| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltexprlem1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Lemma for Proposition 9-3.5(iv) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ltexprlem.1 | ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ltexprlem1 | ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pssnel 4427 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | prnmadd 11121 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥(𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 3 | 2 | anim2i 629 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 4 | 19.42v 1988 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | sylibr 237 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 6 | 5 | exp32 426 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)))) |
| 7 | 6 | com3l 90 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)))) |
| 8 | 7 | impd 416 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 9 | 8 | eximdv 1952 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 10 | 1, 9 | syl5 35 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 11 | ltexprlem.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} | |
| 12 | 11 | eqabri 2906 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 13 | 12 | exbii 1881 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 14 | n0 4303 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) | |
| 15 | excom 2202 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 16 | 13, 14, 15 | 3bitr4i 306 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 17 | 10, 16 | imbitrrdi 255 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∃wex 1812 ∈ wcel 2147 {cab 2741 ≠ wne 2959 ⊊ wpss 4016 ∅c0 4281 (class class class)co 7451 +Q cplq 10979 Pcnp 10983 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5255 ax-nul 5266 ax-pr 5398 ax-un 7783 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rmo 3369 df-reu 3370 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-ss 3901 df-pss 4017 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4841 df-uni 4873 df-int 4913 df-iun 4958 df-br 5109 df-opab 5174 df-mpt 5193 df-tr 5219 df-id 5553 df-eprel 5558 df-po 5566 df-so 5567 df-fr 5611 df-we 5613 df-xp 5664 df-rel 5665 df-cnv 5666 df-co 5667 df-dm 5668 df-rn 5669 df-res 5670 df-ima 5671 df-pred 6330 df-ord 6391 df-on 6392 df-lim 6393 df-suc 6394 df-iota 6520 df-fun 6568 df-fn 6569 df-f 6570 df-f1 6571 df-fo 6572 df-f1o 6573 df-fv 6574 df-ov 7454 df-oprab 7455 df-mpo 7456 df-om 7912 df-1st 8035 df-2nd 8036 df-frecs 8337 df-wrecs 8368 df-recs 8417 df-rdg 8456 df-1o 8514 df-oadd 8518 df-omul 8519 df-er 8755 df-ni 10996 df-pli 10997 df-mi 10998 df-lti 10999 df-plpq 11032 df-mpq 11033 df-ltpq 11034 df-enq 11035 df-nq 11036 df-erq 11037 df-plq 11038 df-mq 11039 df-1nq 11040 df-ltnq 11042 df-np 11105 |
| This theorem is used by: ltexprlem5 11164 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |