P. 274 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27301-27400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	norecfn 27301	Surreal recursion over one variable is a function over the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn No
Theorem	norecov 27302	Calculate the value of the surreal recursion operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐹 ↾ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))))
15.4.2  Induction and recursion on two variables
Syntax	cnorec2 27303	Declare the syntax for surreal recursion on two arguments.
class norec2 (𝐹)
Definition	df-norec2 27304*	Define surreal recursion on two variables. This function is key to the development of most of surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ norec2 (𝐹) = frecs({⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑎){⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝑐 ∈ (( L ‘𝑑) ∪ ( R ‘𝑑))} (1st ‘𝑏) ∨ (1st ‘𝑎) = (1st ‘𝑏)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑎){⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝑐 ∈ (( L ‘𝑑) ∪ ( R ‘𝑑))} (2nd ‘𝑏) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑎) = (2nd ‘𝑏)) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏))}, ( No × No ), 𝐹)
Theorem	noxpordpo 27305*	To get through most of the textbook defintions in surreal numbers we will need recursion on two variables. This set of theorems sets up the preconditions for double recursion. This theorem establishes the partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Po ( No × No )
Theorem	noxpordfr 27306*	Next we establish the foundedness of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Fr ( No × No )
Theorem	noxpordse 27307*	Next we establish the set-like nature of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Se ( No × No )
Theorem	noxpordpred 27308*	Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ( No × No ) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → Pred(𝑆, ( No × No ), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	no2indslem 27309*	Double induction on surreals with explicit notation for the relationships. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜃) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	no2inds 27310*	Double induction on surreals. The many substitution instances are to cover all possible cases. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No ) → ((∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (( L ‘𝑥) ∪ ( R ‘𝑥))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ (( L ‘𝑦) ∪ ( R ‘𝑦))𝜃) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → 𝜂)
Theorem	norec2fn 27311	The double-recursion operator on surreals yields a function on pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec2 (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	norec2ov 27312	The value of the double-recursion surreal function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec2 (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐺(𝐹 ↾ ((((( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × ((( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))))
Theorem	no3inds 27313*	Triple induction over surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆))    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ No ∧ 𝑐 ∈ No ) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ (( L ‘𝑎) ∪ ( R ‘𝑎))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (( L ‘𝑏) ∪ ( R ‘𝑏))𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (( L ‘𝑐) ∪ ( R ‘𝑐))𝜂) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ 𝑌 ∈ No ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → 𝜆)
15.5  Surreal arithmetic
15.5.1  Addition
Syntax	cadds 27314	Declare the syntax for surreal addition.
class +s
Definition	df-adds 27315*	Define surreal addition. This is the first of the field operations on the surreals. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. Definition from [Gonshor] p. 13. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ +s = norec2 ((𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑦 = (𝑙𝑎(2nd ‘𝑥))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))𝑧 = ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑎𝑙)}) |s ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑦 = (𝑟𝑎(2nd ‘𝑥))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))𝑧 = ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑎𝑟)}))))
Theorem	addsfn 27316	Surreal addition is a function over pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ +s Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	addsval 27317*	The value of surreal addition. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑙)}) |s ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑟)})))
Theorem	addsval2 27318*	The value of surreal addition with different choices for each bound variable. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsrid 27319	Surreal addition to zero is identity. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 +s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addsridd 27320	Surreal addition to zero is identity. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addscom 27321	Surreal addition commutes. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (𝐵 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	addscomd 27322	Surreal addition commutes. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (𝐵 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	addslid 27323	Surreal addition to zero is identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 0s +s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addsproplem1 27324*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. To prove closure on surreal addition we need to prove that addition is compatible with order at the same time. We do this by inducting over the maximum of two natural sums of the birthdays of surreals numbers. In the final step we will loop around and use tfr3 8350 to prove this of all surreals. This first lemma just instantiates the inductive hypothesis so we do not need to do it continuously throughout the proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐶))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐵 <s 𝐶 → (𝐵 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐴))))
Theorem	addsproplem2 27325*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. When proving closure for operations defined using norec and norec2, it is a strictly stronger statement to say that the cut defined is actually a cut than it is to say that the operation is closed. We will often prove this stronger statement. Here, we do so for the cut involved in surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)}))
Theorem	addsproplem3 27326*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the cut properties of surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsproplem4 27327*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝑌 is older than 𝑍. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑌) ∈ ( bday ‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem5 27328*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝑍 is older than 𝑌. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑍) ∈ ( bday ‘𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem6 27329*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Finally, we show the second half of the induction hypothesis when 𝑌 and 𝑍 are the same age. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑌) = ( bday ‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem7 27330*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Putting together the three previous lemmas, we now show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑥) +no ( bday ‘𝑧))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsprop 27331	Inductively show that surreal addition is closed and compatible with less-than. This proof follows from induction on the birthdays of the surreal numbers involved. This pattern occurs throughout surreal development. Theorem 3.1 of [Gonshor] p. 14. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ 𝑌 ∈ No ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No ) → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ (𝑌 <s 𝑍 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))))
Theorem	addscut 27332*	Demonstrate the cut properties of surreal addition. This gives us closure together with a pair of set-less-than relationships for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addscld 27333	Surreal numbers are closed under addition. Theorem 6(iii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No )
Theorem	addscl 27334	Surreal numbers are closed under addition. Theorem 6(iii) of [Conway[ p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	addsf 27335	Function statement for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ +s :( No × No )⟶ No
Theorem	addsfo 27336	Surreal addition is onto. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ +s :( No × No )–onto→ No
Theorem	sltadd1im 27337	Surreal less-than is preserved under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltadd2im 27338	Surreal less-than is preserved under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sleadd1im 27339	Surreal less-than or equal cancels under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵))
Theorem	sleadd2im 27340	Surreal less-than or equal cancels under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵))
Theorem	sleadd1 27341	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. Theorem 5 of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sleadd2 27342	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd2 27343	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd1 27344	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addscan2 27345	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) = (𝐵 +s 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addscan1 27346	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) = (𝐶 +s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	sleadd1d 27347	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. Theorem 5 of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sleadd2d 27348	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd2d 27349	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltadd1d 27350	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addscan2d 27351	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) = (𝐵 +s 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addscan1d 27352	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) = (𝐶 +s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addsunif 27353*	Uniformity theorem for surreal addition. This theorem states that we can use any cuts that define 𝐴 and 𝐵 in the definition of surreal addition. Theorem 3.2 of [Gonshor] p. 15. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑀 𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsasslem1 27354*	Lemma for addition associativity. Expand one form of the triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = ((({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = ((𝑙 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = ((𝐴 +s 𝑚) +s 𝐶)}) ∪ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑤 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝑛)}) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑎 = ((𝑝 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶)} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = ((𝐴 +s 𝑞) +s 𝐶)}) ∪ {𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑐 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝑟)})))
Theorem	addsasslem2 27355*	Lemma for addition associativity. Expand the other form of the triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s (𝑚 +s 𝐶))}) ∪ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑤 = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝑛))}) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)𝑎 = (𝑝 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (𝐴 +s (𝑞 +s 𝐶))}) ∪ {𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑐 = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝑟))})))
Theorem	addsass 27356	Surreal addition is associative. Part of theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsassd 27357	Surreal addition is associative. Part of theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	adds32d 27358	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s 𝐵))
Theorem	adds4d 27359	Rearrangement of four terms in a surreal sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s (𝐶 +s 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 +s 𝐷)))
Theorem	adds42d 27360	Rearrangement of four terms in a surreal sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s (𝐶 +s 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s (𝐷 +s 𝐵)))
15.5.2  Negation and Subtraction
Syntax	cnegs 27361	Declare the syntax for surreal negation.
class -us
Syntax	csubs 27362	Declare the syntax for surreal subtraction.
class -s
Definition	df-negs 27363*	Define surreal negation. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ -us = norec ((𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑛 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑛 “ ( R ‘𝑥)) |s (𝑛 “ ( L ‘𝑥)))))
Definition	df-subs 27364*	Define surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ -s = (𝑥 ∈ No , 𝑦 ∈ No ↦ (𝑥 +s ( -us ‘𝑦)))
Theorem	negsfn 27365	Surreal negation is a function over surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ -us Fn No
Theorem	subsfn 27366	Surreal subtraction is a function over pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ -s Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	negsval 27367	The value of the surreal negation function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negs0s 27368	Negative surreal zero is surreal zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ( -us ‘ 0s ) = 0s
Theorem	negsproplem1 27369*	Lemma for surreal negation. We prove a pair of properties of surreal negation simultaneously. First, we instantiate some quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝑋) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝑋) ∈ No ∧ (𝑋 <s 𝑌 → ( -us ‘𝑌) <s ( -us ‘𝑋))))
Theorem	negsproplem2 27370*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show that the cut that defines negation is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negsproplem3 27371*	Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negsproplem4 27372*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is simpler than 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem5 27373*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐵 is simpler than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem6 27374*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is the same age as 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsproplem7 27375*	Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
Theorem	negsprop 27376	Show closure and ordering properties of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negscl 27377	The surreals are closed under negation. Theorem 6(ii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No )
Theorem	negscld 27378	The surreals are closed under negation. Theorem 6(ii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No )
Theorem	sltnegim 27379	The forward direction of the ordering properties of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negscut 27380	The cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	negscut2 27381	The cut that defines surreal negation is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negsid 27382	Surreal addition of a number and its negative. Theorem 4(iii) of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐴)) = 0s )
Theorem	negsidd 27383	Surreal addition of a number and its negative. Theorem 4(iii) of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐴)) = 0s )
Theorem	negsex 27384*	Every surreal has a negative. Note that this theorem, addscl 27334, addscom 27321, addsass 27356, addsrid 27319, and sltadd1im 27337 are the ordered Abelian group axioms. However, the surreals cannot be said to be an ordered Abelian group because No is a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∃𝑥 ∈ No (𝐴 +s 𝑥) = 0s )
Theorem	negnegs 27385	A surreal is equal to the negative of its negative. Theorem 4(ii) of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘( -us ‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sltneg 27386	Negative of both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	sleneg 27387	Negative of both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ ( -us ‘𝐵) ≤s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	negs11 27388	Surreal negation is one-to-one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (( -us ‘𝐴) = ( -us ‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	negsdi 27389	Distribution of surreal negative over addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ( -us ‘(𝐴 +s 𝐵)) = (( -us ‘𝐴) +s ( -us ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	negsf 27390	Function statement for surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ -us : No ⟶ No
Theorem	negsfo 27391	Function statement for surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ -us : No –onto→ No
Theorem	negsf1o 27392	Surreal negation is a bijection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ -us : No –1-1-onto→ No
Theorem	negsunif 27393	Uniformity property for surreal negation. If 𝐿 and 𝑅 are any cut that represents 𝐴, then they may be used instead of ( L ‘𝐴) and ( R ‘𝐴) in the definition of negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ 𝑅) |s ( -us “ 𝐿)))
Theorem	subsval 27394	The value of surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) = (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	subsvald 27395	The value of surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) = (𝐴 +s ( -us ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	subscl 27396	Closure law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	subscld 27397	Closure law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	subsid1 27398	Identity law for subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 -s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	subsid 27399	Subtraction of a surreal from itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 -s 𝐴) = 0s )
Theorem	subadds 27400	Relationship between addition and subtraction for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 +s 𝐶) = 𝐴))