Theorem satfdmfmla 35905

Description: The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satfdmfmla	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

Proof of Theorem satfdmfmla

Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5272	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1, 1	pm3.2i 476	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
3	2	jctr 534	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
4	3	3adant3 1150	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
5		satfdm 35874	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
7		fveq2 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
8	7	dmeqd 5897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
9		fveq2 6885	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
10	9	dmeqd 5897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
11	8, 10	eqeq12d 2781	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) ↔ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
12	11	rspcv 3579	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
13	12	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
14	6, 13	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
15		elelsuc 6440	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
16	15	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
17		fmlafv 35885	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
18	16, 17	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
19	14, 18	eqtr4d 2803	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  Vcvv 3457  ∅c0 4286  dom cdm 5663  suc csuc 6366  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7416  ωcom 7864   Sat csat 35841  Fmlacfmla 35842

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738  ax-inf2 9613

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-int 4915  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-tr 5221  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-pred 6306  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-om 7865  df-1st 7988  df-2nd 7989  df-frecs 8280  df-wrecs 8311  df-recs 8360  df-rdg 8399  df-goel 35845  df-goal 35847  df-sat 35848  df-fmla 35850

This theorem is used by:  satffunlem1lem2  35908  satffunlem2lem2  35911  satff  35915  satefvfmla0  35923  satefvfmla1  35930