Theorem satfdmfmla 35905

Description: The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satfdmfmla	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

Proof of Theorem satfdmfmla

Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5275	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1, 1	pm3.2i 476	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
3	2	jctr 534	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
4	3	3adant3 1150	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
5		satfdm 35874	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
7		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
8	7	dmeqd 5900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
9		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
10	9	dmeqd 5900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
11	8, 10	eqeq12d 2782	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) ↔ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
12	11	rspcv 3580	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
13	12	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
14	6, 13	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
15		elelsuc 6443	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
16	15	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
17		fmlafv 35885	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
18	16, 17	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
19	14, 18	eqtr4d 2804	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3082  Vcvv 3458  ∅c0 4289  dom cdm 5666  suc csuc 6369  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423  ωcom 7871   Sat csat 35841  Fmlacfmla 35842

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745  ax-inf2 9620

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-pss 3928  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-int 4918  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-tr 5224  df-id 5561  df-eprel 5566  df-po 5574  df-so 5575  df-fr 5619  df-we 5621  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-pred 6309  df-ord 6370  df-on 6371  df-lim 6372  df-suc 6373  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-om 7872  df-1st 7995  df-2nd 7996  df-frecs 8287  df-wrecs 8318  df-recs 8367  df-rdg 8406  df-goel 35845  df-goal 35847  df-sat 35848  df-fmla 35850

This theorem is used by:  satffunlem1lem2  35908  satffunlem2lem2  35911  satff  35915  satefvfmla0  35923  satefvfmla1  35930