Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > hta | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A ZFC emulation of
Hilbert's transfinite axiom. The set 𝐵 has the
properties of Hilbert's epsilon, except that it also depends on a
well-ordering 𝑅. This theorem arose from
discussions with Raph
Levien on 5-Mar-2004 about translating the HOL proof language, which
uses Hilbert's epsilon. See
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/choice.txt
(copy of obsolete link
http://ghilbert.org/choice.txt) and
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/megillaward2005he.pdf.
Hilbert's epsilon is described at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epsilon-calculus/. This theorem differs from Hilbert's transfinite axiom described on that page in that it requires 𝑅 We 𝐴 as an antecedent. Class 𝐴 collects the sets of the least rank for which 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Class 𝐵, which emulates Hilbert's epsilon, is the minimum element in a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴. If a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴 can be expressed in a closed form, as might be the case if we are working with say natural numbers, we can eliminate the antecedent with modus ponens, giving us the exact equivalent of Hilbert's transfinite axiom. Otherwise, we replace 𝑅 with a dummy setvar variable, say 𝑤, and attach 𝑤 We 𝐴 as an antecedent in each step of the ZFC version of the HOL proof until the epsilon is eliminated. At that point, 𝐵 (which will have 𝑤 as a free variable) will no longer be present, and we can eliminate 𝑤 We 𝐴 by applying exlimiv 1931 and weth 9919, using scottexs 9318 to establish the existence of 𝐴. For a version of this theorem scheme using class (meta)variables instead of wff (meta)variables, see htalem 9327. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
hta.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} |
hta.2 | ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
hta | ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.8a 2180 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑) | |
2 | scott0s 9319 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ≠ ∅) | |
3 | hta.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} | |
4 | 3 | neeq1i 3082 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ≠ ∅) |
5 | 2, 4 | bitr4i 280 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) |
6 | 1, 5 | sylib 220 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) |
7 | scottexs 9318 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V | |
8 | 3, 7 | eqeltri 2911 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
9 | hta.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) | |
10 | 8, 9 | htalem 9327 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) |
11 | 10 | ex 415 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) |
12 | simpl 485 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) → 𝜑) | |
13 | 12 | ss2abi 4045 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} |
14 | 3, 13 | eqsstri 4003 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} |
15 | 14 | sseli 3965 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
16 | df-sbc 3775 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
17 | 15, 16 | sylibr 236 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
18 | 6, 11, 17 | syl56 36 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 398 ∀wal 1535 = wceq 1537 ∃wex 1780 ∈ wcel 2114 {cab 2801 ≠ wne 3018 ∀wral 3140 Vcvv 3496 [wsbc 3774 ⊆ wss 3938 ∅c0 4293 class class class wbr 5068 We wwe 5515 ‘cfv 6357 ℩crio 7115 rankcrnk 9194 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2795 ax-rep 5192 ax-sep 5205 ax-nul 5212 ax-pow 5268 ax-pr 5332 ax-un 7463 ax-reg 9058 ax-inf2 9106 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3or 1084 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2802 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-nfc 2965 df-ne 3019 df-ral 3145 df-rex 3146 df-reu 3147 df-rmo 3148 df-rab 3149 df-v 3498 df-sbc 3775 df-csb 3886 df-dif 3941 df-un 3943 df-in 3945 df-ss 3954 df-pss 3956 df-nul 4294 df-if 4470 df-pw 4543 df-sn 4570 df-pr 4572 df-tp 4574 df-op 4576 df-uni 4841 df-int 4879 df-iun 4923 df-iin 4924 df-br 5069 df-opab 5131 df-mpt 5149 df-tr 5175 df-id 5462 df-eprel 5467 df-po 5476 df-so 5477 df-fr 5516 df-we 5518 df-xp 5563 df-rel 5564 df-cnv 5565 df-co 5566 df-dm 5567 df-rn 5568 df-res 5569 df-ima 5570 df-pred 6150 df-ord 6196 df-on 6197 df-lim 6198 df-suc 6199 df-iota 6316 df-fun 6359 df-fn 6360 df-f 6361 df-f1 6362 df-fo 6363 df-f1o 6364 df-fv 6365 df-riota 7116 df-om 7583 df-wrecs 7949 df-recs 8010 df-rdg 8048 df-r1 9195 df-rank 9196 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |