![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rankxplim2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: If the rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal, so is the rank of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rankxplim.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
rankxplim.2 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rankxplim2 | ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0ellim 6427 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ∅ ∈ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | |
2 | n0i 4333 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) | |
3 | 1, 2 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
4 | df-ne 2940 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) | |
5 | rankxplim.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
6 | rankxplim.2 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V | |
7 | 5, 6 | xpex 7744 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V |
8 | 7 | rankeq0 9862 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
9 | 8 | notbii 320 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅) |
10 | 4, 9 | bitr2i 276 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) |
11 | 3, 10 | sylib 217 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) |
12 | limuni2 6426 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | |
13 | limuni2 6426 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | |
14 | 12, 13 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) |
15 | rankuni 9864 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
16 | rankuni 9864 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) | |
17 | 16 | unieqi 4921 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
18 | 15, 17 | eqtr2i 2760 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
19 | unixp 6281 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | |
20 | 19 | fveq2d 6895 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
21 | 18, 20 | eqtrid 2783 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
22 | limeq 6376 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) → (Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))) | |
23 | 21, 22 | syl 17 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))) |
24 | 14, 23 | imbitrid 243 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))) |
25 | 11, 24 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2105 ≠ wne 2939 Vcvv 3473 ∪ cun 3946 ∅c0 4322 ∪ cuni 4908 × cxp 5674 Lim wlim 6365 ‘cfv 6543 rankcrnk 9764 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2153 ax-12 2170 ax-ext 2702 ax-rep 5285 ax-sep 5299 ax-nul 5306 ax-pow 5363 ax-pr 5427 ax-un 7729 ax-reg 9593 ax-inf2 9642 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2067 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2709 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2809 df-nfc 2884 df-ne 2940 df-ral 3061 df-rex 3070 df-reu 3376 df-rab 3432 df-v 3475 df-sbc 3778 df-csb 3894 df-dif 3951 df-un 3953 df-in 3955 df-ss 3965 df-pss 3967 df-nul 4323 df-if 4529 df-pw 4604 df-sn 4629 df-pr 4631 df-op 4635 df-uni 4909 df-int 4951 df-iun 4999 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-mpt 5232 df-tr 5266 df-id 5574 df-eprel 5580 df-po 5588 df-so 5589 df-fr 5631 df-we 5633 df-xp 5682 df-rel 5683 df-cnv 5684 df-co 5685 df-dm 5686 df-rn 5687 df-res 5688 df-ima 5689 df-pred 6300 df-ord 6367 df-on 6368 df-lim 6369 df-suc 6370 df-iota 6495 df-fun 6545 df-fn 6546 df-f 6547 df-f1 6548 df-fo 6549 df-f1o 6550 df-fv 6551 df-ov 7415 df-om 7860 df-2nd 7980 df-frecs 8272 df-wrecs 8303 df-recs 8377 df-rdg 8416 df-r1 9765 df-rank 9766 |
This theorem is referenced by: rankxpsuc 9883 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |