝐹) ⊆ On ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ On (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹))) → setrecs(𝐹) = On)
18	7, 16, 17	mp2an 692	1 ⊢ setrecs(𝐹) = On

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540  ⊤wtru 1541   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044  Vcvv 3447   ⊆ wss 3914  {cpr 4591  ∪ cuni 4871   ↦ cmpt 5188  Oncon0 6332  suc csuc 6334  ‘cfv 6511  setrecscsetrecs 49672

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5234  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711  ax-reg 9545  ax-inf2 9594

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-pss 3934  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-int 4911  df-iun 4957  df-iin 4958  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-tr 5215  df-id 5533  df-eprel 5538  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-we 5593  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-pred 6274  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336  df-lim 6337  df-suc 6338  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-ov 7390  df-om 7843  df-2nd 7969  df-frecs 8260  df-wrecs 8291  df-recs 8340  df-rdg 8378  df-r1 9717  df-rank 9718  df-setrecs 49673

This theorem is referenced by: (None)