Theorem r1pwcl 9885

Description: The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r1pwcl	⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem r1pwcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r1elwf 9834	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
2		elfvdm 6944	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
3	1, 2	jca 511	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
4	3	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
5		r1elwf 9834	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
6		pwwf 9845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
7	5, 6	sylibr 234	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8		elfvdm 6944	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
9	7, 8	jca 511	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
10	9	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
11		limsuc 7870	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
12	11	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
13		rankpwi 9861	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
14	13	ad2antrl 728	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
15	14	eleq1d 2824	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
16	12, 15	bitr4d 282	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
17		rankr1ag 9840	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
18	17	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
19		rankr1ag 9840	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
20	6, 19	sylanb 581	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
22	16, 18, 21	3bitr4d 311	. . 3 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
23	22	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))))
24	4, 10, 23	pm5.21ndd 379	1 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  𝒫 cpw 4605  ∪ cuni 4912  dom cdm 5689   “ cima 5692  Oncon0 6386  Lim wlim 6387  suc csuc 6388  ‘cfv 6563  𝑅₁cr1 9800  rankcrnk 9801

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pow 5371  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3379  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-csb 3909  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-int 4952  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5583  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-we 5643  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-pred 6323  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-lim 6391  df-suc 6392  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fo 6569  df-f1o 6570  df-fv 6571  df-ov 7434  df-om 7888  df-2nd 8014  df-frecs 8305  df-wrecs 8336  df-recs 8410  df-rdg 8449  df-r1 9802  df-rank 9803

This theorem is referenced by:  r1limwun  10774