Theorem ctssexmid 7024

Description: The decidability condition in ctssdc 6998 is needed. More specifically, ctssdc 6998 minus that condition, plus the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ctssexmid.1	⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o))
ctssexmid.lpo	⊢ ω ∈ Omni

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ctssexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑓,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ctssexmid

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3182	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω
2		f1oi 5405	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–1-1-onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}
3		f1ofo 5374	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–1-1-onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
4		ctssexmid.lpo	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ∈ Omni
5	4	elexi 2698	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ∈ V
6	5	rabex 4072	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
7		resiexg 4864	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V → ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) ∈ V)
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) ∈ V
9		foeq1 5341	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}))
10	8, 9	spcev 2780	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
11	2, 3, 10	mp2b 8	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}
12		simpr 109	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
13	12	sseq1d 3126	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑦 ⊆ ω ↔ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω))
14		eqidd 2140	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑓 = 𝑓)
15		simpl 108	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
16	14, 12, 15	foeq123d 5361	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥 ↔ 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}))
17	16	exbidv 1797	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}))
18	13, 17	anbi12d 464	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})))
19		djueq1 6925	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 ⊔ 1o) = ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))
20		foeq3 5343	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊔ 1o) = ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → (𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o) ↔ 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)))
21	15, 19, 20	3syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o) ↔ 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)))
22	21	exbidv 1797	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o) ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)))
23	18, 22	imbi12d 233	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o)) ↔ (({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))))
24		ctssexmid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o))
25	6, 6, 23, 24	vtocl2 2741	. . 3 ⊢ (({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))
26	1, 11, 25	mp2an 422	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)
27	4	a1i 9	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → ω ∈ Omni)
28		id 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))
29	27, 28	fodjuomni 7021	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∨ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅))
30	29	exlimiv 1577	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∨ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅))
31		biidd 171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
32	31	elrab 2840	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜑))
33	32	simprbi 273	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
34	33	exlimiv 1577	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
35		rabeq0 3392	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ω ¬ 𝜑)
36		peano1 4508	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
37		elex2 2702	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ ω → ∃𝑢 𝑢 ∈ ω)
38		r19.3rmv 3453	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑢 𝑢 ∈ ω → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ω ¬ 𝜑))
39	36, 37, 38	mp2b 8	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ω ¬ 𝜑)
40	35, 39	sylbb2 137	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ → ¬ 𝜑)
41	34, 40	orim12i 748	. 2 ⊢ ((∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∨ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
42	26, 30, 41	mp2b 8	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 697   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468   ∈ wcel 1480  ∀wral 2416  {crab 2420  Vcvv 2686   ⊆ wss 3071  ∅c0 3363   I cid 4210  ωcom 4504   ↾ cres 4541  –onto→wfo 5121  –1-1-onto→wf1o 5122  1_oc1o 6306   ⊔ cdju 6922  Omnicomni 7004

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-nul 4054  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131  ax-un 4355  ax-setind 4452

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 820  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-fal 1337  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ne 2309  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-rab 2425  df-v 2688  df-sbc 2910  df-csb 3004  df-dif 3073  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-nul 3364  df-if 3475  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-uni 3737  df-int 3772  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-mpt 3991  df-tr 4027  df-id 4215  df-iord 4288  df-on 4290  df-suc 4293  df-iom 4505  df-xp 4545  df-rel 4546  df-cnv 4547  df-co 4548  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-res 4551  df-ima 4552  df-iota 5088  df-fun 5125  df-fn 5126  df-f 5127  df-f1 5128  df-fo 5129  df-f1o 5130  df-fv 5131  df-ov 5777  df-oprab 5778  df-mpo 5779  df-1st 6038  df-2nd 6039  df-1o 6313  df-2o 6314  df-map 6544  df-dju 6923  df-inl 6932  df-inr 6933  df-omni 7006

This theorem is referenced by: (None)