| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > carden | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Two sets are equinumerous
iff their cardinal numbers are equal. This
important theorem expresses the essential concept behind
"cardinality" or
"size". This theorem appears as Proposition 10.10 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 85, Theorem 7P of [Enderton] p. 197,
and Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 242
(among others). The Axiom of Choice is required for its proof. Related
theorems are hasheni 14366 and the finite-set-only hashen 14365.
This theorem is also known as Hume's Principle. Gottlob Frege's two-volume Grundgesetze der Arithmetik used his Basic Law V to prove this theorem. Unfortunately Basic Law V caused Frege's system to be inconsistent because it was subject to Russell's paradox (see ru 3763). Later scholars have found that Frege primarily used Basic Law V to Hume's Principle. If Basic Law V is replaced by Hume's Principle in Frege's system, much of Frege's work is restored. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, once Basic Law V is replaced, proves "Frege's theorem" (the Peano axioms of arithmetic can be derived in second-order logic from Hume's principle). See https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-theorem 3763. We take a different approach, using first-order logic and ZFC, to prove the Peano axioms of arithmetic. The theory of cardinality can also be developed without AC by introducing "card" as a primitive notion and stating this theorem as an axiom, as is done with the axiom for cardinal numbers in [Suppes] p. 111. Finally, if we allow the Axiom of Regularity, we can avoid AC by defining the cardinal number of a set as the set of all sets equinumerous to it and having the least possible rank (see karden 9909). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| carden | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | numth3 10484 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) | |
| 2 | 1 | ad2antrr 726 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) |
| 3 | cardid2 9967 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | |
| 4 | ensym 9017 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴)) | |
| 5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3syl 18 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴)) |
| 6 | simpr 484 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) | |
| 7 | numth3 10484 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | |
| 8 | 7 | ad2antlr 727 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) |
| 9 | 8 | cardidd 10563 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵) |
| 10 | 6, 9 | eqbrtrd 5141 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐵) |
| 11 | entr 9020 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | |
| 12 | 5, 10, 11 | syl2anc 584 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| 13 | 12 | ex 412 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| 14 | carden2b 9981 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) | |
| 15 | 13, 14 | impbid1 225 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2108 class class class wbr 5119 dom cdm 5654 ‘cfv 6531 ≈ cen 8956 cardccrd 9949 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2707 ax-rep 5249 ax-sep 5266 ax-nul 5276 ax-pow 5335 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7729 ax-ac2 10477 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2809 df-nfc 2885 df-ne 2933 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rmo 3359 df-reu 3360 df-rab 3416 df-v 3461 df-sbc 3766 df-csb 3875 df-dif 3929 df-un 3931 df-in 3933 df-ss 3943 df-pss 3946 df-nul 4309 df-if 4501 df-pw 4577 df-sn 4602 df-pr 4604 df-op 4608 df-uni 4884 df-int 4923 df-iun 4969 df-br 5120 df-opab 5182 df-mpt 5202 df-tr 5230 df-id 5548 df-eprel 5553 df-po 5561 df-so 5562 df-fr 5606 df-se 5607 df-we 5608 df-xp 5660 df-rel 5661 df-cnv 5662 df-co 5663 df-dm 5664 df-rn 5665 df-res 5666 df-ima 5667 df-pred 6290 df-ord 6355 df-on 6356 df-suc 6358 df-iota 6484 df-fun 6533 df-fn 6534 df-f 6535 df-f1 6536 df-fo 6537 df-f1o 6538 df-fv 6539 df-isom 6540 df-riota 7362 df-ov 7408 df-2nd 7989 df-frecs 8280 df-wrecs 8311 df-recs 8385 df-er 8719 df-en 8960 df-card 9953 df-ac 10130 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cardeq0 10566 ficard 10579 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |