P. 274 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 27301-27400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
14.3.13  Euler-Mascheroni constant
Syntax	cem 27301	The Euler-Mascheroni constant. (The label abbreviates Euler-Mascheroni.)
class γ
Definition	df-em 27302	Define the Euler-Mascheroni constant, γ = 0.57721.... This is the limit of the series Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑚)(1 / 𝑘) − (log‘𝑚), with a proof that the limit exists in emcl 27312. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ γ = Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ ((1 / 𝑘) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑘))))
Theorem	logdifbnd 27303	Bound on the difference of logs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → ((log‘(𝐴 + 1)) − (log‘𝐴)) ≤ (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	logdiflbnd 27304	Lower bound on the difference of logs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (1 / (𝐴 + 1)) ≤ ((log‘(𝐴 + 1)) − (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	emcllem1 27305*	Lemma for emcl 27312. The series 𝐹 and 𝐺 are sequences of real numbers that approach γ from above and below, respectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:ℕ⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐺:ℕ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	emcllem2 27306*	Lemma for emcl 27312. 𝐹 is increasing, and 𝐺 is decreasing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1)) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑁) ∧ (𝐺‘𝑁) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	emcllem3 27307*	Lemma for emcl 27312. The function 𝐻 is the difference between 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐻‘𝑁) = ((𝐹‘𝑁) − (𝐺‘𝑁)))
Theorem	emcllem4 27308*	Lemma for emcl 27312. The difference between series 𝐹 and 𝐺 tends to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐻 ⇝ 0
Theorem	emcllem5 27309*	Lemma for emcl 27312. The partial sums of the series 𝑇, which is used in Definition df-em 27302, is in fact the same as 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / 𝑛) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛)))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 = seq1( + , 𝑇)
Theorem	emcllem6 27310*	Lemma for emcl 27312. By the previous lemmas, 𝐹 and 𝐺 must approach a common limit, which is γ by definition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / 𝑛) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ γ ∧ 𝐺 ⇝ γ)
Theorem	emcllem7 27311*	Lemma for emcl 27312 and harmonicbnd 27313. Derive bounds on γ as 𝐹(1) and 𝐺(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑛)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / 𝑛) − (log‘(1 + (1 / 𝑛)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (γ ∈ ((1 − (log‘2))[,]1) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ⟶(γ[,]1) ∧ 𝐺:ℕ⟶((1 − (log‘2))[,]γ))
Theorem	emcl 27312	Closure and bounds for the Euler-Mascheroni constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ γ ∈ ((1 − (log‘2))[,]1)
Theorem	harmonicbnd 27313*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘𝑁)) ∈ (γ[,]1))
Theorem	harmonicbnd2 27314*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∈ ((1 − (log‘2))[,]γ))
Theorem	emre 27315	The Euler-Mascheroni constant is a real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ γ ∈ ℝ
Theorem	emgt0 27316	The Euler-Mascheroni constant is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 0 < γ
Theorem	harmonicbnd3 27317*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...𝑁)(1 / 𝑚) − (log‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∈ (0[,]γ))
Theorem	harmoniclbnd 27318*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log‘𝐴) ≤ Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(1 / 𝑚))
Theorem	harmonicubnd 27319*	A bound on the harmonic series, as compared to the natural logarithm. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Apr-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ≤ 𝐴) → Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(1 / 𝑚) ≤ ((log‘𝐴) + 1))
Theorem	harmonicbnd4 27320*	The asymptotic behavior of Σ𝑚 ≤ 𝐴, 1 / 𝑚 = log𝐴 + γ + 𝑂(1 / 𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (abs‘(Σ𝑚 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(1 / 𝑚) − ((log‘𝐴) + γ))) ≤ (1 / 𝐴))
Theorem	fsumharmonic 27321*	Bound a finite sum based on the harmonic series, where the "strong" bound 𝐶 only applies asymptotically, and there is a "weak" bound 𝑅 for the remaining values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ≤ 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) → 0 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝐴 / 𝑛)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 · 𝑛))    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝐴 / 𝑛) < 𝑇) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))(𝐵 / 𝑛)) ≤ (Σ𝑛 ∈ (1...(⌊‘𝐴))𝐶 + (𝑅 · ((log‘𝑇) + 1))))
14.3.14  Zeta function
Syntax	czeta 27322	The Riemann zeta function.
