Theorem onsetrec 46413

Description: Construct On using set recursion. When 𝑥 ∈ On, the function 𝐹 constructs the least ordinal greater than any of the elements of 𝑥, which is ∪ 𝑥 for a limit ordinal and suc ∪ 𝑥 for a successor ordinal.

For example, (𝐹‘{1_o, 2_o}) = {∪ {1_o, 2_o}, suc ∪ {1_o, 2_o}} = {2_o, 3_o} which contains 3_o, and (𝐹‘ω) = {∪ ω, suc ∪ ω} = {ω, ω +_o 1_o}, which contains ω. If we start with the empty set and keep applying 𝐹 transfinitely many times, all ordinal numbers will be generated.

Any function 𝐹 fulfilling lemmas onsetreclem2 46411 and onsetreclem3 46412 will recursively generate On; for example, 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc suc ∪ 𝑥}) also works. Whether this function or the function in the theorem is used, taking this theorem as a definition of On is unsatisfying because it relies on the different properties of limit and successor ordinals. A different approach could be to let 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∣ Tr 𝑦}), based on dfon2 33768.

The proof of this theorem uses the dummy variable 𝑎 rather than 𝑥 to avoid a distinct variable condition between 𝐹 and 𝑥. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 22-Jun-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
onsetrec.1	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {∪ 𝑥, suc ∪ 𝑥})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onsetrec	⊢ setrecs(𝐹) = On

Proof of Theorem onsetrec

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ setrecs(𝐹) = setrecs(𝐹)
2		onsetrec.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {∪ 𝑥, suc ∪ 𝑥})
3	2	onsetreclem2 46411	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ On → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ On)
4	3	ax-gen 1798	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑎(𝑎 ⊆ On → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ On)
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → ∀𝑎(𝑎 ⊆ On → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ On))
6	1, 5	setrec2v 46402	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → setrecs(𝐹) ⊆ On)
7	6	mptru 1546	. 2 ⊢ setrecs(𝐹) ⊆ On
8		vex 3436	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
9	8	a1i 11	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ V)
10		id 22	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹))
11	1, 9, 10	setrec1 46397	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ setrecs(𝐹))
12	2	onsetreclem3 46412	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ On → 𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑎))
13		ssel 3914	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑎) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹)))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2im 40	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → (𝑎 ∈ On → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹)))
15	14	com12 32	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ On → (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹)))
16	15	rgen 3074	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ On (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹))
17		tfi 7700	. 2 ⊢ ((setrecs(𝐹) ⊆ On ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ On (𝑎 ⊆ setrecs(𝐹) → 𝑎 ∈ setrecs(𝐹))) → setrecs(𝐹) = On)
18	7, 16, 17	mp2an 689	1 ⊢ setrecs(𝐹) = On

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539  ⊤wtru 1540   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064  Vcvv 3432   ⊆ wss 3887  {cpr 4563  ∪ cuni 4839   ↦ cmpt 5157  Oncon0 6266  suc csuc 6268  ‘cfv 6433  setrecscsetrecs 46389

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588  ax-reg 9351  ax-inf2 9399

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-pss 3906  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-int 4880  df-iun 4926  df-iin 4927  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-tr 5192  df-id 5489  df-eprel 5495  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-fr 5544  df-we 5546  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-pred 6202  df-ord 6269  df-on 6270  df-lim 6271  df-suc 6272  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-ov 7278  df-om 7713  df-2nd 7832  df-frecs 8097  df-wrecs 8128  df-recs 8202  df-rdg 8241  df-r1 9522  df-rank 9523  df-setrecs 46390

This theorem is referenced by: (None)