Theorem mulsproplem11 27942

Description: Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
mulsproplem9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
mulsproplem9.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐸,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐹,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑒,𝑓,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem mulsproplem11

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑖 𝑗 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑠 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mulsproplem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
2		mulsproplem9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3		mulsproplem9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
4	1, 2, 3	mulsproplem10 27941	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
5	4	simp1d 1139	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  {cab 2701  ∀wral 3053  ∃wrex 3062   ∪ cun 3938  {csn 4620   class class class wbr 5138  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7401   +no cnadd 8660   No csur 27489   <s cslt 27490   bday cbday 27491   <<s csslt 27629   L cleft 27688   R cright 27689   +_s cadds 27792   -_s csubs 27849   ·_s cmuls 27922

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2695  ax-rep 5275  ax-sep 5289  ax-nul 5296  ax-pow 5353  ax-pr 5417  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2526  df-eu 2555  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3368  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3425  df-v 3468  df-sbc 3770  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3943  df-un 3945  df-in 3947  df-ss 3957  df-pss 3959  df-nul 4315  df-if 4521  df-pw 4596  df-sn 4621  df-pr 4623  df-tp 4625  df-op 4627  df-ot 4629  df-uni 4900  df-int 4941  df-iun 4989  df-br 5139  df-opab 5201  df-mpt 5222  df-tr 5256  df-id 5564  df-eprel 5570  df-po 5578  df-so 5579  df-fr 5621  df-se 5622  df-we 5623  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-pred 6290  df-ord 6357  df-on 6358  df-suc 6360  df-iota 6485  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7357  df-ov 7404  df-oprab 7405  df-mpo 7406  df-1st 7968  df-2nd 7969  df-frecs 8261  df-wrecs 8292  df-recs 8366  df-1o 8461  df-2o 8462  df-nadd 8661  df-no 27492  df-slt 27493  df-bday 27494  df-sle 27594  df-sslt 27630  df-scut 27632  df-0s 27673  df-made 27690  df-old 27691  df-left 27693  df-right 27694  df-norec 27771  df-norec2 27782  df-adds 27793  df-negs 27850  df-subs 27851  df-muls 27923

This theorem is referenced by:  mulsproplem13  27944  mulsproplem14  27945  mulsprop  27946