Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > hta | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A ZFC emulation of
Hilbert's transfinite axiom. The set 𝐵 has the
properties of Hilbert's epsilon, except that it also depends on a
well-ordering 𝑅. This theorem arose from
discussions with Raph
Levien on 5-Mar-2004 about translating the HOL proof language, which
uses Hilbert's epsilon. See
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/choice.txt
(copy of obsolete link
http://ghilbert.org/choice.txt) and
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/megillaward2005he.pdf.
Hilbert's epsilon is described at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epsilon-calculus/. This theorem differs from Hilbert's transfinite axiom described on that page in that it requires 𝑅 We 𝐴 as an antecedent. Class 𝐴 collects the sets of the least rank for which 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Class 𝐵, which emulates Hilbert's epsilon, is the minimum element in a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴. If a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴 can be expressed in a closed form, as might be the case if we are working with say natural numbers, we can eliminate the antecedent with modus ponens, giving us the exact equivalent of Hilbert's transfinite axiom. Otherwise, we replace 𝑅 with a dummy setvar variable, say 𝑤, and attach 𝑤 We 𝐴 as an antecedent in each step of the ZFC version of the HOL proof until the epsilon is eliminated. At that point, 𝐵 (which will have 𝑤 as a free variable) will no longer be present, and we can eliminate 𝑤 We 𝐴 by applying exlimiv 1931 and weth 9906, using scottexs 9300 to establish the existence of 𝐴. For a version of this theorem scheme using class (meta)variables instead of wff (meta)variables, see htalem 9309. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
hta.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} |
hta.2 | ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
hta | ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.8a 2178 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑) | |
2 | scott0s 9301 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ≠ ∅) | |
3 | hta.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} | |
4 | 3 | neeq1i 3051 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ≠ ∅) |
5 | 2, 4 | bitr4i 281 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) |
6 | 1, 5 | sylib 221 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) |
7 | scottexs 9300 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V | |
8 | 3, 7 | eqeltri 2886 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
9 | hta.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) | |
10 | 8, 9 | htalem 9309 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) |
11 | 10 | ex 416 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) |
12 | simpl 486 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) → 𝜑) | |
13 | 12 | ss2abi 3994 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} |
14 | 3, 13 | eqsstri 3949 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} |
15 | 14 | sseli 3911 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
16 | df-sbc 3721 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
17 | 15, 16 | sylibr 237 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
18 | 6, 11, 17 | syl56 36 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∀wal 1536 = wceq 1538 ∃wex 1781 ∈ wcel 2111 {cab 2776 ≠ wne 2987 ∀wral 3106 Vcvv 3441 [wsbc 3720 ⊆ wss 3881 ∅c0 4243 class class class wbr 5030 We wwe 5477 ‘cfv 6324 ℩crio 7092 rankcrnk 9176 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-rep 5154 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 ax-un 7441 ax-reg 9040 ax-inf2 9088 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3or 1085 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ne 2988 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-reu 3113 df-rmo 3114 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-csb 3829 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-pss 3900 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-pw 4499 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-tp 4530 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-int 4839 df-iun 4883 df-iin 4884 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-mpt 5111 df-tr 5137 df-id 5425 df-eprel 5430 df-po 5438 df-so 5439 df-fr 5478 df-we 5480 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-rn 5530 df-res 5531 df-ima 5532 df-pred 6116 df-ord 6162 df-on 6163 df-lim 6164 df-suc 6165 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fn 6327 df-f 6328 df-f1 6329 df-fo 6330 df-f1o 6331 df-fv 6332 df-riota 7093 df-om 7561 df-wrecs 7930 df-recs 7991 df-rdg 8029 df-r1 9177 df-rank 9178 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |