Theorem etaslts2 27811

Description: A version of etaslts 27810 with fewer hypotheses but a weaker upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
etaslts2	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem etaslts2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfun 27765	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Fun bday
2		sltsex1 27780	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		sltsex2 27781	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		unexg 7693	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2anc 590	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
6		funimaexg 6579	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
7	1, 5, 6	sylancr 593	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
8	7	uniexd 7692	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
9		imassrn 6030	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ran bday
10		bdayrn 27768	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran bday = On
11	9, 10	sseqtri 3970	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On
12		ssorduni 7729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
14		elon2 6328	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V))
15	13, 14	mpbiran 715	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
16	8, 15	sylibr 235	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
17		onsucb 7764	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
18	16, 17	sylib 219	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
19		onsucuni 7775	. . 3 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
20	11, 19	mp1i 13	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
21		etaslts 27810	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
22	18, 20, 21	mpd3an23 1471	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1092   ∈ wcel 2119  ∃wrex 3064  Vcvv 3432   ∪ cun 3888   ⊆ wss 3890  {csn 4562  ∪ cuni 4845   class class class wbr 5079  ran crn 5626   “ cima 5628  Ord word 6316  Oncon0 6317  suc csuc 6319  Fun wfun 6486  ‘cfv 6492   No csur 27628   bday cbday 27630   <<s cslts 27774

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2712  ax-rep 5206  ax-sep 5225  ax-nul 5235  ax-pow 5301  ax-pr 5369  ax-un 7685

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3or 1093  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2936  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-rmo 3345  df-reu 3346  df-rab 3393  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3731  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-pss 3910  df-nul 4269  df-if 4462  df-pw 4538  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565  df-tp 4567  df-op 4569  df-uni 4846  df-int 4885  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-mpt 5161  df-tr 5187  df-id 5520  df-eprel 5525  df-po 5533  df-so 5534  df-fr 5578  df-we 5580  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-suc 6323  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-riota 7320  df-1o 8402  df-2o 8403  df-no 27631  df-lts 27632  df-bday 27633  df-slts 27775

This theorem is referenced by:  cutbdaybnd2  27813