Theorem rankxplim2 9040

Description: If the rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal, so is the rank of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rankxplim.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
rankxplim.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rankxplim2	⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem rankxplim2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ellim 6038	. . . 4 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ∅ ∈ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)))
2		n0i 4148	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅)
3	1, 2	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅)
4		df-ne 2970	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅)
5		rankxplim.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
6		rankxplim.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
7	5, 6	xpex 7240	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V
8	7	rankeq0 9021	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅)
9	8	notbii 312	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅)
10	4, 9	bitr2i 268	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
11	3, 10	sylib 210	. 2 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
12		limuni2 6037	. . . 4 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)))
13		limuni2 6037	. . . 4 ⊢ (Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)))
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)))
15		rankuni 9023	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
16		rankuni 9023	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))
17	16	unieqi 4680	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ (rank‘∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))
18	15, 17	eqtr2i 2803	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
19		unixp 5922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
20	19	fveq2d 6450	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (rank‘∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
21	18, 20	syl5eq 2826	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
22		limeq 5988	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) → (Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
23	21, 22	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (Lim ∪ ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
24	14, 23	syl5ib 236	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
25	11, 24	mpcom 38	1 ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   = wceq 1601   ∈ wcel 2107   ≠ wne 2969  Vcvv 3398   ∪ cun 3790  ∅c0 4141  ∪ cuni 4671   × cxp 5353  Lim wlim 5977  ‘cfv 6135  rankcrnk 8923

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2055  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2150  ax-12 2163  ax-13 2334  ax-ext 2754  ax-rep 5006  ax-sep 5017  ax-nul 5025  ax-pow 5077  ax-pr 5138  ax-un 7226  ax-reg 8786  ax-inf2 8835

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-3or 1072  df-3an 1073  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-mo 2551  df-eu 2587  df-clab 2764  df-cleq 2770  df-clel 2774  df-nfc 2921  df-ne 2970  df-ral 3095  df-rex 3096  df-reu 3097  df-rab 3099  df-v 3400  df-sbc 3653  df-csb 3752  df-dif 3795  df-un 3797  df-in 3799  df-ss 3806  df-pss 3808  df-nul 4142  df-if 4308  df-pw 4381  df-sn 4399  df-pr 4401  df-tp 4403  df-op 4405  df-uni 4672  df-int 4711  df-iun 4755  df-br 4887  df-opab 4949  df-mpt 4966  df-tr 4988  df-id 5261  df-eprel 5266  df-po 5274  df-so 5275  df-fr 5314  df-we 5316  df-xp 5361  df-rel 5362  df-cnv 5363  df-co 5364  df-dm 5365  df-rn 5366  df-res 5367  df-ima 5368  df-pred 5933  df-ord 5979  df-on 5980  df-lim 5981  df-suc 5982  df-iota 6099  df-fun 6137  df-fn 6138  df-f 6139  df-f1 6140  df-fo 6141  df-f1o 6142  df-fv 6143  df-om 7344  df-wrecs 7689  df-recs 7751  df-rdg 7789  df-r1 8924  df-rank 8925

This theorem is referenced by:  rankxpsuc  9042