| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > carden | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Two sets are equinumerous
iff their cardinal numbers are equal. This
important theorem expresses the essential concept behind
"cardinality" or
"size". This theorem appears as Proposition 10.10 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 85, Theorem 7P of [Enderton] p. 197,
and Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 242
(among others). The Axiom of Choice is required for its proof. Related
theorems are hasheni 14252 and the finite-set-only hashen 14251.
This theorem is also known as Hume's Principle. Gottlob Frege's two-volume Grundgesetze der Arithmetik used his Basic Law V to prove this theorem. Unfortunately Basic Law V caused Frege's system to be inconsistent because it was subject to Russell's paradox (see ru 3739). Later scholars have found that Frege primarily used Basic Law V to Hume's Principle. If Basic Law V is replaced by Hume's Principle in Frege's system, much of Frege's work is restored. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, once Basic Law V is replaced, proves "Frege's theorem" (the Peano axioms of arithmetic can be derived in second-order logic from Hume's principle). See https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-theorem 3739. We take a different approach, using first-order logic and ZFC, to prove the Peano axioms of arithmetic. The theory of cardinality can also be developed without AC by introducing "card" as a primitive notion and stating this theorem as an axiom, as is done with the axiom for cardinal numbers in [Suppes] p. 111. Finally, if we allow the Axiom of Regularity, we can avoid AC by defining the cardinal number of a set as the set of all sets equinumerous to it and having the least possible rank (see karden 9785). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| carden | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | numth3 10358 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) | |
| 2 | 1 | ad2antrr 726 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card) |
| 3 | cardid2 9843 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴) | |
| 4 | ensym 8925 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴)) | |
| 5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3syl 18 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴)) |
| 6 | simpr 484 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) | |
| 7 | numth3 10358 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) | |
| 8 | 7 | ad2antlr 727 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card) |
| 9 | 8 | cardidd 10437 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐵) ≈ 𝐵) |
| 10 | 6, 9 | eqbrtrd 5113 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐵) |
| 11 | entr 8928 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ (card‘𝐴) ∧ (card‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | |
| 12 | 5, 10, 11 | syl2anc 584 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| 13 | 12 | ex 412 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| 14 | carden2b 9857 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵)) | |
| 15 | 13, 14 | impbid1 225 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2111 class class class wbr 5091 dom cdm 5616 ‘cfv 6481 ≈ cen 8866 cardccrd 9825 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2144 ax-11 2160 ax-12 2180 ax-ext 2703 ax-rep 5217 ax-sep 5234 ax-nul 5244 ax-pow 5303 ax-pr 5370 ax-un 7668 ax-ac2 10351 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2535 df-eu 2564 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2806 df-nfc 2881 df-ne 2929 df-ral 3048 df-rex 3057 df-rmo 3346 df-reu 3347 df-rab 3396 df-v 3438 df-sbc 3742 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-pss 3922 df-nul 4284 df-if 4476 df-pw 4552 df-sn 4577 df-pr 4579 df-op 4583 df-uni 4860 df-int 4898 df-iun 4943 df-br 5092 df-opab 5154 df-mpt 5173 df-tr 5199 df-id 5511 df-eprel 5516 df-po 5524 df-so 5525 df-fr 5569 df-se 5570 df-we 5571 df-xp 5622 df-rel 5623 df-cnv 5624 df-co 5625 df-dm 5626 df-rn 5627 df-res 5628 df-ima 5629 df-pred 6248 df-ord 6309 df-on 6310 df-suc 6312 df-iota 6437 df-fun 6483 df-fn 6484 df-f 6485 df-f1 6486 df-fo 6487 df-f1o 6488 df-fv 6489 df-isom 6490 df-riota 7303 df-ov 7349 df-2nd 7922 df-frecs 8211 df-wrecs 8242 df-recs 8291 df-er 8622 df-en 8870 df-card 9829 df-ac 10004 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cardeq0 10440 ficard 10453 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |