Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Norm Megill < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  pexmidALTN Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem pexmidALTN 40642
Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 40617. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
pexmidALT.a 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
pexmidALT.p + = (+𝑃𝐾)
pexmidALT.o = (⊥𝑃𝐾)
Assertion
Ref Expression
pexmidALTN (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem pexmidALTN
StepHypRef Expression
1 id 23 . . . 4 (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅)
2 fveq2 6882 . . . 4 (𝑋 = ∅ → ( 𝑋) = ( ‘∅))
31, 2oveq12d 7429 . . 3 (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ‘∅)))
4 pexmidALT.a . . . . . . . 8 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
5 pexmidALT.o . . . . . . . 8 = (⊥𝑃𝐾)
64, 5pol0N 40573 . . . . . . 7 (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ‘∅) = 𝐴)
7 eqimss 4003 . . . . . . 7 (( ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
86, 7syl 18 . . . . . 6 (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
9 pexmidALT.p . . . . . . 7 + = (+𝑃𝐾)
104, 9padd02 40476 . . . . . 6 ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = ( ‘∅))
118, 10mpdan 699 . . . . 5 (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = ( ‘∅))
1211, 6eqtrd 2804 . . . 4 (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
1312ad2antrr 738 . . 3 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
143, 13sylan9eqr 2826 . 2 ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
154, 9, 5pexmidlem8N 40641 . . 3 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ (( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
1615anassrs 472 . 2 ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
1714, 16pm2.61dane 3051 1 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 400   = wceq 1567  wcel 2149  wne 2964  wss 3913  c0 4294  cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411  Atomscatm 39927  HLchlt 40014  +𝑃cpadd 40459  𝑃cpolN 40566
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5242  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5337  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-iun 4962  df-iin 4963  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5557  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-proset 18350  df-poset 18369  df-plt 18384  df-lub 18400  df-glb 18401  df-join 18402  df-meet 18403  df-p0 18479  df-p1 18480  df-lat 18488  df-clat 18555  df-oposet 39840  df-ol 39842  df-oml 39843  df-covers 39930  df-ats 39931  df-atl 39962  df-cvlat 39986  df-hlat 40015  df-psubsp 40167  df-pmap 40168  df-padd 40460  df-polarityN 40567  df-psubclN 40599
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator