Theorem precsexlem6 28191

Description: Lemma for surreal reciprocal. Show that 𝐿 is non-strictly increasing in its argument. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
precsexlem.1	⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
precsexlem.2	⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
precsexlem.3	⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
precsexlem6	⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅   𝐹,𝑙,𝑝   𝐼,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅   𝐿,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿   𝑅,𝑎,𝑙,𝑟,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑦_𝐿)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑝,𝑦_𝐿)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑟,𝑎,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅)   𝐽(𝑥,𝑟,𝑝,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑟,𝑝,𝑦_𝑅)

Proof of Theorem precsexlem6

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nnawordex 8565	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽))
2		oveq2 7366	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o ∅))
3	2	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
4	3	sseq2d 3965	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅))))
5		oveq2 7366	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
6	5	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
7	6	sseq2d 3965	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))))
8		oveq2 7366	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))
9	8	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
10	9	sseq2d 3965	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
11		nna0 8532	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐼 +o ∅) = 𝐼)
12	11	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)) = (𝐿‘𝐼))
13	12	eqimsscd 3990	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
14		nnacl 8539	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω)
15		ssun1 4129	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)}))
16		precsexlem.1	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
17		precsexlem.2	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
18		precsexlem.3	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)
19	16, 17, 18	precsexlem4 28189	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)) = ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})))
20	15, 19	sseqtrrid 3976	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
21	14, 20	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
22		nnasuc 8534	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗) = suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
23	22	fveq2d 6837	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) = (𝐿‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
24	21, 23	sseqtrrd 3970	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
25		sstr2 3939	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → ((𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
26	24, 25	syl5com 31	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
27	26	expcom 413	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))))
28	4, 7, 10, 13, 27	finds2 7840	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘))))
29	28	impcom 407	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)))
30		fveq2 6833	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝐿‘𝐽))
31	30	sseq2d 3965	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → ((𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
32	29, 31	syl5ibcom 245	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
33	32	rexlimdva 3136	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
34	33	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
35	1, 34	sylbid 240	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽)))
36	35	3impia 1118	1 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝐿‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝐿‘𝐽))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2713  ∃wrex 3059  {crab 3398  Vcvv 3439  ⦋csb 3848   ∪ cun 3898   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4284  {csn 4579  ⟨cop 4585   class class class wbr 5097   ↦ cmpt 5178   ∘ ccom 5627  suc csuc 6318  ‘cfv 6491  (class class class)co 7358  ωcom 7808  1^st c1st 7931  2^nd c2nd 7932  reccrdg 8340   +_o coa 8394   <s cslt 27610   0_s c0s 27801   1_s c1s 27802   L cleft 27821   R cright 27822   +_s cadds 27939   -_s csubs 28000   ·_s cmuls 28086   /_su cdivs 28167

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2183  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5223  ax-sep 5240  ax-nul 5250  ax-pr 5376  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2932  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-reu 3350  df-rab 3399  df-v 3441  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3849  df-dif 3903  df-un 3905  df-in 3907  df-ss 3917  df-pss 3920  df-nul 4285  df-if 4479  df-pw 4555  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-int 4902  df-iun 4947  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-mpt 5179  df-tr 5205  df-id 5518  df-eprel 5523  df-po 5531  df-so 5532  df-fr 5576  df-we 5578  df-xp 5629  df-rel 5630  df-cnv 5631  df-co 5632  df-dm 5633  df-rn 5634  df-res 5635  df-ima 5636  df-pred 6258  df-ord 6319  df-on 6320  df-lim 6321  df-suc 6322  df-iota 6447  df-fun 6493  df-fn 6494  df-f 6495  df-f1 6496  df-fo 6497  df-f1o 6498  df-fv 6499  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-om 7809  df-1st 7933  df-2nd 7934  df-frecs 8223  df-wrecs 8254  df-recs 8303  df-rdg 8341  df-oadd 8401

This theorem is referenced by:  precsexlem10  28195