recexpr - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

	Intuitionistic Logic Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > recexpr		GIF version

Theorem recexpr 7836

Description: The reciprocal of a positive real exists. Part of Proposition 9-3.7(v) of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
recexpr	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P)

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem recexpr Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq12 4088	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → (𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ↔ 𝑢 <_Q 𝑣))
2		simpr 110	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → 𝑤 = 𝑣)
3	2	fveq2d 5633	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → (_Q‘𝑤) = (_Q‘𝑣))
4	3	eleq1d 2298	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴) ↔ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴)))
5	1, 4	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴)) ↔ (𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))))
6	5	cbvexdva 1976	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))))
7	6	cbvabv 2354	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))} = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}
8		simpl 109	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → 𝑧 = 𝑢)
9	2, 8	breq12d 4096	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → (𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ↔ 𝑣 <_Q 𝑢))
10	3	eleq1d 2298	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴) ↔ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴)))
11	9, 10	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴)) ↔ (𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))))
12	11	cbvexdva 1976	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))))
13	12	cbvabv 2354	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))} = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}
14	7, 13	opeq12i 3862	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ = ⟨{𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩
15	14	recexprlempr 7830	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ ∈ P)
16	14	recexprlemex 7835	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩) = 1_P)
17		oveq2 6015	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ → (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩))
18	17	eqeq1d 2238	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ → ((𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P ↔ (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩) = 1_P))
19	18	rspcev 2907	. 2 ⊢ ((⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ ∈ P ∧ (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩) = 1_P) → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P)
20	15, 16, 19	syl2anc 411	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P)

Colors of variables: wff set class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1395 ∃wex 1538 ∈ wcel 2200 {cab 2215 ∃wrex 2509 ⟨cop 3669 class class class wbr 4083 ‘cfv 5318 (class class class)co 6007 1^st c1st 6290 2^nd c2nd 6291 *_Qcrq 7482 <_Q cltq 7483 Pcnp 7489 1_Pc1p 7490 ·_P cmp 7492

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 617 ax-in2 618 ax-io 714 ax-5 1493 ax-7 1494 ax-gen 1495 ax-ie1 1539 ax-ie2 1540 ax-8 1550 ax-10 1551 ax-11 1552 ax-i12 1553 ax-bndl 1555 ax-4 1556 ax-17 1572 ax-i9 1576 ax-ial 1580 ax-i5r 1581 ax-13 2202 ax-14 2203 ax-ext 2211 ax-coll 4199 ax-sep 4202 ax-nul 4210 ax-pow 4258 ax-pr 4293 ax-un 4524 ax-setind 4629 ax-iinf 4680

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-dc 840 df-3or 1003 df-3an 1004 df-tru 1398 df-fal 1401 df-nf 1507 df-sb 1809 df-eu 2080 df-mo 2081 df-clab 2216 df-cleq 2222 df-clel 2225 df-nfc 2361 df-ne 2401 df-ral 2513 df-rex 2514 df-reu 2515 df-rab 2517 df-v 2801 df-sbc 3029 df-csb 3125 df-dif 3199 df-un 3201 df-in 3203 df-ss 3210 df-nul 3492 df-pw 3651 df-sn 3672 df-pr 3673 df-op 3675 df-uni 3889 df-int 3924 df-iun 3967 df-br 4084 df-opab 4146 df-mpt 4147 df-tr 4183 df-eprel 4380 df-id 4384 df-po 4387 df-iso 4388 df-iord 4457 df-on 4459 df-suc 4462 df-iom 4683 df-xp 4725 df-rel 4726 df-cnv 4727 df-co 4728 df-dm 4729 df-rn 4730 df-res 4731 df-ima 4732 df-iota 5278 df-fun 5320 df-fn 5321 df-f 5322 df-f1 5323 df-fo 5324 df-f1o 5325 df-fv 5326 df-ov 6010 df-oprab 6011 df-mpo 6012 df-1st 6292 df-2nd 6293 df-recs 6457 df-irdg 6522 df-1o 6568 df-2o 6569 df-oadd 6572 df-omul 6573 df-er 6688 df-ec 6690 df-qs 6694 df-ni 7502 df-pli 7503 df-mi 7504 df-lti 7505 df-plpq 7542 df-mpq 7543 df-enq 7545 df-nqqs 7546 df-plqqs 7547 df-mqqs 7548 df-1nqqs 7549 df-rq 7550 df-ltnqqs 7551 df-enq0 7622 df-nq0 7623 df-0nq0 7624 df-plq0 7625 df-mq0 7626 df-inp 7664 df-i1p 7665 df-imp 7667

This theorem is referenced by: ltmprr 7840 recexgt0sr 7971

W3C validator