class ζ
Definition	df-zeta 27323*	Define the Riemann zeta function. This definition uses a series expansion of the alternating zeta function ~? zetaalt that is convergent everywhere except 1, but going from the alternating zeta function to the regular zeta function requires dividing by 1 − 2↑(1 − 𝑠), which has zeroes other than 1. To extract the correct value of the zeta function at these points, we extend the divided alternating zeta function by continuity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ζ = (℩𝑓 ∈ ((ℂ ∖ {1})–cn→ℂ)∀𝑠 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {1})((1 − (2↑𝑐(1 − 𝑠))) · (𝑓‘𝑠)) = Σ𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑛)(((-1↑𝑘) · (𝑛C𝑘)) · ((𝑘 + 1)↑𝑐𝑠)) / (2↑(𝑛 + 1))))
Theorem	zetacvg 27324*	The zeta series is convergent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (ℜ‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝑘↑𝑐-𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
14.3.15  Gamma function
Syntax	clgam 27325	Logarithm of the Gamma function.
class log Γ
Syntax	cgam 27326	The Gamma function.
class Γ
Syntax	cigam 27327	The inverse Gamma function.
class 1/Γ
Definition	df-lgam 27328*	Define the log-Gamma function. We can work with this form of the gamma function a bit easier than the equivalent expression for the gamma function itself, and moreover this function is not actually equal to log(Γ(𝑥)) because the branch cuts are placed differently (we do have exp(log Γ(𝑥)) = Γ(𝑥), though). This definition is attributed to Euler, and unlike the usual integral definition is defined on the entire complex plane except the nonpositive integers ℤ ∖ ℕ, where the function has simple poles. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ log Γ = (𝑧 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ↦ (Σ𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1))) − (log‘𝑧)))
Definition	df-gam 27329	Define the Gamma function. See df-lgam 27328 for more information about the reason for this definition in terms of the log-gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Γ = (exp ∘ log Γ)
Definition	df-igam 27330	Define the inverse Gamma function, which is defined everywhere, unlike the Gamma function itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 1/Γ = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝑥))))
Theorem	eldmgm 27331	Elementhood in the set of non-nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ¬ -𝐴 ∈ ℕ0))
Theorem	dmgmaddn0 27332	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is nonzero for any nonnegative integer 𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ≠ 0)
Theorem	dmlogdmgm 27333	If 𝐴 is in the continuous domain of the logarithm, then it is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (-∞(,]0)) → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	rpdmgm 27334	A positive real number is in the domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	dmgmn0 27335	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer, then 𝐴 is nonzero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)
Theorem	dmgmaddnn0 27336	If 𝐴 is not a nonpositive integer and 𝑁 is a nonnegative integer, then 𝐴 + 𝑁 is also not a nonpositive integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝑁) ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	dmgmdivn0 27337	Lemma for lgamf 27351. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 / 𝑀) + 1) ≠ 0)
Theorem	lgamgulmlem1 27338*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27344. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem2 27339*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27344. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((1 / (𝑁 − 𝑅)) − (1 / 𝑁))))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem3 27340*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27344. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑁 + 1) / 𝑁))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑁) + 1)))) ≤ (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑁↑2))))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem4 27341*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27344. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝑇) ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	lgamgulmlem5 27342*	Lemma for lgamgulm 27344. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) → (abs‘((𝐺‘𝑛)‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑇‘𝑛))
Theorem	lgamgulmlem6 27343*	The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ if((2 · 𝑅) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑅 · ((2 · (𝑅 + 1)) / (𝑚↑2))), ((𝑅 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) + ((log‘((𝑅 + 1) · 𝑚)) + π))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈) ∧ (seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ 𝑂) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘𝑂) ≤ 𝑟)))
Theorem	lgamgulm 27344*	The series 𝐺 is uniformly convergent on the compact region 𝑈, which describes a circle of radius 𝑅 with holes of size 1 / 𝑅 around the poles of the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘𝑈))
Theorem	lgamgulm2 27345*	Rewrite the limit of the sequence 𝐺 in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (log Γ‘𝑧) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( ∘f + , 𝐺)(⇝𝑢‘𝑈)(𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((log Γ‘𝑧) + (log‘𝑧)))))
Theorem	lgambdd 27346*	The log-Gamma function is bounded on the region 𝑈. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑅) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ ((𝑧 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝑧 / 𝑚) + 1)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑈 (abs‘(log Γ‘𝑧)) ≤ 𝑟)
Theorem	lgamucov 27347*	The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27344 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ ((int‘𝐽)‘𝑈))
Theorem	lgamucov2 27348*	The 𝑈 regions used in the proof of lgamgulm 27344 have interiors which cover the entire domain of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℕ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	lgamcvglem 27349*	Lemma for lgamf 27351 and lgamcvg 27363. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ ((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 (1 / 𝑟) ≤ (abs‘(𝑥 + 𝑘)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ ∧ seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴))))
Theorem	lgamcl 27350	The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	lgamf 27351	The log-Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ log Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ
Theorem	gamf 27352	The Gamma function is a complex function defined on the whole complex plane except for the negative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Γ:(ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ))⟶ℂ
Theorem	gamcl 27353	The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eflgam 27354	The exponential of the log-Gamma function is the Gamma function (by definition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (exp‘(log Γ‘𝐴)) = (Γ‘𝐴))
Theorem	gamne0 27355	The Gamma function is never zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ≠ 0)
Theorem	igamval 27356	Value of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = if(𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ), 0, (1 / (Γ‘𝐴))))
Theorem	igamz 27357	Value of the inverse Gamma function on nonpositive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ ℕ) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	igamgam 27358	Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	igamlgam 27359	Value of the inverse Gamma function in terms of the log-Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (1/Γ‘𝐴) = (exp‘-(log Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	igamf 27360	Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 1/Γ:ℂ⟶ℂ
Theorem	igamcl 27361	Closure of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1/Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	gamigam 27362	The Gamma function is the inverse of the inverse Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) = (1 / (1/Γ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	lgamcvg 27363*	The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴) + log(𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	lgamcvg2 27364*	The series 𝐺 converges to log Γ(𝐴 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)))
Theorem	gamcvg 27365*	The pointwise exponential of the series 𝐺 converges to Γ(𝐴) · 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	lgamp1 27366	The functional equation of the (log) Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (log Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((log Γ‘𝐴) + (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	gamp1 27367	The functional equation of the Gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘(𝐴 + 1)) = ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	gamcvg2lem 27368*	Lemma for gamcvg2 27369. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐴 · (log‘((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚))) − (log‘((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (exp ∘ seq1( + , 𝐺)) = seq1( · , 𝐹))
Theorem	gamcvg2 27369*	An infinite product expression for the gamma function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((((𝑚 + 1) / 𝑚)↑𝑐𝐴) / ((𝐴 / 𝑚) + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq1( · , 𝐹) ⇝ ((Γ‘𝐴) · 𝐴))
Theorem	regamcl 27370	The Gamma function is real for real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)) → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	relgamcl 27371	The log-Gamma function is real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rpgamcl 27372	The log-Gamma function is positive real for positive real input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (Γ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	lgam1 27373	The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (log Γ‘1) = 0
Theorem	gam1 27374	The log-Gamma function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (Γ‘1) = 1
Theorem	facgam 27375	The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝑁) = (Γ‘(𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	gamfac 27376	The Gamma function generalizes the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (Γ‘𝑁) = (!‘(𝑁 − 1)))
14.4  Basic number theory
14.4.1  Wilson's theorem
Theorem	wilthlem1 27377	The only elements that are equal to their own inverses in the multiplicative group of nonzero elements in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ are 1 and -1≡𝑃 − 1. (Note that from prmdiveq 16943, (𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃 is the modular inverse of 𝑁 in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))) → (𝑁 = ((𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = (𝑃 − 1))))
Theorem	wilthlem2 27378*	Lemma for wilth 27380: induction step. The "hand proof" version of this theorem works by writing out the list of all numbers from 1 to 𝑃 − 1 in pairs such that a number is paired with its inverse. Every number has a unique inverse different from itself except 1 and 𝑃 − 1, and so each pair multiplies to 1, and 1 and 𝑃 − 1≡-1 multiply to -1, so the full product is equal to -1. Here we make this precise by doing the product pair by pair. The induction hypothesis says that every subset 𝑆 of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse (i.e. all pairs are matched up) and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃. Given such a set, we take out one element 𝑧 ≠ 𝑃 − 1. If there are no such elements, then 𝑆 = {𝑃 − 1} which forms the base case. Otherwise, 𝑆 ∖ {𝑧, 𝑧↑-1} is also closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1, so the induction hypothesis says that this equals -1; and the remaining two elements are either equal to each other, in which case wilthlem1 27377 gives that 𝑧 = 1 or 𝑃 − 1, and we've already excluded the second case, so the product gives 1; or 𝑧 ≠ 𝑧↑-1 and their product is 1. In either case the accumulated product is unaffected. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℙ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑠)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 Σg ( I ↾ 𝑆)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))
Theorem	wilthlem3 27379*	Lemma for wilth 27380. Here we round out the argument of wilthlem2 27378 with the final step of the induction. The induction argument shows that every subset of 1...(𝑃 − 1) that is closed under inverse and contains 𝑃 − 1 multiplies to -1 mod 𝑃, and clearly 1...(𝑃 − 1) itself is such a set. Thus, the product of all the elements is -1, and all that is left is to translate the group sum notation (which we used for its unordered summing capabilities) into an ordered sequence to match the definition of the factorial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 (1...(𝑃 − 1)) ∣ ((𝑃 − 1) ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑦↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ∈ 𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → 𝑃 ∥ ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) + 1))
Theorem	wilth 27380	Wilson's theorem. A number is prime iff it is greater than or equal to 2 and (𝑁 − 1)! is congruent to -1, mod 𝑁, or alternatively if 𝑁 divides (𝑁 − 1)! + 1. In this part of the proof we show the relatively simple reverse implication; see wilthlem3 27379 for the forward implication. This is Metamath 100 proof #51. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 16-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℙ ↔ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∥ ((!‘(𝑁 − 1)) + 1)))
Theorem	wilthimp 27381	The forward implication of Wilson's theorem wilth 27380 (see wilthlem3 27379), expressed using the modulo operation: For any prime 𝑝 we have (𝑝 − 1)!≡ − 1 (mod 𝑝), see theorem 5.24 in [ApostolNT] p. 116. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((!‘(𝑃 − 1)) mod 𝑃) = (-1 mod 𝑃))
14.4.2  The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
Theorem	ftalem1 27382*	Lemma for fta 27389: "growth lemma". There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 is arbitrarily close in proportion to its dominant term. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(abs‘(𝐴‘𝑘)) / 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑥) − ((𝐴‘𝑁) · (𝑥↑𝑁)))) < (𝐸 · ((abs‘𝑥)↑𝑁))))
Theorem	ftalem2 27383*	Lemma for fta 27389. There exists some 𝑟 such that 𝐹 has magnitude greater than 𝐹(0) outside the closed ball B(0,r). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = if(if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1) ≤ 𝑇, 𝑇, if(1 ≤ 𝑠, 𝑠, 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / ((abs‘(𝐴‘𝑁)) / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑟 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))
Theorem	ftalem3 27384*	Lemma for fta 27389. There exists a global minimum of the function abs ∘ 𝐹. The proof uses a circle of radius 𝑟 where 𝑟 is the value coming from ftalem1 27382; since this is a compact set, the minimum on this disk is achieved, and this must then be the global minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∣ (abs‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑅}    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑅 < (abs‘𝑥) → (abs‘(𝐹‘0)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑧)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	ftalem4 27385*	Lemma for fta 27389: Closure of the auxiliary variables for ftalem5 27386. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴‘𝐾) ≠ 0) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+)))
Theorem	ftalem5 27386*	Lemma for fta 27389: Main proof. We have already shifted the minimum found in ftalem3 27384 to zero by a change of variables, and now we show that the minimum value is zero. Expanding in a series about the minimum value, let 𝐾 be the lowest term in the polynomial that is nonzero, and let 𝑇 be a 𝐾-th root of -𝐹(0) / 𝐴(𝐾). Then an evaluation of 𝐹(𝑇𝑋) where 𝑋 is a sufficiently small positive number yields 𝐹(0) for the first term and -𝐹(0) · 𝑋↑𝐾 for the 𝐾-th term, and all higher terms are bounded because 𝑋 is small. Thus, abs(𝐹(𝑇𝑋)) ≤ abs(𝐹(0))(1 − 𝑋↑𝐾) < abs(𝐹(0)), in contradiction to our choice of 𝐹(0) as the minimum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = inf({𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∣ (𝐴‘𝑛) ≠ 0}, ℝ, < )    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (-((𝐹‘0) / (𝐴‘𝐾))↑𝑐(1 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ((abs‘(𝐹‘0)) / (Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝐾 + 1)...𝑁)(abs‘((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑇↑𝑘))) + 1))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = if(1 ≤ 𝑈, 1, 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0)))
Theorem	ftalem6 27387*	Lemma for fta 27389: Discharge the auxiliary variables in ftalem5 27386. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) < (abs‘(𝐹‘0)))
Theorem	ftalem7 27388*	Lemma for fta 27389. Shift the minimum away from zero by a change of variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (coeff‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (deg‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℂ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	fta 27389*	The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Any polynomial with positive degree (i.e. non-constant) has a root. This is Metamath 100 proof #2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆) ∧ (deg‘𝐹) ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑧 ∈ ℂ (𝐹‘𝑧) = 0)
14.4.3  The Basel problem (ζ(2) = π2/6)
Theorem	basellem1 27390	Lemma for basel 27399. Closure of the sequence of roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.) Replace OLD theorem. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → ((𝐾 · π) / 𝑁) ∈ (0(,)(π / 2)))
Theorem	basellem2 27391*	Lemma for basel 27399. Show that 𝑃 is a polynomial of degree 𝑀, and compute its coefficient function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → (𝑃 ∈ (Poly‘ℂ) ∧ (deg‘𝑃) = 𝑀 ∧ (coeff‘𝑃) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝑁C(2 · 𝑛)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑛))))))
Theorem	basellem3 27392*	Lemma for basel 27399. Using the binomial theorem and de Moivre's formula, we have the identity e↑i𝑁𝑥 / (sin𝑥)↑𝑛 = Σ𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)(𝑁C𝑚)(i↑𝑚)(cot𝑥)↑(𝑁 − 𝑚), so taking imaginary parts yields sin(𝑁𝑥) / (sin𝑥)↑𝑁 = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(𝑁C2𝑗)(-1)↑(𝑀 − 𝑗) (cot𝑥)↑(-2𝑗) = 𝑃((cot𝑥)↑2), where 𝑁 = 2𝑀 + 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (0(,)(π / 2))) → (𝑃‘((tan‘𝐴)↑-2)) = ((sin‘(𝑁 · 𝐴)) / ((sin‘𝐴)↑𝑁)))
Theorem	basellem4 27393*	Lemma for basel 27399. By basellem3 27392, the expression 𝑃((cot𝑥)↑2) = sin(𝑁𝑥) / (sin𝑥)↑𝑁 goes to zero whenever 𝑥 = 𝑛π / 𝑁 for some 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀), so this function enumerates 𝑀 distinct roots of a degree- 𝑀 polynomial, which must therefore be all the roots by fta1 26611. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ ((tan‘((𝑛 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → 𝑇:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→(◡𝑃 “ {0}))
Theorem	basellem5 27394*	Lemma for basel 27399. Using vieta1 26617, we can calculate the sum of the roots of 𝑃 as the quotient of the top two coefficients, and since the function 𝑇 enumerates the roots, we are left with an equation that sums the cot↑2 function at the 𝑀 different roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑡 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)(((𝑁C(2 · 𝑗)) · (-1↑(𝑀 − 𝑗))) · (𝑡↑𝑗)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀) ↦ ((tan‘((𝑛 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑀)((tan‘((𝑘 · π) / 𝑁))↑-2) = (((2 · 𝑀) · ((2 · 𝑀) − 1)) / 6))
Theorem	basellem6 27395	Lemma for basel 27399. The function 𝐺 goes to zero because it is bounded by 1 / 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 ⇝ 0
Theorem	basellem7 27396	Lemma for basel 27399. The function 1 + 𝐴 · 𝐺 for any fixed 𝐴 goes to 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {𝐴}) ∘f · 𝐺)) ⇝ 1
Theorem	basellem8 27397*	Lemma for basel 27399. The function 𝐹 of partial sums of the inverse squares is bounded below by 𝐽 and above by 𝐾, obtained by summing the inequality cot↑2𝑥 ≤ 1 / 𝑥↑2 ≤ csc↑2𝑥 = cot↑2𝑥 + 1 over the 𝑀 roots of the polynomial 𝑃, and applying the identity basellem5 27394. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑛↑-2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((ℕ × {((π↑2) / 6)}) ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f − 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {-2}) ∘f · 𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((2 · 𝑀) + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ → ((𝐽‘𝑀) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑀) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑀) ≤ (𝐾‘𝑀)))
Theorem	basellem9 27398*	Lemma for basel 27399. Since by basellem8 27397 𝐹 is bounded by two expressions that tend to π↑2 / 6, 𝐹 must also go to π↑2 / 6 by the squeeze theorem climsqz 15788. But the series 𝐹 is exactly the partial sums of 𝑘↑-2, so it follows that this is also the value of the infinite sum Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ(𝑘↑-2). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (1 / ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑛↑-2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((ℕ × {((π↑2) / 6)}) ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f − 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + ((ℕ × {-2}) ∘f · 𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐻 ∘f · ((ℕ × {1}) ∘f + 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝑘↑-2) = ((π↑2) / 6)
Theorem	basel 27399	The sum of the inverse squares is π↑2 / 6. This is commonly known as the Basel problem, with the first known proof attributed to Euler. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_problem. This particular proof approach is due to Cauchy (1821). This is Metamath 100 proof #14. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jul-2014.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (𝑘↑-2) = ((π↑2) / 6)
14.4.4  Number-theoretical functions
Syntax	ccht 27400	Extend class notation with the first Chebyshev function.
class θ