Theorem precsexlem7 28027

Description: Lemma for surreal reciprocal. Show that 𝑅 is non-strictly increasing in its argument. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
precsexlem.1	⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
precsexlem.2	⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
precsexlem.3	⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
precsexlem7	⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅   𝐹,𝑙,𝑝   𝐼,𝑎,𝑙,𝑝,𝑟,𝑥,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅   𝐿,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿   𝑅,𝑎,𝑙,𝑟,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑦_𝐿)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑝,𝑦_𝐿)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑟,𝑎,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅)   𝐽(𝑥,𝑟,𝑝,𝑎,𝑙,𝑥_𝐿,𝑥_𝑅,𝑦_𝐿,𝑦_𝑅)   𝐿(𝑥,𝑟,𝑝,𝑦_𝑅)

Proof of Theorem precsexlem7

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nnawordex 8632	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽))
2		oveq2 7409	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o ∅))
3	2	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
4	3	sseq2d 4006	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = ∅ → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅))))
5		oveq2 7409	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
6	5	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
7	6	sseq2d 4006	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑗 → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))))
8		oveq2 7409	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))
9	8	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
10	9	sseq2d 4006	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = suc 𝑗 → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
11		nna0 8599	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝐼 +o ∅) = 𝐼)
12	11	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅)) = (𝑅‘𝐼))
13	12	eqimsscd 4031	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o ∅)))
14		nnacl 8606	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω)
15		ssun1 4164	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ ((𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))
16		precsexlem.1	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑝) / 𝑙⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌⟨(𝑙 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝑅)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝐿)})), (𝑟 ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ 𝑙 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ 𝑟 𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)}))⟩), ⟨{ 0s }, ∅⟩)
17		precsexlem.2	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝐿 = (1st ∘ 𝐹)
18		precsexlem.3	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ 𝑅 = (2nd ∘ 𝐹)
19	16, 17, 18	precsexlem5 28025	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)) = ((𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ (𝐿‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝐿 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝐿)) /su 𝑥𝐿)} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗))𝑎 = (( 1s +s ((𝑥𝑅 -s 𝐴) ·s 𝑦𝑅)) /su 𝑥𝑅)})))
20	15, 19	sseqtrrid 4027	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑗) ∈ ω → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
21	14, 20	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
22		nnasuc 8601	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 +o suc 𝑗) = suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗))
23	22	fveq2d 6885	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) = (𝑅‘suc (𝐼 +o 𝑗)))
24	21, 23	sseqtrrd 4015	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))
25		sstr2 3981	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → ((𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
26	24, 25	syl5com 31	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗))))
27	26	expcom 413	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑗)) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o suc 𝑗)))))
28	4, 7, 10, 13, 27	finds2 7884	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ω → (𝐼 ∈ ω → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘))))
29	28	impcom 407	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)))
30		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) = (𝑅‘𝐽))
31	30	sseq2d 4006	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → ((𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘(𝐼 +o 𝑘)) ↔ (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
32	29, 31	syl5ibcom 244	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ω) → ((𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
33	32	rexlimdva 3147	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ ω → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
34	33	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐼 +o 𝑘) = 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
35	1, 34	sylbid 239	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω) → (𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽 → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽)))
36	35	3impia 1114	1 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐼 ⊆ 𝐽) → (𝑅‘𝐼) ⊆ (𝑅‘𝐽))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  {cab 2701  ∃wrex 3062  {crab 3424  Vcvv 3466  ⦋csb 3885   ∪ cun 3938   ⊆ wss 3940  ∅c0 4314  {csn 4620  ⟨cop 4626   class class class wbr 5138   ↦ cmpt 5221   ∘ ccom 5670  suc csuc 6356  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7401  ωcom 7848  1^st c1st 7966  2^nd c2nd 7967  reccrdg 8404   +_o coa 8458   <s cslt 27490   0_s c0s 27671   1_s c1s 27672   L cleft 27688   R cright 27689   +_s cadds 27792   -_s csubs 27849   ·_s cmuls 27922   /_su cdivs 28003

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-rep 5275  ax-sep 5289  ax-nul 5296  ax-pr 5417  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-sbc 3770  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3943  df-un 3945  df-in 3947  df-ss 3957  df-pss 3959  df-nul 4315  df-if 4521  df-pw 4596  df-sn 4621  df-pr 4623  df-op 4627  df-uni 4900  df-int 4941  df-iun 4989  df-br 5139  df-opab 5201  df-mpt 5222  df-tr 5256  df-id 5564  df-eprel 5570  df-po 5578  df-so 5579  df-fr 5621  df-we 5623  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-pred 6290  df-ord 6357  df-on 6358  df-lim 6359  df-suc 6360  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7404  df-oprab 7405  df-mpo 7406  df-om 7849  df-2nd 7969  df-frecs 8261  df-wrecs 8292  df-recs 8366  df-rdg 8405  df-oadd 8465

This theorem is referenced by:  precsexlem10  28030