P. 394 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39301-39400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ec1cnvres 39301*	Converse restricted coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐵]◡(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝐵})
Theorem	eldmres 39302*	Elementhood in the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	elrnres 39303*	Element of the range of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	eldmressnALTV 39304	Element of the domain of a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅)))
Theorem	elrnressn 39305	Element of the range of a restriction to a singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∈ ran (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴}) ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	eldm4 39306*	Elementhood in a domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅))
Theorem	eldmres2 39307*	Elementhood in the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldmres3 39308	Elementhood in the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	eceq1i 39309	Equality theorem for 𝐶-coset of 𝐴 and 𝐶-coset of 𝐵, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶
Theorem	ecres 39310*	Restricted coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Dec-2018.)
⊢ [𝐵](𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)}
Theorem	eccnvepres 39311*	Restricted converse epsilon coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐵](◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴})
Theorem	eleccnvep 39312	Elementhood in the converse epsilon coset of 𝐴 is elementhood in 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴]◡ E ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	eccnvep 39313	The converse epsilon coset of a set is the set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴]◡ E = 𝐴)
Theorem	extep 39314	Property of epsilon relation, see also extid 39341, extssr 39614 and the comment of df-ssr 39603. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴]◡ E = [𝐵]◡ E ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	disjeccnvep 39315	Property of the epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]◡ E ∩ [𝐵]◡ E ) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅))
Theorem	eccnvepres2 39316	The restricted converse epsilon coset of an element of the restriction is the element itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵](◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	eccnvepres3 39317	Condition for a restricted converse epsilon coset of a set to be the set itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) → [𝐵](◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	eldmqsres 39318*	Elementhood in a restricted domain quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 = [𝑢]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldmqsres2 39319*	Elementhood in a restricted domain quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑥 ∈ [ 𝑢]𝑅𝐵 = [𝑢]𝑅))
Theorem	qsss1 39320	Subclass theorem for quotient sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 / 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 / 𝐶))
Theorem	qseq1i 39321	Equality theorem for quotient set, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 / 𝐶) = (𝐵 / 𝐶)
Theorem	brinxprnres 39322	Binary relation on a restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)))𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	inxprnres 39323*	Restriction of a class as a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}
Theorem	dfres4 39324	Alternate definition of the restriction of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	exan3 39325*	Equivalent expressions with existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝐴 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	exanres 39326*	Equivalent expressions with existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝑢(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐵 ∧ 𝑢(𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝐶)))
Theorem	exanres3 39327*	Equivalent expressions with restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ [𝑢]𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝐶)))
Theorem	exanres2 39328*	Equivalent expressions with existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑢(𝑢(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)𝐵 ∧ 𝑢(𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ∈ [𝑢]𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ [𝑢]𝑆)))
Theorem	cnvepres 39329*	Restricted converse epsilon relation as a class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	eqrel2 39330*	Equality of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)))
Theorem	rncnv 39331	Range of converse is the domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ran ◡𝐴 = dom 𝐴
Theorem	dfdm6 39332*	Alternate definition of domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ dom 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ [𝑥]𝑅 ≠ ∅}
Theorem	dfrn6 39333*	Alternate definition of range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ran 𝑅 = {𝑥 ∣ [𝑥]◡𝑅 ≠ ∅}
Theorem	rncnvepres 39334	The range of the restricted converse epsilon is the union of the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Feb-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ran (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	dmecd 39335	Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8774). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmec2d 39336	Equality of the coset of 𝐵 and the coset of 𝐶 implies equivalence of domain elementhood (equivalence is not necessary as opposed to ereldm 8774). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐶]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ dom 𝑅))
Theorem	brid 39337	Property of the identity binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 I 𝐴)
Theorem	ideq2 39338	For sets, the identity binary relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	idresssidinxp 39339	Condition for the identity restriction to be a subclass of identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)))
Theorem	idreseqidinxp 39340	Condition for the identity restriction to be equal to the identity intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	extid 39341	Property of identity relation, see also extep 39314, extssr 39614 and the comment of df-ssr 39603. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴]◡ I = [𝐵]◡ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	inxpss 39342*	Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpss 39343*	Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
Theorem	ref5 39344*	Two ways to say that an intersection of the identity relation with a Cartesian product is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	inxpss3 39345*	Two ways to say that an intersection with a Cartesian product is a subclass (see also inxpss 39342). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦 → 𝑥(𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	inxpss2 39346*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑆𝑦))
Theorem	inxpssidinxp 39347*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 39346. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpssinxp 39348*	Two ways to say that intersections with Cartesian products are in a subclass relation, special case of inxpss2 39346. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
Theorem	idinxpssinxp2 39349*	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	idinxpssinxp3 39350	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑅)
