| Mathbox for Norm Megill |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > pexmidALTN | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 40617. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALT.a | ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.p | ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) |
| pexmidALT.o | ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pexmidALTN | ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | id 23 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅) | |
| 2 | fveq2 6882 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | oveq12d 7429 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅))) |
| 4 | pexmidALT.a | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) | |
| 5 | pexmidALT.o | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | pol0N 40573 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴) |
| 7 | eqimss 4003 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( ⊥ ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | syl 18 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) |
| 9 | pexmidALT.p | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾) | |
| 10 | 4, 9 | padd02 40476 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ⊥ ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | mpdan 699 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = ( ⊥ ‘∅)) |
| 12 | 11, 6 | eqtrd 2804 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 13 | 12 | ad2antrr 738 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ⊥ ‘∅)) = 𝐴) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | sylan9eqr 2826 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 15 | 4, 9, 5 | pexmidlem8N 40641 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 16 | 15 | anassrs 472 | . 2 ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| 17 | 14, 16 | pm2.61dane 3051 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ( ⊥ ‘( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 𝐴) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 = wceq 1567 ∈ wcel 2149 ≠ wne 2964 ⊆ wss 3913 ∅c0 4294 ‘cfv 6537 (class class class)co 7411 Atomscatm 39927 HLchlt 40014 +𝑃cpadd 40459 ⊥𝑃cpolN 40566 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1822 ax-4 1836 ax-5 1937 ax-6 1994 ax-7 2035 ax-8 2151 ax-9 2159 ax-10 2182 ax-11 2198 ax-12 2219 ax-ext 2741 ax-rep 5242 ax-sep 5261 ax-nul 5271 ax-pow 5337 ax-pr 5405 ax-un 7733 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1570 df-fal 1580 df-ex 1807 df-nf 1811 df-sb 2098 df-mo 2573 df-eu 2603 df-clab 2748 df-cleq 2761 df-clel 2844 df-nfc 2918 df-ne 2965 df-ral 3086 df-rex 3096 df-rmo 3376 df-reu 3377 df-rab 3424 df-v 3465 df-sbc 3754 df-csb 3862 df-dif 3916 df-un 3918 df-in 3920 df-ss 3930 df-pss 3933 df-nul 4295 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4877 df-iun 4962 df-iin 4963 df-br 5114 df-opab 5178 df-mpt 5197 df-id 5557 df-xp 5668 df-rel 5669 df-cnv 5670 df-co 5671 df-dm 5672 df-rn 5673 df-res 5674 df-ima 5675 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-riota 7368 df-ov 7414 df-oprab 7415 df-mpo 7416 df-1st 7986 df-2nd 7987 df-proset 18350 df-poset 18369 df-plt 18384 df-lub 18400 df-glb 18401 df-join 18402 df-meet 18403 df-p0 18479 df-p1 18480 df-lat 18488 df-clat 18555 df-oposet 39840 df-ol 39842 df-oml 39843 df-covers 39930 df-ats 39931 df-atl 39962 df-cvlat 39986 df-hlat 40015 df-psubsp 40167 df-pmap 40168 df-padd 40460 df-polarityN 40567 df-psubclN 40599 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |