![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > shftuz | GIF version |
Description: A shift of the upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
shftuz | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2464 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))} | |
2 | simp2 998 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) | |
3 | zcn 9258 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | |
4 | 3 | 3ad2ant1 1018 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) |
5 | 2, 4 | npcand 8272 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) = 𝑥) |
6 | eluzadd 9556 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) | |
7 | 6 | ancoms 268 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
8 | 7 | 3adant2 1016 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
9 | 5, 8 | eqeltrrd 2255 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
10 | 9 | 3expib 1206 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
11 | 10 | adantr 276 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
12 | eluzelcn 9539 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) | |
13 | 12 | a1i 9 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ)) |
14 | eluzsub 9557 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) | |
15 | 14 | 3expia 1205 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))) |
16 | 15 | ancoms 268 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))) |
17 | 13, 16 | jcad 307 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)))) |
18 | 11, 17 | impbid 129 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
19 | 18 | abbi1dv 2297 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
20 | 1, 19 | eqtrid 2222 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∧ w3a 978 = wceq 1353 ∈ wcel 2148 {cab 2163 {crab 2459 ‘cfv 5217 (class class class)co 5875 ℂcc 7809 + caddc 7814 − cmin 8128 ℤcz 9253 ℤ≥cuz 9528 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 614 ax-in2 615 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-bndl 1509 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 ax-13 2150 ax-14 2151 ax-ext 2159 ax-sep 4122 ax-pow 4175 ax-pr 4210 ax-un 4434 ax-setind 4537 ax-cnex 7902 ax-resscn 7903 ax-1cn 7904 ax-1re 7905 ax-icn 7906 ax-addcl 7907 ax-addrcl 7908 ax-mulcl 7909 ax-addcom 7911 ax-addass 7913 ax-distr 7915 ax-i2m1 7916 ax-0lt1 7917 ax-0id 7919 ax-rnegex 7920 ax-cnre 7922 ax-pre-ltirr 7923 ax-pre-ltwlin 7924 ax-pre-lttrn 7925 ax-pre-ltadd 7927 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3or 979 df-3an 980 df-tru 1356 df-fal 1359 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 df-eu 2029 df-mo 2030 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-nfc 2308 df-ne 2348 df-nel 2443 df-ral 2460 df-rex 2461 df-reu 2462 df-rab 2464 df-v 2740 df-sbc 2964 df-dif 3132 df-un 3134 df-in 3136 df-ss 3143 df-pw 3578 df-sn 3599 df-pr 3600 df-op 3602 df-uni 3811 df-int 3846 df-br 4005 df-opab 4066 df-mpt 4067 df-id 4294 df-xp 4633 df-rel 4634 df-cnv 4635 df-co 4636 df-dm 4637 df-rn 4638 df-res 4639 df-ima 4640 df-iota 5179 df-fun 5219 df-fn 5220 df-f 5221 df-fv 5225 df-riota 5831 df-ov 5878 df-oprab 5879 df-mpo 5880 df-pnf 7994 df-mnf 7995 df-xr 7996 df-ltxr 7997 df-le 7998 df-sub 8130 df-neg 8131 df-inn 8920 df-n0 9177 df-z 9254 df-uz 9529 |
This theorem is referenced by: seq3shft 10847 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |