Theorem etaslts2 27802

Description: A version of etaslts 27801 with fewer hypotheses but a weaker upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
etaslts2	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem etaslts2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfun 27756	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Fun bday
2		sltsex1 27771	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		sltsex2 27772	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		unexg 7698	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2anc 585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
6		funimaexg 6587	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
7	1, 5, 6	sylancr 588	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
8	7	uniexd 7697	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
9		imassrn 6038	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ran bday
10		bdayrn 27759	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran bday = On
11	9, 10	sseqtri 3984	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On
12		ssorduni 7734	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
14		elon2 6336	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V))
15	13, 14	mpbiran 710	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
16	8, 15	sylibr 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
17		onsucb 7769	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
18	16, 17	sylib 218	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
19		onsucuni 7780	. . 3 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
20	11, 19	mp1i 13	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
21		etaslts 27801	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
22	18, 20, 21	mpd3an23 1466	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1087   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3062  Vcvv 3442   ∪ cun 3901   ⊆ wss 3903  {csn 4582  ∪ cuni 4865   class class class wbr 5100  ran crn 5633   “ cima 5635  Ord word 6324  Oncon0 6325  suc csuc 6327  Fun wfun 6494  ‘cfv 6500   No csur 27619   bday cbday 27621   <<s cslts 27765

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pow 5312  ax-pr 5379  ax-un 7690

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3352  df-reu 3353  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-pss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-tp 4587  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-int 4905  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-tr 5208  df-id 5527  df-eprel 5532  df-po 5540  df-so 5541  df-fr 5585  df-we 5587  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-res 5644  df-ima 5645  df-ord 6328  df-on 6329  df-suc 6331  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fn 6503  df-f 6504  df-f1 6505  df-fo 6506  df-f1o 6507  df-fv 6508  df-riota 7325  df-1o 8407  df-2o 8408  df-no 27622  df-lts 27623  df-bday 27624  df-slts 27766

This theorem is referenced by:  cutbdaybnd2  27804