Theorem etasslt2 27877

Description: A version of etasslt 27876 with fewer hypotheses but a weaker upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
etasslt2	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem etasslt2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfun 27835	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Fun bday
2		ssltex1 27849	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		ssltex2 27850	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		unexg 7778	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2anc 583	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
6		funimaexg 6664	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
7	1, 5, 6	sylancr 586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
8	7	uniexd 7777	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
9		imassrn 6100	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ran bday
10		bdayrn 27838	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran bday = On
11	9, 10	sseqtri 4045	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On
12		ssorduni 7814	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
14		elon2 6406	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V))
15	13, 14	mpbiran 708	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
16	8, 15	sylibr 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
17		onsucb 7853	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
18	16, 17	sylib 218	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
19		onsucuni 7864	. . 3 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
20	11, 19	mp1i 13	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
21		etasslt 27876	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
22	18, 20, 21	mpd3an23 1463	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1087   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3076  Vcvv 3488   ∪ cun 3974   ⊆ wss 3976  {csn 4648  ∪ cuni 4931   class class class wbr 5166  ran crn 5701   “ cima 5703  Ord word 6394  Oncon0 6395  suc csuc 6397  Fun wfun 6567  ‘cfv 6573   No csur 27702   bday cbday 27704   <<s csslt 27843

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rmo 3388  df-reu 3389  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-pss 3996  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-tp 4653  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-int 4971  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-tr 5284  df-id 5593  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fo 6579  df-f1o 6580  df-fv 6581  df-riota 7404  df-1o 8522  df-2o 8523  df-no 27705  df-slt 27706  df-bday 27707  df-sslt 27844

This theorem is referenced by:  scutbdaybnd2  27879