Theorem etaslts2 28067

Description: A version of etaslts 28066 with fewer hypotheses but a weaker upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
etaslts2	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem etaslts2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfun 28020	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Fun bday
2		sltsex1 28036	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		sltsex2 28037	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		unexg 7749	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2anc 596	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
6		funimaexg 6623	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
7	1, 5, 6	sylancr 599	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
8	7	uniexd 7748	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
9		imassrn 6071	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ran bday
10		bdayrn 28024	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran bday = On
11	9, 10	sseqtri 3982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On
12		ssorduni 7782	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
14		elon2 6372	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V))
15	13, 14	mpbiran 722	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
16	8, 15	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
17		onsucb 7817	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
18	16, 17	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
19		onsucuni 7828	. . 3 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
20	11, 19	mp1i 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
21		etaslts 28066	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
22	18, 20, 21	mpd3an23 1492	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1103   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3453   ∪ cun 3900   ⊆ wss 3902  {csn 4587  ∪ cuni 4870   class class class wbr 5107  ran crn 5660   “ cima 5662  Ord word 6360  Oncon0 6361  suc csuc 6363  Fun wfun 6531  ‘cfv 6537   No csur 27884   bday cbday 27886   <<s cslts 28030

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-tp 4592  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7374  df-1o 8459  df-2o 8460  df-no 27887  df-lts 27888  df-bday 27889  df-slts 28031

This theorem is used by:  cutbdaybnd2  28069