Theorem precsexlem6 28385

Description: Lemma for surreal reciprocal. Show that 𝐿 is non-strictly increasing in its argument. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
precsexlem.1	⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
precsexlem.2	⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
precsexlem.3	⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
precsexlem6	⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅   𝐹,𝑙,𝑝   𝐼,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅   𝐿,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿   𝑅,𝑎,𝑙,𝑟,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑦_𝐿)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑝,𝑦_𝐿)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑟,𝑎,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅)   𝐽(𝑥,𝑟,𝑝,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑟,𝑝,𝑦_𝑅)

Proof of Theorem precsexlem6

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nnawordex 8626	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽))
2		oveq2 7422	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o ∅))
3	2	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
4	3	sseq2d 3977	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅))))
5		oveq2 7422	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
6	5	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
7	6	sseq2d 3977	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))))
8		oveq2 7422	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))
9	8	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
10	9	sseq2d 3977	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
11		nna0 8593	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐼 +o ∅) = 𝐼)
12	11	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)) = (𝐿‘𝐼))
13	12	eqimsscd 4002	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
14		nnacl 8600	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω)
15		ssun1 4139	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)}))
16		precsexlem.1	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
17		precsexlem.2	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
18		precsexlem.3	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)
19	16, 17, 18	precsexlem4 28383	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)) = ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})))
20	15, 19	sseqtrrid 3988	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
21	14, 20	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
22		nnasuc 8595	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗) = suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
23	22	fveq2d 6889	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) = (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
24	21, 23	sseqtrrd 3982	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
25		sstr2 3952	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
26	24, 25	syl5com 32	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
27	26	expcom 418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))))
28	4, 7, 10, 13, 27	finds2 7898	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘))))
29	28	impcom 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)))
30		fveq2 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘𝐽))
31	30	sseq2d 3977	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
32	29, 31	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
33	32	rexlimdva 3173	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
34	33	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
35	1, 34	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
36	35	3impia 1133	1 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2150  {cab 2748  ∃wrex 3096  {crab 3423  Vcvv 3462  ⦋csb 3861   ∪ cun 3911   ⊆ wss 3913  ∅c0 4294  {csn 4594  ⟨cop 4600   class class class wbr 5114   ↦ cmpt 5197   ∘ ccom 5669  suc csuc 6366  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7414  ωcom 7865  1^st c1st 7987  2^nd c2nd 7988  reccrdg 8399   +_o coa 8453   <s clts 27785   0_s c0s 27978   1_s c1s 27979   L cleft 27998   R cright 27999   +_s cadds 28132   -_s csubs 28193   ·_s cmuls 28279   /_su cdivs 28360

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2152  ax-9 2160  ax-10 2183  ax-11 2199  ax-12 2220  ax-ext 2742  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5408  ax-un 7736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-nf 1812  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2574  df-eu 2604  df-clab 2749  df-cleq 2762  df-clel 2845  df-nfc 2919  df-ne 2966  df-ral 3087  df-rex 3097  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3424  df-v 3464  df-sbc 3753  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3933  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-int 4918  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-tr 5224  df-id 5560  df-eprel 5565  df-po 5573  df-so 5574  df-fr 5618  df-we 5620  df-xp 5671  df-rel 5672  df-cnv 5673  df-co 5674  df-dm 5675  df-rn 5676  df-res 5677  df-ima 5678  df-pred 6306  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7417  df-oprab 7418  df-mpo 7419  df-om 7866  df-1st 7989  df-2nd 7990  df-frecs 8281  df-wrecs 8312  df-recs 8361  df-rdg 8400  df-oadd 8460

This theorem is referenced by:  precsexlem10  28389