Theorem r1pwcl 9820

Description: The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r1pwcl	⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem r1pwcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r1elwf 9769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
2		elfvdm 6917	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
3	1, 2	jca 520	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
4	3	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
5		r1elwf 9769	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
6		pwwf 9780	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
7	5, 6	sylibr 237	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8		elfvdm 6917	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)
9	7, 8	jca 520	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1))
10	9	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)))
11		limsuc 7846	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
12	11	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
13		rankpwi 9796	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
14	13	ad2antrl 740	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴))
15	14	eleq1d 2848	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
16	12, 15	bitr4d 285	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
17		rankr1ag 9775	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
18	17	adantl 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
19		rankr1ag 9775	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
20	6, 19	sylanb 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	adantl 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
22	16, 18, 21	3bitr4d 314	. . 3 ⊢ ((Lim 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1)) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
23	22	ex 417	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))))
24	4, 10, 23	pm5.21ndd 382	1 ⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  𝒫 cpw 4563  ∪ cuni 4873  dom cdm 5663   “ cima 5666  Oncon0 6362  Lim wlim 6363  suc csuc 6364  ‘cfv 6538  𝑅₁cr1 9735  rankcrnk 9736

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-int 4914  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-tr 5220  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-pred 6304  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7415  df-om 7864  df-2nd 7988  df-frecs 8279  df-wrecs 8310  df-recs 8359  df-rdg 8398  df-r1 9737  df-rank 9738

This theorem is referenced by:  r1limwun  10722