Theorem pexmidALTN 41301

Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 41276. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
pexmidALT.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
pexmidALT.p	⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
pexmidALT.o	⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pexmidALTN	⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem pexmidALTN

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 23	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅)
2		fveq2 6916	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ( ⊥ ‘∅))
3	1, 2	oveq12d 7469	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)))
4		pexmidALT.a	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
5		pexmidALT.o	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
6	4, 5	pol0N 41232	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴)
7		eqimss 3971	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
8	6, 7	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
9		pexmidALT.p	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
10	4, 9	padd02 41135	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅))
11	8, 10	mpdan 700	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅))
12	11, 6	eqtrd 2798	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
13	12	ad2antrr 739	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
14	3, 13	sylan9eqr 2820	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)
15	4, 9, 5	pexmidlem8N 41300	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)
16	15	anassrs 473	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)
17	14, 16	pm2.61dane 3046	1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4281  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  Atomscatm 40586  HLchlt 40673  +_𝑃cpadd 41118  ⊥_𝑃cpolN 41225

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-iin 4959  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-riota 7408  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-1st 8035  df-2nd 8036  df-proset 18518  df-poset 18537  df-plt 18552  df-lub 18568  df-glb 18569  df-join 18570  df-meet 18571  df-p0 18647  df-p1 18648  df-lat 18656  df-clat 18723  df-oposet 40499  df-ol 40501  df-oml 40502  df-covers 40589  df-ats 40590  df-atl 40621  df-cvlat 40645  df-hlat 40674  df-psubsp 40826  df-pmap 40827  df-padd 41119  df-polarityN 41226  df-psubclN 41258

This theorem is used by: (None)