ltexprlem5 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltexprlem5		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltexprlem5 10951

Description: Lemma for Proposition 9-3.5(iv) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem.1	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem5	⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑦,𝐴 𝑥,𝐵,𝑦 𝑥,𝐶 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ltexprlem5 Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltexprlem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
2	1	ltexprlem1 10947	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅))
3		0pss 4399	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ ∅)
4	2, 3	imbitrrdi 252	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶))
5	4	imp 406	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶)
6	1	ltexprlem2 10948	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
7	6	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
8	1	ltexprlem3 10949	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)))
9	1	ltexprlem4 10950	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
10		df-rex 3061	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
11	9, 10	imbitrrdi 252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
12	8, 11	jcad 512	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
13	12	ralrimiv 3127	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
14	13	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
15		elnp 10898	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ P ↔ ((∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ Q) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
16	5, 7, 14, 15	syl21anbrc 1345	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∀wal 1539 = wceq 1541 ∃wex 1780 ∈ wcel 2113 {cab 2714 ≠ wne 2932 ∀wral 3051 ∃wrex 3060 ⊊ wpss 3902 ∅c0 4285 class class class wbr 5098 (class class class)co 7358 Qcnq 10763 +_Q cplq 10766 <_Q cltq 10769 Pcnp 10770

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2146 ax-11 2162 ax-12 2184 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5241 ax-nul 5251 ax-pow 5310 ax-pr 5377 ax-un 7680 ax-inf2 9550

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2885 df-ne 2933 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rmo 3350 df-reu 3351 df-rab 3400 df-v 3442 df-sbc 3741 df-csb 3850 df-dif 3904 df-un 3906 df-in 3908 df-ss 3918 df-pss 3921 df-nul 4286 df-if 4480 df-pw 4556 df-sn 4581 df-pr 4583 df-op 4587 df-uni 4864 df-int 4903 df-iun 4948 df-br 5099 df-opab 5161 df-mpt 5180 df-tr 5206 df-id 5519 df-eprel 5524 df-po 5532 df-so 5533 df-fr 5577 df-we 5579 df-xp 5630 df-rel 5631 df-cnv 5632 df-co 5633 df-dm 5634 df-rn 5635 df-res 5636 df-ima 5637 df-pred 6259 df-ord 6320 df-on 6321 df-lim 6322 df-suc 6323 df-iota 6448 df-fun 6494 df-fn 6495 df-f 6496 df-f1 6497 df-fo 6498 df-f1o 6499 df-fv 6500 df-ov 7361 df-oprab 7362 df-mpo 7363 df-om 7809 df-1st 7933 df-2nd 7934 df-frecs 8223 df-wrecs 8254 df-recs 8303 df-rdg 8341 df-1o 8397 df-oadd 8401 df-omul 8402 df-er 8635 df-ni 10783 df-pli 10784 df-mi 10785 df-lti 10786 df-plpq 10819 df-mpq 10820 df-ltpq 10821 df-enq 10822 df-nq 10823 df-erq 10824 df-plq 10825 df-mq 10826 df-1nq 10827 df-ltnq 10829 df-np 10892

This theorem is referenced by: ltexprlem6 10952 ltexprlem7 10953 ltexpri 10954

W3C validator