ltexprlem5 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltexprlem5		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltexprlem5 10954

Description: Lemma for Proposition 9-3.5(iv) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem.1	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem5	⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑦,𝐴 𝑥,𝐵,𝑦 𝑥,𝐶 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ltexprlem5 Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltexprlem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
2	1	ltexprlem1 10950	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅))
3		0pss 4375	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ ∅)
4	2, 3	imbitrrdi 253	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶))
5	4	imp 407	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶)
6	1	ltexprlem2 10951	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
7	6	adantr 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
8	1	ltexprlem3 10952	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)))
9	1	ltexprlem4 10953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
10		df-rex 3064	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
11	9, 10	imbitrrdi 253	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
12	8, 11	jcad 517	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
13	12	ralrimiv 3130	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
14	13	adantr 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
15		elnp 10901	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ P ↔ ((∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ Q) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
16	5, 7, 14, 15	syl21anbrc 1351	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 ∀wal 1545 = wceq 1547 ∃wex 1786 ∈ wcel 2119 {cab 2717 ≠ wne 2934 ∀wral 3053 ∃wrex 3063 ⊊ wpss 3884 ∅c0 4261 class class class wbr 5072 (class class class)co 7356 Qcnq 10766 +_Q cplq 10769 <_Q cltq 10772 Pcnp 10773

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2121 ax-9 2129 ax-10 2152 ax-11 2168 ax-12 2189 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5228 ax-pow 5294 ax-pr 5362 ax-un 7678 ax-inf2 9553

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 854 df-3or 1093 df-3an 1094 df-tru 1550 df-fal 1560 df-ex 1787 df-nf 1791 df-sb 2074 df-mo 2543 df-eu 2573 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2888 df-ne 2935 df-ral 3054 df-rex 3064 df-rmo 3344 df-reu 3345 df-rab 3392 df-v 3433 df-sbc 3724 df-csb 3832 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-pss 3903 df-nul 4262 df-if 4455 df-pw 4531 df-sn 4556 df-pr 4558 df-op 4562 df-uni 4839 df-int 4878 df-iun 4923 df-br 5073 df-opab 5135 df-mpt 5154 df-tr 5180 df-id 5513 df-eprel 5518 df-po 5526 df-so 5527 df-fr 5571 df-we 5573 df-xp 5624 df-rel 5625 df-cnv 5626 df-co 5627 df-dm 5628 df-rn 5629 df-res 5630 df-ima 5631 df-pred 6252 df-ord 6313 df-on 6314 df-lim 6315 df-suc 6316 df-iota 6441 df-fun 6487 df-fn 6488 df-f 6489 df-f1 6490 df-fo 6491 df-f1o 6492 df-fv 6493 df-ov 7359 df-oprab 7360 df-mpo 7361 df-om 7807 df-1st 7931 df-2nd 7932 df-frecs 8221 df-wrecs 8252 df-recs 8301 df-rdg 8339 df-1o 8395 df-oadd 8399 df-omul 8400 df-er 8633 df-ni 10786 df-pli 10787 df-mi 10788 df-lti 10789 df-plpq 10822 df-mpq 10823 df-ltpq 10824 df-enq 10825 df-nq 10826 df-erq 10827 df-plq 10828 df-mq 10829 df-1nq 10830 df-ltnq 10832 df-np 10895

This theorem is referenced by: ltexprlem6 10955 ltexprlem7 10956 ltexpri 10957

W3C validator