Theorem r1pwcl 9916

Description: The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r1pwcl	⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem r1pwcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r1elwf 9865	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
2		elfvdm 6957	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
3	1, 2	jca 511	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
4	3	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
5		r1elwf 9865	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
6		pwwf 9876	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
7	5, 6	sylibr 234	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8		elfvdm 6957	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
9	7, 8	jca 511	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
10	9	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
11		limsuc 7886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
12	11	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
13		rankpwi 9892	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
14	13	ad2antrl 727	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
15	14	eleq1d 2829	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
16	12, 15	bitr4d 282	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
17		rankr1ag 9871	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
18	17	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
19		rankr1ag 9871	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
20	6, 19	sylanb 580	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
22	16, 18, 21	3bitr4d 311	. . 3 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
23	22	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))))
24	4, 10, 23	pm5.21ndd 379	1 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  𝒫 cpw 4622  ∪ cuni 4931  dom cdm 5700   “ cima 5703  Oncon0 6395  Lim wlim 6396  suc csuc 6397  ‘cfv 6573  𝑅₁cr1 9831  rankcrnk 9832

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-pss 3996  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-int 4971  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-tr 5284  df-id 5593  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-pred 6332  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-lim 6400  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-om 7904  df-2nd 8031  df-frecs 8322  df-wrecs 8353  df-recs 8427  df-rdg 8466  df-r1 9833  df-rank 9834

This theorem is referenced by:  r1limwun  10805