| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > carden | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Two sets are equinumerous
iff their cardinal numbers are equal. This
important theorem expresses the essential concept behind
"cardinality" or
"size". This theorem appears as Proposition 10.10 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 85, Theorem 7P of [Enderton] p. 197,
and Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 242
(among others). The Axiom of Choice is required for its proof. Related
theorems are hasheni 14404 and the finite-set-only hashen 14403.
This theorem is also known as Hume's Principle. Gottlob Frege's two-volume Grundgesetze der Arithmetik used his Basic Law V to prove this theorem. Unfortunately Basic Law V caused Frege's system to be inconsistent because it was subject to Russell's paradox (see ru 3746). Later scholars have found that Frege primarily used Basic Law V to Hume's Principle. If Basic Law V is replaced by Hume's Principle in Frege's system, much of Frege's work is restored. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, once Basic Law V is replaced, proves "Frege's theorem" (the Peano axioms of arithmetic can be derived in second-order logic from Hume's principle). See https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-theorem 3746. We take a different approach, using first-order logic and ZFC, to prove the Peano axioms of arithmetic. The theory of cardinality can also be developed without AC by introducing "card" as a primitive notion and stating this theorem as an axiom, as is done with the axiom for cardinal numbers in [Suppes] p. 111. Finally, if we allow the Axiom of Regularity, we can avoid AC by defining the cardinal number of a set as the set of all sets equinumerous to it and having the least possible rank (see karden 9898). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| carden | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | numth3 10472 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) | |
| 2 | 1 | ad2antrr 739 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) |
| 3 | cardid2 9958 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | |
| 4 | ensym 9009 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴)) | |
| 5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3syl 19 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴)) |
| 6 | simpr 490 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) | |
| 7 | numth3 10472 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | |
| 8 | 7 | ad2antlr 740 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) |
| 9 | 8 | cardidd 10551 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵) |
| 10 | 6, 9 | eqbrtrd 5138 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐵) |
| 11 | entr 9012 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | |
| 12 | 5, 10, 11 | syl2anc 596 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| 13 | 12 | ex 418 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| 14 | carden2b 9972 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) | |
| 15 | 13, 14 | impbid1 228 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 class class class wbr 5114 dom cdm 5666 ‘cfv 6543 ≈ cen 8949 cardccrd 9940 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2738 ax-rep 5243 ax-sep 5262 ax-nul 5274 ax-pow 5341 ax-pr 5409 ax-un 7745 ax-ac2 10465 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2570 df-eu 2600 df-clab 2745 df-cleq 2758 df-clel 2841 df-nfc 2915 df-ne 2962 df-ral 3083 df-rex 3093 df-rmo 3372 df-reu 3373 df-rab 3420 df-v 3460 df-sbc 3748 df-csb 3857 df-dif 3911 df-un 3913 df-in 3915 df-ss 3925 df-pss 3928 df-nul 4290 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4878 df-int 4918 df-iun 4963 df-br 5115 df-opab 5179 df-mpt 5198 df-tr 5224 df-id 5561 df-eprel 5566 df-po 5574 df-so 5575 df-fr 5619 df-se 5620 df-we 5621 df-xp 5672 df-rel 5673 df-cnv 5674 df-co 5675 df-dm 5676 df-rn 5677 df-res 5678 df-ima 5679 df-pred 6309 df-ord 6370 df-on 6371 df-suc 6373 df-iota 6499 df-fun 6545 df-fn 6546 df-f 6547 df-f1 6548 df-fo 6549 df-f1o 6550 df-fv 6551 df-isom 6552 df-riota 7380 df-ov 7426 df-2nd 7996 df-frecs 8287 df-wrecs 8318 df-recs 8367 df-er 8703 df-en 8953 df-card 9944 df-ac 10119 |
| This theorem is used by: cardeq0 10554 ficard 10567 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |