| Mathbox for Norm Megill |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > pexmidALTN | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 40223. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALT.a | ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.p | ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.o | ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALTN | ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | id 22 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅) | |
| 2 | fveq2 6834 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | oveq12d 7376 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅))) |
| 4 | pexmidALT.a | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) | |
| 5 | pexmidALT.o | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | pol0N 40179 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴) |
| 7 | eqimss 3992 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | syl 17 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) |
| 9 | pexmidALT.p | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 10 | 4, 9 | padd02 40082 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | mpdan 687 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 12 | 11, 6 | eqtrd 2771 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 13 | 12 | ad2antrr 726 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | sylan9eqr 2793 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 15 | 4, 9, 5 | pexmidlem8N 40247 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 16 | 15 | anassrs 467 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 17 | 14, 16 | pm2.61dane 3019 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2113 ≠ wne 2932 ⊆ wss 3901 ∅c0 4285 ‘cfv 6492 (class class class)co 7358 Atomscatm 39533 HLchlt 39620 +𝑃cpadd 40065 ⊥𝑃cpolN 40172 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2146 ax-11 2162 ax-12 2184 ax-ext 2708 ax-rep 5224 ax-sep 5241 ax-nul 5251 ax-pow 5310 ax-pr 5377 ax-un 7680 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2885 df-ne 2933 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rmo 3350 df-reu 3351 df-rab 3400 df-v 3442 df-sbc 3741 df-csb 3850 df-dif 3904 df-un 3906 df-in 3908 df-ss 3918 df-pss 3921 df-nul 4286 df-if 4480 df-pw 4556 df-sn 4581 df-pr 4583 df-op 4587 df-uni 4864 df-iun 4948 df-iin 4949 df-br 5099 df-opab 5161 df-mpt 5180 df-id 5519 df-xp 5630 df-rel 5631 df-cnv 5632 df-co 5633 df-dm 5634 df-rn 5635 df-res 5636 df-ima 5637 df-iota 6448 df-fun 6494 df-fn 6495 df-f 6496 df-f1 6497 df-fo 6498 df-f1o 6499 df-fv 6500 df-riota 7315 df-ov 7361 df-oprab 7362 df-mpo 7363 df-1st 7933 df-2nd 7934 df-proset 18217 df-poset 18236 df-plt 18251 df-lub 18267 df-glb 18268 df-join 18269 df-meet 18270 df-p0 18346 df-p1 18347 df-lat 18355 df-clat 18422 df-oposet 39446 df-ol 39448 df-oml 39449 df-covers 39536 df-ats 39537 df-atl 39568 df-cvlat 39592 df-hlat 39621 df-psubsp 39773 df-pmap 39774 df-padd 40066 df-polarityN 40173 df-psubclN 40205 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |