Theorem mulsproplem11 28075

Description: Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
mulsproplem9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
mulsproplem9.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐸,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐹,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑒,𝑓,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem mulsproplem11

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑖 𝑗 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑠 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mulsproplem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
2		mulsproplem9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3		mulsproplem9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
4	1, 2, 3	mulsproplem10 28074	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
5	4	simp1d 1142	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  {cab 2711  ∀wral 3049  ∃wrex 3058   ∪ cun 3897  {csn 4577   class class class wbr 5095  ‘cfv 6489  (class class class)co 7355   +no cnadd 8589   No csur 27588   <s cslt 27589   bday cbday 27590   <<s csslt 27730   L cleft 27796   R cright 27797   +_s cadds 27912   -_s csubs 27972   ·_s cmuls 28055

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2182  ax-ext 2705  ax-rep 5221  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5248  ax-pow 5307  ax-pr 5374  ax-un 7677

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3059  df-rmo 3348  df-reu 3349  df-rab 3398  df-v 3440  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4285  df-if 4477  df-pw 4553  df-sn 4578  df-pr 4580  df-tp 4582  df-op 4584  df-ot 4586  df-uni 4861  df-int 4900  df-iun 4945  df-br 5096  df-opab 5158  df-mpt 5177  df-tr 5203  df-id 5516  df-eprel 5521  df-po 5529  df-so 5530  df-fr 5574  df-se 5575  df-we 5576  df-xp 5627  df-rel 5628  df-cnv 5629  df-co 5630  df-dm 5631  df-rn 5632  df-res 5633  df-ima 5634  df-pred 6256  df-ord 6317  df-on 6318  df-suc 6320  df-iota 6445  df-fun 6491  df-fn 6492  df-f 6493  df-f1 6494  df-fo 6495  df-f1o 6496  df-fv 6497  df-riota 7312  df-ov 7358  df-oprab 7359  df-mpo 7360  df-1st 7930  df-2nd 7931  df-frecs 8220  df-wrecs 8251  df-recs 8300  df-1o 8394  df-2o 8395  df-nadd 8590  df-no 27591  df-slt 27592  df-bday 27593  df-sle 27694  df-sslt 27731  df-scut 27733  df-0s 27778  df-made 27798  df-old 27799  df-left 27801  df-right 27802  df-norec 27891  df-norec2 27902  df-adds 27913  df-negs 27973  df-subs 27974  df-muls 28056

This theorem is referenced by:  mulsproplem13  28077  mulsproplem14  28078  mulsprop  28079