Theorem mulsproplem11 28153

Description: Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
mulsproplem9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
mulsproplem9.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐸,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐹,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑒,𝑓,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem mulsproplem11

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑖 𝑗 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑠 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mulsproplem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
2		mulsproplem9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3		mulsproplem9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
4	1, 2, 3	mulsproplem10 28152	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
5	4	simp1d 1142	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107  {cab 2713  ∀wral 3060  ∃wrex 3069   ∪ cun 3948  {csn 4625   class class class wbr 5142  ‘cfv 6560  (class class class)co 7432   +no cnadd 8704   No csur 27685   <s cslt 27686   bday cbday 27687   <<s csslt 27826   L cleft 27885   R cright 27886   +_s cadds 27993   -_s csubs 28053   ·_s cmuls 28133

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5278  ax-sep 5295  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5431  ax-un 7756

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3379  df-reu 3380  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-sbc 3788  df-csb 3899  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-in 3957  df-ss 3967  df-pss 3970  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-pw 4601  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-tp 4630  df-op 4632  df-ot 4634  df-uni 4907  df-int 4946  df-iun 4992  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-mpt 5225  df-tr 5259  df-id 5577  df-eprel 5583  df-po 5591  df-so 5592  df-fr 5636  df-se 5637  df-we 5638  df-xp 5690  df-rel 5691  df-cnv 5692  df-co 5693  df-dm 5694  df-rn 5695  df-res 5696  df-ima 5697  df-pred 6320  df-ord 6386  df-on 6387  df-suc 6389  df-iota 6513  df-fun 6562  df-fn 6563  df-f 6564  df-f1 6565  df-fo 6566  df-f1o 6567  df-fv 6568  df-riota 7389  df-ov 7435  df-oprab 7436  df-mpo 7437  df-1st 8015  df-2nd 8016  df-frecs 8307  df-wrecs 8338  df-recs 8412  df-1o 8507  df-2o 8508  df-nadd 8705  df-no 27688  df-slt 27689  df-bday 27690  df-sle 27791  df-sslt 27827  df-scut 27829  df-0s 27870  df-made 27887  df-old 27888  df-left 27890  df-right 27891  df-norec 27972  df-norec2 27983  df-adds 27994  df-negs 28054  df-subs 28055  df-muls 28134

This theorem is referenced by:  mulsproplem13  28155  mulsproplem14  28156  mulsprop  28157