| Mathbox for Norm Megill |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > pexmidALTN | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 40329. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALT.a | ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.p | ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.o | ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALTN | ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | id 22 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅) | |
| 2 | fveq2 6842 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | oveq12d 7386 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅))) |
| 4 | pexmidALT.a | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) | |
| 5 | pexmidALT.o | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | pol0N 40285 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴) |
| 7 | eqimss 3994 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | syl 17 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) |
| 9 | pexmidALT.p | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 10 | 4, 9 | padd02 40188 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | mpdan 688 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 12 | 11, 6 | eqtrd 2772 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 13 | 12 | ad2antrr 727 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | sylan9eqr 2794 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 15 | 4, 9, 5 | pexmidlem8N 40353 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 16 | 15 | anassrs 467 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 17 | 14, 16 | pm2.61dane 3020 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 ≠ wne 2933 ⊆ wss 3903 ∅c0 4287 ‘cfv 6500 (class class class)co 7368 Atomscatm 39639 HLchlt 39726 +𝑃cpadd 40171 ⊥𝑃cpolN 40278 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 ax-rep 5226 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5253 ax-pow 5312 ax-pr 5379 ax-un 7690 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2570 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2934 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3063 df-rmo 3352 df-reu 3353 df-rab 3402 df-v 3444 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-dif 3906 df-un 3908 df-in 3910 df-ss 3920 df-pss 3923 df-nul 4288 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4583 df-pr 4585 df-op 4589 df-uni 4866 df-iun 4950 df-iin 4951 df-br 5101 df-opab 5163 df-mpt 5182 df-id 5527 df-xp 5638 df-rel 5639 df-cnv 5640 df-co 5641 df-dm 5642 df-rn 5643 df-res 5644 df-ima 5645 df-iota 6456 df-fun 6502 df-fn 6503 df-f 6504 df-f1 6505 df-fo 6506 df-f1o 6507 df-fv 6508 df-riota 7325 df-ov 7371 df-oprab 7372 df-mpo 7373 df-1st 7943 df-2nd 7944 df-proset 18229 df-poset 18248 df-plt 18263 df-lub 18279 df-glb 18280 df-join 18281 df-meet 18282 df-p0 18358 df-p1 18359 df-lat 18367 df-clat 18434 df-oposet 39552 df-ol 39554 df-oml 39555 df-covers 39642 df-ats 39643 df-atl 39674 df-cvlat 39698 df-hlat 39727 df-psubsp 39879 df-pmap 39880 df-padd 40172 df-polarityN 40279 df-psubclN 40311 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |