Theorem mulsproplem11 28088

Description: Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
mulsproplem9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
mulsproplem9.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐸,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐹,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑒,𝑓,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem mulsproplem11

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑖 𝑗 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑠 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mulsproplem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
2		mulsproplem9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3		mulsproplem9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
4	1, 2, 3	mulsproplem10 28087	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
5	4	simp1d 1142	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107  {cab 2712  ∀wral 3050  ∃wrex 3059   ∪ cun 3929  {csn 4606   class class class wbr 5123  ‘cfv 6541  (class class class)co 7413   +no cnadd 8685   No csur 27620   <s cslt 27621   bday cbday 27622   <<s csslt 27761   L cleft 27820   R cright 27821   +_s cadds 27928   -_s csubs 27988   ·_s cmuls 28068

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5259  ax-sep 5276  ax-nul 5286  ax-pow 5345  ax-pr 5412  ax-un 7737

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2932  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rmo 3363  df-reu 3364  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3771  df-csb 3880  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-pss 3951  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-pw 4582  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-tp 4611  df-op 4613  df-ot 4615  df-uni 4888  df-int 4927  df-iun 4973  df-br 5124  df-opab 5186  df-mpt 5206  df-tr 5240  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5564  df-po 5572  df-so 5573  df-fr 5617  df-se 5618  df-we 5619  df-xp 5671  df-rel 5672  df-cnv 5673  df-co 5674  df-dm 5675  df-rn 5676  df-res 5677  df-ima 5678  df-pred 6301  df-ord 6366  df-on 6367  df-suc 6369  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6543  df-fn 6544  df-f 6545  df-f1 6546  df-fo 6547  df-f1o 6548  df-fv 6549  df-riota 7370  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-1st 7996  df-2nd 7997  df-frecs 8288  df-wrecs 8319  df-recs 8393  df-1o 8488  df-2o 8489  df-nadd 8686  df-no 27623  df-slt 27624  df-bday 27625  df-sle 27726  df-sslt 27762  df-scut 27764  df-0s 27805  df-made 27822  df-old 27823  df-left 27825  df-right 27826  df-norec 27907  df-norec2 27918  df-adds 27929  df-negs 27989  df-subs 27990  df-muls 28069

This theorem is referenced by:  mulsproplem13  28090  mulsproplem14  28091  mulsprop  28092