ltexprlem5 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltexprlem5		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltexprlem5 10942

Description: Lemma for Proposition 9-3.5(iv) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem.1	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem5	⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑦,𝐴 𝑥,𝐵,𝑦 𝑥,𝐶 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ltexprlem5 Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltexprlem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
2	1	ltexprlem1 10938	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅))
3		0pss 4396	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ ∅)
4	2, 3	imbitrrdi 252	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶))
5	4	imp 406	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶)
6	1	ltexprlem2 10939	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
7	6	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
8	1	ltexprlem3 10940	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)))
9	1	ltexprlem4 10941	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
10		df-rex 3058	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
11	9, 10	imbitrrdi 252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
12	8, 11	jcad 512	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
13	12	ralrimiv 3124	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
14	13	adantr 480	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
15		elnp 10889	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ P ↔ ((∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ Q) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
16	5, 7, 14, 15	syl21anbrc 1345	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∀wal 1539 = wceq 1541 ∃wex 1780 ∈ wcel 2113 {cab 2711 ≠ wne 2929 ∀wral 3048 ∃wrex 3057 ⊊ wpss 3899 ∅c0 4282 class class class wbr 5095 (class class class)co 7355 Qcnq 10754 +_Q cplq 10757 <_Q cltq 10760 Pcnp 10761

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2146 ax-11 2162 ax-12 2182 ax-ext 2705 ax-sep 5238 ax-nul 5248 ax-pow 5307 ax-pr 5374 ax-un 7677 ax-inf2 9542

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2537 df-eu 2566 df-clab 2712 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2808 df-nfc 2882 df-ne 2930 df-ral 3049 df-rex 3058 df-rmo 3347 df-reu 3348 df-rab 3397 df-v 3439 df-sbc 3738 df-csb 3847 df-dif 3901 df-un 3903 df-in 3905 df-ss 3915 df-pss 3918 df-nul 4283 df-if 4477 df-pw 4553 df-sn 4578 df-pr 4580 df-op 4584 df-uni 4861 df-int 4900 df-iun 4945 df-br 5096 df-opab 5158 df-mpt 5177 df-tr 5203 df-id 5516 df-eprel 5521 df-po 5529 df-so 5530 df-fr 5574 df-we 5576 df-xp 5627 df-rel 5628 df-cnv 5629 df-co 5630 df-dm 5631 df-rn 5632 df-res 5633 df-ima 5634 df-pred 6256 df-ord 6317 df-on 6318 df-lim 6319 df-suc 6320 df-iota 6445 df-fun 6491 df-fn 6492 df-f 6493 df-f1 6494 df-fo 6495 df-f1o 6496 df-fv 6497 df-ov 7358 df-oprab 7359 df-mpo 7360 df-om 7806 df-1st 7930 df-2nd 7931 df-frecs 8220 df-wrecs 8251 df-recs 8300 df-rdg 8338 df-1o 8394 df-oadd 8398 df-omul 8399 df-er 8631 df-ni 10774 df-pli 10775 df-mi 10776 df-lti 10777 df-plpq 10810 df-mpq 10811 df-ltpq 10812 df-enq 10813 df-nq 10814 df-erq 10815 df-plq 10816 df-mq 10817 df-1nq 10818 df-ltnq 10820 df-np 10883

This theorem is referenced by: ltexprlem6 10943 ltexprlem7 10944 ltexpri 10945

W3C validator