Theorem etasslt2 34017

Description: A version of etasslt 34016 with fewer hypotheses but a weaker upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
etasslt2	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem etasslt2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayfun 33976	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Fun bday
2		ssltex1 33990	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		ssltex2 33991	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		unexg 7608	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2anc 584	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)
6		funimaexg 6527	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Fun bday ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
7	1, 5, 6	sylancr 587	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
8	7	uniexd 7604	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
9		imassrn 5983	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ran bday
10		bdayrn 33979	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ran bday = On
11	9, 10	sseqtri 3958	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On
12		ssorduni 7638	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
13	11, 12	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
14		elon2 6281	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ (Ord ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V))
15	13, 14	mpbiran 706	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ V)
16	8, 15	sylibr 233	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
17		sucelon 7673	. . 3 ⊢ (∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
18	16, 17	sylib 217	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On)
19		onsucuni 7684	. . 3 ⊢ (( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ On → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
20	11, 19	mp1i 13	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
21		etasslt 34016	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))
22	18, 20, 21	mpd3an23 1462	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 <<s {𝑥} ∧ {𝑥} <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘𝑥) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1086   ∈ wcel 2107  ∃wrex 3066  Vcvv 3433   ∪ cun 3886   ⊆ wss 3888  {csn 4562  ∪ cuni 4840   class class class wbr 5075  ran crn 5591   “ cima 5593  Ord word 6269  Oncon0 6270  suc csuc 6272  Fun wfun 6431  ‘cfv 6437   No csur 33852   bday cbday 33854   <<s csslt 33984

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2710  ax-rep 5210  ax-sep 5224  ax-nul 5231  ax-pr 5353  ax-un 7597

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2541  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2945  df-ral 3070  df-rex 3071  df-rmo 3072  df-reu 3073  df-rab 3074  df-v 3435  df-sbc 3718  df-csb 3834  df-dif 3891  df-un 3893  df-in 3895  df-ss 3905  df-pss 3907  df-nul 4258  df-if 4461  df-pw 4536  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565  df-tp 4567  df-op 4569  df-uni 4841  df-int 4881  df-iun 4927  df-br 5076  df-opab 5138  df-mpt 5159  df-tr 5193  df-id 5490  df-eprel 5496  df-po 5504  df-so 5505  df-fr 5545  df-we 5547  df-xp 5596  df-rel 5597  df-cnv 5598  df-co 5599  df-dm 5600  df-rn 5601  df-res 5602  df-ima 5603  df-ord 6273  df-on 6274  df-suc 6276  df-iota 6395  df-fun 6439  df-fn 6440  df-f 6441  df-f1 6442  df-fo 6443  df-f1o 6444  df-fv 6445  df-riota 7241  df-1o 8306  df-2o 8307  df-no 33855  df-slt 33856  df-bday 33857  df-sslt 33985

This theorem is referenced by:  scutbdaybnd2  34019