Theorem ctssexmid 7490

Description: The decidability condition in ctssdc 7453 is needed. More specifically, ctssdc 7453 minus that condition, plus the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ctssexmid.1	⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o))
ctssexmid.lpo	⊢ ω ∈ Omni

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ctssexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑓,𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ctssexmid

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3333	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω
2		f1oi 5679	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–1-1-onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}
3		f1ofo 5646	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–1-1-onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
4		ctssexmid.lpo	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ∈ Omni
5	4	elexi 2834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ∈ V
6	5	rabex 4280	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
7		resiexg 5108	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V → ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) ∈ V)
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) ∈ V
9		foeq1 5611	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}))
10	8, 9	spcev 2920	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}):{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
11	2, 3, 10	mp2b 8	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}
12		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
13	12	sseq1d 3277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑦 ⊆ ω ↔ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω))
14		eqidd 2239	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑓 = 𝑓)
15		simpl 109	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})
16	14, 12, 15	foeq123d 5632	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥 ↔ 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}))
17	16	exbidv 1878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}))
18	13, 17	anbi12d 477	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑})))
19		djueq1 7380	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 ⊔ 1o) = ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))
20		foeq3 5613	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ⊔ 1o) = ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → (𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o) ↔ 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)))
21	15, 19, 20	3syl 17	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o) ↔ 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)))
22	21	exbidv 1878	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o) ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)))
23	18, 22	imbi12d 234	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → (((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o)) ↔ (({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))))
24		ctssexmid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o))
25	6, 6, 23, 24	vtocl2 2878	. . 3 ⊢ (({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}–onto→{𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑}) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))
26	1, 11, 25	mp2an 430	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o)
27	4	a1i 9	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → ω ∈ Omni)
28		id 19	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o))
29	27, 28	fodjuomni 7489	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∨ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅))
30	29	exlimiv 1651	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ⊔ 1o) → (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∨ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅))
31		biidd 172	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
32	31	elrab 2982	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜑))
33	32	simprbi 275	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
34	33	exlimiv 1651	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
35		rabeq0 3552	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ω ¬ 𝜑)
36		peano1 4741	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
37		elex2 2838	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ ω → ∃𝑢 𝑢 ∈ ω)
38		r19.3rmv 3618	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑢 𝑢 ∈ ω → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ω ¬ 𝜑))
39	36, 37, 38	mp2b 8	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ω ¬ 𝜑)
40	35, 39	sylbb2 138	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ → ¬ 𝜑)
41	34, 40	orim12i 771	. 2 ⊢ ((∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} ∨ {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ 𝜑} = ∅) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
42	26, 30, 41	mp2b 8	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 720   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209  ∀wral 2528  {crab 2532  Vcvv 2821   ⊆ wss 3220  ∅c0 3520   I cid 4433  ωcom 4737   ↾ cres 4776  –onto→wfo 5375  –1-1-onto→wf1o 5376  1_oc1o 6680   ⊔ cdju 7377  Omnicomni 7474

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-id 4438  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688  df-map 6924  df-dju 7378  df-inl 7387  df-inr 7388  df-omni 7475

This theorem is used by: (None)