Theorem satfdmfmla 35979

Description: The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satfdmfmla	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

Proof of Theorem satfdmfmla

Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5264	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1, 1	pm3.2i 476	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
3	2	jctr 534	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
4	3	3adant3 1150	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
5		satfdm 35948	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
7		fveq2 6878	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
8	7	dmeqd 5889	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
9		fveq2 6878	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
10	9	dmeqd 5889	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
11	8, 10	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) ↔ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
12	11	rspcv 3572	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
13	12	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
14	6, 13	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
15		elelsuc 6433	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
16	15	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
17		fmlafv 35959	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
18	16, 17	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
19	14, 18	eqtr4d 2798	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4279  dom cdm 5655  suc csuc 6359  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  ωcom 7862   Sat csat 35915  Fmlacfmla 35916

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736  ax-inf2 9620

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6299  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-lim 6362  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-om 7863  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-frecs 8280  df-wrecs 8311  df-recs 8360  df-rdg 8399  df-goel 35919  df-goal 35921  df-sat 35922  df-fmla 35924

This theorem is used by:  satffunlem1lem2  35982  satffunlem2lem2  35985  satff  35989  satefvfmla0  35997  satefvfmla1  36004