Theorem precsexlem6 28475

Description: Lemma for surreal reciprocal. Show that 𝐿 is non-strictly increasing in its argument. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
precsexlem.1	⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
precsexlem.2	⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
precsexlem.3	⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
precsexlem6	⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅   𝐹,𝑙,𝑝   𝐼,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅   𝐿,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿   𝑅,𝑎,𝑙,𝑟,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑦_𝐿)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑝, 𝑦_𝐿)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑟, 𝑎, 𝑥_𝐿, 𝑥_𝑅, 𝑦_𝐿, 𝑦_𝑅)   𝐽(𝑥, 𝑟, 𝑝, 𝑎, 𝑙, 𝑥_𝐿, 𝑥_𝑅, 𝑦_𝐿, 𝑦_𝑅)   𝐿(𝑥, 𝑟, 𝑝, 𝑦_𝑅)

Proof of Theorem precsexlem6

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nnawordex 8628	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽))
2		oveq2 7424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o ∅))
3	2	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
4	3	sseq2d 3966	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅))))
5		oveq2 7424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
6	5	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
7	6	sseq2d 3966	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))))
8		oveq2 7424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))
9	8	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
10	9	sseq2d 3966	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
11		nna0 8595	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐼 +o ∅) = 𝐼)
12	11	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)) = (𝐿‘𝐼))
13	12	eqimsscd 3991	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
14		nnacl 8602	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω)
15		ssun1 4127	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)}))
16		precsexlem.1	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
17		precsexlem.2	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
18		precsexlem.3	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)
19	16, 17, 18	precsexlem4 28473	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)) = ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})))
20	15, 19	sseqtrrid 3977	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
21	14, 20	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
22		nnasuc 8597	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗) = suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
23	22	fveq2d 6886	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) = (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
24	21, 23	sseqtrrd 3971	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
25		sstr2 3941	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
26	24, 25	syl5com 32	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
27	26	expcom 419	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))))
28	4, 7, 10, 13, 27	finds2 7898	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘))))
29	28	impcom 413	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)))
30		fveq2 6882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘𝐽))
31	30	sseq2d 3966	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
32	29, 31	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
33	32	rexlimdva 3165	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
34	33	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
35	1, 34	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
36	35	3impia 1135	1 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2740  ∃wrex 3088  {crab 3414  Vcvv 3453  ⦋csb 3850   ∪ cun 3900   ⊆ wss 3902  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4587  ⟨cop 4593   class class class wbr 5107   ↦ cmpt 5190   ∘ ccom 5663  suc csuc 6363  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  ωcom 7865  1^st c1st 7987  2^nd c2nd 7988  reccrdg 8401   +_o coa 8455   <s clts 27875   0_s c0s 28068   1_s c1s 28069   L cleft 28088   R cright 28089   +_s cadds 28222   -_s csubs 28283   ·_s cmuls 28369   /_su cdivs 28450

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-om 7866  df-1st 7989  df-2nd 7990  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-oadd 8462

This theorem is used by:  precsexlem10  28479