Theorem r1pwcl 9815

Description: The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r1pwcl	⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem r1pwcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r1elwf 9764	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
2		elfvdm 6913	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
3	1, 2	jca 520	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
4	3	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
5		r1elwf 9764	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
6		pwwf 9775	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
7	5, 6	sylibr 237	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8		elfvdm 6913	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
9	7, 8	jca 520	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
10	9	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
11		limsuc 7841	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
12	11	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
13		rankpwi 9791	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
14	13	ad2antrl 740	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
15	14	eleq1d 2854	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
16	12, 15	bitr4d 285	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
17		rankr1ag 9770	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
18	17	adantl 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
19		rankr1ag 9770	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
20	6, 19	sylanb 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	adantl 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
22	16, 18, 21	3bitr4d 314	. . 3 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
23	22	ex 417	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))))
24	4, 10, 23	pm5.21ndd 382	1 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  𝒫 cpw 4564  ∪ cuni 4873  dom cdm 5659   “ cima 5662  Oncon0 6357  Lim wlim 6358  suc csuc 6359  ‘cfv 6533  𝑅₁cr1 9730  rankcrnk 9731

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7730

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-int 4914  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-tr 5220  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6299  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-lim 6362  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7411  df-om 7859  df-2nd 7983  df-frecs 8274  df-wrecs 8305  df-recs 8354  df-rdg 8393  df-r1 9732  df-rank 9733

This theorem is referenced by:  r1limwun  10717