Theorem precsexlem7 28626

Description: Lemma for surreal reciprocal. Show that 𝑅 is non-strictly increasing in its argument. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
precsexlem.1	⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
precsexlem.2	⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
precsexlem.3	⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
precsexlem7	⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅   𝐹,𝑙,𝑝   𝐼,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅   𝐿,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿   𝑅,𝑎,𝑙,𝑟,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑦_𝐿)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑝, 𝑦_𝐿)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑟, 𝑎, 𝑥_𝐿, 𝑥_𝑅, 𝑦_𝐿, 𝑦_𝑅)   𝐽(𝑥, 𝑟, 𝑝, 𝑎, 𝑙, 𝑥_𝐿, 𝑥_𝑅, 𝑦_𝐿, 𝑦_𝑅)   𝐿(𝑥, 𝑟, 𝑝, 𝑦_𝑅)

Proof of Theorem precsexlem7

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nnawordex 8671	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽))
2		oveq2 7448	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o ∅))
3	2	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
4	3	sseq2d 3945	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅))))
5		oveq2 7448	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
6	5	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
7	6	sseq2d 3945	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))))
8		oveq2 7448	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))
9	8	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
10	9	sseq2d 3945	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
11		nna0 8638	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐼 +o ∅) = 𝐼)
12	11	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅)) = (𝑅‘𝐼))
13	12	eqimsscd 3970	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
14		nnacl 8645	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω)
15		ssun1 4179	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ ((𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))
16		precsexlem.1	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
17		precsexlem.2	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
18		precsexlem.3	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)
19	16, 17, 18	precsexlem5 28624	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)) = ((𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 −s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)})))
20	15, 19	sseqtrrid 3956	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
21	14, 20	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
22		nnasuc 8640	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗) = suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
23	22	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) = (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
24	21, 23	sseqtrrd 3950	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
25		sstr2 3920	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → ((𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
26	24, 25	syl5com 32	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
27	26	expcom 419	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))))
28	4, 7, 10, 13, 27	finds2 7931	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘))))
29	28	impcom 413	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)))
30		fveq2 6905	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘𝐽))
31	30	sseq2d 3945	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
32	29, 31	syl5ibcom 248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
33	32	rexlimdva 3167	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
34	33	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
35	1, 34	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
36	35	3impia 1135	1 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {cab 2741  ∃wrex 3090  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3454  ⦋csb 3851   ⊆ wss 3900   ∪ cun 4152  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106   ↦ cmpt 5189   ∘ ccom 5659  suc csuc 6379  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  ωcom 7898  1^st c1st 8020  2^nd c2nd 8021  reccrdg 8442   +_o coa 8498   <s clts 28025   0_s c0s 28218   1_s c1s 28219  Lcleft 28238  Rcright 28239   +_s cadds 28372   −_s csubs 28433   ·_s cmuls 28519   /_su cdivs 28600

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6319  df-ord 6380  df-on 6381  df-lim 6382  df-suc 6383  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-om 7899  df-2nd 8023  df-frecs 8324  df-wrecs 8355  df-recs 8404  df-rdg 8443  df-oadd 8505

This theorem is used by:  precsexlem10  28629