Theorem satfdmfmla 36252

Description: The domain of the satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in any model 𝑀 and any binary relation 𝐸 on 𝑀 for a natural number 𝑁 is the set of valid Godel formulas of height 𝑁. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satfdmfmla	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

Proof of Theorem satfdmfmla

Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5260	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1, 1	pm3.2i 476	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)
3	2	jctr 534	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
4	3	3adant3 1150	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)))
5		satfdm 36221	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (∅ ∈ V ∧ ∅ ∈ V)) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛))
7		fveq2 6886	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
8	7	dmeqd 5886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁))
9		fveq2 6886	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
10	9	dmeqd 5886	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
11	8, 10	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) ↔ dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
12	11	rspcv 3572	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
13	12	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (∀𝑛 ∈ ω dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑛) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑛) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁)))
14	6, 13	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
15		elelsuc 6438	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
16	15	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → 𝑁 ∈ suc ω)
17		fmlafv 36232	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
18	16, 17	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → (Fmla‘𝑁) = dom ((∅ Sat ∅)‘𝑁))
19	14, 18	eqtr4d 2798	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ω) → dom ((𝑀 Sat 𝐸)‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘𝑁))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4278  dom cdm 5650  suc csuc 6364  ‘cfv 6539  (class class class)co 7421  ωcom 7878   Sat csat 36188  Fmlacfmla 36189

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7752  ax-inf2 9646

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-pss 4014  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5545  df-eprel 5550  df-po 5558  df-so 5559  df-fr 5603  df-we 5605  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-pred 6304  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fn 6542  df-f 6543  df-f1 6544  df-fo 6545  df-f1o 6546  df-fv 6547  df-ov 7424  df-oprab 7425  df-mpo 7426  df-om 7879  df-1st 8002  df-2nd 8003  df-frecs 8303  df-wrecs 8334  df-recs 8383  df-rdg 8422  df-goel 36192  df-goal 36194  df-sat 36195  df-fmla 36197

This theorem is used by:  satffunlem1lem2  36255  satffunlem2lem2  36258  satff  36262  satefvfmla0  36270  satefvfmla1  36277