Theorem	idinxpssinxp4 39351*	Identity intersection with a square Cartesian product in subclass relation with an intersection with the same Cartesian product (see also idinxpssinxp2 39349). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	relcnveq3 39352*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	relcnveq 39353	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅))
Theorem	relcnveq2 39354*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	relcnveq4 39355*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	qsresid 39356	Simplification of a special quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 / (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 / 𝑅)
Theorem	n0elqs 39357	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	n0elqs2 39358	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	rnresequniqs 39359	The range of a restriction is equal to the union of the quotient set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-May-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑉 → ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	n0el2 39360	Two ways of expressing that the empty set is not an element of a class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvepresex 39361	Sethood condition for the restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvepima 39362	The image of converse epsilon. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡ E “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	inex3 39363	Sufficient condition for the intersection relation to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	inxpex 39364	Sufficient condition for an intersection with a Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V)
Theorem	eqres 39365	Converting a class constant definition by restriction (like df-ers 39773 or df-parts 39893) into a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Oct-2018.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑆 ↾ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐵)))
Theorem	brrabga 39366*	The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	brcnvrabga 39367*	The law of concretion for the converse of operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ◡{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	opideq 39368	Equality conditions for ordered pairs ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ and ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	iss2 39369	A subclass of the identity relation is the intersection of identity relation with Cartesian product of the domain and range of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ I ↔ 𝐴 = ( I ∩ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴)))
Theorem	eldmcnv 39370*	Elementhood in a domain of a converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	dfrel5 39371	Alternate definition of the relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅)
Theorem	dfrel6 39372	Alternate definition of the relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	cnvresrn 39373	Converse restricted to range is converse. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (◡𝑅 ↾ ran 𝑅) = ◡𝑅
Theorem	relssinxpdmrn 39374	Subset of restriction, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆))
Theorem	cnvref4 39375	Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑆 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆))
Theorem	cnvref5 39376*	Two ways to say that a relation is a subclass of the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	ecin0 39377*	Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have no elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	ecinn0 39378*	Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐵 have some elements in common. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	ineleq 39379*	Equivalence of restricted universal quantifications. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	inecmo 39380*	Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝐵]𝑅 ∩ [𝐶]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑧∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	inecmo2 39381*	Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-May-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	ineccnvmo 39382*	Equivalence of a double restricted universal quantification and a restricted "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 = 𝑧 ∨ ([𝑦]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	alrmomorn 39383	Equivalence of an "at most one" and an "at most one" restricted to the range inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	alrmomodm 39384*	Equivalence of an "at most one" and an "at most one" restricted to the domain inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	ralmo 39385*	"At most one" can be restricted to the range. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	ralrnmo 39386*	On the range, "at most one" becomes "exactly one". (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∃!𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	dmqsex 39387	Sethood of the domain quotient under sethood of 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	raldmqsmo 39388*	On the quotient carrier, "at most one" and "exactly one" coincide for coset witnesses. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃*𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅)
Theorem	ralrmo3 39389*	Pull a restricted universal quantifier into the body (for ∃*). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-May-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	raldmqseu 39390*	Equivalence between "exactly one" on the quotient carrier and "at most one" globally. Provides a type-safe way to talk about unique representatives either as ∃! on the intended carrier or as a global ∃* statement. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅))
Theorem	rsp3 39391*	From a restricted universal statement over 𝐴, specialize to an arbitrary element 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴, cf. rsp 3250. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	rsp3eq 39392*	From a restricted universal statement over 𝐴, specialize to an arbitrary element class, cf. rsp3 39391. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ((𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓))
Theorem	ineccnvmo2 39393*	Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the range and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥)
Theorem	inecmo3 39394*	Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the domain and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	moeu2 39395	Uniqueness is equivalent to non-existence or unique existence. Alternate definition of the at-most-one quantifier, in terms of the existential quantifier and the unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃!𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	mopickr 39396	"At most one" picks a variable value, eliminating an existential quantifier. The proof begins with references *2.21 (pm2.21 124) and *14.26 (eupickbi 2661) from [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104 and p. 183. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	moantr 39397	Sufficient condition for transitivity of conjunctions inside existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜓 → ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	brabidgaw 39398*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5507. Version of brabidga 39399 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by GG, 2-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	brabidga 39399	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5507. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2401, see brabidgaw 39398 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	inxp2 39400*	Intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}