Theorem trirec0xor 16941

Description: Version of trirec0 16940 with exclusive-or.

The definition of a discrete field is sometimes stated in terms of exclusive-or but as proved here, this is equivalent to inclusive-or because the two disjuncts cannot be simultaneously true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
trirec0xor	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem trirec0xor

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trirec0 16940	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0))
2		1ne0 9322	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 1 ≠ 0
3	2	nesymi 2460	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 0 = 1
4		simpr 110	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) → 𝑥 = 0)
5	4	oveq1d 6073	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) → (𝑥 · 𝑧) = (0 · 𝑧))
6		mul02lem2 8678	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝑧) = 0)
7	5, 6	sylan9eqr 2289	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)) → (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 0)
8		simprl 531	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)) → (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1)
9	7, 8	eqtr3d 2269	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)) → 0 = 1)
10	9	rexlimiva 2657	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) → 0 = 1)
11	3, 10	mto 668	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)
12		r19.41v 2701	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0))
13	11, 12	mtbi 677	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)
14	13	biantru 302	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ∧ ¬ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)))
15		df-xor 1421	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ∧ ¬ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)))
16	14, 15	bitr4i 187	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))
17	16	ralbii 2550	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))
18	1, 17	bitri 184	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 716   ∨ w3o 1004   = wceq 1398   ⊻ wxo 1420   ∈ wcel 2205  ∀wral 2522  ∃wrex 2523   class class class wbr 4114  (class class class)co 6058  ℝcr 8142  0cc0 8143  1c1 8144   · cmul 8148   < clt 8324

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-sep 4233  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-setind 4664  ax-cnex 8234  ax-resscn 8235  ax-1cn 8236  ax-1re 8237  ax-icn 8238  ax-addcl 8239  ax-addrcl 8240  ax-mulcl 8241  ax-mulrcl 8242  ax-addcom 8243  ax-mulcom 8244  ax-addass 8245  ax-mulass 8246  ax-distr 8247  ax-i2m1 8248  ax-0lt1 8249  ax-1rid 8250  ax-0id 8251  ax-rnegex 8252  ax-precex 8253  ax-cnre 8254  ax-pre-ltirr 8255  ax-pre-ltwlin 8256  ax-pre-lttrn 8257  ax-pre-apti 8258  ax-pre-ltadd 8259  ax-pre-mulgt0 8260  ax-pre-mulext 8261

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-xor 1421  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-nel 2510  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-reu 2529  df-rmo 2530  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-id 4419  df-po 4422  df-iso 4423  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fv 5365  df-riota 6011  df-ov 6061  df-oprab 6062  df-mpo 6063  df-pnf 8326  df-mnf 8327  df-xr 8328  df-ltxr 8329  df-le 8330  df-sub 8462  df-neg 8463  df-reap 8866  df-ap 8873  df-div 8964

This theorem is referenced by: (None)