recexpr - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

	Intuitionistic Logic Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > recexpr		GIF version

Theorem recexpr 7918

Description: The reciprocal of a positive real exists. Part of Proposition 9-3.7(v) of [Gleason] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2013.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
recexpr	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P)

Distinct variable group: 𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem recexpr Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		breq12 4098	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → (𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ↔ 𝑢 <_Q 𝑣))
2		simpr 110	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → 𝑤 = 𝑣)
3	2	fveq2d 5652	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → (_Q‘𝑤) = (_Q‘𝑣))
4	3	eleq1d 2300	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴) ↔ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴)))
5	1, 4	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴)) ↔ (𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))))
6	5	cbvexdva 1978	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))))
7	6	cbvabv 2357	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))} = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}
8		simpl 109	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → 𝑧 = 𝑢)
9	2, 8	breq12d 4106	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → (𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ↔ 𝑣 <_Q 𝑢))
10	3	eleq1d 2300	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴) ↔ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴)))
11	9, 10	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑣) → ((𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴)) ↔ (𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))))
12	11	cbvexdva 1978	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴)) ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))))
13	12	cbvabv 2357	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))} = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}
14	7, 13	opeq12i 3872	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ = ⟨{𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑢 <_Q 𝑣 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑣(𝑣 <_Q 𝑢 ∧ (_Q‘𝑣) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩
15	14	recexprlempr 7912	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ ∈ P)
16	14	recexprlemex 7917	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩) = 1_P)
17		oveq2 6036	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ → (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩))
18	17	eqeq1d 2240	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ → ((𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P ↔ (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩) = 1_P))
19	18	rspcev 2911	. 2 ⊢ ((⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩ ∈ P ∧ (𝐴 ·_P ⟨{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑧 <_Q 𝑤 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (2^nd ‘𝐴))}, {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑤 <_Q 𝑧 ∧ (_Q‘𝑤) ∈ (1^st ‘𝐴))}⟩) = 1_P) → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P)
20	15, 16, 19	syl2anc 411	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ P → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐴 ·_P 𝑥) = 1_P)

Colors of variables: wff set class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1398 ∃wex 1541 ∈ wcel 2202 {cab 2217 ∃wrex 2512 ⟨cop 3676 class class class wbr 4093 ‘cfv 5333 (class class class)co 6028 1^st c1st 6310 2^nd c2nd 6311 *_Qcrq 7564 <_Q cltq 7565 Pcnp 7571 1_Pc1p 7572 ·_P cmp 7574

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 619 ax-in2 620 ax-io 717 ax-5 1496 ax-7 1497 ax-gen 1498 ax-ie1 1542 ax-ie2 1543 ax-8 1553 ax-10 1554 ax-11 1555 ax-i12 1556 ax-bndl 1558 ax-4 1559 ax-17 1575 ax-i9 1579 ax-ial 1583 ax-i5r 1584 ax-13 2204 ax-14 2205 ax-ext 2213 ax-coll 4209 ax-sep 4212 ax-nul 4220 ax-pow 4270 ax-pr 4305 ax-un 4536 ax-setind 4641 ax-iinf 4692

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-dc 843 df-3or 1006 df-3an 1007 df-tru 1401 df-fal 1404 df-nf 1510 df-sb 1811 df-eu 2082 df-mo 2083 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-nfc 2364 df-ne 2404 df-ral 2516 df-rex 2517 df-reu 2518 df-rab 2520 df-v 2805 df-sbc 3033 df-csb 3129 df-dif 3203 df-un 3205 df-in 3207 df-ss 3214 df-nul 3497 df-pw 3658 df-sn 3679 df-pr 3680 df-op 3682 df-uni 3899 df-int 3934 df-iun 3977 df-br 4094 df-opab 4156 df-mpt 4157 df-tr 4193 df-eprel 4392 df-id 4396 df-po 4399 df-iso 4400 df-iord 4469 df-on 4471 df-suc 4474 df-iom 4695 df-xp 4737 df-rel 4738 df-cnv 4739 df-co 4740 df-dm 4741 df-rn 4742 df-res 4743 df-ima 4744 df-iota 5293 df-fun 5335 df-fn 5336 df-f 5337 df-f1 5338 df-fo 5339 df-f1o 5340 df-fv 5341 df-ov 6031 df-oprab 6032 df-mpo 6033 df-1st 6312 df-2nd 6313 df-recs 6514 df-irdg 6579 df-1o 6625 df-2o 6626 df-oadd 6629 df-omul 6630 df-er 6745 df-ec 6747 df-qs 6751 df-ni 7584 df-pli 7585 df-mi 7586 df-lti 7587 df-plpq 7624 df-mpq 7625 df-enq 7627 df-nqqs 7628 df-plqqs 7629 df-mqqs 7630 df-1nqqs 7631 df-rq 7632 df-ltnqqs 7633 df-enq0 7704 df-nq0 7705 df-0nq0 7706 df-plq0 7707 df-mq0 7708 df-inp 7746 df-i1p 7747 df-imp 7749

This theorem is referenced by: ltmprr 7922 recexgt0sr 8053

W3C validator