| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltexprlem1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Lemma for Proposition 9-3.5(iv) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ltexprlem.1 | ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ltexprlem1 | ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pssnel 4424 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
| 2 | prnmadd 11007 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥(𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 3 | 2 | anim2i 629 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 4 | 19.42v 1986 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | sylibr 237 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 6 | 5 | exp32 426 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)))) |
| 7 | 6 | com3l 90 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)))) |
| 8 | 7 | impd 416 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 9 | 8 | eximdv 1950 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 10 | 1, 9 | syl5 35 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 11 | ltexprlem.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} | |
| 12 | 11 | eqabri 2902 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 13 | 12 | exbii 1881 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 14 | n0 4300 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) | |
| 15 | excom 2199 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) | |
| 16 | 13, 14, 15 | 3bitr4i 306 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 17 | 10, 16 | imbitrrdi 255 | 1 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∃wex 1812 ∈ wcel 2145 {cab 2738 ≠ wne 2955 ⊊ wpss 3900 ∅c0 4279 (class class class)co 7414 +Q cplq 10865 Pcnp 10869 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5263 ax-pr 5398 ax-un 7737 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rmo 3365 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-int 4908 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5550 df-eprel 5555 df-po 5563 df-so 5564 df-fr 5608 df-we 5610 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-pred 6299 df-ord 6360 df-on 6361 df-lim 6362 df-suc 6363 df-iota 6489 df-fun 6535 df-fn 6536 df-f 6537 df-f1 6538 df-fo 6539 df-f1o 6540 df-fv 6541 df-ov 7417 df-oprab 7418 df-mpo 7419 df-om 7864 df-1st 7987 df-2nd 7988 df-frecs 8281 df-wrecs 8312 df-recs 8361 df-rdg 8400 df-1o 8456 df-oadd 8460 df-omul 8461 df-er 8697 df-ni 10882 df-pli 10883 df-mi 10884 df-lti 10885 df-plpq 10918 df-mpq 10919 df-ltpq 10920 df-enq 10921 df-nq 10922 df-erq 10923 df-plq 10924 df-mq 10925 df-1nq 10926 df-ltnq 10928 df-np 10991 |
| This theorem is used by: ltexprlem5 11050 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |