Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Norm Megill < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  pexmidALTN Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem pexmidALTN 39961
Description: Excluded middle law for closed projective subspaces, which is equivalent to (and derived from) the orthomodular law poml4N 39936. Lemma 3.3(2) in [Holland95] p. 215. In our proof, we use the variables 𝑋, 𝑀, 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑟 in place of Hollands' l, m, P, Q, L respectively. TODO: should we make this obsolete? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
pexmidALT.a 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
pexmidALT.p + = (+𝑃𝐾)
pexmidALT.o = (⊥𝑃𝐾)
Assertion
Ref Expression
pexmidALTN (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem pexmidALTN
StepHypRef Expression
1 id 22 . . . 4 (𝑋 = ∅ → 𝑋 = ∅)
2 fveq2 6907 . . . 4 (𝑋 = ∅ → ( 𝑋) = ( ‘∅))
31, 2oveq12d 7449 . . 3 (𝑋 = ∅ → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = (∅ + ( ‘∅)))
4 pexmidALT.a . . . . . . . 8 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
5 pexmidALT.o . . . . . . . 8 = (⊥𝑃𝐾)
64, 5pol0N 39892 . . . . . . 7 (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ‘∅) = 𝐴)
7 eqimss 4054 . . . . . . 7 (( ‘∅) = 𝐴 → ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
86, 7syl 17 . . . . . 6 (𝐾 ∈ HL → ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴)
9 pexmidALT.p . . . . . . 7 + = (+𝑃𝐾)
104, 9padd02 39795 . . . . . 6 ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( ‘∅) ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = ( ‘∅))
118, 10mpdan 687 . . . . 5 (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = ( ‘∅))
1211, 6eqtrd 2775 . . . 4 (𝐾 ∈ HL → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
1312ad2antrr 726 . . 3 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (∅ + ( ‘∅)) = 𝐴)
143, 13sylan9eqr 2797 . 2 ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 = ∅) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
154, 9, 5pexmidlem8N 39960 . . 3 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ (( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋𝑋 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
1615anassrs 467 . 2 ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
1714, 16pm2.61dane 3027 1 (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋𝐴) ∧ ( ‘( 𝑋)) = 𝑋) → (𝑋 + ( 𝑋)) = 𝐴)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395   = wceq 1537  wcel 2106  wne 2938  wss 3963  c0 4339  cfv 6563  (class class class)co 7431  Atomscatm 39245  HLchlt 39332  +𝑃cpadd 39778  𝑃cpolN 39885
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pow 5371  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rmo 3378  df-reu 3379  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-csb 3909  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-iun 4998  df-iin 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5583  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fo 6569  df-f1o 6570  df-fv 6571  df-riota 7388  df-ov 7434  df-oprab 7435  df-mpo 7436  df-1st 8013  df-2nd 8014  df-proset 18352  df-poset 18371  df-plt 18388  df-lub 18404  df-glb 18405  df-join 18406  df-meet 18407  df-p0 18483  df-p1 18484  df-lat 18490  df-clat 18557  df-oposet 39158  df-ol 39160  df-oml 39161  df-covers 39248  df-ats 39249  df-atl 39280  df-cvlat 39304  df-hlat 39333  df-psubsp 39486  df-pmap 39487  df-padd 39779  df-polarityN 39886  df-psubclN 39918
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator