P. 394 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39301-39400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-disjALTV 39301	Define the disjoint relation predicate, i.e., the disjoint predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation by dfdisjALTV 39309, see the comment of df-disjs 39300 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. The element of the class of disjoints and the disjoint predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see eldisjsdisj 39335. Alternate definitions are dfdisjALTV 39309, ... , dfdisjALTV5 39313. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Definition	df-eldisjs 39302	Define the disjoint element relations class, i.e., the disjoint elements class. The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set, see eleldisjseldisj 39340. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ElDisjs = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) ∈ Disjs }
Definition	df-eldisj 39303	Define the disjoint element relation predicate, i.e., the disjoint elementhood predicate. Read: the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint. The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set, see eleldisjseldisj 39340. As of now, disjoint elementhood is defined as "partition" in set.mm : compare df-prt 39508 with dfeldisj5 39324. See also the comments of dfmembpart2 39384 and of df-parts 39379. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfdisjs 39304	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ ◡𝑟 ∈ CnvRefRels }
Theorem	dfdisjs2 39305	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ ◡𝑟 ⊆ I }
Theorem	dfdisjs3 39306*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑟𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑟𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)}
Theorem	dfdisjs4 39307*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑟𝑥}
Theorem	dfdisjs5 39308*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑟(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑟 ∩ [𝑣]𝑟) = ∅)}
Theorem	dfdisjALTV 39309	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation, see the comment of df-disjs 39300 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV2 39310	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV2 39284. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV3 39311*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV3 39285. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV4 39312*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV4 39286. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV5 39313*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV5 39287. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV5a 39314*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate. Disj 𝑅 means: different domain generators have disjoint cosets (unless the generators are equal), plus Rel 𝑅 for relation-typedness. This is the characterization that makes canonicity/uniqueness arguments modular. It is the starting point for the entire "Disj ↔ unique representative per block" pipeline that feeds into Disjs, see dfdisjs7 39454. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	disjimeceqim 39315*	Disj implies coset-equality injectivity (domain-wise). Extracts the practical consequence of Disj: the map 𝑢 ↦ [𝑢]𝑅 is injective on dom 𝑅. This is exactly the "canonicity" property used repeatedly when turning ∃* into ∃! and when reasoning about uniqueness of representatives. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	disjimeceqim2 39316	Disj implies injectivity (pairwise form). The same content as disjimeceqim 39315 but packaged for direct use with explicit hypotheses (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	disjimeceqbi 39317*	Disj gives biconditional injectivity (domain-wise). Strengthens injectivity to an iff. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	disjimeceqbi2 39318	Injectivity of the block constructor under disjointness. suc11reg 9576 analogue: under disjointness, equal blocks force equal generators (on dom 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	disjimrmoeqec 39319*	Under Disj, every block has a unique generator (∃* form). If 𝑡 is a block in the quotient sense, then there is a uniquely determined 𝑢 in dom 𝑅 such that 𝑡 = [𝑢]𝑅. This is the existence+uniqueness engine behind Disjs and QMap characterizations: it is the "representative theorem" from which the ∃! forms are obtained. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∃*𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑡 = [𝑢]𝑅)
Theorem	disjimdmqseq 39320*	Disjointness implies unique-generation of quotient blocks. Converts existence-quotient comprehension (see df-qs 8688) into a uniqueness-comprehension under disjointness; rewrites (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) carriers as exactly the class of blocks with a unique representative. This is the "unique generator per block" content in a carrier-normal form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = {𝑡 ∣ ∃!𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑡 = [𝑢]𝑅})
Theorem	dfeldisj2 39321	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ◡(◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ I )
Theorem	dfeldisj3 39322*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)𝑢 = 𝑣)
Theorem	dfeldisj4 39323*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
Theorem	dfeldisj5 39324*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
Theorem	dfeldisj5a 39325*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. Members of 𝐴 are pairwise disjoint: if two members overlap, they are equal. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	eldisjim3 39326	ElDisj elimination (two chosen elements). Standard specialization lemma: from ElDisj 𝐴 infer the disjointness condition for two specific elements. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	eldisjdmqsim2 39327	ElDisj of quotient implies coset-disjointness (domain form). Converts element-disjointness of the quotient carrier into a usable "cosets don't overlap unless equal" rule. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ) → ((𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldisjdmqsim 39328*	Shared output implies equal cosets (under ElDisj of quotient): if 𝑢 and 𝑣 both relate to the same 𝑥, then their cosets intersect, hence must coincide under quotient ElDisj. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ) → ((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → [𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅))
Theorem	suceldisj 39329*	Disjointness of successor enforces element-carrier separation: If 𝐵 is the successor of 𝐴 and 𝐵 is element-disjoint as a family, then no element of 𝐴 can itself be a member of 𝐴 (equivalently, every 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 has empty intersection with the carrier 𝐴). Provides a clean bridge between "disjoint family at the next grade" and "no block contains a block of the same family" at the previous grade: MembPart alone does not enforce this, see dfmembpart2 39384 (it gives disjoint blocks and excludes the empty block, but does not prevent 𝑢 ∈ 𝑚 from also being a member of the carrier 𝑚). This lemma is used to justify when grade-stability (via successor-shift) supplies the extra separation axioms needed in roof/root-style carrier reasoning. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ElDisj 𝐵 ∧ suc 𝐴 = 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	eldisjs 39330	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs2 39331	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs3 39332*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs4 39333*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs5 39334*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels )))
Theorem	eldisjsdisj 39335	The element of the class of disjoint relations and the disjoint relation predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅))
Theorem	qmapeldisjs 39336	When 𝑅 is a set (e.g., when it is an element of the class of relations df-rels 38951), the quotient map element of the class of disjoint relations and the disjoint relation predicate for quotient maps are the same. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj QMap 𝑅))
Theorem	disjqmap2 39337*	Disjointness of QMap equals ∃*-generation. Pairs with disjqmap 39338 and raldmqseu 38876 to move between ∃* and ∃! depending on context. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj QMap 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅))
Theorem	disjqmap 39338*	Disjointness of QMap equals unique generation of the quotient carrier. The cleaned, carrier-respecting version of disjqmap2 39337. This is the statement "each equivalence class has a unique representative" for the general coset carrier (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj QMap 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅))
Theorem	eleldisjs 39339	Elementhood in the disjoint elements class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ Disjs ))
Theorem	eleldisjseldisj 39340	The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴))
Theorem	disjrel 39341	Disjoint relation is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Rel 𝑅)
Theorem	disjss 39342	Subclass theorem for disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( Disj 𝐵 → Disj 𝐴))
Theorem	disjssi 39343	Subclass theorem for disjoints, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝐵 → Disj 𝐴)
Theorem	disjssd 39344	Subclass theorem for disjoints, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( Disj 𝐵 → Disj 𝐴))
Theorem	disjeq 39345	Equality theorem for disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( Disj 𝐴 ↔ Disj 𝐵))
Theorem	disjeqi 39346	Equality theorem for disjoints, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝐴 ↔ Disj 𝐵)
Theorem	disjeqd 39347	Equality theorem for disjoints, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( Disj 𝐴 ↔ Disj 𝐵))
Theorem	disjdmqseqeq1 39348	Lemma for the equality theorem for partition parteq1 39388. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( Disj 𝑆 ∧ (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	eldisjss 39349	Subclass theorem for disjoint elementhood. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( ElDisj 𝐵 → ElDisj 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjssi 39350	Subclass theorem for disjoint elementhood, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐵 → ElDisj 𝐴)
Theorem	eldisjssd 39351	Subclass theorem for disjoint elementhood, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ElDisj 𝐵 → ElDisj 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjeq 39352	Equality theorem for disjoint elementhood. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ElDisj 𝐵))
Theorem	eldisjeqi 39353	Equality theorem for disjoint elementhood, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ElDisj 𝐵)
Theorem	eldisjeqd 39354	Equality theorem for disjoint elementhood, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ElDisj 𝐵))
Theorem	disjres 39355*	Disjoint restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ( Disj (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅)))
Theorem	eldisjn0elb 39356	Two forms of disjoint elements when the empty set is not an element of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	disjxrn 39357	Two ways of saying that a range Cartesian product is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ∩ ≀ ◡𝑆) ⊆ I )
Theorem	disjxrnres5 39358*	Disjoint range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅))
Theorem	disjorimxrn 39359	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∨ Disj 𝑆) → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjimxrn 39360	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Dec-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjimres 39361	Disjointness condition for restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Disj (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjimin 39362	Disjointness condition for intersection. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjiminres 39363	Disjointness condition for intersection with restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjimxrnres 39364	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product with restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjALTV0 39365	The null class is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ∅
Theorem	disjALTVid 39366	The class of identity relations is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Disj I
Theorem	disjALTVidres 39367	The class of identity relations restricted is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjALTVinidres 39368	The intersection with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjALTVxrnidres 39369	The class of range Cartesian product with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjsuc 39370*	Disjoint range Cartesian product, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ suc 𝐴)) ↔ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsim 39371	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (implication form): under the Disjs condition on QMap 𝑅, the coset assignment is injective on dom 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsbi 39372	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (biconditional form). Convenience version of qmapeldisjsim 39371. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	rnqmapeleldisjsim 39373	Element-disjointness of the quotient carrier forces coset disjointness. Supplies the "cosets don't overlap unless equal" direction, but expressed via ran QMap 𝑅 (the quotient carrier) and ElDisjs. This is the structural reason Disjs needs a "carrier disjointness" level distinct from the "unique representatives" level. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21.26.20  Antisymmetry
Definition	df-antisymrel 39374	Define the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel4 39375	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel5 39376*	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	antisymrelres 39377*	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	antisymrelressn 39378	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jun-2024.)
⊢ AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})
21.26.21  Partitions: disjoints on domain quotients
Definition	df-parts 39379	Define the class of all partitions, cf. the comment of df-disjs 39300. Partitions are disjoints on domain quotients (or: domain quotients restricted to disjoints). This is a more general meaning of partition than we we are familiar with: the conventional meaning of partition (e.g. partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 39300) is what we call membership partition here, cf. dfmembpart2 39384. The binary partitions relation and the partition predicate are the same, that is, (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴) if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39387. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Parts = ( DomainQss ↾ Disjs )
Definition	df-part 39380	Define the partition predicate (read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅). Alternative definition is dfpart2 39383. The binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 39387. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Definition	df-membparts 39381	Define the class of member partition relations on their domain quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ MembParts = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) Parts 𝑎}
Definition	df-membpart 39382	Define the member partition predicate, or the disjoint restricted element relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) A alternative definition is dfmembpart2 39384. Member partition is the conventional meaning of partition (see the notes of df-parts 39379 and dfmembpart2 39384), we generalize the concept in df-parts 39379 and df-part 39380. Member partition and comember equivalence are the same by mpet 39464. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	dfpart2 39383	Alternate definition of the partition predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dfmembpart2 39384	Alternate definition of the conventional membership case of partition. Partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	brparts 39385	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴)))
Theorem	brparts2 39386	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	brpartspart 39387	Binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq1 39388	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	parteq2 39389	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq12 39390	Equality theorem for partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐵))
Theorem	parteq1i 39391	Equality theorem for partition, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑅 = 𝑆    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴)
Theorem	parteq1d 39392	Equality theorem for partition, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Part 𝐴))
Theorem	partsuc2 39393	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part ((𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}) ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	partsuc 39394	Property of the partition. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 ↾ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})) Part (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
21.26.22  Partition-Equivalence Theorems
Theorem	disjim 39395	The "Divide et Aequivalere" Theorem: every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation: generalization of the former prter1 39515, cf. eldisjim 39398. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	disjimi 39396	Every disjoint relation generates equivalent cosets by the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅
Theorem	detlem 39397	If a relation is disjoint, then it is equivalent to the equivalent cosets of the relation, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj 𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ EqvRel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	eldisjim 39398	If the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint, then it has equivalent coelements (former prter1 39515). Special case of disjim 39395. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 13-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 8-Feb-2018.) ( Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → CoElEqvRel 𝐴)
Theorem	eldisjim2 39399	Alternate form of eldisjim 39398. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → EqvRel ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqvrel0 39400	The null class is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ EqvRel ∅