Theorem phplem4 8895

Description: Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
phplem2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
phplem2.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
phplem4	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem phplem4

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bren 8701	. 2 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵)
2		f1of1 6699	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1→suc 𝐵)
3	2	adantl 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1→suc 𝐵)
4		phplem2.2	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
5	4	sucex 7633	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ suc 𝐵 ∈ V
6		sssucid 6328	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7		phplem2.1	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
8		f1imaen2g 8756	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1→suc 𝐵 ∧ suc 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V)) → (𝑓 “ 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
9	6, 7, 8	mpanr12 701	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1→suc 𝐵 ∧ suc 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑓 “ 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
10	3, 5, 9	sylancl 585	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → (𝑓 “ 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
11	10	ensymd 8746	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ (𝑓 “ 𝐴))
12		nnord 7695	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → Ord 𝐴)
13		orddif 6344	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}))
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}))
15	14	imaeq2d 5958	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝑓 “ 𝐴) = (𝑓 “ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴})))
16		f1ofn 6701	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → 𝑓 Fn suc 𝐴)
17	7	sucid 6330	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
18		fnsnfv 6829	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴) → {(𝑓‘𝐴)} = (𝑓 “ {𝐴}))
19	16, 17, 18	sylancl 585	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → {(𝑓‘𝐴)} = (𝑓 “ {𝐴}))
20	19	difeq2d 4053	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → ((𝑓 “ suc 𝐴) ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}) = ((𝑓 “ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑓 “ {𝐴})))
21		imadmrn 5968	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑓 “ dom 𝑓) = ran 𝑓
22	21	eqcomi 2747	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ran 𝑓 = (𝑓 “ dom 𝑓)
23		f1ofo 6707	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → 𝑓:suc 𝐴–onto→suc 𝐵)
24		forn 6675	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–onto→suc 𝐵 → ran 𝑓 = suc 𝐵)
25	23, 24	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → ran 𝑓 = suc 𝐵)
26		f1odm 6704	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → dom 𝑓 = suc 𝐴)
27	26	imaeq2d 5958	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → (𝑓 “ dom 𝑓) = (𝑓 “ suc 𝐴))
28	22, 25, 27	3eqtr3a 2803	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → suc 𝐵 = (𝑓 “ suc 𝐴))
29	28	difeq1d 4052	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}) = ((𝑓 “ suc 𝐴) ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}))
30		dff1o3 6706	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–onto→suc 𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓))
31		imadif 6502	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Fun ◡𝑓 → (𝑓 “ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴})) = ((𝑓 “ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑓 “ {𝐴})))
32	30, 31	simplbiim 504	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → (𝑓 “ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴})) = ((𝑓 “ suc 𝐴) ∖ (𝑓 “ {𝐴})))
33	20, 29, 32	3eqtr4rd 2789	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → (𝑓 “ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴})) = (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}))
34	15, 33	sylan9eq 2799	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → (𝑓 “ 𝐴) = (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}))
35	11, 34	breqtrd 5096	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}))
36		fnfvelrn 6940	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴) → (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑓)
37	16, 17, 36	sylancl 585	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑓)
38	24	eleq2d 2824	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–onto→suc 𝐵 → ((𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑓 ↔ (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ suc 𝐵))
39	23, 38	syl 17	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → ((𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑓 ↔ (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ suc 𝐵))
40	37, 39	mpbid 231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ suc 𝐵)
41		fvex 6769	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ V
42	4, 41	phplem3 8894	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑓‘𝐴) ∈ suc 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≈ (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}))
43	40, 42	sylan2 592	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → 𝐵 ≈ (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}))
44	43	ensymd 8746	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}) ≈ 𝐵)
45		entr 8747	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}) ∧ (suc 𝐵 ∖ {(𝑓‘𝐴)}) ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
46	35, 44, 45	syl2an 595	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
47	46	anandirs 675	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
48	47	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
49	48	exlimdv 1937	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (∃𝑓 𝑓:suc 𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
50	1, 49	syl5bi 241	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1783   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3422   ∖ cdif 3880   ⊆ wss 3883  {csn 4558   class class class wbr 5070  ^◡ccnv 5579  dom cdm 5580  ran crn 5581   “ cima 5583  Ord word 6250  suc csuc 6253  Fun wfun 6412   Fn wfn 6413  –1-1→wf1 6415  –onto→wfo 6416  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6417  ‘cfv 6418  ωcom 7687   ≈ cen 8688

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-tr 5188  df-id 5480  df-eprel 5486  df-po 5494  df-so 5495  df-fr 5535  df-we 5537  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-ord 6254  df-on 6255  df-suc 6257  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-om 7688  df-er 8456  df-en 8692

This theorem is referenced by:  nneneq  8896