ltexprlem5 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ltexprlem5		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ltexprlem5 10992

Description: Lemma for Proposition 9-3.5(iv) of [Gleason] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem.1	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ltexprlem5	⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑦,𝐴 𝑥,𝐵,𝑦 𝑥,𝐶 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ltexprlem5 Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltexprlem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 +_Q 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
2	1	ltexprlem1 10988	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ ∅))
3		0pss 4398	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ ∅)
4	2, 3	imbitrrdi 254	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶))
5	4	imp 410	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∅ ⊊ 𝐶)
6	1	ltexprlem2 10989	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
7	6	adantr 484	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ⊊ Q)
8	1	ltexprlem3 10990	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)))
9	1	ltexprlem4 10991	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
10		df-rex 3086	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
11	9, 10	imbitrrdi 254	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
12	8, 11	jcad 520	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
13	12	ralrimiv 3152	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ P → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
14	13	adantr 484	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧))
15		elnp 10939	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ P ↔ ((∅ ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ Q) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (∀𝑧(𝑧 <_Q 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 <_Q 𝑧)))
16	5, 7, 14, 15	syl21anbrc 1357	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ P ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ P)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∀wal 1557 = wceq 1559 ∃wex 1798 ∈ wcel 2141 {cab 2739 ≠ wne 2956 ∀wral 3075 ∃wrex 3085 ⊊ wpss 3903 ∅c0 4283 class class class wbr 5097 (class class class)co 7391 Qcnq 10804 +_Q cplq 10807 <_Q cltq 10810 Pcnp 10811

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-10 2174 ax-11 2190 ax-12 2211 ax-ext 2733 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5253 ax-pow 5319 ax-pr 5387 ax-un 7713 ax-inf2 9590

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3or 1098 df-3an 1099 df-tru 1562 df-fal 1572 df-ex 1799 df-nf 1803 df-sb 2090 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-ral 3076 df-rex 3086 df-rmo 3366 df-reu 3367 df-rab 3414 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-pss 3922 df-nul 4284 df-if 4478 df-pw 4554 df-sn 4580 df-pr 4582 df-op 4586 df-uni 4863 df-int 4903 df-iun 4948 df-br 5098 df-opab 5160 df-mpt 5179 df-tr 5205 df-id 5538 df-eprel 5543 df-po 5551 df-so 5552 df-fr 5596 df-we 5598 df-xp 5649 df-rel 5650 df-cnv 5651 df-co 5652 df-dm 5653 df-rn 5654 df-res 5655 df-ima 5656 df-pred 6283 df-ord 6344 df-on 6345 df-lim 6346 df-suc 6347 df-iota 6472 df-fun 6518 df-fn 6519 df-f 6520 df-f1 6521 df-fo 6522 df-f1o 6523 df-fv 6524 df-ov 7394 df-oprab 7395 df-mpo 7396 df-om 7842 df-1st 7965 df-2nd 7966 df-frecs 8256 df-wrecs 8287 df-recs 8336 df-rdg 8375 df-1o 8431 df-oadd 8435 df-omul 8436 df-er 8672 df-ni 10824 df-pli 10825 df-mi 10826 df-lti 10827 df-plpq 10860 df-mpq 10861 df-ltpq 10862 df-enq 10863 df-nq 10864 df-erq 10865 df-plq 10866 df-mq 10867 df-1nq 10868 df-ltnq 10870 df-np 10933

This theorem is referenced by: ltexprlem6 10993 ltexprlem7 10994 ltexpri 10995

W3C validator