Theorem rankscottu 35821

Description: An upper bound on the rank of a Scott's trick set. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Jul-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rankscottu	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))

Proof of Theorem rankscottu

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵)
2	1	scottrankd 9962	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) = suc (rank‘𝑥))
3	2	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) = suc (rank‘𝑥))
4		elscottrankss 35813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝐴))
5		rankon 9816	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (rank‘𝑥) ∈ On
6	5	onordi 6483	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ord (rank‘𝑥)
7		rankon 9816	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ On
8	7	onordi 6483	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ord (rank‘𝐴)
9		ordsucsssuc 7844	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ord (rank‘𝑥) ∧ Ord (rank‘𝐴)) → ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) ↔ suc (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴)))
10	6, 8, 9	mp2an 705	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) ↔ suc (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))
11	4, 10	sylib 221	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → suc (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))
12	3, 11	eqsstrd 3947	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))
13	12	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴)))
14	13	exlimiv 1964	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴)))
15		neq0 4302	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ Scott 𝐵 = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵)
16	15	con1bii 359	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 ↔ Scott 𝐵 = ∅)
17		scottex 9946	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Scott 𝐵 ∈ V
18	17	rankeq0 9890	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Scott 𝐵 = ∅ ↔ (rank‘Scott 𝐵) = ∅)
19		0ss 4353	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴)
20		sseq1 3938	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((rank‘Scott 𝐵) = ∅ → ((rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴) ↔ ∅ ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴)))
21	19, 20	mpbiri 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((rank‘Scott 𝐵) = ∅ → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))
22	18, 21	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (Scott 𝐵 = ∅ → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))
23	16, 22	sylbi 220	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))
24	23	a1d 26	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Scott 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴)))
25	14, 24	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘Scott 𝐵) ⊆ suc (rank‘𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2146   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4281  Ord word 6368  suc csuc 6371  ‘cfv 6547  rankcrnk 9780  Scott cscott 9941

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7761  ax-reg 9599  ax-inf2 9655

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6311  df-ord 6372  df-on 6373  df-lim 6374  df-suc 6375  df-iota 6501  df-fun 6549  df-fn 6550  df-f 6551  df-f1 6552  df-fo 6553  df-f1o 6554  df-fv 6555  df-ov 7433  df-om 7888  df-2nd 8012  df-frecs 8313  df-wrecs 8344  df-recs 8393  df-rdg 8432  df-r1 9781  df-rank 9782  df-scott 9942

This theorem is used by:  scottssr1  35822  rankkardu  35913