Theorem trirec0xor 16821

Description: Version of trirec0 16820 with exclusive-or.

The definition of a discrete field is sometimes stated in terms of exclusive-or but as proved here, this is equivalent to inclusive-or because the two disjuncts cannot be simultaneously true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
trirec0xor	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem trirec0xor

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trirec0 16820	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0))
2		1ne0 9304	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 1 ≠ 0
3	2	nesymi 2458	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 0 = 1
4		simpr 110	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) → 𝑥 = 0)
5	4	oveq1d 6064	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) → (𝑥 · 𝑧) = (0 · 𝑧))
6		mul02lem2 8660	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝑧) = 0)
7	5, 6	sylan9eqr 2287	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)) → (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 0)
8		simprl 531	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)) → (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1)
9	7, 8	eqtr3d 2267	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)) → 0 = 1)
10	9	rexlimiva 2655	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) → 0 = 1)
11	3, 10	mto 668	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)
12		r19.41v 2699	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ((𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0))
13	11, 12	mtbi 677	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)
14	13	biantru 302	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ∧ ¬ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)))
15		df-xor 1421	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ∧ ¬ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∧ 𝑥 = 0)))
16	14, 15	bitr4i 187	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))
17	16	ralbii 2548	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))
18	1, 17	bitri 184	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 716   ∨ w3o 1004   = wceq 1398   ⊻ wxo 1420   ∈ wcel 2203  ∀wral 2520  ∃wrex 2521   class class class wbr 4108  (class class class)co 6049  ℝcr 8125  0cc0 8126  1c1 8127   · cmul 8131   < clt 8307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2205  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4227  ax-pow 4286  ax-pr 4321  ax-un 4553  ax-setind 4658  ax-cnex 8217  ax-resscn 8218  ax-1cn 8219  ax-1re 8220  ax-icn 8221  ax-addcl 8222  ax-addrcl 8223  ax-mulcl 8224  ax-mulrcl 8225  ax-addcom 8226  ax-mulcom 8227  ax-addass 8228  ax-mulass 8229  ax-distr 8230  ax-i2m1 8231  ax-0lt1 8232  ax-1rid 8233  ax-0id 8234  ax-rnegex 8235  ax-precex 8236  ax-cnre 8237  ax-pre-ltirr 8238  ax-pre-ltwlin 8239  ax-pre-lttrn 8240  ax-pre-apti 8241  ax-pre-ltadd 8242  ax-pre-mulgt0 8243  ax-pre-mulext 8244

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-xor 1421  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2083  df-mo 2084  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-ne 2413  df-nel 2508  df-ral 2525  df-rex 2526  df-reu 2527  df-rmo 2528  df-rab 2529  df-v 2814  df-sbc 3042  df-dif 3212  df-un 3214  df-in 3216  df-ss 3223  df-pw 3670  df-sn 3694  df-pr 3695  df-op 3697  df-uni 3914  df-br 4109  df-opab 4171  df-id 4413  df-po 4416  df-iso 4417  df-xp 4754  df-rel 4755  df-cnv 4756  df-co 4757  df-dm 4758  df-iota 5311  df-fun 5353  df-fv 5359  df-riota 6002  df-ov 6052  df-oprab 6053  df-mpo 6054  df-pnf 8309  df-mnf 8310  df-xr 8311  df-ltxr 8312  df-le 8313  df-sub 8445  df-neg 8446  df-reap 8848  df-ap 8855  df-div 8946

This theorem is referenced by: (None)