Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > shftuz | GIF version |
Description: A shift of the upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
shftuz | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2462 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))} | |
2 | simp2 998 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) | |
3 | zcn 9231 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | |
4 | 3 | 3ad2ant1 1018 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) |
5 | 2, 4 | npcand 8246 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) = 𝑥) |
6 | eluzadd 9529 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) | |
7 | 6 | ancoms 268 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
8 | 7 | 3adant2 1016 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
9 | 5, 8 | eqeltrrd 2253 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
10 | 9 | 3expib 1206 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
11 | 10 | adantr 276 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
12 | eluzelcn 9512 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) | |
13 | 12 | a1i 9 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ)) |
14 | eluzsub 9530 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) | |
15 | 14 | 3expia 1205 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))) |
16 | 15 | ancoms 268 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))) |
17 | 13, 16 | jcad 307 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)))) |
18 | 11, 17 | impbid 129 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
19 | 18 | abbi1dv 2295 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
20 | 1, 19 | eqtrid 2220 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∧ w3a 978 = wceq 1353 ∈ wcel 2146 {cab 2161 {crab 2457 ‘cfv 5208 (class class class)co 5865 ℂcc 7784 + caddc 7789 − cmin 8102 ℤcz 9226 ℤ≥cuz 9501 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 614 ax-in2 615 ax-io 709 ax-5 1445 ax-7 1446 ax-gen 1447 ax-ie1 1491 ax-ie2 1492 ax-8 1502 ax-10 1503 ax-11 1504 ax-i12 1505 ax-bndl 1507 ax-4 1508 ax-17 1524 ax-i9 1528 ax-ial 1532 ax-i5r 1533 ax-13 2148 ax-14 2149 ax-ext 2157 ax-sep 4116 ax-pow 4169 ax-pr 4203 ax-un 4427 ax-setind 4530 ax-cnex 7877 ax-resscn 7878 ax-1cn 7879 ax-1re 7880 ax-icn 7881 ax-addcl 7882 ax-addrcl 7883 ax-mulcl 7884 ax-addcom 7886 ax-addass 7888 ax-distr 7890 ax-i2m1 7891 ax-0lt1 7892 ax-0id 7894 ax-rnegex 7895 ax-cnre 7897 ax-pre-ltirr 7898 ax-pre-ltwlin 7899 ax-pre-lttrn 7900 ax-pre-ltadd 7902 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3or 979 df-3an 980 df-tru 1356 df-fal 1359 df-nf 1459 df-sb 1761 df-eu 2027 df-mo 2028 df-clab 2162 df-cleq 2168 df-clel 2171 df-nfc 2306 df-ne 2346 df-nel 2441 df-ral 2458 df-rex 2459 df-reu 2460 df-rab 2462 df-v 2737 df-sbc 2961 df-dif 3129 df-un 3131 df-in 3133 df-ss 3140 df-pw 3574 df-sn 3595 df-pr 3596 df-op 3598 df-uni 3806 df-int 3841 df-br 3999 df-opab 4060 df-mpt 4061 df-id 4287 df-xp 4626 df-rel 4627 df-cnv 4628 df-co 4629 df-dm 4630 df-rn 4631 df-res 4632 df-ima 4633 df-iota 5170 df-fun 5210 df-fn 5211 df-f 5212 df-fv 5216 df-riota 5821 df-ov 5868 df-oprab 5869 df-mpo 5870 df-pnf 7968 df-mnf 7969 df-xr 7970 df-ltxr 7971 df-le 7972 df-sub 8104 df-neg 8105 df-inn 8893 df-n0 9150 df-z 9227 df-uz 9502 |
This theorem is referenced by: seq3shft 10815 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |