Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Norm Megill < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  pexmidALTN Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem pexmidALTN 40772
Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 40747. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
pexmidALT.a 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
pexmidALT.p + = (+𝑃𝐾)
pexmidALT.o = (⊥𝑃𝐾)
Assertion
Ref Expression
pexmidALTN (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem pexmidALTN
StepHypRef Expression
1 id 23 . . . 4 (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅)
2 fveq2 6881 . . . 4 (𝑋 = ∅ → ( 𝑋) = ( ‘∅))
31, 2oveq12d 7428 . . 3 (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ‘∅)))
4 pexmidALT.a . . . . . . . 8 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
5 pexmidALT.o . . . . . . . 8 = (⊥𝑃𝐾)
64, 5pol0N 40703 . . . . . . 7 (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ‘∅) = 𝐴)
7 eqimss 3995 . . . . . . 7 (( ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
86, 7syl 18 . . . . . 6 (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
9 pexmidALT.p . . . . . . 7 + = (+𝑃𝐾)
104, 9padd02 40606 . . . . . 6 ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = ( ‘∅))
118, 10mpdan 699 . . . . 5 (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = ( ‘∅))
1211, 6eqtrd 2798 . . . 4 (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
1312ad2antrr 738 . . 3 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
143, 13sylan9eqr 2820 . 2 ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
154, 9, 5pexmidlem8N 40771 . . 3 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ (( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
1615anassrs 472 . 2 ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
1714, 16pm2.61dane 3045 1 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 400   = wceq 1570  wcel 2143  wne 2958  wss 3905  c0 4286  cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  Atomscatm 40057  HLchlt 40144  +𝑃cpadd 40589  𝑃cpolN 40696
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-iin 4959  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-proset 18345  df-poset 18364  df-plt 18379  df-lub 18395  df-glb 18396  df-join 18397  df-meet 18398  df-p0 18474  df-p1 18475  df-lat 18483  df-clat 18550  df-oposet 39970  df-ol 39972  df-oml 39973  df-covers 40060  df-ats 40061  df-atl 40092  df-cvlat 40116  df-hlat 40145  df-psubsp 40297  df-pmap 40298  df-padd 40590  df-polarityN 40697  df-psubclN 40729
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator