| Mathbox for Norm Megill |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > pexmidALTN | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 39947. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALT.a | ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.p | ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.o | ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALTN | ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | id 22 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅) | |
| 2 | fveq2 6858 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | oveq12d 7405 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅))) |
| 4 | pexmidALT.a | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) | |
| 5 | pexmidALT.o | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | pol0N 39903 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴) |
| 7 | eqimss 4005 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | syl 17 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) |
| 9 | pexmidALT.p | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 10 | 4, 9 | padd02 39806 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | mpdan 687 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 12 | 11, 6 | eqtrd 2764 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 13 | 12 | ad2antrr 726 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | sylan9eqr 2786 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 15 | 4, 9, 5 | pexmidlem8N 39971 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 16 | 15 | anassrs 467 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 17 | 14, 16 | pm2.61dane 3012 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2109 ≠ wne 2925 ⊆ wss 3914 ∅c0 4296 ‘cfv 6511 (class class class)co 7387 Atomscatm 39256 HLchlt 39343 +𝑃cpadd 39789 ⊥𝑃cpolN 39896 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2701 ax-rep 5234 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5261 ax-pow 5320 ax-pr 5387 ax-un 7711 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2721 df-clel 2803 df-nfc 2878 df-ne 2926 df-ral 3045 df-rex 3054 df-rmo 3354 df-reu 3355 df-rab 3406 df-v 3449 df-sbc 3754 df-csb 3863 df-dif 3917 df-un 3919 df-in 3921 df-ss 3931 df-pss 3934 df-nul 4297 df-if 4489 df-pw 4565 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4872 df-iun 4957 df-iin 4958 df-br 5108 df-opab 5170 df-mpt 5189 df-id 5533 df-xp 5644 df-rel 5645 df-cnv 5646 df-co 5647 df-dm 5648 df-rn 5649 df-res 5650 df-ima 5651 df-iota 6464 df-fun 6513 df-fn 6514 df-f 6515 df-f1 6516 df-fo 6517 df-f1o 6518 df-fv 6519 df-riota 7344 df-ov 7390 df-oprab 7391 df-mpo 7392 df-1st 7968 df-2nd 7969 df-proset 18255 df-poset 18274 df-plt 18289 df-lub 18305 df-glb 18306 df-join 18307 df-meet 18308 df-p0 18384 df-p1 18385 df-lat 18391 df-clat 18458 df-oposet 39169 df-ol 39171 df-oml 39172 df-covers 39259 df-ats 39260 df-atl 39291 df-cvlat 39315 df-hlat 39344 df-psubsp 39497 df-pmap 39498 df-padd 39790 df-polarityN 39897 df-psubclN 39929 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |