Theorem mulsproplem11 28069

Description: Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
mulsproplem9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
mulsproplem9.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mulsproplem11	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐸,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓   𝐹,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑,𝑒,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑒,𝑓,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem mulsproplem11

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑖 𝑗 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑠 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mulsproplem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))
2		mulsproplem9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3		mulsproplem9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
4	1, 2, 3	mulsproplem10 28068	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
5	4	simp1d 1142	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053   ∪ cun 3909  {csn 4585   class class class wbr 5102  ‘cfv 6499  (class class class)co 7369   +no cnadd 8606   No csur 27584   <s cslt 27585   bday cbday 27586   <<s csslt 27726   L cleft 27790   R cright 27791   +_s cadds 27906   -_s csubs 27966   ·_s cmuls 28049

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5229  ax-sep 5246  ax-nul 5256  ax-pow 5315  ax-pr 5382  ax-un 7691

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3351  df-reu 3352  df-rab 3403  df-v 3446  df-sbc 3751  df-csb 3860  df-dif 3914  df-un 3916  df-in 3918  df-ss 3928  df-pss 3931  df-nul 4293  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-tp 4590  df-op 4592  df-ot 4594  df-uni 4868  df-int 4907  df-iun 4953  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-tr 5210  df-id 5526  df-eprel 5531  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-fr 5584  df-se 5585  df-we 5586  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-pred 6262  df-ord 6323  df-on 6324  df-suc 6326  df-iota 6452  df-fun 6501  df-fn 6502  df-f 6503  df-f1 6504  df-fo 6505  df-f1o 6506  df-fv 6507  df-riota 7326  df-ov 7372  df-oprab 7373  df-mpo 7374  df-1st 7947  df-2nd 7948  df-frecs 8237  df-wrecs 8268  df-recs 8317  df-1o 8411  df-2o 8412  df-nadd 8607  df-no 27587  df-slt 27588  df-bday 27589  df-sle 27690  df-sslt 27727  df-scut 27729  df-0s 27773  df-made 27792  df-old 27793  df-left 27795  df-right 27796  df-norec 27885  df-norec2 27896  df-adds 27907  df-negs 27967  df-subs 27968  df-muls 28050

This theorem is referenced by:  mulsproplem13  28071  mulsproplem14  28072  mulsprop  28073